Poweful photos of people living in poverty....

[ClosedCaption]

Moron:
You don't have the mental ability to understand anything. Hell, you can barely read. I didn't say it was impossible, nor did I use the made up word "unpossible". You aren't smart enough to understand anything. I can only try to educate you but I can't make you learn anything. Good luck with your handicap.

vi·a·ble
ˈvīəb(ə)l/
adjective

1. capable of working successfully; feasible.
   "the proposed investment was economically viable"
   synonyms: feasible, workable, practicable, practical, usable, possible, realistic, achievable, attainable,realizable;
   informaldoable

Now, do you want to explain how your plan works or just call more names because you're mad you dont have anything left but platitudes?


You guys have a hard time with the word "How?" and react in furious anger

the way to eliminate poverty is to create a robust economy where there are more jobs than job seekers. Its not the least bit complicated, we did it in this country for over 200 years before the libtards took over.

Seemed to work until we sold our soul to supply side economics

BS, it worked fine until we sold our soul to liberal welfare economics and the "punish success and reward failure" mantra of socialism.

caption finds the truth funny, not a bit surprising.

The only thing I find funny is your fact free wild eyed posts that gets destroyed with a one word question:

it worked fine until we sold our soul to liberal welfare economics and the "punish success and reward failure" mantra of socialism.

When?

 

[ClosedCaption]

The poverty rate is around 4%? So why are we even having this debate then? Problem is solved, move on.

The problem isn't solved because conservatives would like to abolish the aid to the poor and put the poverty rate back up to 15% or more.

So the problem isn't solved? I thought YOU said the War on Poverty worked? Make up your alleged mind.

Thats because you would think it didnt work if your idea of it working is there will be no more poor people.

 

[Redfish]

vi·a·ble
ˈvīəb(ə)l/
adjective

1. capable of working successfully; feasible.
   "the proposed investment was economically viable"
   synonyms: feasible, workable, practicable, practical, usable, possible, realistic, achievable, attainable,realizable;
   informaldoable

Now, do you want to explain how your plan works or just call more names because you're mad you dont have anything left but platitudes?


You guys have a hard time with the word "How?" and react in furious anger

the way to eliminate poverty is to create a robust economy where there are more jobs than job seekers. Its not the least bit complicated, we did it in this country for over 200 years before the libtards took over.

Seemed to work until we sold our soul to supply side economics

BS, it worked fine until we sold our soul to liberal welfare economics and the "punish success and reward failure" mantra of socialism.

caption finds the truth funny, not a bit surprising.

The only thing I find funny is your fact free wild eyed posts that gets destroyed with a one word question:

it worked fine until we sold our soul to liberal welfare economics and the "punish success and reward failure" mantra of socialism.

When?

Its been a gradual process, it didn't happen on a certain date. Creeping liberalism has been destroying this country for years. FDR started it and every president and congress since (from both parties) has continued it in order to buy votes.


Remaining in power is more important than doing whats right for the country. If we don't put term limits in place this shit will never end.

 

[PredFan]

The poverty rate is around 4%? So why are we even having this debate then? Problem is solved, move on.

The problem isn't solved because conservatives would like to abolish the aid to the poor and put the poverty rate back up to 15% or more.

So the problem isn't solved? I thought YOU said the War on Poverty worked? Make up your alleged mind.

Thats because you would think it didnt work if your idea of it working is there will be no more poor people.

Jesus, I have to explain everything to you. He said the war worked, then he said poverty wasn't solved, he can't have both. It isn't about what I said. Have I made that simple enough for you?

 

[Redfish]

The poverty rate is around 4%? So why are we even having this debate then? Problem is solved, move on.

The problem isn't solved because conservatives would like to abolish the aid to the poor and put the poverty rate back up to 15% or more.

So the problem isn't solved? I thought YOU said the War on Poverty worked? Make up your alleged mind.

Thats because you would think it didnt work if your idea of it working is there will be no more poor people.

there will always be rich and there will always be poor. The failed socialist idea of making everyone equal will never happen-----------NEVER.

 

[ClosedCaption]

The poverty rate is around 4%? So why are we even having this debate then? Problem is solved, move on.

The problem isn't solved because conservatives would like to abolish the aid to the poor and put the poverty rate back up to 15% or more.

So the problem isn't solved? I thought YOU said the War on Poverty worked? Make up your alleged mind.

