Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Favoring a side…lol. They did more than that.
Victoria Nuland selected the corrupt Ukrainian politician who replaced Yanukovych in 2014,
Lol. Get informed.What did they do? In your words, please,
Inform me then. What is not true in here:Lol. Get informed.
Why did Ukraine’s Euromaidan protests begin?
In late November 2013, Ukrainians took to the streets in peaceful protest after then-president Viktor Yanukovych chose not to sign an agreement that would have integrated the country more closely with the European Union.As the protests in Kyiv’s Independence Square, or Maidan, continued into 2014, the government began cracking down on the demonstrators. The size of the protests only grew in reaction and turned into what was termed “the revolution of dignity.” Those who remained on the Maidan risked assault, kidnapping, unlawful arrest, and loss of their jobs. On January 16, the government introduced a series of repressive laws severely restricting civil society and the right to protest. On January 22, the first protesters were killed in clashes in Kyiv; in all, over 100 mostly civilian protesters died, the majority on February 20 and 21.On February 22, after President Yanukovych had fled the country, parliament voted to oust him and hold new elections. On May 25, Ukrainians elected Petro Poroshenko as president. After October elections, a new pro-reform coalition government came into power in December 2014.
What were the Euromaidan protests about
The protests were more than a demand for closer EU relations; they were a rejection of injustice as a way of life and of the post-Soviet politics of corruption and nepotism. Ukrainians took to the streets to denounce the country’s endemic corruption, from the grand corruption practiced by ex-president Yanukovych and his peers, to everyday corruption and petty unfairness—like the need to bribe a teacher to get better classroom conditions for your children, a doctor to get an appointment, or the traffic police to avoid unlawful fines.Civil society activists and NGOs played an important role in organizing this early protest movement. Ukraine’s independent media—including Ukrainska Pravda, Nashi Groshi (Our Money), and Slidstvo.info—were also pivotal in exposing the corruption that eventually brought people onto the streets in November 2013.The brutal government crackdown that followed these initial protests galvanized Maidan supporters and encouraged more to join. This momentum, further propelled by the killings of February 20 and 21, led to the removal of ex-president Yanukovych from power.
What happened in Crimea and how has it affected people living there?
On February 27 and 28, pro-Russian gunmen seized key buildings in Crimea and took control of the Crimean Peninsula, which has an ethnic Russian majority. On March 16, in a disputed referendum that Ukraine and the West deemed illegal, a section of the Crimean population chose to secede from Ukraine. On March 18, Russian and Crimean leaders signed a deal in Moscow to join the region to Russia.Following Russia’s annexation of Crimea, many people from the Ukrainian community and Crimean Tatar minority community, fearing repression, fled the region. Those who stayed behind have faced persecution. Other vulnerable groups have also suffered; for instance, methadone treatment for former drug users is not allowed under Russian law and was stopped after the annexation—an estimated 100 people have died in Crimea as a result.
Your mind is starved for facts @georgephillip . Your head is so far up Putin’s fascist ass it gets no oxygen or sunlight. You are so far left you wen full circle to the Trump fascist right.A 5-Minute Guide to Understanding Ukraine’s Euromaidan Protests
Amid ongoing conflict, Ukraine’s civil society is working hard to enable reforms; support independent, accurate reporting; and help thousands of displaced people.www.opensocietyfoundations.org
When Putin annexed Crimea he took a million pro-Moscow voters out of Ukraine. He could not control a Ukrainian election ever again. What we see today - military invasion and genocide is the result on how Putin intended to take all of Ukraine all along., He built the bridge tin Crimea for his tanks not for tourists
How does that justify Putin deposing the duly elected Zelenski government in 2022 by brute military force and genocide of 45 million people who want Zelinski and the democracy and freedom to choose him.Victoria Nuland selected the corrupt Ukrainian politician who replaced Yanukovych in 2014
Those three should be charged. Along with Obama. All are war criminals.gipper and georgephillip can you tell us why Blair Bush and Putin all are here should not be indicted as war criminals?
