Probe finds no proof of ‘racist or offensive statements’ by Covington Catholic students...

[Eric Arthur Blair]

So once more a leftist plot to defame and place innocent people in a false narrative,exposing them to the hate and
threats of deranged stooges, is debunked
and I'm quite sure this will figure in the law suit being brought against media outlets of low repute.

When will Vox, HuffPo, etc. ever be held accountable for their lies and rancid hate campaign?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

"The statements we obtained from students and chaperones are remarkably consistent," the investigators said. “And, the statements are consistent with the videos we reviewed."

That's true.

When everyone is telling the truth you get the truth.

Nick Sandmann is a modern-day Gandhi. He remained poised and dignified like blacks at a lunch counter while surrounded by obnoxious creeps hurling insults.

The Hill ^

An investigation into the viral encounter between students from Covington Catholic High School and a Native American man found the students' accounts to be largely accurate, according to findings released Wednesday.

Greater Cincinnati Investigations issued a report dated Feb. 11 that found no evidence that students from Covington Catholic made “offensive or racist” statements to either Black Hebrew Israelites or Native American tribe members gathered on the National Mall.

"The statements we obtained from students and chaperones are remarkably consistent," the investigators said. “And, the statements are consistent with the videos we reviewed."

The students were the subject of intense scrutiny after a short video clip went viral that showed students wearing "Make America Great Again" hats surrounding Native American Nathan Phillips as he played a traditional Native American drum. One student, Nicholas Sandmann, appeared to be in a standoff with Phillips.

Social media users, politicians and the Diocese of Covington were among those who initially condemned the boys’ actions. The students maintained that they were being respectful, and additional video footage and accounts emerged in the days that followed that showed Phillips had walked toward the student group amid broader tensions near the Lincoln Memorial.

Investigators found that, based on interviews with 43 students and 16 adult chaperones and hours of video and social media content, "none of the students felt threatened by Mr. Phillips and many stated they were 'confused.’"

The investigation found that some students performed a “tomahawk chop” to the beat of Phillips’ drum, and that the group did “school cheers” directed at the Black Hebrew Israelites.

Investigators attempted to interview Sandmann and Phillips, but were unsuccessful. Sandmann referred to a previously issued written statement on the matter, which investigators said "appears to accurately reflect the facts surrounding the interaction between the students and the Black Hebrew Israelites."

The report makes no recommendations to the school about future events or policies in the wake of the incident.

The Bishop of the Covington Diocese, Roger Foys, welcomed the report as vindication of the students' behavior, despite the diocese's initial condemnation of the events.

"In truth, taking everything into account, our students were placed in a situation that was at once bizarre and even threatening," Foys said in a statement. "Their reaction to the situation was, given the circumstances, expected and one might even say laudatory."

What chaperones? There were no chaperones in any of the videos. Were they off having a smoke?

You mean because YOU didn't see any on the few videos tsken, it never happened.....ROTFLMFAO..... YOU ALSO DIDN'T SEE THE 9/11 HIJACKERS WITHIN THE PLANES!!!

No one trusts anything you lying MFers has to say. Fake news. Move on, dickhead.

Yes, the ABNORMALS BRILLIANCE DIMS in comparison to this salamanders!!!

I'm no Democrat, but you're certainly a winger idiot.

 

[Dragonlady]

"The statements we obtained from students and chaperones are remarkably consistent," the investigators said. “And, the statements are consistent with the videos we reviewed."

That's true.

When everyone is telling the truth you get the truth.

Nick Sandmann is a modern-day Gandhi. He remained poised and dignified like blacks at a lunch counter while surrounded by obnoxious creeps hurling insults.

The Hill ^

An investigation into the viral encounter between students from Covington Catholic High School and a Native American man found the students' accounts to be largely accurate, according to findings released Wednesday.

Greater Cincinnati Investigations issued a report dated Feb. 11 that found no evidence that students from Covington Catholic made “offensive or racist” statements to either Black Hebrew Israelites or Native American tribe members gathered on the National Mall.

