1. Is there a directive that the United States government must whitewash Islam?
What would be the rationale behind scrubbing all material that our military has access to that reveals the motivations of Islamofascist terrorists?
Would you be surprised to find a memorandum from Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin E. Dempsey that ordered such a scrub of educational, training, files, and rosters of instructors of material "disrespectful of the Islamic religion"?
Here it is:
http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/347431/review-of-military-education-training-curriculum.pdf
2. Is this 'sensitivity' universal? Reject disrespect of Christianity and Judaism? Hardly.
"The Obama administrations Department of Defense was caught training U.S. troops that Catholics, orthodox Jews, and evangelical Christians are to be considered religious extremists, even equating the major religions representing more than half of Americans with truly violent groups such as al-Qaeda, the Ku Klux Klan, and Hamas." Christians Are Extremists Like al-Qaeda, U.S. Army Taught Troops
3. Perhaps this is a carefully considered plan to protect Americans, by the Bush and Obama administrations.
But...what if the Islamic terrorists are not 'hijacking' Islam, and sharia, when they obey jihad, but are following the commands of the religion?
What if they are not twisting the foundations of Islam...but exemplifying it???
Wouldn't that make the claim "Islam is the religion of peace" the most profound
lie of the decade??
4. And, from a military perspective....why hide the facts of jihad doctrine from military leaders? In Pentagon parlance, this information is known as "enemy threat doctrine," the history and facts of Islamic war principles.
"To talk about how we are going to proceed, we need to understand the nature of the enemy. And clearly, the nature of this enemy is different than any we have faced in the past . Our enemies had declared war on us years before, but the attacks in New York, in the skies over Pennsylvania and here in
Washington, D.C. brought home very clearly to us that we were at war."
General Peter Pace, USMC, Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff, National Defense University, 1 December 2005, four years into the War on Terror http://www.aina.org/reports/iwesaj.pdf
5. But...the Bush administration then disallowed even the mention of "jihad," or "Islam," in connection with the war on terror:
"The following set of suggestions regarding appropriate language for use in conversations with target audiences was developed by the Extremist Messaging Branch of the National
Counterterrorism Center...."
http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/127.pdf
a. Obama continued this....on steroids!
6. Former State Department official, James E. Horn, writes that the United States has become the agency of Saudi Arabia, which has the final say on what can be said in the war on terror, and on US policy, e.g., aid to radicals in Syria:
"The Saudis and other Arabs who have reportedly provided millions in illegal (laundered) funds for Obamas two elections have IOUs coming from Obama, and they called these in.
The Sunnis want the Shiia/Alawite Assad regime to fall, and are doing all that they can to make this happen. They are using us surrogate servants towards this end. The Clintons are no less involved in that they receive millions of dirty Arab oil money as well via slick Willies regular speaking trips to the oil states, and then collect multi-million dollar honorariums on a very regular basis.
Hillary may well receive as much as a half of a billion laundered petro-dollars for her 2016 run for the Presidency. The Saudis are determined to keep control of our government away from we, the American people, and Hillary is panting for the job.
In short, the President of the United States appears owned by the Saudis and their partners, as is aspiring future President of the United States, Hillary Clinton." JIM HORN:The Deception Marathon of Benghazigate/Bostongate ? a Conspiracy? | RUTHFULLY YOURS
If he would include Bush in there, I'd say he's connected the dots pretty well.
You have another explanation of the last decade?
What would be the rationale behind scrubbing all material that our military has access to that reveals the motivations of Islamofascist terrorists?
Would you be surprised to find a memorandum from Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin E. Dempsey that ordered such a scrub of educational, training, files, and rosters of instructors of material "disrespectful of the Islamic religion"?
Here it is:
http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/347431/review-of-military-education-training-curriculum.pdf
2. Is this 'sensitivity' universal? Reject disrespect of Christianity and Judaism? Hardly.
"The Obama administrations Department of Defense was caught training U.S. troops that Catholics, orthodox Jews, and evangelical Christians are to be considered religious extremists, even equating the major religions representing more than half of Americans with truly violent groups such as al-Qaeda, the Ku Klux Klan, and Hamas." Christians Are Extremists Like al-Qaeda, U.S. Army Taught Troops
3. Perhaps this is a carefully considered plan to protect Americans, by the Bush and Obama administrations.
But...what if the Islamic terrorists are not 'hijacking' Islam, and sharia, when they obey jihad, but are following the commands of the religion?
What if they are not twisting the foundations of Islam...but exemplifying it???
Wouldn't that make the claim "Islam is the religion of peace" the most profound
lie of the decade??
4. And, from a military perspective....why hide the facts of jihad doctrine from military leaders? In Pentagon parlance, this information is known as "enemy threat doctrine," the history and facts of Islamic war principles.
"To talk about how we are going to proceed, we need to understand the nature of the enemy. And clearly, the nature of this enemy is different than any we have faced in the past . Our enemies had declared war on us years before, but the attacks in New York, in the skies over Pennsylvania and here in
Washington, D.C. brought home very clearly to us that we were at war."
General Peter Pace, USMC, Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff, National Defense University, 1 December 2005, four years into the War on Terror http://www.aina.org/reports/iwesaj.pdf
5. But...the Bush administration then disallowed even the mention of "jihad," or "Islam," in connection with the war on terror:
"The following set of suggestions regarding appropriate language for use in conversations with target audiences was developed by the Extremist Messaging Branch of the National
Counterterrorism Center...."
http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/127.pdf
a. Obama continued this....on steroids!
6. Former State Department official, James E. Horn, writes that the United States has become the agency of Saudi Arabia, which has the final say on what can be said in the war on terror, and on US policy, e.g., aid to radicals in Syria:
"The Saudis and other Arabs who have reportedly provided millions in illegal (laundered) funds for Obamas two elections have IOUs coming from Obama, and they called these in.
The Sunnis want the Shiia/Alawite Assad regime to fall, and are doing all that they can to make this happen. They are using us surrogate servants towards this end. The Clintons are no less involved in that they receive millions of dirty Arab oil money as well via slick Willies regular speaking trips to the oil states, and then collect multi-million dollar honorariums on a very regular basis.
Hillary may well receive as much as a half of a billion laundered petro-dollars for her 2016 run for the Presidency. The Saudis are determined to keep control of our government away from we, the American people, and Hillary is panting for the job.
In short, the President of the United States appears owned by the Saudis and their partners, as is aspiring future President of the United States, Hillary Clinton." JIM HORN:The Deception Marathon of Benghazigate/Bostongate ? a Conspiracy? | RUTHFULLY YOURS
If he would include Bush in there, I'd say he's connected the dots pretty well.
You have another explanation of the last decade?
