Regret Your Vote Yet?

I think this thread is great.

There is concern that someone wasn't properly vetted in a recent presidential election and that someone is not named Palin.

The world is upside down.



"Ukraine: Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney were right about Russia
The Republicans have been warning us about Russia for years, and we've ignored them every time. They're the little boy who cried wolf. Except that it was a bear and, wouldn't ya know it, the damn thing was real.

First, Sarah Palin. In 2008, the Alaskan conservative warned that Putin was on the prowl. Quote: "After the Russian army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of moral indecision and equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next."

Wow. Mrs Palin not only got the country that Putin would threaten right, she also predicted the reason behind it. Obama's "indecision and equivalence" over Iran, Egypt and, most importantly, Syria, has probably encouraged Putin to believe that there would be next-to-no Western response to an attack on Ukraine."
Ukraine Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney were right about Russia 8211 Telegraph Blogs




Are you bright enough to regret your vote yet?

Let me ask you something, genius. Have you ever regretted one of your votes in a presidential election?





So......do I detect a round-about way of saying you regret support of the failure in the Oval Office?


C'mon.....say the words.....

Nope. I don't do round-about. He's clearly not a failure.

Now...answer the question please. Have you ever voted for a presidential candidate and ended up regretting your vote?



"He's clearly not a failure."

In which category of failure would you like me to prove otherwise...

...domestic policy or foreign policy?

Is it a disability of some kind? Are you going to answer the question?



1. So....we'll stipulate that you recognize that I can easily provide about a dozen specifics documenting Obama as a failure in each, domestic policy, and foreign policy.

a. Your continued support of such a failure can lead to only one conclusion about your.....limited abilities.


2. "Are you going to answer the question?"
Unlike myself, it appears that you have not engaged in a deep and thorough study of the works of William Shakespeare....

Has you done so, you would see that the superior in a conversation asks the questions....the less so is the one who answers.

Hamlet asks, Horatio answers.....


You recognize the name 'Hamlet'.....don't you?

You are my superior? Shit! When was someone going to clue me in on that little nugget?

Have you ever voted for a presidential candidate and then regretted your vote later on? I have. But it wasn't Obama.

Come on...........give a glimpse of your brilliance.
 
From your article...

Food-stamp use remains high, historically speaking. The share of Americans on the benefit—which lets them buy basics like cereal and meat and treats like cookies, but not tobacco, alcohol or pet food—is above the 8% to 11% that prevailed before the financial crisis.
NA-CC572A_FOODS_G_20140901183005.jpg

It's doubled under Obama, now it's dropped a fraction.....woopdie fucking doo
 
Was the OP really expecting someone to post

"dammit, you're right, I shouldn't have voted Obama?"

It's quite obvious that many people ,who are not lunatics on message boards ,regret their vote by the fact that a lower percentage of people approve of him than voted for him.
that doesn't necessarily mean that they would have preferred the alternative, or now believe they should have voted differently.
it just means that currently, they wish he were doing things differently.
 
From your article...

Food-stamp use remains high, historically speaking. The share of Americans on the benefit—which lets them buy basics like cereal and meat and treats like cookies, but not tobacco, alcohol or pet food—is above the 8% to 11% that prevailed before the financial crisis.
NA-CC572A_FOODS_G_20140901183005.jpg

It's doubled under Obama, now it's dropped a fraction.....woopdie fucking doo

What does the article....which you have just given credibility to.....say about the prospects for the future?
 
I think this thread is great.

There is concern that someone wasn't properly vetted in a recent presidential election and that someone is not named Palin.

The world is upside down.



"Ukraine: Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney were right about Russia
The Republicans have been warning us about Russia for years, and we've ignored them every time. They're the little boy who cried wolf. Except that it was a bear and, wouldn't ya know it, the damn thing was real.

First, Sarah Palin. In 2008, the Alaskan conservative warned that Putin was on the prowl. Quote: "After the Russian army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of moral indecision and equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next."

Wow. Mrs Palin not only got the country that Putin would threaten right, she also predicted the reason behind it. Obama's "indecision and equivalence" over Iran, Egypt and, most importantly, Syria, has probably encouraged Putin to believe that there would be next-to-no Western response to an attack on Ukraine."
Ukraine Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney were right about Russia 8211 Telegraph Blogs




Are you bright enough to regret your vote yet?

Let me ask you something, genius. Have you ever regretted one of your votes in a presidential election?





So......do I detect a round-about way of saying you regret support of the failure in the Oval Office?