"The statements we obtained from students and chaperones are remarkably consistent," the investigators said. “And, the statements are consistent with the videos we reviewed."

The students were the subject of intense scrutiny after a short video clip went viral that showed students wearing "Make America Great Again" hats surrounding Native American Nathan Phillips as he played a traditional Native American drum. One student, Nicholas Sandmann, appeared to be in a standoff with Phillips.

Social media users, politicians and the Diocese of Covington were among those who initially condemned the boys’ actions. The students maintained that they were being respectful, and additional video footage and accounts emerged in the days that followed that showed Phillips had walked toward the student group amid broader tensions near the Lincoln Memorial.

Investigators found that, based on interviews with 43 students and 16 adult chaperones and hours of video and social media content, "none of the students felt threatened by Mr. Phillips and many stated they were 'confused.’"

The investigation found that some students performed a “tomahawk chop” to the beat of Phillips’ drum, and that the group did “school cheers” directed at the Black Hebrew Israelites.

Investigators attempted to interview Sandmann and Phillips, but were unsuccessful. Sandmann referred to a previously issued written statement on the matter, which investigators said "appears to accurately reflect the facts surrounding the interaction between the students and the Black Hebrew Israelites."

The report makes no recommendations to the school about future events or policies in the wake of the incident.

The Bishop of the Covington Diocese, Roger Foys, welcomed the report as vindication of the students' behavior, despite the diocese's initial condemnation of the events.

"In truth, taking everything into account, our students were placed in a situation that was at once bizarre and even threatening," Foys said in a statement. "Their reaction to the situation was, given the circumstances, expected and one might even say laudatory."

My question is why the time and money wasted on a study?

The same conclusions were reached by anyone who watched the videos and the videos proved those conclusions true beyond any question.

Of course there are still stupid fools like bwk and others lying about those kids because they are too childish to admit when they are wrong. But the facts prove they are liars.

You are correct that it's a waste of time and money to deploy a classic strawman. WHO claimed "Covington Catholic students are racists" in the first place?

Been posing that query for -- whatever it is, a month now. Have yet to get a single answer.

Always easy to find in the negative when there's nothing to disprove.

I love this desperate stretch of the OP though:

Nick Sandmann is a modern-day Gandhi. He remained poised and dignified like blacks at a lunch counter while surrounded by obnoxious creeps hurling insults.

Yyyyyeah I don't think you'll find Ghandi standing in front of the British army smirking. Or anything "dignified" about a smirk. The OP insults the memory of both Ghandi and the Greesnboro Four. None of them copped an attitude.

He did not smirk he smiled you idiotic sack of shit.

And many on this forum lied and called him a racist.

He was more respectful than anyone there including the dishonest Indian punk

And that is what you really hate.

No, what we really hate is seeing the smart ass children of the white elite showing disrespect and bad behaviour and putting themselves in dangers, and then having their parents tell them they behaved like fine young gentlemen, because they didn't. The whole encounter is tribalism run amok.

It's always the kids whose behaviour is the WORST that have the parents who stand there saying "My son would never behave like that". These people hired a public relations agency to come up with a plausible denial that their son was some kind of modern day Ghandi standing up to tryany, when he was, in reality, a rude little shit, being disrespect to a tribal elder.

When you're buying your kid's way out of trouble at this age, by age 40, you have a guy who thinks he can buy his way out of anything.

 

[Pogo]

So once more a leftist plot to defame and place innocent people in a false narrative,exposing them to the hate and
threats of deranged stooges, is debunked
and I'm quite sure this will figure in the law suit being brought against media outlets of low repute.

When will Vox, HuffPo, etc. ever be held accountable for their lies and rancid hate campaign?

When will they ever be posted here as evidence that such actually exists? Funny, I called that challenge on the weekend it happened and no one has brought a shred of anything, ever. And you were there for it.

