Proof of Russian Collusion!!!!

[PoliticalChic]

Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.


Of course they have no proof, but, the Democrats have authored this mantra:

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”[ Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." You simply need to make a harsh, totally unfounded charge, and that's reason enough to investigate. ]



Hence, their argument has more twists and turns in that position than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!




But.....there is documented evidence of exactly that: offers to have foreign influence change the course of United States elections!!!


It's by the Democrats.


" It was a May 14, 1983 letter from the head of the KGB, Viktor Chebrikov, to the head of the USSR, the odious Yuri Andropov, with the highest level of classification. Chebrikov relayed to Andropov an offer from Senator Ted Kennedy, presented by Kennedy’s old friend and law-school buddy, John Tunney, a former Democratic senator from California, to reach out to the Soviet leadership at the height of a very hot time in the Cold War. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy was deeply troubled by the deteriorating relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which he believed was bringing us perilously close to nuclear confrontation. Kennedy, according to Chebrikov, blamed this situation not on the Soviet leadership but on the American president---Ronald Reagan. Not only was the USSR not to blame, but, said Chebrikov, Kennedy was, quite the contrary, “very impressed” with Andropov.

The thrust of the letter is that Reagan had to be stopped, meaning his alleged aggressive defense policies, which then ranged from the Pershing IIs to the MX to SDI, and even his re-election bid, needed to be stopped. It was Ronald Reagan who was the hindrance to peace. That view of Reagan is consistent with things that Kennedy said and wrote at the time, including articles in sources like Rolling Stone (March 1984) and in a speeches like his March 24, 1983 remarks on the Senate floor the day after Reagan’s SDI speech, which he lambasted as “misleading Red-Scare tactics and reckless Star Wars schemes.”

Even more interesting than Kennedy’s diagnosis was the prescription: According to Chebrikov, Kennedy suggested a number of PR moves to help the Soviets in terms of their public image with the American public. He reportedly believed that the Soviet problem was a communication problem, resulting from an inability to counter Reagan’s (not the USSR’s) “propaganda.” If only Americans could get through Reagan’s smokescreen and hear the Soviets’ peaceful intentions." FrontPage Magazine - Ted Kennedy and the KGB



Just one more proof of the adage....'to know what the Democrats are doing, listen to what they blame the other side for."

This post got fifteen - FIFTEEN -- accolades.

More proof this place is just a GOP circle-jerk. Democrats, you have zero margin for error. Can't fight Putin in Syria because that's being the "founder of ISIS". Can't fight ISIS with Assad/Putin, because that's "soft on Russia."

But the GOP? Fuck it, grab a few pussies, appoint Vladimir's personal RimJobber as secretary of state, and it's all good in the hood! #VoterIntegrity #NotForUs #CinnamonHitlerAllTheWay

Syria is not a threat to the US , never was , never will.

The US became involved in Syria because the Obama administration and Hillary were , somehow, COMPELLED to defend Israel. They wanted Bibi to retain the Golan Heights and by weakening Syria it could not RETALIATE against Israel when the latter attacked Iran. The US has no constitutional authority to engage in that type of foreign and military policy.

Grabbing the pussy of a consenting adult is the most wonderful feeling in this world. There is NOTHING better. You should try it sometime.

.

The Groper Elect's actions of grabbing pussy because he is a star and bragging about it make him a creepy fellow.

Speaking of creepy....did you vote for the rapist, Bill Clinton?

No. Who did he rape? When were the charges filed against President Clinton for rape?

NYTimes: a day late and a dollar short...


"But with Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky, we know what happened: A president being sued for sexual harassment tried to buy off a mistress-turned-potential-witness with White House favors, and then committed perjury serious enough to merit disbarment. Which also brought forward a compelling allegation from Juanita Broaddrick that the president had raped her.

The longer I spent with these old stories, the more I came back to a question: If exploiting a willing intern is a serious enough abuse of power to warrant resignation, why is obstructing justice in a sexual harassment case not serious enough to warrant impeachment? Especially when the behavior is part of a longstanding pattern that also may extend to rape? Would any feminist today hesitate to take a similar opportunity to remove a predatory studio head or C.E.O.?" Opinion | What if Ken Starr Was Right?

 

[Hossfly]

This post got fifteen - FIFTEEN -- accolades.

More proof this place is just a GOP circle-jerk. Democrats, you have zero margin for error. Can't fight Putin in Syria because that's being the "founder of ISIS". Can't fight ISIS with Assad/Putin, because that's "soft on Russia."

But the GOP? Fuck it, grab a few pussies, appoint Vladimir's personal RimJobber as secretary of state, and it's all good in the hood! #VoterIntegrity #NotForUs #CinnamonHitlerAllTheWay

Syria is not a threat to the US , never was , never will.

