Q1 2019 watch - if under 3.0% - where is Trump’s economic miracle - can Trump beat O’s 2.9% ever?

[Harpy Eagle]

Then the claim about Obama not having a year above 3% is equally false as he had 12 months that came out to above 3% twice.

But we do not measure GDP growth that way.

One can measure it however one sees fit.

That is fine, if that is the case than you have to give Obama credit for 2 "years" over 3%.

but you will not, because you are a mindless partisan sheep

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Then the claim about Obama not having a year above 3% is equally false as he had 12 months that came out to above 3% twice.

But we do not measure GDP growth that way.

One can measure it however one sees fit.

That is fine, if that is the case than you have to give Obama credit for 2 "years" over 3%.

but you will not, because you are a mindless partisan sheep

Which 4 quarter strings of over 3% did he have?

 

[The Purge]

Unemployment lowest in 50 years....and the Surrender Monkey???... ROTFLMFAO!!!

 

[Faun]

Here’s the record thru 2018:
View attachment 254781

U.S. - GDP growth by year 1990-2017 | Statista

Trump and Obama are tied a 2.9 Best full year of GDP growth.

Do you think Trump’s Q1 this year will break the tie and boost Trump to 3.0 or more?

Do you believe Trump will ever get a full year of GDP growth this high?

View attachment 254787

Some experts - The liberal fake news WSJ is forecasting 1.4% for Q1.

• Economic Forecasting Survey - The Wall Street Journal. Economist Q&A. Forecast Edition: March 2019 ..... Projected: Q1 2019. 1.4%. Projected: Q2 2019. 2.6%. Projected: Q3 2019. 2.2%. Projected: ...

Trump supporters tell us your forecast?

What happens if Trump’s third year ends (GDP-wise) anywhere below Obama’s 2.9% in 2015?

According to Trump 2.9 is anemic and weak.

"Obama is the first president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth," Trump said during an Oct. 28 campaign rally in Manchester, N.H.

Trump's claim about Obama's weak economic growth is limited

Do you think Trump will be the second president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth,"

What does an “anemic” Trump do for Obama’s legacy?

• Moving forward, there are reasons to believe that growth will continue to be slower than was originally hoped. Annual U.S. GDP growth exceeding 3.0 percent, as experienced in the mid- to late 1990s and mid-2000s, is not expected to be attainable over the coming decade.

The U.S. economy to 2022: settling into a new normal : Monthly Labor Review: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Are we settling into a new normal that is not so horrible without 3% sustained GDP growth?

You fricken loons are, if nothing else, quite entertaining. You piss and moan month after month for the last couple of years, resisting everything and anything possible. Then you want to whine about GDP numbers not reaching a certain level. Why the hell don't ya try contributing for once in your stinkin life.

So the left shouldn't treat trump like the right treated Obama?

 

[Faun]

Here’s the record thru 2018:
View attachment 254781

U.S. - GDP growth by year 1990-2017 | Statista

Trump and Obama are tied a 2.9 Best full year of GDP growth.

Do you think Trump’s Q1 this year will break the tie and boost Trump to 3.0 or more?

Do you believe Trump will ever get a full year of GDP growth this high?

View attachment 254787

Some experts - The liberal fake news WSJ is forecasting 1.4% for Q1.

• Economic Forecasting Survey - The Wall Street Journal. Economist Q&A. Forecast Edition: March 2019 ..... Projected: Q1 2019. 1.4%. Projected: Q2 2019. 2.6%. Projected: Q3 2019. 2.2%. Projected: ...

Trump supporters tell us your forecast?

What happens if Trump’s third year ends (GDP-wise) anywhere below Obama’s 2.9% in 2015?

According to Trump 2.9 is anemic and weak.

"Obama is the first president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth," Trump said during an Oct. 28 campaign rally in Manchester, N.H.

Trump's claim about Obama's weak economic growth is limited

Do you think Trump will be the second president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth,"

What does an “anemic” Trump do for Obama’s legacy?

• Moving forward, there are reasons to believe that growth will continue to be slower than was originally hoped. Annual U.S. GDP growth exceeding 3.0 percent, as experienced in the mid- to late 1990s and mid-2000s, is not expected to be attainable over the coming decade.

The U.S. economy to 2022: settling into a new normal : Monthly Labor Review: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Are we settling into a new normal that is not so horrible without 3% sustained GDP growth?

Trump has accomplished economic and employment successes not seen in decades and accomplished more in 2 years than Obama did in 8...

Yet poor sore loser butt-hurt, hate-driven, reality-denying snowflakes continue to whine, wail, lie, deny, justify, and attempt to minimize successes Obama NEVER accomplished while President.