 

[Dragonlady]

The parents paraded the kids out on television. These children are NOT the Parkland Survivors. They weren't attacked or harmed, and they're far too young to be ready for prime time. They come from a very sheltered environment, an elite private school. And that report was bought and paid for by the school which depends upon the parents' tuition to keep them open.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...ould-have-walked-away/?utm_term=.122eed380f00

 

[TrumpisDaResistance]

 

[Godboy]

"The statements we obtained from students and chaperones are remarkably consistent," the investigators said. “And, the statements are consistent with the videos we reviewed."

That's true.

When everyone is telling the truth you get the truth.

Nick Sandmann is a modern-day Gandhi. He remained poised and dignified like blacks at a lunch counter while surrounded by obnoxious creeps hurling insults.

The Hill ^

An investigation into the viral encounter between students from Covington Catholic High School and a Native American man found the students' accounts to be largely accurate, according to findings released Wednesday.

Greater Cincinnati Investigations issued a report dated Feb. 11 that found no evidence that students from Covington Catholic made “offensive or racist” statements to either Black Hebrew Israelites or Native American tribe members gathered on the National Mall.

"The statements we obtained from students and chaperones are remarkably consistent," the investigators said. “And, the statements are consistent with the videos we reviewed."

The students were the subject of intense scrutiny after a short video clip went viral that showed students wearing "Make America Great Again" hats surrounding Native American Nathan Phillips as he played a traditional Native American drum. One student, Nicholas Sandmann, appeared to be in a standoff with Phillips.

Social media users, politicians and the Diocese of Covington were among those who initially condemned the boys’ actions. The students maintained that they were being respectful, and additional video footage and accounts emerged in the days that followed that showed Phillips had walked toward the student group amid broader tensions near the Lincoln Memorial.

Investigators found that, based on interviews with 43 students and 16 adult chaperones and hours of video and social media content, "none of the students felt threatened by Mr. Phillips and many stated they were 'confused.’"

The investigation found that some students performed a “tomahawk chop” to the beat of Phillips’ drum, and that the group did “school cheers” directed at the Black Hebrew Israelites.

Investigators attempted to interview Sandmann and Phillips, but were unsuccessful. Sandmann referred to a previously issued written statement on the matter, which investigators said "appears to accurately reflect the facts surrounding the interaction between the students and the Black Hebrew Israelites."

The report makes no recommendations to the school about future events or policies in the wake of the incident.

The Bishop of the Covington Diocese, Roger Foys, welcomed the report as vindication of the students' behavior, despite the diocese's initial condemnation of the events.

"In truth, taking everything into account, our students were placed in a situation that was at once bizarre and even threatening," Foys said in a statement. "Their reaction to the situation was, given the circumstances, expected and one might even say laudatory."

What chaperones? There were no chaperones in any of the videos. Were they off having a smoke?

If you actually knew this story well enough, you wouldnt have to ask such a stupid question, but as usual you are just ignorant.

 

[The Purge]

"The statements we obtained from students and chaperones are remarkably consistent," the investigators said. “And, the statements are consistent with the videos we reviewed."

That's true.

When everyone is telling the truth you get the truth.

Nick Sandmann is a modern-day Gandhi. He remained poised and dignified like blacks at a lunch counter while surrounded by obnoxious creeps hurling insults.

The Hill ^

An investigation into the viral encounter between students from Covington Catholic High School and a Native American man found the students' accounts to be largely accurate, according to findings released Wednesday.

Greater Cincinnati Investigations issued a report dated Feb. 11 that found no evidence that students from Covington Catholic made “offensive or racist” statements to either Black Hebrew Israelites or Native American tribe members gathered on the National Mall.

"The statements we obtained from students and chaperones are remarkably consistent," the investigators said. “And, the statements are consistent with the videos we reviewed."

The students were the subject of intense scrutiny after a short video clip went viral that showed students wearing "Make America Great Again" hats surrounding Native American Nathan Phillips as he played a traditional Native American drum. One student, Nicholas Sandmann, appeared to be in a standoff with Phillips.