The US became involved in Syria because the Obama administration and Hillary were , somehow, COMPELLED to defend Israel. They wanted Bibi to retain the Golan Heights and by weakening Syria it could not RETALIATE against Israel when the latter attacked Iran. The US has no constitutional authority to engage in that type of foreign and military policy.

Grabbing the pussy of a consenting adult is the most wonderful feeling in this world. There is NOTHING better. You should try it sometime.

.

The Groper Elect's actions of grabbing pussy because he is a star and bragging about it make him a creepy fellow.

Speaking of creepy....did you vote for the rapist, Bill Clinton?

No. Who did he rape? When were the charges filed against President Clinton for rape?

NYTimes: a day late and a dollar short...


"But with Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky, we know what happened: A president being sued for sexual harassment tried to buy off a mistress-turned-potential-witness with White House favors, and then committed perjury serious enough to merit disbarment. Which also brought forward a compelling allegation from Juanita Broaddrick that the president had raped her.

The longer I spent with these old stories, the more I came back to a question: If exploiting a willing intern is a serious enough abuse of power to warrant resignation, why is obstructing justice in a sexual harassment case not serious enough to warrant impeachment? Especially when the behavior is part of a longstanding pattern that also may extend to rape? Would any feminist today hesitate to take a similar opportunity to remove a predatory studio head or C.E.O.?" Opinion | What if Ken Starr Was Right?

Basically it's because, as Trump says, "in Washington,things never get done." Judge Jeanine was railing last night that crimes are committed, the House has an investigation and send their findings to the DOJ and the DOJ hems and haws and sends it back to the house and back and forth until it goes to the Senate. Then the Senate has their investigation, sends it to the DOJ and then back and forth. This process takes three or four years and if a vote is held one side or the other blocks it and the case is shelved long enough that everyone forgets about it and then another case pops up and here we go again.

I say that the 2 parties are two cheeks on the same butt and each party covers for one another and protects the guilty unless one of them happens to talk or make money without sharing and then they crucify one of their own to set an example. That's been the way of Washington since the Revolution and it will go on and on until the Goddamned swamp is drained. Plus, the above is why both parties are fighting Trump tooth and nail. I won't pontificate any more because I am getting pissed just thinking about it.

Remember: Every politician with good intentions gets elected, goes to Washington, sells their soul to the devil, becomes filthy rich and concentrates on getting re-elected and re-elected until they have to go on life support. .

 

[PoliticalChic]

Syria is not a threat to the US , never was , never will.

The US became involved in Syria because the Obama administration and Hillary were , somehow, COMPELLED to defend Israel. They wanted Bibi to retain the Golan Heights and by weakening Syria it could not RETALIATE against Israel when the latter attacked Iran. The US has no constitutional authority to engage in that type of foreign and military policy.

Grabbing the pussy of a consenting adult is the most wonderful feeling in this world. There is NOTHING better. You should try it sometime.

.

The Groper Elect's actions of grabbing pussy because he is a star and bragging about it make him a creepy fellow.

Speaking of creepy....did you vote for the rapist, Bill Clinton?

No. Who did he rape? When were the charges filed against President Clinton for rape?

NYTimes: a day late and a dollar short...


"But with Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky, we know what happened: A president being sued for sexual harassment tried to buy off a mistress-turned-potential-witness with White House favors, and then committed perjury serious enough to merit disbarment. Which also brought forward a compelling allegation from Juanita Broaddrick that the president had raped her.

The longer I spent with these old stories, the more I came back to a question: If exploiting a willing intern is a serious enough abuse of power to warrant resignation, why is obstructing justice in a sexual harassment case not serious enough to warrant impeachment? Especially when the behavior is part of a longstanding pattern that also may extend to rape? Would any feminist today hesitate to take a similar opportunity to remove a predatory studio head or C.E.O.?" Opinion | What if Ken Starr Was Right?

Basically it's because, as Trump says, "in Washington,things never get done." Judge Jeanine was railing last night that crimes are committed, the House has an investigation and send their findings to the DOJ and the DOJ hems and haws and sends it back to the house and back and forth until it goes to the Senate. Then the Senate has their investigation, sends it to the DOJ and then back and forth. This process takes three or four years and if a vote is held one side or the other blocks it and the case is shelved long enough that everyone forgets about it and then another case pops up and here we go again.

I say that the 2 parties are two cheeks on the same butt and each party covers for one another and protects the guilty unless one of them happens to talk or make money without sharing and then they crucify one of their own to set an example. That's been the way of Washington since the Revolution and it will go on and on until the Goddamned swamp is drained. Plus, the above is why both parties are fighting Trump tooth and nail. I won't pontificate any more because I am getting pissed just thinking about it.

Remember: Every politician with good intentions gets elected, goes to Washington, sells their soul to the devil, becomes filthy rich and concentrates on getting re-elected and re-elected until they have to go on life support. .

A little slack here, Hossfly.....we conservatives always referred to him as Bill 'the rapist' Clinton