C'mon.....say the words.....

Nope. I don't do round-about. He's clearly not a failure.

Now...answer the question please. Have you ever voted for a presidential candidate and ended up regretting your vote?



"He's clearly not a failure."

In which category of failure would you like me to prove otherwise...

...domestic policy or foreign policy?

Is it a disability of some kind? Are you going to answer the question?



1. So....we'll stipulate that you recognize that I can easily provide about a dozen specifics documenting Obama as a failure in each, domestic policy, and foreign policy.

a. Your continued support of such a failure can lead to only one conclusion about your.....limited abilities.


2. "Are you going to answer the question?"
Unlike myself, it appears that you have not engaged in a deep and thorough study of the works of William Shakespeare....

Has you done so, you would see that the superior in a conversation asks the questions....the less so is the one who answers.

Hamlet asks, Horatio answers.....


You recognize the name 'Hamlet'.....don't you?

You are my superior? Shit! When was someone going to clue me in on that little nugget?

Have you ever voted for a presidential candidate and then regretted your vote later on? I have. But it wasn't Obama.

Come on...........give a glimpse of your brilliance.




Sadly, I voted for Ross Perot, with the result that a rapist attained the highest office in the land.
 
What were the alternatives again?



Funny you should ask.

The alternative was a man of courage, a hero who shut down his business to help a colleague search for a missing child, a man with proven successful executive and business experience.
Just what the nation needed.....

Hard to believe any dolts voted for the windbag in the White House, huh?

Man, I guess I just didn't know McCain's history.

Of course that business experience would have been useless in government since they serve opposing interests.
Just what we'd need - an even wider DC revolving door.

So as always --- lesser of two evils. Gotta love "choice". Gotta love the illusion anyway, since that's as close as we ever get.



"Man, I guess I just didn't know McCain's history. "

So...you thought it was McCain running in '12?

Or was the last two years one of those 'lost weekends'?

Well, you weren't specific, and you did say:

Barack Obama wasn't vetted.

The media didn't do it's job.

(Apparently neither did the English teachers.)
So when you say "vetted" you speak of an investigation of the unknown, which would mean 2008. Which I'm pretty sure was John McCain and Jo Anne Worley.

But extra points for comedy here:

The unfolding of events since his election have proven the truth of the warnings that the rightwing gave early on.

Remember this warning?
"The Oval Office is no place for on the job training!"

You have a point; the media didn't do it is job [sic] making the point that Mittens with all of four years in a governor's mansion would have been the fourth most inexperiecned POTUS ever, for what that's worth. Having it both ways: Priceless.

But hey, at least they told us "Jeep was moving to China". Shouldn't be a total loss. :thup:

That would give Romney four years more executive experience in government than the beginner in the White House.


Uh ----nnnno, it would give him eight years less. Calculate much?



I also suggest that Romney was the CEO of a large company for a lot of years and the E in CEO stands for Executive.

-- which again, is commercial business -- which again operates in an opposite dynamic from government.
By definition, government serves its citizens, while commerce serves itself. If anything at the expense of those citizens.

Just what we need eh?
 
From your article...

Food-stamp use remains high, historically speaking. The share of Americans on the benefit—which lets them buy basics like cereal and meat and treats like cookies, but not tobacco, alcohol or pet food—is above the 8% to 11% that prevailed before the financial crisis.
NA-CC572A_FOODS_G_20140901183005.jpg

It's doubled under Obama, now it's dropped a fraction.....woopdie fucking doo

What does the article....which you have just given credibility to.....say about the prospects for the future?

The article believes it will come down. But the future is uncertain. Government projections are notoriously inaccurate.

What we have right now is 46 million Americans on food stamps. Therefore the "Food Stamp POTUS" is an accurate moniker....
 
I think this thread is great.

There is concern that someone wasn't properly vetted in a recent presidential election and that someone is not named Palin.

The world is upside down.



"Ukraine: Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney were right about Russia
The Republicans have been warning us about Russia for years, and we've ignored them every time. They're the little boy who cried wolf. Except that it was a bear and, wouldn't ya know it, the damn thing was real.

First, Sarah Palin. In 2008, the Alaskan conservative warned that Putin was on the prowl. Quote: "After the Russian army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of moral indecision and equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next."

Wow. Mrs Palin not only got the country that Putin would threaten right, she also predicted the reason behind it. Obama's "indecision and equivalence" over Iran, Egypt and, most importantly, Syria, has probably encouraged Putin to believe that there would be next-to-no Western response to an attack on Ukraine."
Ukraine Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney were right about Russia 8211 Telegraph Blogs




Are you bright enough to regret your vote yet?

