Previously anonymous whistleblower now testifying in front of Congress

Joe is a story of a corrupted and evil man. No honor and integrity at all. Does anything for power. And that is dangerous. his history proves it.
he destroyed the Nordstrom pipeline and affected all of our allies. wow huh, no one talking about on either side.
 
If they are offering no new information and the old information was nothing substantive but instead hearsay, conjecture and supposition; what is the point of these new whistleblowers except that they may be alive and not Chinese spys?
lie,
lie,
lie.
 
OH Gd….now we have a black Democrat racist going on and on as to how a WHITE former president doesn’t have to post bail, but blacks do…..and inequality….and blah, blah, blah.

What does that have to do with the way the DOJ handled Biden’s tax evasion?
 
Sure. No one has any idea that Hunter is sketchy. This will really blow the doors off his presidential hopes. Joe Biden continues to be clean as a whistle with zero credible accusations he has ever done anything shady. You guys just cant live with that. Sorry.
He's as dirty as Al Capone.
 
From the article.

"Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) said the testimony from the two agents will not likely reveal any new information."

So I would guess that this supposed whistleblower is just being used so Comer can rehash the same old nothingburger he did a month or two ago...right when more indictments are likely in the way.

Speculation. Hearsay. Theories. Conjecture.

Yawn...what a coincidence.
Comer? Ain't Comer the guy who got suckered by that Chinese spy from Israel? lol
 
Comer? Ain't Comer the guy who got suckered by that Chinese spy from Israel? lol
Yeah. That's the one. Not only that but he died and was resurrected...which was probably a better whistleblower then the guy who was getting paid by a Trump associate.

Lol, you can't make this shit.

Trump humpers have the worst whistleblowers.
 
So what new evidence was presented today except that whistleblower X was passed over for promotion?
Whether new evidence is presented isn't the point of this hearing. A lot of voters, like the kind that watch fake news, have never heard any of this evidence. It's clear from your posts that you haven't heard the evidence. That's why you're so hysterical.
 

Forum List

Back
Top