Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you post this:
"All Terrorists Are Muslim-- Except for the 94% that Aren't"
How about a yes or no.
Waiting.
Did you post this:
"All Terrorists Are Muslim-- Except for the 94% that Aren't"
How about a yes or no.
Waiting.
Exactly whose question are you trying to avoid by going down this tangent hole pretending to be an idiot?
I posted the title of that article as part of a response to Clementine. It served its purpose and that was hours ago. It wasn't even addressed to you so get the fuck OVER it.
Did you post this:
"All Terrorists Are Muslim-- Except for the 94% that Aren't"
How about a yes or no.
Waiting.
Exactly whose question are you trying to avoid by going down this tangent hole pretending to be an idiot?
I posted the title of that article as part of a response to Clementine. It served its purpose and that was hours ago. It wasn't even addressed to you so get the fuck OVER it.
Good.
So...now that you've admitted that you posted
"All Terrorists Are Muslim-- Except for the 94% that Aren't"
....my post that, in scholarly fashion, [post #55] proved that far more than 6% are a threat to the West, and to non-Muslim Westerners, was entirely appropriate.
Therefore... your several posts blabbering about my not understanding how to read the board's posts were simply lies.
Since you posted "All Terrorists Are Muslim-- Except for the 94% that Aren't"...
my post about devout Muslims and the Koran was eminently responsive.
Your lies were an attempt to hide the fact that my response to the 94% line eviscerated your post.....and, I suppose, made you look like a fool.
But, it isn't that you appear a fool....rather, .you're a liar who is also a fool.
You could have retained some dignity by simply noting that the '94% aren't' necessarily terrorists, and terrorist supporters might arguably be convinced to be otherwise.
That might have also been a response to the OP.
Sad that so very many on the Left follow the disreputable path you chose.
Doesn't really address the comment, IMO. It's merely a deflection to divert attention from your hypocrisy.
If you beat her up badly enough, on the topic, she'll run off and start a call-out thread about you that'll end up in the badlands.
"If you beat her up badly enough, on the topic, she'll run off..."
Conjecture on the part of the defeated, an attempt to lick your wounds?
After all, what you suggest has never occurred.
Exactly whose question are you trying to avoid by going down this tangent hole pretending to be an idiot?
I posted the title of that article as part of a response to Clementine. It served its purpose and that was hours ago. It wasn't even addressed to you so get the fuck OVER it.
Good.
So...now that you've admitted that you posted
"All Terrorists Are Muslim-- Except for the 94% that Aren't"
....my post that, in scholarly fashion, [post #55] proved that far more than 6% are a threat to the West, and to non-Muslim Westerners, was entirely appropriate.
Therefore... your several posts blabbering about my not understanding how to read the board's posts were simply lies.
Since you posted "All Terrorists Are Muslim-- Except for the 94% that Aren't"...
my post about devout Muslims and the Koran was eminently responsive.
Your lies were an attempt to hide the fact that my response to the 94% line eviscerated your post.....and, I suppose, made you look like a fool.
But, it isn't that you appear a fool....rather, .you're a liar who is also a fool.
You could have retained some dignity by simply noting that the '94% aren't' necessarily terrorists, and terrorist supporters might arguably be convinced to be otherwise.
That might have also been a response to the OP.
Sad that so very many on the Left follow the disreputable path you chose.
"Admitted"??
MY NAME IS ON THE FRICKING POST, Einstein. It's not a damn secret!
Neg on the way.
If you beat her up badly enough, on the topic, she'll run off and start a call-out thread about you that'll end up in the badlands.
"If you beat her up badly enough, on the topic, she'll run off..."
Conjecture on the part of the defeated, an attempt to lick your wounds?
After all, what you suggest has never occurred.
Anyone who doubts my word can go to the badlands and see the proof.
Good.
So...now that you've admitted that you posted
"All Terrorists Are Muslim-- Except for the 94% that Aren't"
....my post that, in scholarly fashion, [post #55] proved that far more than 6% are a threat to the West, and to non-Muslim Westerners, was entirely appropriate.
Therefore... your several posts blabbering about my not understanding how to read the board's posts were simply lies.
Since you posted "All Terrorists Are Muslim-- Except for the 94% that Aren't"...
my post about devout Muslims and the Koran was eminently responsive.
Your lies were an attempt to hide the fact that my response to the 94% line eviscerated your post.....and, I suppose, made you look like a fool.
But, it isn't that you appear a fool....rather, .you're a liar who is also a fool.
