Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's the entire CLIP featuring the "racist Joke" that the racist RW claims MHP made....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfCy1nOVK9k
Can one of you RW BASTARDS who believe that to be true please pin-point the exact statements that MHP made that are racist? Cause I saw the entire show live on that Sunday and I saw no racism from MHP. I was shocked, SHOCKED when a controversy was the result.
So what was the purpose of the photo then? Do you need something beyond visual aid to determine the purpose of this discussion? I know your slow on this issue, so try playing this clip a couple of times and see if you can figure it out, if not just remain in denial...
Limbaugh's statement was a pithy way to recognize that Obama's agenda would be bad for the country, so naturally we don't want him to succeed in passing it.
You continue to misrepresent what McConnell said.
The actions of Republicans in Congress reflect people who are doing what their constituents sent them to Washington to do. The left says that if Republicans want something different from Obama's agenda they need to start winning elections. Well, Republicans won elections. My legislators in my district and state won elections and went to Washington with a mandate from me.
This is about the fifth time I've tried to have a political discussion with you. You twist words, make extreme statements, sometimes backpedal when caught out, and sometimes don't even have the grace to recognize that you have been caught out. You double down and pretend your extreme version of events is fact.
I keep saying I won't make the mistake of engaging you again. But you can be such a nice person in nonpolitical settings that I forget and try again. Hopefully I won't forget next time.
What McConnell said was unprecedented. Congress also followed suit by being the most obstructionist in history. These are all "firsts". If it happens again, by the way, under a Republican President? No big deal. So you are essentially stating that this crap should be BAU.
Limbaugh? Par for the course. He's a racist bigoted asshole who's one of the biggest hypocrites on the planet. He called Clinton a terrorist. Privately, when he isn't looking for his new trophy wife and trying to score drugs, he jets off two third world nations to hire prostitutes and pop viagra. Real role model there..you betcha!
I don't think "unprecedented" means what you think it means. Some things escalated during Obama's presidency but the trends began earlier. The obstructionism, the hate, etc.
McConnell's statement was purely in the context of what it would take to get Obamacare reversed. The end.
And Limbaugh is not a racist. He's a shock jock. He's no worse than Bill Maher.
She is claiming that Michigan is about to sign into a "rape" insurance requirement! What a lying SOB.
The bill that law makers are signing into law is an abortion premium RELIEF bill. If you want your insurance to cover abortion, then you pay an extra premium. Look not everyone believes in abortion, so why should they be forced to pay higher premiums to keep it in their insurance policy? If you want it covered in your insurance policy, then don't complain if you have to pay more for it! It used to be the same for child birth. Not everyone is going to need or want it, but the extra coverage is extremely expensive. With Obamacare every policy must include it, so everyone premiums increase a ton.
But I digress. This is obviously about not having people who don't believe in abortion having to pay higher premiums to include it in their insurance policy. But the sick lying bitch Madcow calls it rape insurance. Here is her thinking. Women who are raped might get pregnant from the assault, since the Michigan law will require an extra charge to cover abortion, women now pay for rape insurance! It a fallacy in logic from one of the most dishonest people in media!
What McConnell said was unprecedented. Congress also followed suit by being the most obstructionist in history. These are all "firsts". If it happens again, by the way, under a Republican President? No big deal. So you are essentially stating that this crap should be BAU.
Limbaugh? Par for the course. He's a racist bigoted asshole who's one of the biggest hypocrites on the planet. He called Clinton a terrorist. Privately, when he isn't looking for his new trophy wife and trying to score drugs, he jets off two third world nations to hire prostitutes and pop viagra. Real role model there..you betcha!
I don't think "unprecedented" means what you think it means. Some things escalated during Obama's presidency but the trends began earlier. The obstructionism, the hate, etc.
McConnell's statement was purely in the context of what it would take to get Obamacare reversed. The end.
And Limbaugh is not a racist. He's a shock jock. He's no worse than Bill Maher.
I know EXACTLY what it means.
No other congressional leader, as a mission statement, said their goal was to make sure the President only serves one term. That's never been done.
Additionally, shortly after the President was elected, Republicans did a power point briefing on what they were going to do to unseat the President.
That's with:
-Failing financial and manufacturing sectors.
-2 Hot Wars.
-High Unemployment.
-Looming Depression.
-Full on Recession.
It was and is..the height of "malpractice" in governance.
I don't think "unprecedented" means what you think it means. Some things escalated during Obama's presidency but the trends began earlier. The obstructionism, the hate, etc.
McConnell's statement was purely in the context of what it would take to get Obamacare reversed. The end.
And Limbaugh is not a racist. He's a shock jock. He's no worse than Bill Maher.
I know EXACTLY what it means.
No other congressional leader, as a mission statement, said their goal was to make sure the President only serves one term. That's never been done.
Additionally, shortly after the President was elected, Republicans did a power point briefing on what they were going to do to unseat the President.
That's with:
-Failing financial and manufacturing sectors.
-2 Hot Wars.
-High Unemployment.
-Looming Depression.
-Full on Recession.
It was and is..the height of "malpractice" in governance.
That wasn't McConnell's mission statement. That was McConnell saying that taking the Senate in 2010 wouldn't be enough to get Obamacare reversed.
