Proof We Have Too Many Liberal Judges

[lennypartiv]

Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler are trying to increase the power of the House of Representatives. Why can't they simply pass legislation like they are supposed to do? If we had sensible judges, they would reject this power grab by Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler.

<< On Monday, a federal district court did just that, categorically rejecting President Trump’s claims and finding that McGahn had a duty to comply with the Judiciary committee’s subpoena and to appear before Congress to testify. “[T]he President does not have (and, thus, cannot lawfully assert) the power to prevent his current and former senior-level aides from responding to congressional subpoenas.” >>

Will John Bolton and Mick Mulvaney have to testify in impeachment?

 

[lennypartiv]

Another crazy decision by a liberal judge:

< Judge Furman ruled to drop the citizenship question from next year’s decennial census. In doing so, he disregarded the precedent for including the citizenship. This precedent has a history that dates back to 1820 and was continuously used from 1890 to 1950 on every census, and continues to this very day in the American Community Survey. >

Heritage Experts: Trump must fight liberal judge’s ruling on 2020 census | myHeritage

 

[lennypartiv]

And another example:

<< A federal judge ruled against President Donald Trump on Monday in a lawsuit to block a subpoena from House Democrats for information about his finances. >>

These are private financial records that should never see the light of day.

Judge rules against Trump in lawsuit to block Democrats' subpoena for financial records

 

[Slade3200]

Ok so let me get this straight. If a judge rules against Trump they are crazy liberals pushing an agenda. Is that the genius conclusion that you've come to?

 

[jameny5]

Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler are trying to increase the power of the House of Representatives. Why can't they simply pass legislation like they are supposed to do? If we had sensible judges, they would reject this power grab by Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler.

<< On Monday, a federal district court did just that, categorically rejecting President Trump’s claims and finding that McGahn had a duty to comply with the Judiciary committee’s subpoena and to appear before Congress to testify. “[T]he President does not have (and, thus, cannot lawfully assert) the power to prevent his current and former senior-level aides from responding to congressional subpoenas.” >>

Will John Bolton and Mick Mulvaney have to testify in impeachment?

YAWN! Sleeping real hard... Are you sure about that? How about all the Conservative judges out there? Not enough of them huh? We need a fact checking feature on here. You guys are all over the place with this Liberal this and Liberal that NONSENSE. We thank you for keeping us in your daily thoughts. I didn't know we keep the RePuBlitard's up at night.

 

[lennypartiv]

Ok so let me get this straight. If a judge rules against Trump they are crazy liberals pushing an agenda. Is that the genius conclusion that you've come to?

Liberals are on the wrong side. Real Americans are figuring this out.

<< Federal judge blocks Trump from using Defense fund for parts of border wall >>

Federal judge blocks Trump from using Defense funds for parts of border wall - CNNPolitics

 

[mudwhistle]

Liberals are communists.....even their judges are criminals communists.

 

[lennypartiv]

Liberals are communists.....even their judges are criminals communists.

If anyone should be impeached, it should be liberal judges.

 

[Slade3200]

Ok so let me get this straight. If a judge rules against Trump they are crazy liberals pushing an agenda. Is that the genius conclusion that you've come to?

Liberals are on the wrong side. Real Americans are figuring this out.

<< Federal judge blocks Trump from using Defense fund for parts of border wall >>

Federal judge blocks Trump from using Defense funds for parts of border wall - CNNPolitics

When you don’t display a smart or comprehensive understanding of situations like this and play the partisan narratives then your observations can’t be respected or taken seriously. Sorry but that’s the bed your making for yourself

 

[Lovebears65]

Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler are trying to increase the power of the House of Representatives. Why can't they simply pass legislation like they are supposed to do? If we had sensible judges, they would reject this power grab by Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler.

<< On Monday, a federal district court did just that, categorically rejecting President Trump’s claims and finding that McGahn had a duty to comply with the Judiciary committee’s subpoena and to appear before Congress to testify. “[T]he President does not have (and, thus, cannot lawfully assert) the power to prevent his current and former senior-level aides from responding to congressional subpoenas.” >>

Will John Bolton and Mick Mulvaney have to testify in impeachment?

Cant they just plead the 5th, isnt that what the IRS lady did

 

[lennypartiv]

Another example of over reach by liberal judges is the rulings that blocked Trump's Muslim Ban from going into effect. Trump is trying to keep Americans safe and liberals are working for the other side.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Liberals really have no use for the Legislative process. They want The Bench so they can legislate with little or no opposition.

 

[Slade3200]

Liberals really have no use for the Legislative process. They want The Bench so they can legislate with little or no opposition.

Wow, how enlightening... thanks for sharing

 

[LeftofLeft]

Liberals really have no use for the Legislative process. They want The Bench so they can legislate with little or no opposition.

Wow, how enlightening... thanks for sharing

You are welcome. It is only an opinion based on observations of behavior by Democrats.

 

[Slade3200]

Liberals really have no use for the Legislative process. They want The Bench so they can legislate with little or no opposition.

Wow, how enlightening... thanks for sharing

You are welcome. It is only an opinion based on observations of behavior by Democrats.

its a selective observation based on a select group of Democrats. When you apply that to the very diverse and general group of Liberals you present a dishonest and inaccurate point... do better

 

[lennypartiv]

Wow, how enlightening... thanks for sharing

Getting educated on these boards is the only way you liberals learn the truth.

 

[Slade3200]

Wow, how enlightening... thanks for sharing

Getting educated on these boards is the only way you liberals learn the truth.

Trust me, the only education people like you provide is how ignorant and partisan some people in this country can be

 

[lennypartiv]

Trust me, the only education people like you provide is how ignorant and partisan some people in this country can be

Like it or not, we're taking our country back.

 

[Slade3200]

Trust me, the only education people like you provide is how ignorant and partisan some people in this country can be

Like it or not, we're taking our country back.

The fact that you think you lost “Your country” and are engaged in some kind of battle with your fellow countrymen shows how delusional you are. Keep fighting man

 

[LeftofLeft]

Liberals really have no use for the Legislative process. They want The Bench so they can legislate with little or no opposition.

Wow, how enlightening... thanks for sharing

You are welcome. It is only an opinion based on observations of behavior by Democrats.

its a selective observation based on a select group of Democrats. When you apply that to the very diverse and general group of Liberals you present a dishonest and inaccurate point... do better

I qualified it as pure opinion vs. trying to present opinion as fact so you can stop your bullshit about dishonesty and inaccuracy.