Thats because you would think it didnt work if your idea of it working is there will be no more poor people.

Jesus, I have to explain everything to you. He said the war worked, then he said poverty wasn't solved, he can't have both. It isn't about what I said. Have I made that simple enough for you?

Yeah, you think that for the program to work poverty as a reality must go away. Thats silly as fuck. Do you understand poverty will never go away so that cannot be a goal?

 

[ClosedCaption]

The poverty rate is around 4%? So why are we even having this debate then? Problem is solved, move on.

The problem isn't solved because conservatives would like to abolish the aid to the poor and put the poverty rate back up to 15% or more.

So the problem isn't solved? I thought YOU said the War on Poverty worked? Make up your alleged mind.

Thats because you would think it didnt work if your idea of it working is there will be no more poor people.

there will always be rich and there will always be poor. The failed socialist idea of making everyone equal will never happen-----------NEVER.

Thats only the idea of this guy

No one ever believes or said the goal is to make everyone equal. Thats just your made up BS again

 

[tyroneweaver]

I looked at the photos. Maybe they'd lose some weight if they did some tidying and cleaning?

Poverty and lacking hope often go hand in hand.

People who have nothing to live for, don't care if they live in a mess, don't care if they're fat, don't care about much in life.

If you have a country that takes hope away from lots of people, what you get are ghettos, crime ridden areas, problems of all sorts.

You can take someone out of the ghetto who has no hope, stick them in the Army, give them something to live for, and they'll become a completely different person.

Are you aware that some urban gang members require military service before you can join their gang.

What is your point here?

That you think I said all people who join the military suddenly have a life long sense of purpose, and when they leave the military and go back to ghettos they're still having this sense of purpose?

I was a youth counselor for 15 years. I had extensive gang training. For Some All is not all it seams when an urban youth joins the military. He may join b/c he wants to join a violent gang upon discharge. It's that gangs form of initiation

Maybe that is the case.

However this is not to do with the point I was making, that is that when people have something to live for, they can be given a purpose in life, a reason to keep fit, look good, act in a good way, and so on.

 

[Flash]

[Q

Studies also show that conservatives consider donations to their church to be charity even when only 1% of those donations are actually given to charities.

Studies have also shown that Liberals are very stingy with their own money but are great advocates of taking money away from other people. The greedy bastards.

The Bible teaches that charity should come from the heart, family and church. There is nothing in there about supporting an oppressive bloated debt ridden out of control government welfare state that was created to provide a voting block for Liberals.

Maybe you can show me the link between liberalism and stinginess. If there is one, it's probably a reflection of religiosity and conservatives mistaken notion of its link to charity.

Here is one from the religious zealots that work for the New York Times. It is an opinion piece but it references studies.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21kristof.html

Bleeding Heart Tightwads

Here is another that quotes studies:

Left-Wingers Are only Generous with other People’s Money

Left-Wingers Are only Generous with other People’s Money

Another one

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Conservatives More Liberal Givers

Conservatives More Liberal Givers

Here is good one showing the charity in Red states being higher than Blue states

America’s Generosity Divide



There are plenty of other articles but I don't think you, being a Moon Bat, are really interested in hearing the truth. Moon Bats never are.

Liberal are hypocritical assholes when it comes to real charity. They want everybody else to foot the filthy ass welfare bill except themselves.

My wife and I are real Conservatives and we give very generously to charities in addition to our church. When we help out at the food bank and helping to feed the poor we see our fellow Conservatives not greedy selfish Moon Bats that talk a big game and want you to pay but don't do anything themselves.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

......8 years after the Mesiah, wonder what blue city's these are from????

Powerful Photos Of Living In Poverty In The U.S.



View attachment 75079


View attachment 75080

Unfortunately, poverty does not have a universally global definition. These people live in a house, apparently own a car, have multiple electronics, furniture, wall to wall carpeting, and evidently spend more time curly their hair than cleaning their house, and somehow found the money to buy their kids cereal full of sugar. Mom doesn't look like she has missed many meals. I wonder how much of her welfare check went to buy that stuffed animal. Check out what poverty looks like in other countries.

Faces of World Poverty: 20 Arresting Photographs

 

[NYcarbineer]

[Q

Studies also show that conservatives consider donations to their church to be charity even when only 1% of those donations are actually given to charities.