Social media users, politicians and the Diocese of Covington were among those who initially condemned the boys’ actions. The students maintained that they were being respectful, and additional video footage and accounts emerged in the days that followed that showed Phillips had walked toward the student group amid broader tensions near the Lincoln Memorial.

Investigators found that, based on interviews with 43 students and 16 adult chaperones and hours of video and social media content, "none of the students felt threatened by Mr. Phillips and many stated they were 'confused.’"

The investigation found that some students performed a “tomahawk chop” to the beat of Phillips’ drum, and that the group did “school cheers” directed at the Black Hebrew Israelites.

Investigators attempted to interview Sandmann and Phillips, but were unsuccessful. Sandmann referred to a previously issued written statement on the matter, which investigators said "appears to accurately reflect the facts surrounding the interaction between the students and the Black Hebrew Israelites."

The report makes no recommendations to the school about future events or policies in the wake of the incident.

The Bishop of the Covington Diocese, Roger Foys, welcomed the report as vindication of the students' behavior, despite the diocese's initial condemnation of the events.

"In truth, taking everything into account, our students were placed in a situation that was at once bizarre and even threatening," Foys said in a statement. "Their reaction to the situation was, given the circumstances, expected and one might even say laudatory."

What chaperones? There were no chaperones in any of the videos. Were they off having a smoke?

You mean because YOU didn't see any on the few videos tsken, it never happened.....ROTFLMFAO..... YOU ALSO DIDN'T SEE THE 9/11 HIJACKERS WITHIN THE PLANES!!!

No one trusts anything you lying MFers has to say. Fake news. Move on, dickhead.

Yes, the ABNORMALS BRILLIANCE DIMS in comparison to this salamanders!!!

I'm no Democrat, but you're certainly a winger idiot.

Then what are you. Just plain stupid?

 

[Godboy]

"The statements we obtained from students and chaperones are remarkably consistent," the investigators said. “And, the statements are consistent with the videos we reviewed."

That's true.

When everyone is telling the truth you get the truth.

Nick Sandmann is a modern-day Gandhi. He remained poised and dignified like blacks at a lunch counter while surrounded by obnoxious creeps hurling insults.

The Hill ^

An investigation into the viral encounter between students from Covington Catholic High School and a Native American man found the students' accounts to be largely accurate, according to findings released Wednesday.

Greater Cincinnati Investigations issued a report dated Feb. 11 that found no evidence that students from Covington Catholic made “offensive or racist” statements to either Black Hebrew Israelites or Native American tribe members gathered on the National Mall.

"The statements we obtained from students and chaperones are remarkably consistent," the investigators said. “And, the statements are consistent with the videos we reviewed."

The students were the subject of intense scrutiny after a short video clip went viral that showed students wearing "Make America Great Again" hats surrounding Native American Nathan Phillips as he played a traditional Native American drum. One student, Nicholas Sandmann, appeared to be in a standoff with Phillips.

Social media users, politicians and the Diocese of Covington were among those who initially condemned the boys’ actions. The students maintained that they were being respectful, and additional video footage and accounts emerged in the days that followed that showed Phillips had walked toward the student group amid broader tensions near the Lincoln Memorial.

Investigators found that, based on interviews with 43 students and 16 adult chaperones and hours of video and social media content, "none of the students felt threatened by Mr. Phillips and many stated they were 'confused.’"

The investigation found that some students performed a “tomahawk chop” to the beat of Phillips’ drum, and that the group did “school cheers” directed at the Black Hebrew Israelites.

Investigators attempted to interview Sandmann and Phillips, but were unsuccessful. Sandmann referred to a previously issued written statement on the matter, which investigators said "appears to accurately reflect the facts surrounding the interaction between the students and the Black Hebrew Israelites."

The report makes no recommendations to the school about future events or policies in the wake of the incident.

