I did, and the Mueller report, the part that no one got to see, proved him wrong. DOJ releases a Mueller-era memo to Barr on the decision not to prosecute TrumpDid you listen to your own NPR link?... buuuuaahahahahahaha
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I did, and the Mueller report, the part that no one got to see, proved him wrong. DOJ releases a Mueller-era memo to Barr on the decision not to prosecute TrumpDid you listen to your own NPR link?... buuuuaahahahahahaha
What part and proved who wrong?....I did, and the Mueller report, the part that no one got to see, proved him wrong.
Why should they turn it over to you when they aren't finished?You’re a dope.
It is one thing to redact identifying information about confidential sources. It is another thing entirely to redact almost all of the substantive portions of a search warrant application. That is especially true in THIS matter.
I know you’re ignorant and wouldn’t understand the concept, but it’s absolutely still the truth that a (prospective) trial is not supposed to be an ambush. That why we have this thing called “discovery.” The prosecution is obliged, sooner or later, to turn over their documentation and alleged “evidence” to the accused.
That being so, in a case of this historic magnitude, there is actually no valid basis for secrecy of this absurd magnitude. And this is even more true considering who they are thinking about accusing. Unlike the Clinton Crime Family, there’s no reason to believe that the accused would ever have a witness “suicided.”
DOJ releases a Mueller-era memo to Barr on the decision not to prosecute Trump Pay attention.What part and proved who wrong?....
DOJ releases a Mueller-era memo to Barr on the decision not to prosecute Trump Pay attention.
![]()
The DOJ under Barr wrongly withheld parts of a Russia probe memo, a court rules
The Justice Department improperly withheld parts of an internal memo Attorney General William Barr cited in announcing that President Donald Trump had not obstructed justice, an appeals panel said.www.npr.org
Collude is not a crime. Conspiracy to collude is you dope.
A laugh? That's it? Dude, you failed bigley.What part and proved who wrong?....
From your own NPR link....DOJ releases a Mueller-era memo to Barr on the decision not to prosecute Trump Pay attention.
![]()
The DOJ under Barr wrongly withheld parts of a Russia probe memo, a court rules
The Justice Department improperly withheld parts of an internal memo Attorney General William Barr cited in announcing that President Donald Trump had not obstructed justice, an appeals panel said.www.npr.org
Hey you didn't make yourself clear... who were you talking about and what were you talking about... your post makes no sense as it was written...A laugh? That's it? Dude, you failed bigley.
Yes, Trump's lackey Bill Barr decided not to prosecute his boss and then he lied to the public and said the Mueller report exonerated Trump when, in fact, the report very specifically said it did NOT exonerate Trump and described at least three obstructions of justice on Trump's part.The Justice Department on Wednesday released a memo from 2019 laying out the case for not prosecuting former President Donald Trump
The report did exonerate Trump or Trump would be in prison dummy....Yes, Trump's lackey Bill Barr decided not to prosecute his boss and then he lied to the public and said the Mueller report exonerated Trump when, in fact, the report very specifically said it did NOT exonerate Trump and described at least three obstructions of justice on Trump's part.
No, it did not. You have obviously not read it.The report did exonerate Trump or Trump would be in prison dummy....
It’s obvious for people with an IQ. Obviously, that excludes you.Substantive portions? What does that even mean?
Look Sling Blade,
it's real simple.
Bullshit. This falls into neither.This investigation falls into one of two buckets. An investigation that protects material evidence and witnesses, or one that doesn't.
Wrong again, you retard. Some portions are kind of boilerplate crap where the applicant defines terms. Some portions are supposedly “background” even if not actually correct. .. or honest."Substantive portions" is just a criminals way of trying to get the investigators to give the store away.
What you are suggesting is ludicrous.
Fuck your self you cockroach. I’m probably older than you. Certainly smarter. That’s not hard though.Sonny boy,
To do “that!?” Your a dope.you ain't none too bright if you expected them to do that.
What “bait,” you shitlicker?The investigators didn't take that bait.
Trumps only defense now is the victimhood defense.
That's not going to fly either; Hallie Jackson Reports on MSNBC
It wasn’t the palace of Mueller to even talk about exoneration, you gullible retard.No, it did not. You have obviously not read it.
Mueller did not believe it was his role to prosecute Trump, only to document his actions.
Every time you rubes talk about the Mueller report, you reveal that not one of you have read the report. All you do is parrot what you have been told to parrot by your propagandists.
Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
Bill Barr lied. Trump also lied. He was not exonerated.
And you believe it!From the affidavit:
Of most significant concern was that highly classified records were unfoldered, intermixed with other records, and otherwise unproperly [sic] identified.
Lol. Turn it over because there’s no good reason not to. That’s for starters!Why should they turn it over to you when they aren't finished?
Simple fact, Trump and Barr claimed the report exonerated Trump.It wasn’t the palace of Mueller to even talk about exoneration, you gullible retard.
Damn! Boy, are you one fucking gullible shithead.![]()
No. They didn’t lie. In reality, of course, it did exonerate him. Yiubdolt.Simple fact, Trump and Barr claimed the report exonerated Trump.
They lied.
Idiot.
And if any of you tards actually read the report, you would know Trump obstructed the investigation.