Racist Con stabs men protecting Muslim teen girls .

[Avatar4321]

What evidence that the victims were liberal?

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

this scum was spewing racists shit towards some Muslim girls on a Portland bus . When some bystanders defended the girls he want on a stabbing spree.

How is this not terrorsim? And can we stop with this false narratives that it's the liberals who are violent ?

Redirect Notice

Meche, 23, and Ricky John Best, 53, were killed Friday as they tried to stop Jeremy Joseph Christian from harassing Hudson’s 16-year-old daughter, Destinee Mangum, and her friend, authorities have said. The friend was wearing a hijab. Christian’s social media postings indicate an affinity for Nazis and political violence.

And a Bernie Sanders supporter who wanted to kill Trump supporters.
'White Supremacist' Portland Stabber Was A Bernie Supporter, Threatened to Kill Trump Supporters

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

this scum was spewing racists shit towards some Muslim girls on a Portland bus . When some bystanders defended the girls he want on a stabbing spree.

How is this not terrorsim? And can we stop with this false narratives that it's the liberals who are violent ?

Redirect Notice

Meche, 23, and Ricky John Best, 53, were killed Friday as they tried to stop Jeremy Joseph Christian from harassing Hudson’s 16-year-old daughter, Destinee Mangum, and her friend, authorities have said. The friend was wearing a hijab. Christian’s social media postings indicate an affinity for Nazis and political violence.

He was a con alright, a convict. Not everything is related to politics, no matter how hard you try.

.

Nope
'White Supremacist' Portland Stabber Was A Bernie Supporter, Threatened to Kill Trump Supporters

 

[pinqy]

The guy was assaulted by a couple snowflakes, while exercising his constitutionally protected right to free speech.

Except he was committing the crime of harassment. 2015 ORS 166.065¹
Harassment

Then the two pussy snowflakes end up assuming room temperature... An unsustainable environment for a snowflake...

Escalation of violence (pulling a weapon on an unarmed person) nullifies a self-defense claim.

 

[DarkFury]

The guy was assaulted by a couple snowflakes, while exercising his constitutionally protected right to free speech.

Except he was committing the crime of harassment. 2015 ORS 166.065¹
Harassment

Then the two pussy snowflakes end up assuming room temperature... An unsustainable environment for a snowflake...

Escalation of violence (pulling a weapon on an unarmed person) nullifies a self-defense claim.

No it does not! The original attacker armed or not remains the attacker. No laws says you lose your right of self defense because you are armed. Try again!

 

[Vastator]

The guy was assaulted by a couple snowflakes, while exercising his constitutionally protected right to free speech.

Except he was committing the crime of harassment. 2015 ORS 166.065¹
Harassment

Then the two pussy snowflakes end up assuming room temperature... An unsustainable environment for a snowflake...

Escalation of violence (pulling a weapon on an unarmed person) nullifies a self-defense claim.

Wrong!

 

[Vastator]

What evidence that the victims were liberal?

Well... They attacked a person exercising speech they didn't agree with, for one... No need to go on after that...

 

[Vastator]

The guy was assaulted by a couple snowflakes, while exercising his constitutionally protected right to free speech.

Except he was committing the crime of harassment. 2015 ORS 166.065¹
Harassment

Then the two pussy snowflakes end up assuming room temperature... An unsustainable environment for a snowflake...

Escalation of violence (pulling a weapon on an unarmed person) nullifies a self-defense claim.

Horse shit! Not to mention there were two of them. That's like saying, "if I have a gun, and am assaulted by a knife wielding assailant; and I shoot him... That I escalated the situation. Because the assailant only had a knife... Yeah... Your argument is that retarded.

 

[ABikerSailor]

What evidence that the victims were liberal?

Well... They attacked a person exercising speech they didn't agree with, for one... No need to go on after that...

They told the dude that was using hate speech on those two women to knock it off, and then he turned around and stabbed them.

Hate speech and free speech are 2 different things.

 

[Vastator]

What evidence that the victims were liberal?

Well... They attacked a person exercising speech they didn't agree with, for one... No need to go on after that...

They told the dude that was using hate speech on those two women to knock it off, and then he turned around and stabbed them.

Hate speech and free speech are 2 different things.

No. They aren't. End of story.

 

[WEATHER53]

What evidence that the victims were liberal?

Well... They attacked a person exercising speech they didn't agree with, for one... No need to go on after that...

They told the dude that was using hate speech on those two women to knock it off, and then he turned around and stabbed them.

Hate speech and free speech are 2 different things.

They physically accosted him
Bad choice to show off for the girls

 

[DigitalDrifter]

this scum was spewing racists shit towards some Muslim girls on a Portland bus . When some bystanders defended the girls he want on a stabbing spree.

How is this not terrorsim? And can we stop with this false narratives that it's the liberals who are violent ?

Redirect Notice

Meche, 23, and Ricky John Best, 53, were killed Friday as they tried to stop Jeremy Joseph Christian from harassing Hudson’s 16-year-old daughter, Destinee Mangum, and her friend, authorities have said. The friend was wearing a hijab. Christian’s social media postings indicate an affinity for Nazis and political violence.