BWUHAHAHAHAHA....

poor little snowflakes...

"Trump has accomplished economic and employment successes not seen in decades and accomplished more in 2 years than Obama did in 8..."

He lowered the unemployment rate about one percentage point after inheriting a good economy. You freaks act like he's the second coming of Christ.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Then the claim about Obama not having a year above 3% is equally false as he had 12 months that came out to above 3% twice.

But we do not measure GDP growth that way.

One can measure it however one sees fit.

That is fine, if that is the case than you have to give Obama credit for 2 "years" over 3%.

but you will not, because you are a mindless partisan sheep

Which 4 quarter strings of over 3% did he have?

Did Obama never have a whole year of 3% economic growth?

But if the data is used to compare one quarter to the same quarter from a year ago, there were two periods during Obama’s tenure in which growth exceeded 3 percent. Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent; and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Then the claim about Obama not having a year above 3% is equally false as he had 12 months that came out to above 3% twice.

But we do not measure GDP growth that way.

One can measure it however one sees fit.

That is fine, if that is the case than you have to give Obama credit for 2 "years" over 3%.

but you will not, because you are a mindless partisan sheep

Which 4 quarter strings of over 3% did he have?

Did Obama never have a whole year of 3% economic growth?

But if the data is used to compare one quarter to the same quarter from a year ago, there were two periods during Obama’s tenure in which growth exceeded 3 percent. Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent; and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Thanks!

Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent;

The first summer of recovery.

and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent,

0-0.25% Fed Funds and $1.7 trillion in QE3 still working its way thru the economy.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Then the claim about Obama not having a year above 3% is equally false as he had 12 months that came out to above 3% twice.

But we do not measure GDP growth that way.

One can measure it however one sees fit.

That is fine, if that is the case than you have to give Obama credit for 2 "years" over 3%.

but you will not, because you are a mindless partisan sheep

Which 4 quarter strings of over 3% did he have?

Did Obama never have a whole year of 3% economic growth?

But if the data is used to compare one quarter to the same quarter from a year ago, there were two periods during Obama’s tenure in which growth exceeded 3 percent. Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent; and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Thanks!

Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent;

The first summer of recovery.

and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent,

0-0.25% Fed Funds and $1.7 trillion in QE3 still working its way thru the economy.

And? I am not here defending Obama, just trying to keep things honest.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

One can measure it however one sees fit.

That is fine, if that is the case than you have to give Obama credit for 2 "years" over 3%.

but you will not, because you are a mindless partisan sheep

Which 4 quarter strings of over 3% did he have?

Did Obama never have a whole year of 3% economic growth?

But if the data is used to compare one quarter to the same quarter from a year ago, there were two periods during Obama’s tenure in which growth exceeded 3 percent. Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent; and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Thanks!

Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent;

The first summer of recovery.

and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent,

0-0.25% Fed Funds and $1.7 trillion in QE3 still working its way thru the economy.

And? I am not here defending Obama, just trying to keep things honest.

And nothing. If he hadn't been such a bozo, he'd have had much better growth. That's all.

Not accusing you of defending his weak economy.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That is fine, if that is the case than you have to give Obama credit for 2 "years" over 3%.

but you will not, because you are a mindless partisan sheep

Which 4 quarter strings of over 3% did he have?

Did Obama never have a whole year of 3% economic growth?

But if the data is used to compare one quarter to the same quarter from a year ago, there were two periods during Obama’s tenure in which growth exceeded 3 percent. Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent; and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Thanks!

Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent;

The first summer of recovery.

and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent,

0-0.25% Fed Funds and $1.7 trillion in QE3 still working its way thru the economy.

And? I am not here defending Obama, just trying to keep things honest.

And nothing. If he hadn't been such a bozo, he'd have had much better growth. That's all.

Not accusing you of defending his weak economy.

I agree, he was terrible. The fact that Trump can only do slightly better should tell you something...but it does not seem to.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Which 4 quarter strings of over 3% did he have?

Did Obama never have a whole year of 3% economic growth?

But if the data is used to compare one quarter to the same quarter from a year ago, there were two periods during Obama’s tenure in which growth exceeded 3 percent. Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent; and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Thanks!

Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent;

The first summer of recovery.

and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent,

0-0.25% Fed Funds and $1.7 trillion in QE3 still working its way thru the economy.

And? I am not here defending Obama, just trying to keep things honest.

And nothing. If he hadn't been such a bozo, he'd have had much better growth. That's all.

Not accusing you of defending his weak economy.

I agree, he was terrible. The fact that Trump can only do slightly better should tell you something...but it does not seem to.

