Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 52,460
- 15,583
- 2,180
Suddenly a university defends someones First Amendment rights.
Oberlin professor keeps her job despite spewing anti-Semitic hate - including blaming Jews for 9/11 - on social media
- Joy Karega is a professor of 'rhetoric and composition' at Oberlin College
- She allegedly said Jews are responsible for the Charlie Hebdo massacre
- Karega called ISIS a 'CIA and Mossad' operation, referring to Israel's national intelligence agency
- However, the college said Karega has a right to express 'personal views'
A professor at a prestigious Ohio college has kept her job despite spewing anti-Semitic hate on social media – including blaming Jews for 9/11 and the rise of ISIS.
Joy Karega, an assistant professor of ‘rhetoric and composition’ at Oberlin College, claimed in a series of Facebook posts that Israel planned the September 11 attacks in 2001 and the Charlie Hebdo massacre in January last year.
She also posted conspiracy theories that alleged the Jewish state’s national intelligence agency formed the Islamic State terror group.
However, in its response, Oberlin College did not condemn Karega’s posts and added that she has the right to express ‘her personal views’.
According to Karega’s profile on the private liberal arts college’s website, she received her PhD from the University of Louisville in 2014.
At Oberlin, she has recently taught courses entitled ‘Writing for Social Justice’ and ‘Negotiating Language, Culture and Power’.
Read more: Oberlin professor keeps her job despite spewing anti-Semitic hate
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Read more: Oberlin professor keeps her job despite spewing anti-Semitic hate
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Telling the truth the way she sees it, is not anti Semitic. If the poor Jews have hurt feelings, too bad.Should we assume, here, that she kept her job because the hate she spewed was consistent with the far left playbook instead of far right?
It's really not about the hatred per se, but the targets of the hatred, some of which come with pre-approval and some not.
Can we see this 'far left playbook' you're making reference to? Because I'm pretty sure you're just making that up.
Should we assume, here, that she kept her job because the hate she spewed was consistent with the far left playbook instead of far right?
It's really not about the hatred per se, but the targets of the hatred, some of which come with pre-approval and some not.
Can we see this 'far left playbook' you're making reference to? Because I'm pretty sure you're just making that up.
View attachment 65870
And where in that book does it say anything from the OP?