Studies have also shown that Liberals are very stingy with their own money but are great advocates of taking money away from other people. The greedy bastards.

The Bible teaches that charity should come from the heart, family and church. There is nothing in there about supporting an oppressive bloated debt ridden out of control government welfare state that was created to provide a voting block for Liberals.

Maybe you can show me the link between liberalism and stinginess. If there is one, it's probably a reflection of religiosity and conservatives mistaken notion of its link to charity.

Here is one from the religious zealots that work for the New York Times. It is an opinion piece but it references studies.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21kristof.html

Bleeding Heart Tightwads

Here is another that quotes studies:

Left-Wingers Are only Generous with other People’s Money

Left-Wingers Are only Generous with other People’s Money

Another one

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Conservatives More Liberal Givers

Conservatives More Liberal Givers

Here is good one showing the charity in Red states being higher than Blue states

America’s Generosity Divide



There are plenty of other articles but I don't think you, being a Moon Bat, is really interested in hearing the truth. Moon Bats never are.

Liberal are hypocritical assholes when it comes to real charity. They want everybody else to foot the filthy ass welfare bill except themselves.

My wife and I are real Conservatives and we give very generously to charities in addition to our church. When we help out at the food bank and helping to feed the poor we see our fellow Conservatives not greedy selfish Moon Bats that talk a big game and want you to pay but don't do anything themselves.

Why are conservatives giving to the poor if conservatives believe that handouts are what keep the poor locked in poverty?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Medicaid is the single biggest anti-poverty program.

How would it make life better in America if that program ended tomorrow?

 

[Anathema]

Medicaid is the single biggest anti-poverty program.

How would it make life better in America if that program ended tomorrow?

The poor would die, as they should, and relieve us of their burden.

 

[Flash]

[

Why are conservatives giving to the poor if conservatives believe that handouts are what keep the poor locked in poverty?

We believe that charity should come from the heart, church and family and not a filthy ass bloated debt ridden corrupt government where politicians use the handouts to buy votes.

This stupid government we have is fixated on giving away other people's money and that is not morally right and it is thievery. It is destroying the economy and created a welfare slave population whose only job is every four years vote for the corrupt politicians that provide the welfare.

If this corrupt government would get out of the business of providing hundreds of billions of dollars each year in free shit in the form of welfare, bailouts, entitlements and subsides the economy would boom and their would be plenty of real jobs for anybody willing to work.

The welfare state is destroying this country and you dumbass Moon Bats are simply too stupid to see it. That is one of the many reasons we ridicule you greedy assholes so much.

 

[JoeNormal]

[Q

Studies also show that conservatives consider donations to their church to be charity even when only 1% of those donations are actually given to charities.

Studies have also shown that Liberals are very stingy with their own money but are great advocates of taking money away from other people. The greedy bastards.

The Bible teaches that charity should come from the heart, family and church. There is nothing in there about supporting an oppressive bloated debt ridden out of control government welfare state that was created to provide a voting block for Liberals.

Maybe you can show me the link between liberalism and stinginess. If there is one, it's probably a reflection of religiosity and conservatives mistaken notion of its link to charity.

Here is one from the religious zealots that work for the New York Times. It is an opinion piece but it references studies.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21kristof.html

Bleeding Heart Tightwads

Here is another that quotes studies:

Left-Wingers Are only Generous with other People’s Money

Left-Wingers Are only Generous with other People’s Money

Another one

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Conservatives More Liberal Givers

Conservatives More Liberal Givers

Here is good one showing the charity in Red states being higher than Blue states

America’s Generosity Divide



There are plenty of other articles but I don't think you, being a Moon Bat, are really interested in hearing the truth. Moon Bats never are.

Liberal are hypocritical assholes when it comes to real charity. They want everybody else to foot the filthy ass welfare bill except themselves.

My wife and I are real Conservatives and we give very generously to charities in addition to our church. When we help out at the food bank and helping to feed the poor we see our fellow Conservatives not greedy selfish Moon Bats that talk a big game and want you to pay but don't do anything themselves.

This article: America’s Generosity Divide is exactly what I'm talking about. The big donation goes to the BYU women's basketball team (aka, the LDS church's university). This very subject came up years ago on a forum long gone. The exceptional generosity of the LDS church (which they advertise to death in PR releases) worked out to about 1% of collected tithing. That's about what I, an agnostic, give in charitable contributions of one form or another.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

......8 years after the Mesiah, wonder what blue city's these are from????