Let me ask you something, genius. Have you ever regretted one of your votes in a presidential election?





So......do I detect a round-about way of saying you regret support of the failure in the Oval Office?


C'mon.....say the words.....

Nope. I don't do round-about. He's clearly not a failure.

Now...answer the question please. Have you ever voted for a presidential candidate and ended up regretting your vote?



"He's clearly not a failure."

In which category of failure would you like me to prove otherwise...

...domestic policy or foreign policy?

Is it a disability of some kind? Are you going to answer the question?



1. So....we'll stipulate that you recognize that I can easily provide about a dozen specifics documenting Obama as a failure in each, domestic policy, and foreign policy.

a. Your continued support of such a failure can lead to only one conclusion about your.....limited abilities.


2. "Are you going to answer the question?"
Unlike myself, it appears that you have not engaged in a deep and thorough study of the works of William Shakespeare....

Has you done so, you would see that the superior in a conversation asks the questions....the less so is the one who answers.

Hamlet asks, Horatio answers.....


You recognize the name 'Hamlet'.....don't you?

You are my superior? Shit! When was someone going to clue me in on that little nugget?

Have you ever voted for a presidential candidate and then regretted your vote later on? I have. But it wasn't Obama.

Come on...........give a glimpse of your brilliance.




Sadly, I voted for Ross Perot, with the result that a rapist attained the highest office in the land.[/QUOTE

WTF!.........I thought you were my superior and were not going to answer. Are you schizophrenic?

What a great thread! You rock.
 
From your article...

Food-stamp use remains high, historically speaking. The share of Americans on the benefit—which lets them buy basics like cereal and meat and treats like cookies, but not tobacco, alcohol or pet food—is above the 8% to 11% that prevailed before the financial crisis.
NA-CC572A_FOODS_G_20140901183005.jpg

It's doubled under Obama, now it's dropped a fraction.....woopdie fucking doo

What does the article....which you have just given credibility to.....say about the prospects for the future?

The article believes it will come down. But the future is uncertain. Government projections are notoriously inaccurate.

What we have right now is 46 million Americans in food stamps. Therefore the "Food Stamp POTUS" is an accurate moniker....

If the rise in participation was his doing.....you'd have a fucking point.
 
What were the alternatives again?



Funny you should ask.

The alternative was a man of courage, a hero who shut down his business to help a colleague search for a missing child, a man with proven successful executive and business experience.
Just what the nation needed.....

Hard to believe any dolts voted for the windbag in the White House, huh?

Man, I guess I just didn't know McCain's history.

Of course that business experience would have been useless in government since they serve opposing interests.
Just what we'd need - an even wider DC revolving door.

So as always --- lesser of two evils. Gotta love "choice". Gotta love the illusion anyway, since that's as close as we ever get.
She confused you with the mention of "hero" I think. She made Mitt a hero for something or another.



Certainly I will help educate you!

"A number of readers recently have asked us to fact-check a story about Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. The story, currently circulating on email, Facebook, and blogs, says that Romney helped a colleague of his at Bain Capital locate his missing teenage daughter.

...her distraught father had no idea where she was. Romney took immediate action. He closed down the entire firm and asked all 30 partners and employees to fly to New York to help find Gay’s daughter. Romney set up a command center at the LaGuardia Marriott and hired a private detective firm to assist with the search. He established a toll-free number for tips, coordinating the effort with the NYPD, and went through his Rolodex and called everyone Bain did business with in New York and asked them to help find his friend’s missing daughter. Romney’s accountants at Price Waterhouse Cooper put up posters on street poles, while cashiers at a pharmacy owned by Bain put fliers in the bag of every shopper. Romney and the other Bain employees scoured every part of New York and talked with everyone they could – prostitutes, drug addicts – anyone.

.... we can verify the facts of the episode. In fact, we did so when this story came up during the 2008 presidential election season."
Viral Internet story says Mitt Romney helped locate missing teen daughter of Bain Capital partner PolitiFact

How does this make a person hero? You think because an obscenely rich business owner did the decent thing and closed his business for a day or two so fellow employees could help find the missing child of their fellow employee makes the owner a hero?



I'm thrilled to inform you that you have moved up to the front of the pack, those striving for the vaunted "Most Obtuse Post of the Year" award.

The judges will have to determine if you actually speak English before the winner is chosen.

Ironic from a poster flummoxed by the three-letter word its...
 