The Bishop of the Covington Diocese, Roger Foys, welcomed the report as vindication of the students' behavior, despite the diocese's initial condemnation of the events.

"In truth, taking everything into account, our students were placed in a situation that was at once bizarre and even threatening," Foys said in a statement. "Their reaction to the situation was, given the circumstances, expected and one might even say laudatory."

My question is why the time and money wasted on a study?

The same conclusions were reached by anyone who watched the videos and the videos proved those conclusions true beyond any question.

Of course there are still stupid fools like bwk and others lying about those kids because they are too childish to admit when they are wrong. But the facts prove they are liars.

You are correct that it's a waste of time and money to deploy a classic strawman. WHO claimed "Covington Catholic students are racists" in the first place?

Been posing that query for -- whatever it is, a month now. Have yet to get a single answer.

Always easy to find in the negative when there's nothing to disprove.

I love this desperate stretch of the OP though:

Nick Sandmann is a modern-day Gandhi. He remained poised and dignified like blacks at a lunch counter while surrounded by obnoxious creeps hurling insults.

Yyyyyeah I don't think you'll find Ghandi standing in front of the British army smirking. Or anything "dignified" about a smirk. The OP insults the memory of both Ghandi and the Greesnboro Four. None of them copped an attitude.

He did not smirk he smiled you idiotic sack of shit.

And many on this forum lied and called him a racist.

He was more respectful than anyone there including the dishonest Indian punk

And that is what you really hate.

No, what we really hate is seeing the smart ass children of the white elite showing disrespect and bad behaviour and putting themselves in dangers, and then having their parents tell them they behaved like fine young gentlemen, because they didn't. The whole encounter is tribalism run amok.

It's always the kids whose behaviour is the WORST that have the parents who stand there saying "My son would never behave like that". These people hired a public relations agency to come up with a plausible denial that their son was some kind of modern day Ghandi standing up to tryany, when he was, in reality, a rude little shit, being disrespect to a tribal elder.

When you're buying your kid's way out of trouble at this age, by age 40, you have a guy who thinks he can buy his way out of anything.

^ Someone clearly hasnt watched the actual footage.

 

[Pogo]

"The statements we obtained from students and chaperones are remarkably consistent," the investigators said. “And, the statements are consistent with the videos we reviewed."

That's true.

When everyone is telling the truth you get the truth.

Nick Sandmann is a modern-day Gandhi. He remained poised and dignified like blacks at a lunch counter while surrounded by obnoxious creeps hurling insults.

The Hill ^

An investigation into the viral encounter between students from Covington Catholic High School and a Native American man found the students' accounts to be largely accurate, according to findings released Wednesday.

Greater Cincinnati Investigations issued a report dated Feb. 11 that found no evidence that students from Covington Catholic made “offensive or racist” statements to either Black Hebrew Israelites or Native American tribe members gathered on the National Mall.

"The statements we obtained from students and chaperones are remarkably consistent," the investigators said. “And, the statements are consistent with the videos we reviewed."

The students were the subject of intense scrutiny after a short video clip went viral that showed students wearing "Make America Great Again" hats surrounding Native American Nathan Phillips as he played a traditional Native American drum. One student, Nicholas Sandmann, appeared to be in a standoff with Phillips.

Social media users, politicians and the Diocese of Covington were among those who initially condemned the boys’ actions. The students maintained that they were being respectful, and additional video footage and accounts emerged in the days that followed that showed Phillips had walked toward the student group amid broader tensions near the Lincoln Memorial.

Investigators found that, based on interviews with 43 students and 16 adult chaperones and hours of video and social media content, "none of the students felt threatened by Mr. Phillips and many stated they were 'confused.’"

The investigation found that some students performed a “tomahawk chop” to the beat of Phillips’ drum, and that the group did “school cheers” directed at the Black Hebrew Israelites.

Investigators attempted to interview Sandmann and Phillips, but were unsuccessful. Sandmann referred to a previously issued written statement on the matter, which investigators said "appears to accurately reflect the facts surrounding the interaction between the students and the Black Hebrew Israelites."

