Rigby5
Diamond Member
No, you did not show that there is more ice now.
There is NO ice data from before there were planes and submarines to explore the ice.
And the graphs you did show were of such as large scale that they do not at all show the last 50 years.
They hardly even show the last 1000 years.
You clearly do not know how to read a graph at all.
As what you published shows you are totally wrong.
It is easy show the real data.
Here is one that at first glance appears similar to what you posted.
But look closer.
The Hockey Stick is visible.
If you look along the right edge on the Temperature Anomaly axis, you will see the year 2016 with an arrow point to a point on the axis, very close to 1 degree above the dotted median of the axis. That clearly is higher than almost every single spike anywhere during the entire Holocene.
Anyone then who does not recognize this as an enormous hockey stick, would have to be blind, stupid, and irrational.
What a doofus...clearly you don't even know what the hockey stick is...and that graph doesn't show one...what that graph shows is that the present is cooler than it has been for most of the past 10,000 years. It shows the same thing as the graphs that I have been showing you, and in case you didn't know, when it is warmer, there is going to be less ice.....or do you think that ice didn't melt when it was warmer in the past.
No, it is clear you do not understand graphs.
The scale of the graph is a span of 10,000 years, so the blip of the hockey stick tip is totally invisible. You can't see it. The interval of the last 1000 years worth of data totally overwhelms it and averages it out of existence on the graph.
The ONLY way we can tell where the hockey stick tip extends, is that they put an arrow with the year 2016 pointing near to the 1 degree increase mark, on the far right axis.
Of course the last 1000 years have been cooler than the 7000 years preceding that. It is supposed to be cooler. We are supposed to have ended the warming at the end of the last interglacial period, and and starting to be cooling off again. But the last 50 years are what is wrong. They are NOT cooling, but heating higher than anything else on the entire graph. Such quick changes do NOT show up on graphs that have too great of a span of time as the scale.