Qanon shaman...likely to get a new trial considering the government withheld video evidence from the defense....

[Faun]

Do you get paid every time you post this?
Better watch out, Biden is going to raise your taxes.

Then she'll just have to post more.

 

[Faun]

The Cap Police are part of Govt, they aren't allowed to illegally withhold Brady evidence....they aren't above the law.

You have yet to show the DoJ was in possession of these videos when BuffaloHead pleaded guilty AND you have yet to show these videos are covered by Brady.

 

[Marener]

geez man...let me make this real easy for you: ‘It’s Appalling’: QAnon Shaman’s Lawyer Says DOJ Lied, Withheld Videos Aired By Carlson | The Daily Wire

Oh, and I suppose you think a lawyer going on TV would never lie or exaggerate.

Have you geniuses learned nothing?

 

[struth]

LOLOLOL

You claimed the DoJ said they didn't turn over these videos to the defense.

When challenged on that, you THEN post a link to an article which says the DoJ DIDN'T say they turned those videos over to the DoJ

Kimberly Paschall, the assistant U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia who Watkins said lied, did not immediately return a request for comment. A spokesman for her boss, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Matthew Graves, declined to comment even though Chansley’s case is not ongoing.​

Did you even bother to read that article? Or did you simply not understand it?

You're such a flamin' idiot.

What in that article makes you think the DOJ turned everything over?

 

[Marener]

The Cap Police are part of Govt, they aren't allowed to illegally withhold Brady evidence....they aren't above the law.

It never went to trial.

 

[struth]

You have yet to show the DoJ was in possession of these videos when BuffaloHead pleaded guilty AND you have yet to show these videos are covered by Brady.

The DOJ is charged with having them.https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule

The Brady rule, named after Brady v. Maryland, requires prosecutors to disclose material, exculpatory information in the government's possession to the defense. Brady material, or the evidence the prosecutor is required to disclose under this rule, includes any information favorable to the accused which may reduce a defendant's potential sentence, go against the credibility of an unfavorable witness, or otherwise allow a jury to infer against the defendant’s guilt.

Initially, the Brady rule was only applicable if the defendant made a pretrial request for specific information which the prosecution denied. In United States v. Bagley, however, the Supreme Court eliminated this request requirement and stated that the prosecution has a constitutional duty to disclose all material, favorable information in their possession to defendants regardless of whether it is requested. This duty is breached regardless of whether that information is withheld intentionally or unintentionally.

 

[struth]

It never went to trial.

so? Brady evidence is turned over regardless

 

[struth]

Oh, and I suppose you think a lawyer going on TV would never lie or exaggerate.

Have you geniuses learned nothing?

oh no, I've seen Adam Shifty do just that, many times over

 

[Marener]

oh no, I've seen Adam Shifty do just that, many times over

Did you do any fact checking about this story?

 

[Marener]

so? Brady evidence is turned over regardless

It’s turned over before trial.

 

[struth]

Did you do any fact checking about this story?

Yes...you know I saw the video once it was released, so I know the "Committee" lied

 

[struth]

It’s turned over before trial.

Yes it's suppose to be, in this case it looks like the Dems hide it

 

[Faun]

What in that article makes you think the DOJ turned everything over?

Not being privvy to the defense, I have no idea what was or was not turned over.

That has nothing to do with you lying, claiming the DoJ said they didn't turn over these videos.

 

[Marener]

Yes it's suppose to be, in this case it looks like the Dems hide it

It never went to trial.

 

[Marener]

Yes...you know I saw the video once it was released, so I know the "Committee" lied

But you know nothing about the discovery process for Chansley’s court case.

Do you.

 

[struth]

Not being privvy to the defense, I have no idea what was or was not turned over.

That has nothing to do with you lying, claiming the DoJ said they didn't turn over these videos.

of course we know they didn’t…the defense has said they didn’t

 

[struth]

It never went to trial.

so? going to trial has nothing to do with Brady evidence and the Govt burden to turn it over

 

[struth]

But you know nothing about the discovery process for Chansley’s court case.

Do you.

yes…read the link that was provided in the OP they discussed it

 

[Marener]

so? going to trial has nothing to do with Brady evidence and the Govt burden to turn it over

It does. The government is required to turn it over before trial.

It never went to trial. He took a plea.

Therefore it didn’t affect his defense because there was no defense.

 

[Marener]

yes…read the link that was provided in the OP they discussed it

So all you have is a one sided allegation from a criminal defense attorney that you did no fact checking for.

Is that right?