You could have retained some dignity by simply noting that the '94% aren't' necessarily terrorists, and terrorist supporters might arguably be convinced to be otherwise.
That might have also been a response to the OP.
Sad that so very many on the Left follow the disreputable path you chose.
"Admitted"??
MY NAME IS ON THE FRICKING POST, Einstein. It's not a damn secret!
Neg on the way.
I've nailed you, really gotten to you. You are a liar and a fool....and worse.
Now....this is the best part: you've proven what a low-bred sniveling cur you are.
Here's why:
When you first came to the board, someone gave you a neg, for a disagreement, and you mentioned it.....
I had problems with you, but sent you a pos rep, saying, 'I don't agree with neg reps for disagreement.'
(I've never given a neg....I fight battles in public.).
"If you beat her up badly enough, on the topic, she'll run off..."
Conjecture on the part of the defeated, an attempt to lick your wounds?
After all, what you suggest has never occurred.
Anyone who doubts my word can go to the badlands and see the proof.
You dunce!
Why didn't you provide the link???
The OP is called Progressives and Eugenics and demonstrates the lack of humanity of the progressives/liberals/ whatever.....
http://www.usmessageboard.com/usmb-badlands/300077-progressives-and-eugenics.html
"Admitted"??
MY NAME IS ON THE FRICKING POST, Einstein. It's not a damn secret!
Neg on the way.
I've nailed you, really gotten to you. You are a liar and a fool....and worse.
Now....this is the best part: you've proven what a low-bred sniveling cur you are.
Here's why:
When you first came to the board, someone gave you a neg, for a disagreement, and you mentioned it.....
I had problems with you, but sent you a pos rep, saying, 'I don't agree with neg reps for disagreement.'
(I've never given a neg....I fight battles in public.).
And you're not shy to just make shit up in doing it. And for that you'll pay the price.
You must be very proud.
So.... your lying about what I didn't say makes me a "cur" --- how again?
...Until a large group of Muslims comes out and denounces terrorism, I will consider them to be in league with the killers. If they choose not to separate themselves or help us in locating the radicals among them, it is safe to assume they hold the same mindset.
There are museums in Israel honoring terrorists, and Israeli medals named after terrorist groups.
does that trouble you as well?
How many terrorist attacks have Christians carried out? They say things the left disagrees with and they protest abortion clinics. That is all child's play compared to the acts committed by Muslims over the years. Muslims have been consistent with killing infidels. The "peaceful" ones remain silent. We keep getting told that only a handful are radical and the others can be trusted. I guess it's a big handful that are radical judging from the pics after 9/11 showing crowds cheering in different countries. I wonder how many of those t-shirts have been sold that celebrate the attack on us.
Until a large group of Muslims comes out and denounces terrorism, I will consider them to be in league with the killers. If they choose not to separate themselves or help us in locating the radicals among them, it is safe to assume they hold the same mindset.
Here ya go, compiled on a single page for easy reading.
And here ya go again -- All Terrorists Are Muslim-- Except for the 94% that Aren't
>> Yet, Americans continue to live in mortal fear of radical Islam, a fear propagated and inflamed by right wing Islamophobes. If one follows the cable news networks, it seems as if all terrorists are Muslims. It has even become axiomatic in some circles to chant: Not all Muslims are terrorists, but nearly all terrorists are Muslims. Muslims and their leftist dhimmi allies respond feebly, mentioning Waco as the one counter example, unwittingly affirming the belief that nearly all terrorists are Muslims.
But perception is not reality. The data simply does not support such a hasty conclusion. On the FBIs official website, there exists a chronological list of all terrorist attacks committed on U.S. soil from the year 1980 all the way to 2005. That list can be accessed here (scroll down all the way to the bottom).
... According to this data, there were more Jewish acts of terrorism within the United States than Islamic (7% vs 6%). These radical Jews committed acts of terrorism in the name of their religion. These were not terrorists who happened to be Jews; rather, they were extremist Jews who committed acts of terrorism based on their religious passions, just like Al-Qaeda and company.
Yet notice the disparity in media coverage between the two. It would indeed be very interesting to construct a corresponding pie chart that depicted the level of media coverage of each group. The reason that Muslim apologists and their leftist dhimmi allies cannot recall another non-Islamic act of terrorism other than Waco is due to the fact that the media gives menial (if any) coverage to such events. If a terrorist attack does not fit the Islam is the perennial and existential threat of our times narrative, it is simply not paid much attention to, which in a circuitous manner reinforces and proves the preconceived narrative. It is to such an extent that the average American cannot remember any Jewish or Latino terrorist; why should he when he has never even heard of the Jewish Defense League or the Ejercito Popular Boricua Macheteros? Surely what he does not know does not exist! <<
Never ceases to amaze me when the same voices that (correctly) rail at the biases of mainstream media.... then turn around and follow it like a puppy when it suits a preconceived agenda.
