M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
- Thread starter
- #221
None of you want to take a stab at answering the questions asked in the OP?
Why not?
Why not?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still no answers. Amazing.
Considering what they call an assault style weapon is repsonsible for less than 200 deaths a year, way too much emphasis is being put on them. it is not the type of gun that is an issue. in all honesty, guns themselves really aren't the issue. Its the total disregard for life that is a problem. the fact that someone will so easily take a life is a real problem in our society.
What worries me is the assault on the Bill of Rights that cancels the rights of ordinary people to defend themselves from extraordinary attackers who have no compunctions about breaking any and all gun laws to suit their acquisitions of other people's assets. Oh, my goodness. That's what Congress gets off on doing--taking power away from the people and expropriating all that power for themselves through payroll control.![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHWq3cihjvI
Any gun you can do that with? Should not be in the hands of a civilian.
Do you have any idea whats going on in that video?
I'm guessing no.
NO !! he has no fucking idea what is happening or how it is happening, shallow is an Obamcommie who follows the rule of Hitler, Stalin, PolPot, and all other despot dictators who want to subjugate us patriots......, AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN !! that is EXACTLY why the founders put the second amdt. in our founding documents.
There are such animanls, thought I am not sure it it will fit...M14....laughed my balls off when I came in here tonight and saw this thread!!! Most all of these limpwristers have never even seen a gun except on the TV or in the newspaper......the same assholes who didn't bat an eyelash when the official Sandy Hook report spoke to a "shotgun being found in the glove compartment" ( of the Honda Civic).
Hey M14.....you got one of those compact 12G's???![]()
Contrasted sharply by -your- bigoted, partisan, left wing hyperbole, consistently arging from emotion, ignorance and dishonesty.Considering what they call an assault style weapon is repsonsible for less than 200 deaths a year, way too much emphasis is being put on them. it is not the type of gun that is an issue. in all honesty, guns themselves really aren't the issue. Its the total disregard for life that is a problem. the fact that someone will so easily take a life is a real problem in our society.
What worries me is the assault on the Bill of Rights that cancels the rights of ordinary people to defend themselves from extraordinary attackers who have no compunctions about breaking any and all gun laws to suit their acquisitions of other people's assets. Oh, my goodness. That's what Congress gets off on doing--taking power away from the people and expropriating all that power for themselves through payroll control.![]()
What should worry you instead is your comprehensive ignorance of the issue and propensity for partisan rightwing hyperbole.
Interesting....If a few politicians and CEOs of major weapons manufacturers are killed with assault weapons....
They're a simply a menace to the status quo. God forbid the citizenry have access to the same stuff the militarized police state has access to or there actually might be repercussions for their tyranny.
You are either ignorant of the fact that "arms", as the term is used in the 2nd, does not include tanks, etc, or you are aware fo the fact and choose to ignore it.So you have access to tanks, cruise missiles, nukes...? Hmmm, don't think so. Arguing over an Amendment that's already being violated without anyone doing anything is pointless. Just violate the Amendment and move on, that's how it's been done in the past.They're a simply a menace to the status quo. God forbid the citizenry have access to the same stuff the militarized police state has access to or there actually might be repercussions for their tyranny.
It's obvious that a right-wing "militia" will never take up arms in defense of the Constitution. They don't want the Constitution. They only want certain parts of it. They love freedom of speech but insist that there is not a separation of church and state.
If a few politicians and CEOs of major weapons manufacturers are killed with assault weapons then those assault weapons will stop being made. Short of that happening, Americans are free to still buy AKs and ARs for "hunting", "home defense" and "protecting a rich racist criminal's cattle".
It's obvious that a right-wing "militia" will never take up arms in defense of the Constitution. They don't want the Constitution. They only want certain parts of it. They love freedom of speech but insist that there is not a separation of church and state. They love the right to bear arms but not the part about the "WELL-REGULATED" militia. They certainly don't want to interpret gay marriage as being a personal right under the 9th. They love "stop and frisk" on black people and won't defend their 4th Amendment rights, and they loved the USAPATRIOT Act for all of Bush's presidency even though the big government uses it to spy on us.
These people are dangerous. The American Taliban has taken up arms against America to stop laws from being enforced. The right-wing American Teabagger Taliban needs to be treated like a fundamentalist terrorist group.
You are either ignorant of the fact that "arms", as the term is used in the 2nd, does not include tanks, etc, or you are aware fo the fact and choose to ignore it.So you have access to tanks, cruise missiles, nukes...? Hmmm, don't think so. Arguing over an Amendment that's already being violated without anyone doing anything is pointless. Just violate the Amendment and move on, that's how it's been done in the past.They're a simply a menace to the status quo. God forbid the citizenry have access to the same stuff the militarized police state has access to or there actually might be repercussions for their tyranny.
Either way, your response holds no water; either way, you only serve to help prove the premise that anti-gun loons can only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.
Now -- how about addressing the questions asked in the OP?
Why do you choose to be ignorant?Arms are weapons. A cruise missile is a weapon. KYou are either ignorant of the fact that "arms", as the term is used in the 2nd, does not include tanks, etc, or you are aware fo the fact and choose to ignore it.So you have access to tanks, cruise missiles, nukes...? Hmmm, don't think so. Arguing over an Amendment that's already being violated without anyone doing anything is pointless. Just violate the Amendment and move on, that's how it's been done in the past.
Either way, your response holds no water; either way, you only serve to help prove the premise that anti-gun loons can only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.
Now -- how about addressing the questions asked in the OP?
I see you aren't afraid to put your ignorance on display. Good for you.Arms are weapons, weapons are tanks and missiles etc...