Reading Is A Revolutionary Act

Of course...

you miss the big picture, but you're a weirdo idiot anyway


You are a moron who is illiterate in many ways.

how about this linguistic gem: F()k off?


If you wanted this thread to be about your personal religious bigotry, you should have made that clear in the OP. That way, reasonable people could have just avoided you and your insecurities.


Unke enters a thread and as usual , it devolves.....


Says the bigot trolling its own thread...
trolling my own thread? precious


Hey Weirdo!!!


Stop humping my leg. I'm getting a Charlie Horse
 
I think to some it is.
Me, and my sons, all read before 5, because there were newspapers in the house twice a day.

Just sort of absorbed it, I guess.


That's great, but really has nothing to do with the neurolinguistics involved.

I think all human read, it is just what they read.

A bushman would be literate in signs and such, a form of reading.

But listen, if I knew how to TEACH reading to the ones having so much trouble I could be a billionaire.

Thing is, you bring a kid into the world, don't talk to it, treat it like shit, then send it off to school, it probably won't learn to read or do much more of anything else.
 
I think to some it is.
Me, and my sons, all read before 5, because there were newspapers in the house twice a day.

Just sort of absorbed it, I guess.


That's great, but really has nothing to do with the neurolinguistics involved.

I think all human read, it is just what they read.

A bushman would be literate in signs and such, a form of reading......


Did YOU read the link I posted?
 
I think to some it is.
Me, and my sons, all read before 5, because there were newspapers in the house twice a day.

Just sort of absorbed it, I guess.


That's great, but really has nothing to do with the neurolinguistics involved.

I think all human read, it is just what they read.

A bushman would be literate in signs and such, a form of reading......


Did YOU read the link I posted?
I must confess I did not.

Tell the truth, I don't trust links too much.

Which issue of PT?

I'll read the hard copy at my GFs.
 
I think to some it is.
Me, and my sons, all read before 5, because there were newspapers in the house twice a day.

Just sort of absorbed it, I guess.


That's great, but really has nothing to do with the neurolinguistics involved.

I think all human read, it is just what they read.

A bushman would be literate in signs and such, a form of reading......


Did YOU read the link I posted?

go away you hijacker!!!

:lol:
 
I think to some it is.
Me, and my sons, all read before 5, because there were newspapers in the house twice a day.

Just sort of absorbed it, I guess.


That's great, but really has nothing to do with the neurolinguistics involved.

I think all human read, it is just what they read.

A bushman would be literate in signs and such, a form of reading......


Did YOU read the link I posted?
I must confess I did not.

Tell the truth, I don't trust links too much.

Which issue of PT?

I'll read the hard copy at my GFs.

be very careful of somebody as nasty as Unke
 
I think to some it is.
Me, and my sons, all read before 5, because there were newspapers in the house twice a day.

Just sort of absorbed it, I guess.


That's great, but really has nothing to do with the neurolinguistics involved.

I think all human read, it is just what they read.

A bushman would be literate in signs and such, a form of reading......


Did YOU read the link I posted?
I must confess I did not.....


You should. It's an interesting read, and I can point you to more info on the topic if you want.
 
yes it is


That is why the education wing of the democrat party does such a poor job of teaching it in public schools....can't have their subjects learning the truth.....
 

Forum List

Back
Top