Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,073
- 1,130
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Record 93 million Americans not working
- Thread starter Freewill
- Start date
uh... the mere fact of a growing population (anywhere) means there will be more people not working as time goes on, which will be a record.
As well as people working...
People who live in states with an A in the name...
People with wrist injuries...
Etc etc etc
As well as people working...
People who live in states with an A in the name...
People with wrist injuries...
Etc etc etc
Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,073
- 1,130
- Thread starter
- #3
uh... the mere fact of a growing population (anywhere) means there will be more people not working as time goes on, which will be a record.
As well as people working...
People who live in states with an A in the name...
People with wrist injuries...
Etc etc etc
What effect on those not working do you think immigration has on the situation?
g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 125,215
- 68,917
- 2,605
What Pogo said.
Headlines like yours work for people who are innumerate. Intelligent people, though, don't fall for that shit.
The 14 year plunge of the LFPR which began long before the current Administration has been halted for the past 12 months.
591,000 jobs have been added this year, so far.
U1 through U6 have all declined in the past year.
This is all GOOD news. I know how much it pains you party-before-country idiots that people are getting jobs and unemployment is going down, but try not to be such assholes about it.
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
- 2,255
- Banned
- #6
uh... the mere fact of a growing population (anywhere) means there will be more people not working as time goes on, which will be a record.
As well as people working...
People who live in states with an A in the name...
People with wrist injuries...
Etc etc etc
What effect on those not working do you think immigration has on the situation?
Doubling up on one CNS inanity with another?
JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
- 2,165
- Banned
- #7
Record 93 million Americans not working tells us just how good our economy has recovered.
- With all the baby boomers retiring,
- the folks who want to moving to part time because they are no longer tied to 40 hour a week companies for their health care,
- more than 3 million job openings going begging because far righties won't retrain and stay on the dole, and
- unemployment headed toward 5%,
Last edited:
g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 125,215
- 68,917
- 2,605
Year One: 6 out of a total of 10 purple polka dotted people lose money.
Year Five: The purple polka dotted population has increased by 5, and 7 out of 15 purple polka dotted people lose money, and a retard posts "Record number of purple polka dotted people lost money!", and is actually gleeful about what he thinks is bad news.
Year Five: The purple polka dotted population has increased by 5, and 7 out of 15 purple polka dotted people lose money, and a retard posts "Record number of purple polka dotted people lost money!", and is actually gleeful about what he thinks is bad news.
Liminal
Gold Member
And just think, only 64 million of that number are receiving social security benefits.
g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 125,215
- 68,917
- 2,605
Which is probably a record number...And just think, only 64 million of that number are receiving social security benefits.
Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,073
- 1,130
- Thread starter
- #12
Usin
As always me being truthful what POGO said appears to be true:
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
What you said isn't really exactly right. The plunge occurred on Obama's watch and after two years of democrat rule. Maybe it was beyond his ability to stop it but that is not what you said. Would I say you are untruthful? No. I say you just know so much that isn't so.
What Pogo said.
Headlines like yours work for people who are innumerate. Intelligent people, though, don't fall for that shit.
The 14 year plunge of the LFPR which began long before the current Administration has been halted for the past 12 months.
591,000 jobs have been added this year, so far.
U1 through U6 have all declined in the past year.
This is all GOOD news. I know how much it pains you party-before-country idiots that people are getting jobs and unemployment is going down, but try not to be such assholes about it.
As always me being truthful what POGO said appears to be true:
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
What you said isn't really exactly right. The plunge occurred on Obama's watch and after two years of democrat rule. Maybe it was beyond his ability to stop it but that is not what you said. Would I say you are untruthful? No. I say you just know so much that isn't so.
Manonthestreet
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2014
- 35,242
- 23,761
- 1,945
Yes.....stacatiions are powering our economy to Obama Hts never to be seen again. These truly are the glory days
AceRothstein
Gold Member
- Sep 8, 2012
- 5,978
- 1,441
- 245
Convenient that you only went back 10 years instead of 15.Usin
What Pogo said.