Powerful Photos Of Living In Poverty In The U.S.



View attachment 75079


View attachment 75080

That is just horrible....

Why after six years of Republican Congressional control, haven't they passed a single anti-poverty bill?

Don't Republicans care?

LBJ passed welfare anti poverty laws and here we are 22 trillion dollars later with record numbers on welfare.

You're an idiot. First of all, we just had a massive recession and automatic stabilizers kicked in. And since the government abandoned sensible policy in the 80's in favor of neoliberal dogma...
22 trillion? Not near enough.

Of course its not surprising that you would want to waste 100 trillion on a problem that isn't or never will be fixed by money.

 

[PredFan]

The poverty rate is around 4%? So why are we even having this debate then? Problem is solved, move on.

The problem isn't solved because conservatives would like to abolish the aid to the poor and put the poverty rate back up to 15% or more.

So the problem isn't solved? I thought YOU said the War on Poverty worked? Make up your alleged mind.

Thats because you would think it didnt work if your idea of it working is there will be no more poor people.

Jesus, I have to explain everything to you. He said the war worked, then he said poverty wasn't solved, he can't have both. It isn't about what I said. Have I made that simple enough for you?

Yeah, you think that for the program to work poverty as a reality must go away. Thats silly as fuck. Do you understand poverty will never go away so that cannot be a goal?

I guess I can't make it simple enough for you.

 

[NYcarbineer]

[

Why are conservatives giving to the poor if conservatives believe that handouts are what keep the poor locked in poverty?

We believe that charity should come from the heart, church and family and not a filthy ass bloated debt ridden corrupt government where politicians use the handouts to buy votes.

.

That doesn't disprove that your claim that handouts do more harm than good.

 

[NYcarbineer]

......8 years after the Mesiah, wonder what blue city's these are from????

Powerful Photos Of Living In Poverty In The U.S.



View attachment 75079


View attachment 75080

That is just horrible....

Why after six years of Republican Congressional control, haven't they passed a single anti-poverty bill?

Don't Republicans care?

LBJ passed welfare anti poverty laws and here we are 22 trillion dollars later with record numbers on welfare.

You're an idiot. First of all, we just had a massive recession and automatic stabilizers kicked in. And since the government abandoned sensible policy in the 80's in favor of neoliberal dogma...
22 trillion? Not near enough.

Of course its not surprising that you would want to waste 100 trillion on a problem that isn't or never will be fixed by money.

A poor family that can't afford healthcare insurance isn't 'fixed' by being given healthcare insurance free of charge?

 

[Wyatt earp]

[Q

Studies also show that conservatives consider donations to their church to be charity even when only 1% of those donations are actually given to charities.

Studies have also shown that Liberals are very stingy with their own money but are great advocates of taking money away from other people. The greedy bastards.

The Bible teaches that charity should come from the heart, family and church. There is nothing in there about supporting an oppressive bloated debt ridden out of control government welfare state that was created to provide a voting block for Liberals.

Maybe you can show me the link between liberalism and stinginess. If there is one, it's probably a reflection of religiosity and conservatives mistaken notion of its link to charity.

Here is one from the religious zealots that work for the New York Times. It is an opinion piece but it references studies.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21kristof.html

Bleeding Heart Tightwads

Here is another that quotes studies:

Left-Wingers Are only Generous with other People’s Money

Left-Wingers Are only Generous with other People’s Money

Another one

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Conservatives More Liberal Givers

Conservatives More Liberal Givers

Here is good one showing the charity in Red states being higher than Blue states

America’s Generosity Divide



There are plenty of other articles but I don't think you, being a Moon Bat, is really interested in hearing the truth. Moon Bats never are.

Liberal are hypocritical assholes when it comes to real charity. They want everybody else to foot the filthy ass welfare bill except themselves.

My wife and I are real Conservatives and we give very generously to charities in addition to our church. When we help out at the food bank and helping to feed the poor we see our fellow Conservatives not greedy selfish Moon Bats that talk a big game and want you to pay but don't do anything themselves.

Why are conservatives giving to the poor if conservatives believe that handouts are what keep the poor locked in poverty?

Government handouts