Pro-lifers cannot have it both ways

[Billy000]

Why do you think its "unchristian" to have the Baby's Daddy pony up to support the kid- instead of the taxpayers?

When did I say that? If he’s held accountable I’m all for it. That isn’t always the case of course.

 

[Billy000]

So you don't have a link and just pushing abortions for all.

So what do I need a link for?

 

[Polishprince]

When did I say that? If he’s held accountable I’m all for it. That isn’t always the case of course.

You said that the taxpayers must pay SNAP benefits- not the baby's daddy.

 

[Billy000]

You obviously have no clue what the fuck you're talking about there silly billy. There are people lining up to adopt those kids.

For every adoption-eligible baby, an invisible queue of 36 couples waits for the chance to take that baby home. Most never will.

Nearly two million infertile couples in the United States are actively trying to adopt a child. Each of those hopeful couples would give their right arm for the privilege of parenting children

Why So Many Families Who Want To Adopt Can’t

For every adoption-eligible baby, an invisible queue of 36 couples waits for the chance to take that baby home. Most never will.

thefederalist.com

.

Well see in this fascist scenario where the mothers would have to give up their kids, there would be a massive influx of kids in the system so 2 million parents won’t cut it. Not even close. Also, there is the issue of older kids. Older kids - Take 9-13 as an example age bracket. Those couples do not want to adopt 13 year olds.

 

[Billy000]

You said that the taxpayers must pay SNAP benefits- not the baby's daddy.

Uh if it’s not going to happen, yeah.

 

[Confederate Soldier]

Well see you guys don’t actually know how this program works. SNAP also goes to the disabled like the DD population. They depended on it. Are you willing to let them starve?

Let them starve, the planet will supposedly kill us all anyway.

 

[fncceo]

They can’t tell an impoverished pregnant woman she has to carry the baby to term and then not have her kids receive any government benefits like SNAP after they are born.

I sure can.

It's easy, watch.

 

[Delldude]

Well see in this fascist scenario where the mothers would have to give up their kids, there would be a massive influx of kids in the system so 2 million parents won’t cut it. Not even close. Also, there is the issue of older kids. Older kids - Take 9-13 as an example age bracket. Those couples do not want to adopt 13 year olds.

Yes, the left thinks they are better equipped at raising our children....look at what's going on in K-9 schooling.

 

[Polishprince]

If there were no government snap benefits, more baby daddy's would step up and do the right thing and support their children. Right now, a lot of these guys would rather just push their responsibility off on the Taxpayers.

 

[Billy000]

Let them starve, the planet will supposedly kill us all anyway.

I am definitely not surprised by this answer. You definitely adequately reflect the RW.

 

[Billy000]

I sure can.

It's easy, watch.

We get it. You’re incredibly selfish.

 

[fncceo]

We get it. You’re incredibly selfish.

Incredibly ... I don't care what someone does with their life and I especially don't want them to care what I do with mine.

Except, if you're asking for taxpayer money to fund how you live your life, then I do care.

 

[Dragonlady]

Christians are the biggest faction helping the less fortunate

/Thread

No they are not. Most donations to Churches go to pay to maintain the buildings, and to pay the salaries of the minister and the church staff. Only a very small percentage of donations go to help the poor.

Most smaller churches keep cost down by sharing ministers or organists. Our church had a 3/4 time minister, and rented out office space to non-profits, but we were still dipping into trust funds just to cover basic expenses. Our 100 year old Sanctuary was expensive to maintain. Our building, which included meeting rooms, community recreation centre, and suites of offices cost $50,000 a year to heat.

Churches do work within their own communities so churches in poor neighbourhoods, just like schools in poor neighbourhoods, have the least amount of donations and other resources to work with, and the greatest amount of need in the community.

 

[martybegan]

They can’t tell an impoverished pregnant woman she has to carry the baby to term and then not have her kids receive any government benefits like SNAP after they are born.

Now the automatic response to this is always “well should have never gotten pregnant!”

Uh yeah no shit. Here’s the issue though: the kids exist. They exist right? Should they starve because of something their mom did? Probably not right? You guys get so caught up in shaming the woman that you forget why they get SNAP in the first place. The benefits they get is a small fraction of the full cost to raise a kid every year therefore it’s ridiculous to suggest the mom is profiting off of having kids.

Now some republicans’ fascist solution to this is to force the mom to put the kids up for adoption. Well that’s obviously a stupid idea. It’s not like people are lining up to adopt the kids huh? Meanwhile such a foster system would cost the government an astronomical amount of money per year. Far more than the cost of SNAP.

Do republicans realize how insane it is to suggest a ludicrous idea like this just so that mere PENNIES will not be taken out of their OWN paychecks to pay for this program?

Yeah really Christian of you guys! Jesus would be proud.

Elizabeth Warren accused pro-life pregnancy centers of 'torturing' women. Here's what they actually do

More hypocrisy from the left.

WHY DONT YOU HELP PREGNANT WOMEN.

DONT HELP PREGNANT WOMEN.

 

[Dragonlady]

Incredibly ... I don't care what someone does with their life and I especially don't want them to care what I do with mine.

Except, if you're asking for taxpayer money to fund how you live your life, then I do care.

Do you ask corporations why THEY need taxpayer money? Do you care that they're always looking for subsidies or hand outs and tax breaks? Do you demand that corporations become self sufficient and stop asking for government tax cuts or handouts???

 

[Dragonlady]

Elizabeth Warren accused pro-life pregnancy centers of 'torturing' women. Here's what they actually do

More hypocrisy from the left.

WHY DONT YOU HELP PREGNANT WOMEN.

DONT HELP PREGNANT WOMEN.

Helping pregnant women find jobs, isn't helping pregnant women.

 

[martybegan]

Helping pregnant women find jobs, isn't helping pregnant women.

They do more than that, you dipshit canuck twat.

 

[jbander]

Christians are the biggest faction helping the less fortunate

/Thread

Not at all , if you consider per-capita . Because being the largest religion by a long shot brings in money but per capita within religions , nope. Sounds good to you though, doesn't it.

 

[jbander]

With all these illegals looking for work, I'd say we got baby sitters out the ass.

Compared to MAGA Maggots and their politics of hate and ugliness. I would rather have a whole neighborhood of Illegals compared to just one of you hate Nazi's as a neighbor.

 

[martybegan]

Not at all , if you consider per-capita . Because being the largest religion by a long shot brings in money but per capita within religions , nope. Sounds good to you though, doesn't it.

As usual for a leftist, no math backing up their accusation.

and taxes are not charity, even if you think they are. Way too much overhead.