The report makes no recommendations to the school about future events or policies in the wake of the incident.

The Bishop of the Covington Diocese, Roger Foys, welcomed the report as vindication of the students' behavior, despite the diocese's initial condemnation of the events.

"In truth, taking everything into account, our students were placed in a situation that was at once bizarre and even threatening," Foys said in a statement. "Their reaction to the situation was, given the circumstances, expected and one might even say laudatory."

My question is why the time and money wasted on a study?

The same conclusions were reached by anyone who watched the videos and the videos proved those conclusions true beyond any question.

Of course there are still stupid fools like bwk and others lying about those kids because they are too childish to admit when they are wrong. But the facts prove they are liars.

You are correct that it's a waste of time and money to deploy a classic strawman. WHO claimed "Covington Catholic students are racists" in the first place?

Been posing that query for -- whatever it is, a month now. Have yet to get a single answer.

Always easy to find in the negative when there's nothing to disprove.

I love this desperate stretch of the OP though:

Nick Sandmann is a modern-day Gandhi. He remained poised and dignified like blacks at a lunch counter while surrounded by obnoxious creeps hurling insults.

Yyyyyeah I don't think you'll find Ghandi standing in front of the British army smirking. Or anything "dignified" about a smirk. The OP insults the memory of both Ghandi and the Greesnboro Four. None of them copped an attitude.

He did not smirk he smiled you idiotic sack of shit.

And many on this forum lied and called him a racist.

He was more respectful than anyone there including the dishonest Indian punk

And that is what you really hate.

No, what we really hate is seeing the smart ass children of the white elite showing disrespect and bad behaviour and putting themselves in dangers, and then having their parents tell them they behaved like fine young gentlemen, because they didn't. The whole encounter is tribalism run amok.

It's always the kids whose behaviour is the WORST that have the parents who stand there saying "My son would never behave like that". These people hired a public relations agency to come up with a plausible denial that their son was some kind of modern day Ghandi standing up to tryany, when he was, in reality, a rude little shit, being disrespect to a tribal elder.

When you're buying your kid's way out of trouble at this age, by age 40, you have a guy who thinks he can buy his way out of anything.

^ Someone clearly hasnt watched the actual footage.

You should do that then.

 

[Godboy]

My question is why the time and money wasted on a study?

The same conclusions were reached by anyone who watched the videos and the videos proved those conclusions true beyond any question.

Of course there are still stupid fools like bwk and others lying about those kids because they are too childish to admit when they are wrong. But the facts prove they are liars.

You are correct that it's a waste of time and money to deploy a classic strawman. WHO claimed "Covington Catholic students are racists" in the first place?

Been posing that query for -- whatever it is, a month now. Have yet to get a single answer.

Always easy to find in the negative when there's nothing to disprove.

I love this desperate stretch of the OP though:

Nick Sandmann is a modern-day Gandhi. He remained poised and dignified like blacks at a lunch counter while surrounded by obnoxious creeps hurling insults.

Yyyyyeah I don't think you'll find Ghandi standing in front of the British army smirking. Or anything "dignified" about a smirk. The OP insults the memory of both Ghandi and the Greesnboro Four. None of them copped an attitude.

He did not smirk he smiled you idiotic sack of shit.

And many on this forum lied and called him a racist.

He was more respectful than anyone there including the dishonest Indian punk

And that is what you really hate.

No, what we really hate is seeing the smart ass children of the white elite showing disrespect and bad behaviour and putting themselves in dangers, and then having their parents tell them they behaved like fine young gentlemen, because they didn't. The whole encounter is tribalism run amok.

It's always the kids whose behaviour is the WORST that have the parents who stand there saying "My son would never behave like that". These people hired a public relations agency to come up with a plausible denial that their son was some kind of modern day Ghandi standing up to tryany, when he was, in reality, a rude little shit, being disrespect to a tribal elder.

