Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And then at noon on January 20th, 2021 Trump lost all rights to the possession of presidential papers.The files were transferred to Mar Lago while Trump was president, before Biden took the oath of office. Trump was the incumbent.
I kind of thought you knew the facts of this case, that is not true, is it.
Yes, no Legal Custody, that belongs to the Archives. Physical Custody is separate. Same as in a divorce, I had legal custody of my child but the mother had legal and physical custody.The PRA divests the ex-president of "legal custody".
Establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office.
Actually that's a good example. I saw many people make that argument in traffic court, and the judge explained it. Just because someone else did not get caught, has no bearing on your being caught breaking the law.It’s like a speed trap that only applies to one specific car.
Of course. And that analogy would apply if this was a random trapping. But this trap is designed for one specific car, not just the car that had a bad luck day. See the difference? This episode points to the corruption of the system and not the actual trapped car.Actually that's a good example. I saw many people make that argument in traffic court, and the judge explained it. Just because someone else did not get caught, has no bearing on your being caught breaking the law.
Trump vs Biden, etc.The good "Father O'blivion" is playing a game of gotcha with this thread, but refuses to acknowledge the obvious unequal and unfair application of the the law as pertaining to Trump v Biden.
Trump did not lose his rights, the law is specific, Legal Custody.And then at noon on January 20th, 2021 Trump lost all rights to the possession of presidential papers.
No different than a parent losing "legal custody" of a child. Once custody is legally transferred to another party, the parent is committing a crime by retaining physical possession of the child. In that case it's kidnapping,
See how that works?
Getting your information from the media is why they put the 1st amendment into the constitution.Keep spewing liar, it's how all you vermin work.
If Trump is found guilty in the documents case with Cannon presiding, will you agree the government proved its case and Trump deserves the punishment meted out?
Before the obvious question is asked, yes I will believe the government did not prove its case if he is acquitted with Cannon presiding..
Trump seems to be guilty of a crime that multiple other people have been guilty of, except they werent punished for it. Why would you expect us to watch our politicians go to jail for crimes that your politicians dont go to jail for? In what world does that sound reasonable? We would have to be fucking idiots to just roll over and accept it. If you havent noticed, it enraged MILLIONS of Americans.
Bullshit. Not allowing censorship of the press is why. Today the media tells us what they want us to hear and fools like you suck it down.Getting your information from the media is why they put the 1st amendment into the constitution.
Already there dude.There will be whataboutism BIGLY.
Where you got it completely wrong is that the person with "legal custody" can determine who can have "physical custody". No different than a parent dropping their child off at daycare, thus granting them "physical custody"Establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office.
Is anyone here, divorced, with legal custody, of their child? Does your child live with you? Or does the child live with their mother?
The National Archive, has legal custody, not physical custody.
Trump violated no law
And then at noon on January 20th, 2021 Trump lost all rights to the possession of presidential papers.
No different than a parent losing "legal custody" of a child. Once custody is legally transferred to another party, the parent is committing a crime by retaining physical possession of the child. In that case it's kidnapping,
See how that works?
That's a case where two people shared legal custody.Yes, no Legal Custody, that belongs to the Archives. Physical Custody is separate. Same as in a divorce, I had legal custody of my child but the mother had legal and physical custody.
Where you get this wrong, is that "legal custody", and "physical custody" are determined in Family Courts, under family law, determined by judges.Where you got it completely wrong is that the person with "legal custody" can determine who can have "physical custody". No different than a parent dropping their child off at daycare, thus granting them "physical custody"
Person, needs to be agency or department.But the person with "legal custody" determines who shall have "physical custody" and the National Archives with "legal custody" also took "physical custody" of all records.
