BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Jar look at it. It’s not that difficult.She does? How so?
Not that I would be sad or surprised.
Too many irrelevant and unexplained videos get posted. I need a bit of a summary.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jar look at it. It’s not that difficult.She does? How so?
Not that I would be sad or surprised.
Too many irrelevant and unexplained videos get posted. I need a bit of a summary.
She already gutted it."She will gut the paper" ... it's still September along this World Line ...
Even less difficult to sum up a point from it.Jar look at it. It’s not that difficult.
Stop being a quivering pussy. View it for a few moments. Really. It’s not difficult.Even less difficult to sum up a point from it.
Hmm, I think the sissy is the one who can't sum up a point from it in his own big boy words.Stop being a quivering pussy. View it for a few moments. Really. It’s not difficult.
Hmm, I think the sissy is the one who can't sum up a point from it in his own big boy words.
Of course, we have different standards, in educated circles.
You are ok with the multiple uses of a one symbol representing different mathematical concepts?Why shouldn't they have dropped the second term in the Einstein field equation?
For example.
But you can't.No. Just click a link and listen. So simple even a moron like you can do it.
She already gutted it.
Why? I couldn't care less if you don't. If you want to believe garbage science that's totally your choice.So are you going to sum up why any of us should watch that video?
I don't believe the paper's claims. It's one paper.Why? I couldn't care less if you don't. If you want to believe garbage science that's totally your choice.
First of all this paper is garbage science. Mass creates curvature so curvature must create mass? Really? That's not obviously flawed science? She said so many garbage science papers are getting published that the community has pretty much given up on fighting them.She offered her opposition ... somebody has to ... others are busy confirming the math ... it's better than mGR ... it's about time lazy physicists finally started work on this ... talk about milking the clock ...
Ironically it was a person of faith (me) that set you straight on this scientific paper. Given that this has been a common occurrence, I would have thought you would have shown a little more humility.I don't believe the paper's claims. It's one paper.
That kind of faith -- just believing one wild document that makes lofty claims -- is for religious peope like you.
I did.But you can't.
Strange.
Set me straight? Uh, what? Ding, you post like a jilted 7th grader. Settle down. I didn't write or gobble up the other paper.Ironically it was a person of faith (me) that set you straight on this scientific paper.
I don't think that about anyone. I have never stated or even implied it. Ding, you're flailing and swinging at flies that don't exist.That you think my faith precludes my understanding of complex subjects
Yep, set you straight and others as well.Set me straight? Uh, what? Ding, you post like a jilted 7th grader. Settle down. I didn't write or gobble up the other paper.
I don't think that about anyone. I have never stated or even implied it. Ding, you're flailing and swinging at flies that don't exist.
Uh, okay.Yep, set you straight and others as well.