Well, the recovery is old. And don't fight the Fed.

 

[protectionist]

That is fine, if that is the case than you have to give Obama credit for 2 "years" over 3%.

but you will not, because you are a mindless partisan sheep

You give Obama credit for 2009-2015, which are nothing more than recession recoil years. And you don't give him blame for the only awful year 2016, that is connected with him, because you are a mindless partisan sheep.

 

[protectionist]

I agree, he was terrible. The fact that Trump can only do slightly better should tell you something...but it does not seem to.

Obama's best (2016-2nd quarter) was 2.3. Trump's best so far is 4.2. Much more than "slightly"

 

[protectionist]

"Trump has accomplished economic and employment successes not seen in decades and accomplished more in 2 years than Obama did in 8..."

He lowered the unemployment rate about one percentage point after inheriting a good economy. You freaks act like he's the second coming of Christ.

FALSE! Here is the SINKING/STINKING economy Trump inherited >>

The unemployment rate went from 4.7% to 3.6. with unemployment, that's quite a bit. And that includes the lowest unemployment for blacks, Hispanics, and disabled, EVER.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Which 4 quarter strings of over 3% did he have?

Did Obama never have a whole year of 3% economic growth?

But if the data is used to compare one quarter to the same quarter from a year ago, there were two periods during Obama’s tenure in which growth exceeded 3 percent. Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent; and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Thanks!

Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent;

The first summer of recovery.

and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent,

0-0.25% Fed Funds and $1.7 trillion in QE3 still working its way thru the economy.

And? I am not here defending Obama, just trying to keep things honest.

And nothing. If he hadn't been such a bozo, he'd have had much better growth. That's all.

Not accusing you of defending his weak economy.

I agree, he was terrible. The fact that Trump can only do slightly better should tell you something...but it does not seem to.

The fact you're trying to defend Ears's tepid economy speaks volumes too.

The present economy vs Ears's is night and day

 

[protectionist]

I agree, he was terrible. The fact that Trump can only do slightly better should tell you something...but it does not seem to.

The fact you're trying to defend Ears's tepid economy speaks volumes too.

The present economy vs Ears's is night and day[/QUOTE]
Of course, but that is the difference between getting a multi-billionaire POTUS with decades of industrial experience, and an airhead who was a "community organizer"

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I agree, he was terrible. The fact that Trump can only do slightly better should tell you something...but it does not seem to.

The fact you're trying to defend Ears's tepid economy speaks volumes too.

The present economy vs Ears's is night and day

Of course, but that is the difference between getting a multi-billionaire POTUS with decades of industrial experience, and an airhead who was a "community organizer"[/QUOTE]

Ears was in over his head and the Fed saved his gay ass

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That is fine, if that is the case than you have to give Obama credit for 2 "years" over 3%.

but you will not, because you are a mindless partisan sheep

You give Obama credit for 2009-2015, which are nothing more than recession recoil years. And you don't give him blame for the only awful year 2016, that is connected with him, because you are a mindless partisan sheep.

Acutally, I think that Obama sucked, was the 2nd worst POTUS ever in my opinion. I just do not think Trump is much better...which makes me anything but partisan.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Did Obama never have a whole year of 3% economic growth?

But if the data is used to compare one quarter to the same quarter from a year ago, there were two periods during Obama’s tenure in which growth exceeded 3 percent. Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent; and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Thanks!

Between the third quarters of 2009 and 2010, GDP growth was about 3.1 percent;

The first summer of recovery.

and between the first quarters of 2014 and 2015, the economy grew by 3.3 percent,

0-0.25% Fed Funds and $1.7 trillion in QE3 still working its way thru the economy.

And? I am not here defending Obama, just trying to keep things honest.

And nothing. If he hadn't been such a bozo, he'd have had much better growth. That's all.

Not accusing you of defending his weak economy.

I agree, he was terrible. The fact that Trump can only do slightly better should tell you something...but it does not seem to.

The fact you're trying to defend Ears's tepid economy speaks volumes too.

The present economy vs Ears's is night and day

I have no defended anything, do try and keep up.

I said Obama was terrible, that is not a defense of someone one...fuck I hate idiots.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That is fine, if that is the case than you have to give Obama credit for 2 "years" over 3%.

but you will not, because you are a mindless partisan sheep

You give Obama credit for 2009-2015, which are nothing more than recession recoil years. And you don't give him blame for the only awful year 2016, that is connected with him, because you are a mindless partisan sheep.

GDP growth is always in a state of flux, with ups and downs. The drop in late 15 and early 16 was already changing before the election.