Putin kills 298 people while r-wingers admire him here and elect him President.

[Kosh]

Now Obama needs to ACT, he stated his intentions, I'll be one of the ones watching for DEEDS.

I hope your a patient person, he will make some pretty speeches, but actions, don't hold your breath.

Projected answer: Um uh

Question: What should Obama do? And what has Putin done to get so much respect?

And the far left continues to show that they wish Obama was more like Putin..

 

[rightwinger]

A community organizer is kicking his ass on the world stage. How are those sanctions working out for poor Putin? Not so fun when you use bullying as your key diplomatic card

Now Putin is turning worldwide pariah while the community organizer laughs from the sidelines

Untrue. "The world" is laughing it's ass off at the fool we elected president and at our citizens for being idiotic enough to elect him. Putin is at least respected. Obama isn't.

He sure did

 

[rightwinger]

Worship? No.
Putin is a statesman while Obama is a bumbling asshole. It is what it is.

A community organizer is kicking his ass on the world stage. How are those sanctions working out for poor Putin? Not so fun when you use bullying as your key diplomatic card

Now Putin is turning worldwide pariah while the community organizer laughs from the sidelines

Untrue. "The world" is laughing it's ass off at the fool we elected president and at our citizens for being idiotic enough to elect him. Putin is at least respected. Obama isn't.

Actually, the world breathed a sigh of relief when we removed Republicans from power. Even today they wonder why Republucans have the influence they do

 

[driveby]

He sure didn't........

 

[Vigilante]

Untrue. "The world" is laughing it's ass off at the fool we elected president and at our citizens for being idiotic enough to elect him. Putin is at least respected. Obama isn't.

He sure did

Prove it!

 

[ClosedCaption]

Untrue. "The world" is laughing it's ass off at the fool we elected president and at our citizens for being idiotic enough to elect him. Putin is at least respected. Obama isn't.

He sure did

And he sold weapons to the Iranians but at least he didnt read from a teleprompter

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

He sure did

And he sold weapons to the Iranians but at least he didnt read from a teleprompter

FAST N FURIOUS.. You were saying? People in glass houses.. BOTH sides can throw stones all day long.

 

[OKTexas]

I hope your a patient person, he will make some pretty speeches, but actions, don't hold your breath.

Wonder how long it will take him to blame Bush.

We lost allies because of the Iraq disaster, we gained them back in the last few years, I posted the G-7 condemnation of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The primary group of people holding the US back now are the victims of ODS, here IN the US.

You do know that in 1994 the US, Russia and Great Britain sign a treaty with Ukraine pledging to defend them if they gave up their nukes. They gave up the nukes, did your dear leader abide by the treaty to defend them?

 

[Vigilante]

He sure did

And he sold weapons to the Iranians but at least he didnt read from a teleprompter

And the obomanation GIVES WEAPONS to Al Qaeda in Syria....your point????

 

[Lakhota]

Who do you trust?

 

[ClosedCaption]

He sure did

And he sold weapons to the Iranians but at least he didnt read from a teleprompter

FAST N FURIOUS.. You were saying? People in glass houses.. BOTH sides can throw stones all day long.

And both are great guys right? Or only one guy?

Regan admitted

You suspect it

see the difference

 

[JimH52]

Putin and Palin.....just across the straight from each other....

 

[Vigilante]

Who do you trust?

The man on the right who doesn't LIE as much as the socialist on the left!

 

[ClosedCaption]

He sure did

And he sold weapons to the Iranians but at least he didnt read from a teleprompter

And the obomanation GIVES WEAPONS to Al Qaeda in Syria....your point????

Point is that you consider one to be fine and the other as not.

Regan admitted it

You suspect Obama did it. Thats the difference

 

[blackhawk]

Who do you trust?

Neither.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Who do you trust?

NEITHER OF THEM.. I don't trust either Obama or Putin.. Nor did I trust Bush.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Who do you trust?

The man on the right who doesn't LIE as much as the socialist on the left!

ROFLMAO At the bozo pic!!!!!!

 

[B. Kidd]

Who do you trust?

When everything are lies, all that is left are political opinions.

 

[Vigilante]

And he sold weapons to the Iranians but at least he didnt read from a teleprompter

And the obomanation GIVES WEAPONS to Al Qaeda in Syria....your point????

Point is that you consider one to be fine and the other as not.

Regan admitted it

You suspect Obama did it. Thats the difference

No, you fool, he DID IT!

Obama Bypasses Terrorism Rule To Give Weapons To Syrian Rebels | FDL News Desk

President Obama, in order to arm Al-Qaeda linked Syrian rebels, has waived a provision of federal law designed to prevent the supply of arms to terrorist groups. Not surprisingly, federal law currently bans giving weapons to terrorists. Though it seems Obama does have the authority to bypass the restriction and he is choosing to do so by arming the Syrian rebels who have links to Al Qaeda, a group still listed as supporting terrorism.

The president, citing his authority under the Arms Export Control Act, announced today that he would “waive the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A of the AECA related to such a transaction.”
Those two sections prohibit sending weaponry to countries described in section 40(d): “The prohibitions contained in this section apply with respect to a country if the Secretary of State determines that the government of that country has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism,” Congress stated in the Arms Control Export Act.

​

The Syrian rebels not only include factions that are explicitly loyal to Al Qaeda but, according to US intelligence and experts analysts, those factions are now dominant within the opposition. So it is highly likely that some of the arms being shipped into Syria right now by the CIA will fall into the hands of Syrian rebels loyal to Al Qaeda.

The law allows the president to waive those prohibitions if he “determines that the transaction is essential to the national security interests of the United States.”
Under section 40(g) of the AECA, the Obama team must also provide Congress — at least 15 days before turning over the weapons — “the name of any country involved in the proposed transaction, the identity of any recipient of the items to be provided pursuant to the proposed transaction, and the anticipated use of those items,” along with a list of the weaponry to be provided, when they will be delivered, and why the transfer is key to American security interests.

​

Essential? I thought it was made pretty clear to the president and friends that America did not have any vital national security interests at stake in Syria. That’s why Obama pulled the bill, it was going down. And that bill was related to chemical weapons not arming the rebels to undermine the Assad government. How is undermining the Assad government essential to the national security interests of the United States?
President Bashar al-Assad has already said that by arming the rebels President Obama will kill the chemical weapons deal. Now bans on arming terrorists are being waved to justify dubious activity that might blow up a peace deal? Looks like war with Syria is still very much on the table as the US government gives weapons to groups loyal to the people that attacked America on 9/11.

 

[rightwinger]

He sure did

And he sold weapons to the Iranians but at least he didnt read from a teleprompter

He sure did