Good god, another thread on this ? Didn't it occur to you that there was probably multiple threads already out there on this ?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Another duplicate thread?

I wonder if this thread will be closed?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Depending on the topic, and the political leanings, some get very upset about multiple threads --especially if their world view is challenged.

 

[pinqy]

Escalation of violence (pulling a weapon on an unarmed person) nullifies a self-defense claim.

No it does not! The original attacker armed or not remains the attacker. No laws says you lose your right of self defense because you are armed. Try again!

2015 ORS 161.219¹
Limitations on use of deadly physical force in defense of a person
Notwithstanding the provisions of ORS 161.209 (Use of physical force in defense of a person), a person is not justified in using deadly physical force upon another person unless the person reasonably believes that the other person is:

(1)Committing or attempting to commit a felony involving the use or threatened imminent use of physical force against a person; or

(2)Committing or attempting to commit a burglary in a dwelling; or

(3)Using or about to use unlawful deadly physical force against a person. [1971 c.743 §23]

Hmm so if the other person isn't using deadly force, and you're not preventing a crime, you are not justified in using deadly force,

 

[pinqy]

The guy was assaulted by a couple snowflakes, while exercising his constitutionally protected right to free speech.

Except he was committing the crime of harassment. 2015 ORS 166.065¹
Harassment

Then the two pussy snowflakes end up assuming room temperature... An unsustainable environment for a snowflake...

Escalation of violence (pulling a weapon on an unarmed person) nullifies a self-defense claim.

Horse shit! Not to mention there were two of them. That's like saying, "if I have a gun, and am assaulted by a knife wielding assailant; and I shoot him... That I escalated the situation. Because the assailant only had a knife... Yeah... Your argument is that retarded.

A knife is deadly force, so pulling a gun is fine in that case. But using deadly force when the other person isn't and no crime is being prevented is not legitimate self defense

 

[DarkFury]

Escalation of violence (pulling a weapon on an unarmed person) nullifies a self-defense claim.

No it does not! The original attacker armed or not remains the attacker. No laws says you lose your right of self defense because you are armed. Try again!

2015 ORS 161.219¹
Limitations on use of deadly physical force in defense of a person
Notwithstanding the provisions of ORS 161.209 (Use of physical force in defense of a person), a person is not justified in using deadly physical force upon another person unless the person reasonably believes that the other person is:

(1)Committing or attempting to commit a felony involving the use or threatened imminent use of physical force against a person; or

(2)Committing or attempting to commit a burglary in a dwelling; or

(3)Using or about to use unlawful deadly physical force against a person. [1971 c.743 §23]

Hmm so if the other person isn't using deadly force, and you're not preventing a crime, you are not justified in using deadly force,

You better look again. It was 3 on 1.

 

[pinqy]

Escalation of violence (pulling a weapon on an unarmed person) nullifies a self-defense claim.

No it does not! The original attacker armed or not remains the attacker. No laws says you lose your right of self defense because you are armed. Try again!

2015 ORS 161.219¹
Limitations on use of deadly physical force in defense of a person
Notwithstanding the provisions of ORS 161.209 (Use of physical force in defense of a person), a person is not justified in using deadly physical force upon another person unless the person reasonably believes that the other person is:

(1)Committing or attempting to commit a felony involving the use or threatened imminent use of physical force against a person; or

(2)Committing or attempting to commit a burglary in a dwelling; or

(3)Using or about to use unlawful deadly physical force against a person. [1971 c.743 §23]

Hmm so if the other person isn't using deadly force, and you're not preventing a crime, you are not justified in using deadly force,

You better look again. It was 3 on 1.

Could you point out where the law states that there's an exception for 3 on 1? I didn't think you could.

 

[DarkFury]

Escalation of violence (pulling a weapon on an unarmed person) nullifies a self-defense claim.

No it does not! The original attacker armed or not remains the attacker. No laws says you lose your right of self defense because you are armed. Try again!

2015 ORS 161.219¹
Limitations on use of deadly physical force in defense of a person
Notwithstanding the provisions of ORS 161.209 (Use of physical force in defense of a person), a person is not justified in using deadly physical force upon another person unless the person reasonably believes that the other person is:

(1)Committing or attempting to commit a felony involving the use or threatened imminent use of physical force against a person; or

(2)Committing or attempting to commit a burglary in a dwelling; or

(3)Using or about to use unlawful deadly physical force against a person. [1971 c.743 §23]

Hmm so if the other person isn't using deadly force, and you're not preventing a crime, you are not justified in using deadly force,

You better look again. It was 3 on 1.

Could you point out where the law states that there's an exception for 3 on 1? I didn't think you could.

3 on 1 qualifys as a mob attack. Do your own fuckin leg work noob. I'm not here to school I'm just here to point out how full of shit you are.

 

[Dale Smith]

Jeremy Christian was a passionate supporter of Bernie Sanders and also Jill Stein according to his facebook posts........OOOPS!!!!!