Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He attacked cops? He broke into the capitol?He did as much or more than others who got arrested and jailed.
Frankly, I don't think they or Epps should have been or should be arrested however the discrepancy is glaring. Why wasn't Epps subjected to the same punishment?
It was about to occur. The NEXT DAY!! Epps was inciting a riot. That's what you guys called Jan6. Pretty convenient to make up your own charges.Not eminent. Imminent.
And imminent is time based. A statement made the day before, with several meals and a good night's sleep between between statement and action?
There's nothing imminent about that. A prosecutor would be laughed out of court if they tried.
No one has been charged with 'encouraging lawless obstruction'.
There's no such crime. Which might explain why no one was charged with it.
He incited a riot according to what D.C. called Jan 6th and was never arrested.He attacked cops? He broke into the capitol?
Do you have any evidence of this?
What crime would you charge him with? Do you have evidence that he obstructed an official proceeding?
If so, show us.
It was about to occur. The NEXT DAY!! Epps was inciting a riot. That's what you guys called Jan6. Pretty convenient to make up your own charges.
Leftists playing games with terminology to cover for the FBI OPERATIVE Ray Epps.Tucker Carlson, the bow-tied mouthpiece for the Republican Party, has been hit with a formal demand for an on-air apology after he falsely claimed that Ray Epps, a man who was seen on video encouraging people to enter the Capitol on January 6, was an FBI agent.
Epps' lawyer, John Pierce, sent Carlson a letter demanding that he retract his false statements and apologize to Epps. Pierce said that Carlson's claims have caused Epps to be harassed and threatened, and that they have damaged his reputation.
Carlson has not yet responded to Pierce's letter. The article also states that Epps has denied being an FBI agent, and that the FBI has said that he was not an agent.
Carlson's claims about Epps are false and defamatory. He should retract them and apologize to Epps, but he won't because he's a lying, sniveling, cowardly little worm who would rather spread lies and hate than admit when he's wrong.
Arresting people for protesting on fake charges is also pseudo-legal gibberish.He attacked cops? He broke into the capitol?
Do you have any evidence of this?
What crime would you charge him with? Do you have evidence that he obstructed an official proceeding?
If so, show us. Remember, 'encouraging lawless obstruction' is meaningless pseudo-legal gibberish.
He incited a riot according to what D.C. called Jan 6th and was never arrested.
Nope, he did not. Good luck with that, Leo.He incited a riot according to what D.C. called Jan 6th and was never arrested.
Well it seems that I remember or I think I've seen a video with the the guy in question talking and/or directing people in the video clip that was aired, but I can't remember now upon exactly when I saw it, where and/or who aired it. Memory fading fast these days. lolAt 4:20 in the video, Tucker Carlson says that Ray Epps told people to go into the capitol.
But the video he's showing is silent. Tucker Carlson is speaking over it.
Show us the video where on 1/6....Ray Epps told anyone to go into the capitol. Not Tucker Carlson speaking for Ray Epps. But Ray Epps saying it.
You don't know your own conspiracy, Ram. There is no such video. You've been duped again.
Arresting people for protesting on fake charges is also pseudo-legal gibberish.
'immediate' is only one qualifier in the definition of imminent. Better to use the word 'emergent' if you want to insinuate something happening now.A day later isn't imminent. No prosecutor would try to charge anyone with incitement for claims they made the day before. They'd be laughed out of court. Incitement is an immediate thing. Not something separated by a good night's sleep.
Tell me, how many people were charged with incitement for J6.
Round to the nearly 100. The nearest 10.
Well it seems that I remember or I think I've seen a video with the the guy in question talking and/or directing people in the video clip that was aired, but I can't remember now upon exactly when I saw it, where and/or who aired it. Memory fading fast these days. lol
Hmmmmm, now did the opposing team destroy it maybe, and therefore wipe it clean like Hillary was accused of with the bleach bit event or with the 30,000 wipe of her email's and such ??
If so, then why would the left want to protect this one supposedly red state believing/conservative guy like they are doing ??
Trump never incited a riot neither, but you all won't apply the same apologetic behavior in regards to Trump. Why ???Says who? Certainly not the law. And did Ray Epps call for anyone to riot, ever? For any acts of violence?
Of course not.
And how many people were charged with incitement for J6.
Round up.
'immediate' is only one qualifier in the definition of imminent. Better to use the word 'emergent' if you want to insinuate something happening now.
Trump never incited a riot neither, but you all won't apply the same apologetic behavior in regards to Trump. Why ???
I bet someone will find that video again, and possibly post it here. Would you then apologize for being wrong ??The opposing team destroyed......your imagination?
If 'evidence' exists no where but your memory, then maybe your memory isn't terribly reliable.
He will be, despite Beagle's outrage.Has Trump been charged with incitement?
I bet someone will find that video again, and possibly post it here. Would you then apologize for being wrong ??
He better not be, because he didn't incite nothing but the leftist maybe, otherwise getting them to double down on their TDS big time.Has Trump been charged with incitement?
He will be, despite Beagle's outrage.