When you're buying your kid's way out of trouble at this age, by age 40, you have a guy who thinks he can buy his way out of anything.

^ Someone clearly hasnt watched the actual footage.

You should do that then.

Oh i have. Im very well versed on this incident. Do you have any questions about it? If so, ask away.

 

[Dragonlady]

You are correct that it's a waste of time and money to deploy a classic strawman. WHO claimed "Covington Catholic students are racists" in the first place?

Been posing that query for -- whatever it is, a month now. Have yet to get a single answer.

Always easy to find in the negative when there's nothing to disprove.

I love this desperate stretch of the OP though:



Yyyyyeah I don't think you'll find Ghandi standing in front of the British army smirking. Or anything "dignified" about a smirk. The OP insults the memory of both Ghandi and the Greesnboro Four. None of them copped an attitude.

He did not smirk he smiled you idiotic sack of shit.

And many on this forum lied and called him a racist.

He was more respectful than anyone there including the dishonest Indian punk

And that is what you really hate.

No, what we really hate is seeing the smart ass children of the white elite showing disrespect and bad behaviour and putting themselves in dangers, and then having their parents tell them they behaved like fine young gentlemen, because they didn't. The whole encounter is tribalism run amok.

It's always the kids whose behaviour is the WORST that have the parents who stand there saying "My son would never behave like that". These people hired a public relations agency to come up with a plausible denial that their son was some kind of modern day Ghandi standing up to tryany, when he was, in reality, a rude little shit, being disrespect to a tribal elder.

When you're buying your kid's way out of trouble at this age, by age 40, you have a guy who thinks he can buy his way out of anything.

^ Someone clearly hasnt watched the actual footage.

You should do that then.

Oh i have. Im very well versed on this incident. Do you have any questions about it? If so, ask away.

Did you watch the full video, or the edited version put out by boy's PR firm? They are two quite different things.

 

[Pogo]

You are correct that it's a waste of time and money to deploy a classic strawman. WHO claimed "Covington Catholic students are racists" in the first place?

Been posing that query for -- whatever it is, a month now. Have yet to get a single answer.

Always easy to find in the negative when there's nothing to disprove.

I love this desperate stretch of the OP though:



Yyyyyeah I don't think you'll find Ghandi standing in front of the British army smirking. Or anything "dignified" about a smirk. The OP insults the memory of both Ghandi and the Greesnboro Four. None of them copped an attitude.

He did not smirk he smiled you idiotic sack of shit.

And many on this forum lied and called him a racist.

He was more respectful than anyone there including the dishonest Indian punk

And that is what you really hate.

No, what we really hate is seeing the smart ass children of the white elite showing disrespect and bad behaviour and putting themselves in dangers, and then having their parents tell them they behaved like fine young gentlemen, because they didn't. The whole encounter is tribalism run amok.

It's always the kids whose behaviour is the WORST that have the parents who stand there saying "My son would never behave like that". These people hired a public relations agency to come up with a plausible denial that their son was some kind of modern day Ghandi standing up to tryany, when he was, in reality, a rude little shit, being disrespect to a tribal elder.

When you're buying your kid's way out of trouble at this age, by age 40, you have a guy who thinks he can buy his way out of anything.

^ Someone clearly hasnt watched the actual footage.

You should do that then.

Oh i have. Im very well versed on this incident. Do you have any questions about it? If so, ask away.

Oh I already did, as soon as the kerfuffle started. And I have yet to get Answer One.

--- which is kinda what I expected but I put the challenge out there just in case something slipped by me.

Fatter o' mact I was the first one, maybe the only one, to note the woman bystander chiding the boys that they were "acting like a mob".

 

[pismoe]

now all Nick Sandman needs to do is BULK UP and learn to fight . GO Nick Sandman !!

 

[pismoe]

He did not smirk he smiled you idiotic sack of shit.

And many on this forum lied and called him a racist.

He was more respectful than anyone there including the dishonest Indian punk

And that is what you really hate.