I lack the patience to educate the ignorant. You’ll have to do it yourself.Inform me then. What is not true in here:
Why do you agree with georgephillip that Putin is justified and not committing genocide and accuse me of ignorance?Have you failed to understand my posts?
If so why?Putin would not be in Ukraine today if the US had not trained and armed Ukrainian Nazis over the past 7 years
Obama opposed the idea of regime change in Iraq before Bush lied to us and did it. How do you blame Obama for that?Those three should be charged. Along with Obama. All are war criminals.
Lol. Are you so clueless that you don’t know O’s warmongering record?Obama opposed the idea of regime change in Iraq before Bush lied to us and did it. How do you blame Obama for that?
No I remember him making them start paying their share. Maybe that is what makes you a Leftist not seeing reality no matter how hard it bitch slaps you across the face.What a clusterfuck our response to this invasion would be if Putin's BFF was still in Washington. The world breathes a sigh of relief, along with educated and sensible Americans.
BRUSSELS — The Dutch are sending rocket launchers for air defense. The Estonians are sending Javelin antitank missiles. The Poles and the Latvians are sending Stinger surface-to-air missiles. The Czechs are sending machine guns, sniper rifles, pistols and ammunition.
Even formerly neutral countries like Sweden and Finland are sending weapons. And Germany, long allergic to sending weapons into conflict zones, is sending Stingers as well as other shoulder-launched rockets.
In all, about 20 countries — most members of NATO and the European Union, but not all — are funneling arms into Ukraine to fight off Russian invaders and arm an insurgency, if the war comes to that.
At the same time, NATO is moving military equipment and as many as 22,000 more troops into member states bordering Russia and Belarus, to reassure them and enhance deterrence.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine has brought European countries together as never before, minds concentrated by the larger threat to European security presented by the Russia of President Vladimir V. Putin.
“European security and defense has evolved more in the last six days than in the last two decades,” Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Union’s executive arm, asserted in a speech to the European Parliament on Tuesday. Brussels has moved to “Europeanize” the efforts of member states to aid Ukraine with weapons and money and put down a marker for the bloc as a significant military actor.
But whether European weaponry will continue to reach the Ukrainian battlefield in time to make a difference is far from certain. However proud Brussels is of its effort, it is a strategy that risks encouraging a wider war and possible retaliation from Mr. Putin. The rush of lethal military aid into Ukraine from Poland, a member of NATO, aims, after all, to kill Russian soldiers.
Mr. Putin already sees NATO as committed to threaten or even destroy Russia through its support for Ukraine, as he has repeated in his recent speeches, even as he has raised the nuclear alert of his own forces to warn Europe and the United States of the risks of interference.
NATO Countries Pour Weapons Into Ukraine, Risking Conflict With Russia (Published 2022)
Brussels is proud to be providing military aid, but Moscow may see it as a dangerous intervention.www.nytimes.com
I lack the patience to educate the ignorant. You’ll have to do it yourself.
Lol. Are you so clueless that you don’t know O’s warmongering record?
Yeah that makes war acceptable. You aren’t educated at all.OBAMA started no war ever against a non-existent threat or outside United Nations Resolutions. ONLY Bush Blair and Putin have “started” a preemptive war to depose a non-threat regime on a specific date when their military crossed an internationally recognized border on two specific dates. March 19 2003 and now February 24 2022.
O took W’s two wars
Is no war acceptable?Yeah that makes war acceptable.
War is always unacceptable, but you’ll never get it.Is no war acceptable?
Heil Hitler, Heil Putin. I see where you’re coming from now. There will always be peace if we did not resist tyranny. Lay down and take it for the sake of peace I get you nowWar is always unacceptable, but you’ll never get it.
"Biden shakes hands with Ukrainian fascist leader, Oleh Yaroslavovych Tyahnybok, in Kiev, Ukraine, April 22, 2014