Hope this helps.
It probably won't.
How many terrorist attacks have Christians carried out? They say things the left disagrees with and they protest abortion clinics. That is all child's play compared to the acts committed by Muslims over the years. Muslims have been consistent with killing infidels. The "peaceful" ones remain silent. We keep getting told that only a handful are radical and the others can be trusted. I guess it's a big handful that are radical judging from the pics after 9/11 showing crowds cheering in different countries. I wonder how many of those t-shirts have been sold that celebrate the attack on us.
Until a large group of Muslims comes out and denounces terrorism, I will consider them to be in league with the killers. If they choose not to separate themselves or help us in locating the radicals among them, it is safe to assume they hold the same mindset.
Here ya go, compiled on a single page for easy reading.
And here ya go again -- All Terrorists Are Muslim-- Except for the 94% that Aren't
>> Yet, Americans continue to live in mortal fear of radical Islam, a fear propagated and inflamed by right wing Islamophobes. If one follows the cable news networks, it seems as if all terrorists are Muslims. It has even become axiomatic in some circles to chant: “Not all Muslims are terrorists, but nearly all terrorists are Muslims.” Muslims and their “leftist dhimmi allies” respond feebly, mentioning Waco as the one counter example, unwittingly affirming the belief that “nearly all terrorists are Muslims.”
But perception is not reality. The data simply does not support such a hasty conclusion. On the FBI’s official website, there exists a chronological list of all terrorist attacks committed on U.S. soil from the year 1980 all the way to 2005. That list can be accessed here (scroll down all the way to the bottom).
... According to this data, there were more Jewish acts of terrorism within the United States than Islamic (7% vs 6%). These radical Jews committed acts of terrorism in the name of their religion. These were not terrorists who happened to be Jews; rather, they were extremist Jews who committed acts of terrorism based on their religious passions, just like Al-Qaeda and company.
Yet notice the disparity in media coverage between the two. It would indeed be very interesting to construct a corresponding pie chart that depicted the level of media coverage of each group. The reason that Muslim apologists and their “leftist dhimmi allies” cannot recall another non-Islamic act of terrorism other than Waco is due to the fact that the media gives menial (if any) coverage to such events. If a terrorist attack does not fit the “Islam is the perennial and existential threat of our times” narrative, it is simply not paid much attention to, which in a circuitous manner reinforces and “proves” the preconceived narrative. It is to such an extent that the average American cannot remember any Jewish or Latino terrorist; why should he when he has never even heard of the Jewish Defense League or the Ejercito Popular Boricua Macheteros? Surely what he does not know does not exist! <<
Never ceases to amaze me when the same voices that (correctly) rail at the biases of mainstream media.... then turn around and follow it like a puppy when it suits a preconceived agenda.
Hope this helps.
It probably won't.
The only thing as consistent as the radical Muslim terrorist attacks is the defense of them by the left. I have yet to hear Obama or any leftie condemn the acts of the radical Muslms. Instead, they point fingers, as if to say that others have done it and therefore the Muslims are excused.
The left is staunchly defensive of a group that doesn't believe in rights for women and even discuss proper times to beat their wives on television shows in their country.
They don't want women voting or even speaking to men in public unless chaperoned. Honor killings and genital mutilations continue. Yet, the left defends them.
And it's not just the terrorists who treat women like this. It's the Muslim culture. It's Sharia law. Islam is their government and Sharia law is their constitution. '
There can be only one reason for them to spread out and multiply across the world. They want Sharia law to rule someday and the left is all too willing to give them a hand. I am only repeating what different Muslims have stated over the years. They do not like American culture, laws and especially our constitution. It's evil in their eyes and they don't come here to live in a free country. They, like Obama, wish to fundamentally change the world. Sorry, liberals, but many of us just can't get behind that.
I asked before how many liberals would be willing to live under Sharia law. No one answered. Maybe because if you admit it would be a horrible existence, it might be harder to defend those who mistreat women to the extreme- all in the name of religion.
By "scrubbing material," I assume you mean blowing the terrorists up with drones.