Headlines like yours work for people who are innumerate. Intelligent people, though, don't fall for that shit.
The 14 year plunge of the LFPR which began long before the current Administration has been halted for the past 12 months.
591,000 jobs have been added this year, so far.
U1 through U6 have all declined in the past year.
This is all GOOD news. I know how much it pains you party-before-country idiots that people are getting jobs and unemployment is going down, but try not to be such assholes about it.
As always me being truthful what POGO said appears to be true:
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
What you said isn't really exactly right. The plunge occurred on Obama's watch and after two years of democrat rule. Maybe it was beyond his ability to stop it but that is not what you said. Would I say you are untruthful? No. I say you just know so much that isn't so.
Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,073
- 1,130
- Thread starter
- #15
And just think, only 64 million of that number are receiving social security benefits.
59 million total 41 million retirees. Benefits in current payment status
So you were not that far off. But read the following:
While studying employment, another important figure to determine is the labor force participation rate. Here, we compare the size of the labor force with the number of people that could potentially be a part of the labor force. It is important to note that we do not include people under the age of 16 in this figure. In addition, students, retirees, the disabled, homemakers, and the voluntarily idle are not counted in the labor force. The labor force as the percentage of the total population over the minimum working age is called labor force participation rate.
Labor Force Participation Rate = (Labor Force / Total Population over Age 16) * 100
EconPort - Defining the Labor Force
HenryBHough
Diamond Member
Imagine, the regime has liberated 93,000,000 from the burden of having to get off their ass and work!
This surely calls for a celebration with FREE cake!
This surely calls for a celebration with FREE cake!
Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,073
- 1,130
- Thread starter
- #17
Convenient that you only went back 10 years instead of 15.Usin
What Pogo said.
Headlines like yours work for people who are innumerate. Intelligent people, though, don't fall for that shit.
The 14 year plunge of the LFPR which began long before the current Administration has been halted for the past 12 months.
591,000 jobs have been added this year, so far.
U1 through U6 have all declined in the past year.
This is all GOOD news. I know how much it pains you party-before-country idiots that people are getting jobs and unemployment is going down, but try not to be such assholes about it.
As always me being truthful what POGO said appears to be true:
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
What you said isn't really exactly right. The plunge occurred on Obama's watch and after two years of democrat rule. Maybe it was beyond his ability to stop it but that is not what you said. Would I say you are untruthful? No. I say you just know so much that isn't so.
Are you guys unaware that you can do this yourself? Or is your point innuendo? So there was a drop after Clinton's recession, it wasn't a plunge by any means. Thanks be to GWB. Matter of fact look at the chart, it started dropping when? When the democrats took control of congress and ignored GWB.
hipeter924
Not a zombie yet
Heard on BBC radio that the latest unemployment data puts jobs created each month (excluding temporary agricultural work) down from 250,000 to 175,000 a month.
Liminal
Gold Member
And just think, only 64 million of that number are receiving social security benefits.
59 million total 41 million retirees. Benefits in current payment status
So you were not that far off. But read the following:
While studying employment, another important figure to determine is the labor force participation rate. Here, we compare the size of the labor force with the number of people that could potentially be a part of the labor force. It is important to note that we do not include people under the age of 16 in this figure. In addition, students, retirees, the disabled, homemakers, and the voluntarily idle are not counted in the labor force. The labor force as the percentage of the total population over the minimum working age is called labor force participation rate.
Labor Force Participation Rate = (Labor Force / Total Population over Age 16) * 100
EconPort - Defining the Labor Force
Your information is almost correct, but out of date.
Monthly Statistical Snapshot February 2015
Similar threads
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 145
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 116
- Replies
- 31
- Views
- 871
- Replies
- 37
- Views
- 1K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 43
- Views
- 295
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8472
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 481
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-