Redacted Affadavit officially released

You’re a dope.

It is one thing to redact identifying information about confidential sources. It is another thing entirely to redact almost all of the substantive portions of a search warrant application. That is especially true in THIS matter.

I know you’re ignorant and wouldn’t understand the concept, but it’s absolutely still the truth that a (prospective) trial is not supposed to be an ambush. That why we have this thing called “discovery.” The prosecution is obliged, sooner or later, to turn over their documentation and alleged “evidence” to the accused.

That being so, in a case of this historic magnitude, there is actually no valid basis for secrecy of this absurd magnitude. And this is even more true considering who they are thinking about accusing. Unlike the Clinton Crime Family, there’s no reason to believe that the accused would ever have a witness “suicided.”
Why should they turn it over to you when they aren't finished?
 
As I previously indicated to you, Mar-a-Lago does not include a secure location authorized for the storage of classified information. As such, it appears that since the time classified documents were removed from the secure facilities at the White House and moved to Mar-a-Lago on or around January 20, 2021, they have not been handled in an appropriate manner or stored in an appropriate location. Accordingly, we ask that the room at Mar-a-Lago where the documents had been stored be secured and that all of the boxes that were moved from the White House to Mar-a-Lago (along with any other items in that room) be preserved in that room in their current condition until further notice.
 
What part and proved who wrong?....
DOJ releases a Mueller-era memo to Barr on the decision not to prosecute Trump Pay attention.


Collude is not a crime. Conspiracy to collude is you dope.
 
DOJ releases a Mueller-era memo to Barr on the decision not to prosecute Trump Pay attention.


Collude is not a crime. Conspiracy to collude is you dope.
What part and proved who wrong?....
A laugh? That's it? Dude, you failed bigley.
 
DOJ releases a Mueller-era memo to Barr on the decision not to prosecute Trump Pay attention.

From your own NPR link....
thanks....

They conclude that none of Trump's actions documented in the Mueller report — his firing of FBI Director James Comey; his directing the top White House lawyer to fire Mueller; his exhorting witnesses not to flip — should be viewed as obstruction

The Justice Department on Wednesday released a memo from 2019 laying out the case for not prosecuting former President Donald Trump
 
A laugh? That's it? Dude, you failed bigley.
Hey you didn't make yourself clear... who were you talking about and what were you talking about... your post makes no sense as it was written...
 
The Justice Department on Wednesday released a memo from 2019 laying out the case for not prosecuting former President Donald Trump
Yes, Trump's lackey Bill Barr decided not to prosecute his boss and then he lied to the public and said the Mueller report exonerated Trump when, in fact, the report very specifically said it did NOT exonerate Trump and described at least three obstructions of justice on Trump's part.
 
Yes, Trump's lackey Bill Barr decided not to prosecute his boss and then he lied to the public and said the Mueller report exonerated Trump when, in fact, the report very specifically said it did NOT exonerate Trump and described at least three obstructions of justice on Trump's part.
The report did exonerate Trump or Trump would be in prison dummy....
 
The report did exonerate Trump or Trump would be in prison dummy....
No, it did not. You have obviously not read it.

Mueller did not believe it was his role to prosecute Trump, only to document his actions.

Every time you rubes talk about the Mueller report, you reveal that not one of you have read the report. All you do is parrot what you have been told to parrot by your propagandists.


Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.


Bill Barr lied. Trump also lied. He was not exonerated.
 
Substantive portions? What does that even mean?
It’s obvious for people with an IQ. Obviously, that excludes you. 🤣🤪
Look Sling Blade,

You’ve now confused me for yourself. 😂🤣
it's real simple.

You are real simple. 😂🤣

This investigation falls into one of two buckets. An investigation that protects material evidence and witnesses, or one that doesn't.
Bullshit. This falls into neither. 😎
"Substantive portions" is just a criminals way of trying to get the investigators to give the store away.
Wrong again, you retard. Some portions are kind of boilerplate crap where the applicant defines terms. Some portions are supposedly “background” even if not actually correct. .. or honest.

But SOME portions of an affidavit for a search warrant affidavit supposedly set forth the alleged “factual basis” to justify the request. That’s the substantive part, you imbecile.
What you are suggesting is ludicrous.

You don’t even understand any of this. So how the duck would a retard like you know? 😂🤣
Sonny boy,
Fuck your self you cockroach. I’m probably older than you. Certainly smarter. That’s not hard though.
you ain't none too bright if you expected them to do that.
To do “that!?” Your a dope.
The investigators didn't take that bait.
What “bait,” you shitlicker?
Trumps only defense now is the victimhood defense.

Defense to what you scumsucking asswipe!? 😂🤣
That's not going to fly either; Hallie Jackson Reports on MSNBC
:cuckoo: Ms Jackson used to be kinda cute. But she was never smart. And you’re dumber than she is. 😂🤣😂
 
No, it did not. You have obviously not read it.

Mueller did not believe it was his role to prosecute Trump, only to document his actions.

Every time you rubes talk about the Mueller report, you reveal that not one of you have read the report. All you do is parrot what you have been told to parrot by your propagandists.


Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.


Bill Barr lied. Trump also lied. He was not exonerated.
It wasn’t the palace of Mueller to even talk about exoneration, you gullible retard.

Damn! Boy, are you one fucking gullible shithead. 😂🤣
 
Why should they turn it over to you when they aren't finished?
Lol. Turn it over because there’s no good reason not to. That’s for starters!

And for fairness

And for transparency on a monumental “case” such as this.

But go ahead. Cover your eyes. You stupid bitch. 😂
 
Why even bother releasing it if it's going to be filled with so much stuff that can't be released that you have to redact most of the document.
 
It wasn’t the palace of Mueller to even talk about exoneration, you gullible retard.

Damn! Boy, are you one fucking gullible shithead. 😂🤣
Simple fact, Trump and Barr claimed the report exonerated Trump.

They lied.

Idiot.

And if any of you tards actually read the report, you would know Trump obstructed the investigation.
 
28 pages into this thread and of course, deep in the weeds.

Trump took documents. So what. After what the corrupt and crooked FBI/DOJ put him through, he should have taken everything not nailed down, and I would not blame him. No one like me would blame him. Are you kidding? The corrupt and crooked Obama admin spied on him before he even took office. Are we forgetting all this while you all snip and snap about what was classified or not?

Are we forgetting that Hillary, SoS and NOT president, let all kinds of "top secret" docs fly around unsupervised and James Comey shrugged?

So this is a big So What for me. And none of your pearl clutching is going to change it. So go cry about it; I don't care.
 
Simple fact, Trump and Barr claimed the report exonerated Trump.

They lied.
No. They didn’t lie. In reality, of course, it did exonerate him. Yiubdolt.

Yes. You are an idiot.
And if any of you tards actually read the report, you would know Trump obstructed the investigation.

And if any of you scumbags libtards understood it, you’d realize you’re wrong. But your an asshole, so you don’t understand much of anything.

Sucks to be you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top