No, what we really hate is seeing the smart ass children of the white elite showing disrespect and bad behaviour and putting themselves in dangers, and then having their parents tell them they behaved like fine young gentlemen, because they didn't. The whole encounter is tribalism run amok.

It's always the kids whose behaviour is the WORST that have the parents who stand there saying "My son would never behave like that". These people hired a public relations agency to come up with a plausible denial that their son was some kind of modern day Ghandi standing up to tryany, when he was, in reality, a rude little shit, being disrespect to a tribal elder.

When you're buying your kid's way out of trouble at this age, by age 40, you have a guy who thinks he can buy his way out of anything.

^ Someone clearly hasnt watched the actual footage.

You should do that then.

Oh i have. Im very well versed on this incident. Do you have any questions about it? If so, ask away.

Oh I already did, as soon as the kerfuffle started. And I have yet to get Answer One.

--- which is kinda what I expected but I put the challenge out there just in case something slipped by me.

Fatter o' mact I was the first one, maybe the only one, to note the woman bystander chiding the boys that they were "acting like a mob".

----------------------------------------- was this woman by stander one of the Boys Mother or a Chaperon or a Lady Cop or was she just a Busy Body 'mrs cravits' Pogo ??

 

[Pogo]

No, what we really hate is seeing the smart ass children of the white elite showing disrespect and bad behaviour and putting themselves in dangers, and then having their parents tell them they behaved like fine young gentlemen, because they didn't. The whole encounter is tribalism run amok.

It's always the kids whose behaviour is the WORST that have the parents who stand there saying "My son would never behave like that". These people hired a public relations agency to come up with a plausible denial that their son was some kind of modern day Ghandi standing up to tryany, when he was, in reality, a rude little shit, being disrespect to a tribal elder.

When you're buying your kid's way out of trouble at this age, by age 40, you have a guy who thinks he can buy his way out of anything.

^ Someone clearly hasnt watched the actual footage.

You should do that then.

Oh i have. Im very well versed on this incident. Do you have any questions about it? If so, ask away.

Oh I already did, as soon as the kerfuffle started. And I have yet to get Answer One.

--- which is kinda what I expected but I put the challenge out there just in case something slipped by me.

Fatter o' mact I was the first one, maybe the only one, to note the woman bystander chiding the boys that they were "acting like a mob".

----------------------------------------- was this woman by stander one of the Boys Mother or a Chaperon or a Lady Cop or was she just a Busy Body 'mrs cravits' Pogo ??

Amazingly enough I actually know who Gladys Kravitz "was".

The woman was just some adult who happened to be near the recording camera and her voice was captured on one of the videos when somebody in the vicinity asked "what's going on". Presumably she's specifically referring to the tomahawk chops (oh wait we're not supposed to talk about them are we) and that sort of taunting going on at that point. "Y'all are acting like a mob, that's what's going on. Fucking mob mentality".

 

[Pogo]

now all Nick Sandman needs to do is BULK UP and learn to fight . GO Nick Sandman !!

Why do you want him to "fight"? He's already got the obnoxious smirk thing down. Isn't that effective enough?

 

[pismoe]

can't stop Tomahawk chops as i think they are free speech and expression Pogo .

 

[Pogo]

can't stop Tomahawk chops as i think they are free speech and expression Pogo .

Nobody even hinted that "you can stop" them or that they're not "free expression". Not AT ALL the point.

The point is what the nature of the message is that it sends. Especially in the presence of a Native American group. Are they free to make that statement? Of course they are. Does it say something about those who would choose to do so? Damn right it does.

 

[pismoe]

now all Nick Sandman needs to do is BULK UP and learn to fight . GO Nick Sandman !!

Why do you want him to "fight"? He's already got the obnoxious smirk thing down. Isn't that effective enough?

----------------------------------- i don't want him to fight anyone but i think that he , actually all men and women should be Prepared and Nick looks kinda too relaxed and polite in an interview i saw him do Pogo .