I think this thread is great.

There is concern that someone wasn't properly vetted in a recent presidential election and that someone is not named Palin.

The world is upside down.
Sarah Palin has been more right about policies than Obama.

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeee! What you have just done is akin to raising your hand when the MC asks...."Who here is an idiot?!"
 
From your article...

Food-stamp use remains high, historically speaking. The share of Americans on the benefit—which lets them buy basics like cereal and meat and treats like cookies, but not tobacco, alcohol or pet food—is above the 8% to 11% that prevailed before the financial crisis.
NA-CC572A_FOODS_G_20140901183005.jpg

It's doubled under Obama, now it's dropped a fraction.....woopdie fucking doo

What does the article....which you have just given credibility to.....say about the prospects for the future?

The article believes it will come down. But the future is uncertain. Government projections are notoriously inaccurate.

What we have right now is 46 million Americans in food stamps. Therefore the "Food Stamp POTUS" is an accurate moniker....

If the rise in participation was his doing.....you'd have a fucking point.

 
From your article...

Food-stamp use remains high, historically speaking. The share of Americans on the benefit—which lets them buy basics like cereal and meat and treats like cookies, but not tobacco, alcohol or pet food—is above the 8% to 11% that prevailed before the financial crisis.
NA-CC572A_FOODS_G_20140901183005.jpg

It's doubled under Obama, now it's dropped a fraction.....woopdie fucking doo

What does the article....which you have just given credibility to.....say about the prospects for the future?

The article believes it will come down. But the future is uncertain. Government projections are notoriously inaccurate.

What we have right now is 46 million Americans in food stamps. Therefore the "Food Stamp POTUS" is an accurate moniker....

If the rise in participation was his doing.....you'd have a fucking point.



Post #40 indicates that the rise was due to exactly that: his policies.

So.....Zander wins.
 
I think this thread is great.

There is concern that someone wasn't properly vetted in a recent presidential election and that someone is not named Palin.

The world is upside down.
Sarah Palin has been more right about policies than Obama.

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeee! What you have just done is akin to raising your hand when the MC asks...."Who here is an idiot?!"
She was right about Russia, that's for sure.

Here's what I think about Sarah Palin: Half of the opposition to her is pure and simple sexism. She's very attractive.

The other half is snobbism. She's from a small town and went to less distinguished institutions of higher learning.

If Sarah Palin was a man with an Ivy League degree and from an urban area, you'd elect her (she'd be him then).

Regardless of ability or experience.

Like you did Obama.

Of course, she has more ability and directly related experience than he did.

Not to mention, with 6 years on the job, he hasn't shown the ability to learn from his experience.
 
I think this thread is great.

There is concern that someone wasn't properly vetted in a recent presidential election and that someone is not named Palin.

The world is upside down.
Sarah Palin has been more right about policies than Obama.

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeee! What you have just done is akin to raising your hand when the MC asks...."Who here is an idiot?!"




As shown in post #24, AmericanGirl is correct....and, with metronomic regularity.....you fail.
 
I think this thread is great.

There is concern that someone wasn't properly vetted in a recent presidential election and that someone is not named Palin.

The world is upside down.
Sarah Palin has been more right about policies than Obama.

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeee! What you have just done is akin to raising your hand when the MC asks...."Who here is an idiot?!"
She was right about Russia, that's for sure.

Here's what I think about Sarah Palin: Half of the opposition to her is pure and simple sexism. She's very attractive.

The other half is snobbism. She's from a small town and went to less distinguished institutions of higher learning.

If Sarah Palin was a man with an Ivy League degree and from an urban area, you'd elect her (she'd be him then).

Regardless of ability or experience.

Like you did Obama.

Of course, she has more ability and directly related experience than he did.

Not to mention, with 6 years on the job, he hasn't shown the ability to learn from his experience.

She isn't attractive. I'm from a small town. I went to a lesser known college. Can you fail more.

You think she's got what it takes to be in a position of authority. That makes you an idiot. Just own it.
 
I think this thread is great.

There is concern that someone wasn't properly vetted in a recent presidential election and that someone is not named Palin.

The world is upside down.
Sarah Palin has been more right about policies than Obama.

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeee! What you have just done is akin to raising your hand when the MC asks...."Who here is an idiot?!"




As shown in post #24, AmericanGirl is correct....and, with metronomic regularity.....you fail.
so... it isn't that people are meeting the old standards, it's that standards have been relaxed.
do you have a problem with the relaxed standards?
 

Forum List

Back
Top