bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,330
- 2,180
I can find no credible proof that any ACORN activities illegally affected the outcome of any elections.
You couldn't find your own dick if you had both hands on it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can find no credible proof that any ACORN activities illegally affected the outcome of any elections.
Justice Department Report Shows Very Few Prosecutions For Illegally Casting Ballots. According to a report by the Public Integrity Section of the Justice Department, from October 2002 through September 2005, the Justice Department charged 95 people with "election fraud" and convicted 55. Among those, however, just 17 individuals were convicted for casting fraudulent ballots; cases against three other individuals accused of casting fraudulent votes were pending at the time of the report. In addition, the Justice Department convicted one election official of submitting fraudulent ballots and convicted five individuals of registration fraud, with cases against 12 individuals pending at the time of the report. Thirty-two individuals were convicted of other "election fraud" issues, including Republicans convicted of offenses arising from "a scheme to block the phone lines used by two Manchester [New Hampshire] organizations to arrange drives to the polls during the 2002 general election." In other words, many of these convictions were connected to voter suppression efforts, not voter fraud. Several other people listed in the report were convicted of vote-buying. [Department of Justice, accessed 4/7/11]
Although a sizable share of the population believes that vote fraud
commonly or occasionally occurs, there is little or no relationship between
beliefs about the frequency of fraud and electoral participation
(reported, validated, or intended). Nor does it appear to be the case
that universal voter identification requirements will raise levels of trust
in the electoral process. Such fears appear unaffected by stricter voter
ID laws, given that individuals asked to produce ID seem to have the
same beliefs about the frequency of fraud as those not asked for ID.
Voter registration scares the bejesus out of folks who basically HATE democracy.
The Employment Policies Institute is a crock of wingnut crap. Not exactly a reliable source.
I am so sick of this bull, I grew up dirt poor but my parents found a way to vote. This is just the left trying to get to think we hold them down but its not they hold their self down. What is the saying . If there is a will there is a way
Voter registration scares the bejesus out of folks who basically HATE democracy.
Allowing imbeciles like you to vote should scare any intelligent person.
Voter registration scares the bejesus out of folks who basically HATE democracy.
Allowing imbeciles like you to vote should scare any intelligent person.
Thanks Bri, you just proved my point.
Your "dirt poor" parents weren't required to provide photo ID at the polls. Republicans have been passing and trying to pass some of the most restrictive voter ID laws in our history.
I am so sick of this bull, I grew up dirt poor but my parents found a way to vote. This is just the left trying to get to think we hold them down but its not they hold their self down. What is the saying . If there is a will there is a way
We don't live in a Democracy. Its a Republic. Know why the Framers wanted it that way, besides the problems of time and distance? They wanted an intelligent voter. Yes, its true. Any learned person would know that we don't vote for President. We vote for electors. People who then vote for President. Guess what? In many cases they can vote for whoever they want, even though the people who voted for them picked someone else. The Electorial College is a safety against stupid voters.