Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
Hell yes! But I doubt that Trump would go for it...and his supporters would just howl! Besides, everyone knows Trump lies...and no-one cares anymore, they expect it..even his supporters.
there are some dangers there for Joe as well...he is getting a bit spotty...
I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
Depends who is doing it. Not like that already is t happening. And is it fa t checking, or trying too help Biden along? I mean, at some point Sleepy Jose has to prove he can do it.
I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
Depends who is doing it. Not like that already is t happening. And is it fa t checking, or trying too help Biden along? I mean, at some point Sleepy Jose has to prove he can do it.
Real-time means while they are debating - and the fact-check is immediately reported.
I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
Depends who is doing it. Not like that already is t happening. And is it fa t checking, or trying too help Biden along? I mean, at some point Sleepy Jose has to prove he can do it.
Real-time means while they are debating - and the fact-check is immediately reported.
Yes but who will be doing the fact checking? A news agency? If so which one because all of them have been caught lying a few times over the past 4 years. So who would fact check them? Political hacks from an alphebet news network? We know that won't fly with either side so who can fact check them and be believed ? Not being a dick it's a serious question.
Fact checked by whom? And who is going to fact check the fact checkers in real time. And who is going to fact check them?I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
I guess they'd need an "alternate fact" checker to make the Trumpistas happy.Fact checked by whom? And who is going to fact check the fact checkers in real time. And who is going to fact check them?I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
I guess they'd need an "alternate fact" checker to make the Trumpistas happy.Fact checked by whom? And who is going to fact check the fact checkers in real time. And who is going to fact check them?I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
Depends who is doing it. Not like that already is t happening. And is it fa t checking, or trying too help Biden along? I mean, at some point Sleepy Jose has to prove he can do it.
Real-time means while they are debating - and the fact-check is immediately reported.
Yes but who will be doing the fact checking? A news agency? If so which one because all of them have been caught lying a few times over the past 4 years. So who would fact check them? Political hacks from an alphebet news network? We know that won't fly with either side so who can fact check them and be believed ? Not being a dick it's a serious question.
Putting your trolling bullshit aside - assume it would be reputable fact-checkers. There are many reputable fact-checkers.
Fact checked by whom? And who is going to fact check the fact checkers in real time. And who is going to fact check them?I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
Ah yes the liberal lazy fucks who cant fact check for themselves, but must have someone else do it for them.. Go figure...I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
I think having Hannity, Rush and maybe Tucker up there to keep Biden in line is a good idea.
Ah yes the liberal lazy fucks who cant fact check for themselves, but must have someone else do it for them.. Go figure...I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
The voting people should fact check the candidates.
I think fact-checking them both during real-time is fair. It gives the public the opportunity to see who is being more truthful.
Well, considering that since we now have search engines and high speed internet (even on phones), fact checking is something that would be easy to do during the debates. And, I also think that it should be done, with large screens in back of the candidates to show what the fact checkers are looking at.
In the past, we didn't have the capability to do real time fact checking during the debates, but now we do. Why not take advantage of it?