Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Having been raised to have no discipline and to know how to manipulate people to get what they want, the leftists will endlessly play "I'll hold my breath until my face turns blue" in order to avoid ever having to be accountable for their decisions.More liberal fearmongering. If government handouts are ended, people will not just sit down and and wait to die. They will change their behavior if they are held accountable for their decisions.
Do you even know what DD means?Funny. My tenant is on disability and he got around $12.00 a month in food stamps.
Considering it came out of your "brain", it could be anything.Do you even know what DD means?
Actually your source was stupid. It didn’t explain why those 2 million werent weren’t actually doing the adopting. It’s clearly because they all want infants and not older children.You said no one was lining up to adopt these kids and I proved you a liar, now you're calling me names? Also there are literally thousands of organizations to help these mothers with a place to live, child care and job training so they don't have to give up their kids. Of course you commies are going around trying to burn those places down. I also know a pair of vets that adopted 7 siblings at the same time. So yeah, there are families that will take older kids. So take your propaganda, commie talking points and faux outrage and shove it up your ass.
.
adoptionnetwork.com
Actually your source was stupid. It didn’t explain why those 2 million werent weren’t actually doing the adopting. It’s clearly because they all want infants and not older children.
“About 135,000 children are adopted in the United States each year. Of non- stepparent adoptions, about 59% are from the child welfare (or foster) system, 26% are from other countries, and 15% are voluntarily relinquished American babies.”
“There are 107,918 foster children eligible for and waiting to be adopted. In 2014, 50,644 foster kids were adopted — a number that has stayed roughly consistent for the past five years. The average age of a waiting child is 7.7 years old and 29% of them will spend at least three years in foster care.”
“The average child waits for an adoptive family for more than three years. 11 percent spend 5 years or more waiting for a family (43,083 children). The average age of children waiting for an adoptive family is 8.”
“On any given day, there are nearly 428,000 children in foster care in the United States. In 2015, over 670,000 children spent time in U.S. foster care. Unfortunately, instead of being safely reunified with their families — or moved quickly into adoptive homes — many will languish for years in foster homes or institutions.
How long does the average child spend in the foster care system?
More than 60% of children in foster care spend two to five years in the system before being adopted. Almost 20% spend five or more years in foster care before being adopted. Some never get adopted.”
US Adoption Statistics | Adoption Network
US Adoption Statistics may surprise you as nearly 100 million Americans have adoption in their immediate family. Learn more here.
Just admit you have no argument to put forth. Failing that you are just embarrassing yourself lol
The value for the dollar received is tremendous. There are people who donate time, donate money and do it no matter their views. What we have is a major party with agendas that promotes bad behaviors and calls it freedom. then charges the taxpayer for it and shames corporate interests to give resources and products away to the affected which raise prices for all consumers.You do a terrible job at it, apparently.
LOL....I see the democrat party had done you well......Compared to MAGA Maggots and their politics of hate and ugliness. I would rather have a whole neighborhood of Illegals compared to just one of you hate Nazi's as a neighbor.
Do you even know what DD means?
Her life CHOICES are NOT my responsibilityThey can’t tell an impoverished pregnant woman she has to carry the baby to term and then not have her kids receive any government benefits like SNAP after they are born.
Now the automatic response to this is always “well should have never gotten pregnant!”
Uh yeah no shit. Here’s the issue though: the kids exist. They exist right? Should they starve because of something their mom did? Probably not right? You guys get so caught up in shaming the woman that you forget why they get SNAP in the first place. The benefits they get is a small fraction of the full cost to raise a kid every year therefore it’s ridiculous to suggest the mom is profiting off of having kids.
Now some republicans’ fascist solution to this is to force the mom to put the kids up for adoption. Well that’s obviously a stupid idea. It’s not like people are lining up to adopt the kids huh? Meanwhile such a foster system would cost the government an astronomical amount of money per year. Far more than the cost of SNAP.
Do republicans realize how insane it is to suggest a ludicrous idea like this just so that mere PENNIES will not be taken out of their OWN paychecks to pay for this program?
Yeah really Christian of you guys! Jesus would be proud.
The developmentally disabled. They are completely dependent.Apparently not since you had to ask. We Americans have become so lazy we won't even type out words anymore. I was just making assumptions.
More liberal fearmongering. If government handouts are ended, people will not just sit down and and wait to die. They will change their behavior if they are held accountable for their decisions.
Once again you guys miss the point.Her life CHOICES are NOT my responsibility
The developmentally disabled. They are completely dependent.
So how many refugees have you taken in from war zones?Christians are the biggest faction helping the less fortunate
/Thread
So the argument is unless society is going to pay for the care and feeding of my children I should be allowed to kill them?They can’t tell an impoverished pregnant woman she has to carry the baby to term and then not have her kids receive any government benefits like SNAP after they are born.
Now the automatic response to this is always “well should have never gotten pregnant!”
Uh yeah no shit. Here’s the issue though: the kids exist. They exist right? Should they starve because of something their mom did? Probably not right? You guys get so caught up in shaming the woman that you forget why they get SNAP in the first place. The benefits they get is a small fraction of the full cost to raise a kid every year therefore it’s ridiculous to suggest the mom is profiting off of having kids.
Now some republicans’ fascist solution to this is to force the mom to put the kids up for adoption. Well that’s obviously a stupid idea. It’s not like people are lining up to adopt the kids huh? Meanwhile such a foster system would cost the government an astronomical amount of money per year. Far more than the cost of SNAP.
Do republicans realize how insane it is to suggest a ludicrous idea like this just so that mere PENNIES will not be taken out of their OWN paychecks to pay for this program?
Yeah really Christian of you guys! Jesus would be proud.
Lol I’m well luckily for you the DD rarely actually ever vote. Making them about politics and the left does not make any sense.You're not going to find many if any Republicans against helping out the truly needy. Our problem is when the left makes it political. They know the more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters. What we are against is people abusing these programs that can otherwise work.
I see it in my grocery line all the time. A fat woman with three kids are in the checkout. They pay for their groceries with food stamps, and then whip out a wad of cash for the beer, wine, greeting cards, huge bags of dog food and cat litter. Then on the way to the exit of the store, stop by the head cashier to buy cigarettes and lottery tickets.
When we see these things happening we take an attitude against these programs. But that doesn't mean we're against the people that actually need them, we're against the people that can work and make their own money to buy their food instead of us buying their food and them using their cash to feed their two huge dogs and three cats.