Obama himself introduced the "one-term" language when he spoke of what would happen if we didn't have an economic recovery.
McConnell echoed his language, in the context of what would need to happen if Obamacare were going to be blocked.
Democrats do the same.
Did it when Bush was in office.
It's not "unprecedented".
And we could have had immigration reform already if they didn't.
And Obama did it too.
Democrats do the same.
Did it when Bush was in office.
It's not "unprecedented".
And we could have had immigration reform already if they didn't.
And Obama did it too.
Did what the same?
They closed down the government?
When?
Yeah..there were filibusters. But nothing like this.
Bush was largely successful in passing legislation.
He got done most of his agenda.
He failed on immigration, a handful of judges and appointments and turning SSI into a 401K plan.
Democrats do the same.
Did it when Bush was in office.
It's not "unprecedented".
And we could have had immigration reform already if they didn't.
And Obama did it too.
Did what the same?
They closed down the government?
When?
Yeah..there were filibusters. But nothing like this.
Bush was largely successful in passing legislation.
He got done most of his agenda.
He failed on immigration, a handful of judges and appointments and turning SSI into a 401K plan.
Partisanship and obstructionism escalated since Obama took office but it was not unprecedented and was not caused by his election. It was on the upswing before he was nominated. He participated in it. I already gave an example -- how he behaved with the Alito nomination. He said Alito was well-qualified. He said it would be wrong to filibuster and vote against such a candidate. He did so anyway. What caused his change of heart? A trusted Obama advisor said that it was because he was reminded that not joining in the partisanship could hurt his future political prospects. [Edit: I might be smashing together things said about Alito and things said about Roberts but Obama still went against what he claimed he believed in.]
Did what the same?
They closed down the government?
When?
Yeah..there were filibusters. But nothing like this.
Bush was largely successful in passing legislation.
He got done most of his agenda.
He failed on immigration, a handful of judges and appointments and turning SSI into a 401K plan.
Partisanship and obstructionism escalated since Obama took office but it was not unprecedented and was not caused by his election. It was on the upswing before he was nominated. He participated in it. I already gave an example -- how he behaved with the Alito nomination. He said Alito was well-qualified. He said it would be wrong to filibuster and vote against such a candidate. He did so anyway. What caused his change of heart? A trusted Obama advisor said that it was because he was reminded that not joining in the partisanship could hurt his future political prospects. [Edit: I might be smashing together things said about Alito and things said about Roberts but Obama still went against what he claimed he believed in.]
Again.
I pointed out what was unprecedented.
And additionally obstruction went on by a magnitude of hundreds after Obama was elected.
You just don't see Democrats..well Liberals..behaving in remotely the same fashion as the Tea Party types in congress.
They stated they hate the government. And prove it daily.
Here's the entire CLIP featuring the "racist Joke" that the racist RW claims MHP made....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfCy1nOVK9k
Can one of you RW BASTARDS who believe that to be true please pin-point the exact statements that MHP made that are racist? Cause I saw the entire show live on that Sunday and I saw no racism from MHP. I was shocked, SHOCKED when a controversy was the result.
So what was the purpose of the photo then? Do you need something beyond visual aid to determine the purpose of this discussion? I know your slow on this issue, so try playing this clip a couple of times and see if you can figure it out, if not just remain in denial...
Perry didn't make fun of Kieran Romney. The photo was a terrible choice of subject matter to make any kind of joke about it, but she didn't actually insult the child.
And I believe her apology was sincere. Why would she want to insult anyone for adopting a black child? It would be like slapping her own family.
So what was the purpose of the photo then? Do you need something beyond visual aid to determine the purpose of this discussion? I know your slow on this issue, so try playing this clip a couple of times and see if you can figure it out, if not just remain in denial...
Perry didn't make fun of Kieran Romney. The photo was a terrible choice of subject matter to make any kind of joke about it, but she didn't actually insult the child.
And I believe her apology was sincere. Why would she want to insult anyone for adopting a black child? It would be like slapping her own family.
I must have missed Marc's point then?
The photo was the center piece to her point...
When has Rachel done some "pants on fire" stuff?
Cite them please.
When has Rachel done some "pants on fire" stuff?
Cite them please.
Bush got major hate.
The trends were established before Obama was elected.
How Democrats talk about the Tea Party is as bad as how the Tea Party talks about Democrats.
Two sides of the same coin. Reciprocated. A continuation of a trend. Exacerbated by gerrymandering. Stoked by the 24-hour news cycle. Cameras on at all times makes people have to posture for the base and inhibits the ability to make deals.
Rebublicans fighting for smaller government or for limited growth of government is not a crime. It is not wrong. It does not deserve the excoriation it receives. That excoriation comes from a partisan place.
We're going in circles. I'm done here.
On topic: Rachel Maddow has her good points. But she's done some pants on fire stuff too. Occupational hazard.
When has Rachel done some "pants on fire" stuff?
Cite them please.
The connection she tried to draw between the Kochs and the Florida drug testing law was Beckian in its conspiratorial absurdity. The logic she used would have implicated MSNBC's parent company as complicit in what she accused the Kochs of.
