Reminder: the economy does better under democrat presidents

"Crypto billionaire Bankman-Fried donated $100 million of stolen customer funds to U.S. politicians.
Today, the U.S. government announced it is dropping 6 charges and will not prosecute him for violating political campaign finance rules"

All the stinking capitalism in one news story
Not capitalism. CRONY CAPITALISM. Short for fascism..
 
Why would I need to calculate that?

Well, if you want to claim the recession ended because Obama spent billions in stimulus,
knowing the number of billions would be useful evidence.

See once again you and I are in this dynamic where I am the only one presenting specific facts.

You presented a claim, "Economists widely credit his stimulus package as being the main driver of the recession reversing."

You didn't present any facts.
You’re just making up your own bullshit rules on the spot. There were major boosts to those programs which in turn majorly boosted consumer spending. Either way, The package cost 787 billion altogether. It’s safe to assume billions were spent in that 4 month time frame. We both know that if gave you the exact figure, your knee jerk childish reaction would be “that wouldnt be enough!” It’s good thing for me you are not an economist.

I very clearly presented facts. I listed the programs that got the boosts which created consumer spending. I also specified when the law was passed. You meanwhile are completely unable to present your own information to counter mine.
 
Not capitalism. CRONY CAPITALISM. Short for fascism..
The web is full of wailing from members of the True Capitalism sect: "Give us back proper capitalism! Stop killing us!"
Fools. Your dolce vita was driven by the recovery from 2MW and then the looting of the socialist system in the 90s. End of the movie, please go to the bioreactor. Capitalism stands and has stood on death and plunder.
 
You’re just making up your own bullshit rules on the spot. There were major boosts to those programs which in turn majorly boosted consumer spending. Either way, The package cost 787 billion altogether. It’s safe to assume billions were spent in that 4 month time frame. We both know that if gave you the exact figure, your knee jerk childish reaction would be “that wouldnt be enough!” It’s good thing for me you are not an economist.

I very clearly presented facts. I listed the programs that got the boosts which created consumer spending. I also specified when the law was passed. You meanwhile are completely unable to present your own information to counter mine.

There were major boosts to those programs which in turn majorly boosted consumer spending.

And there was major waste. Now if you want to claim the money spent before June
was enough to end the recession, you should post actual numbers.

It’s safe to assume billions were spent in that 4 month time frame.

Probably a few billion.

We both know that if gave you the exact figure, your knee jerk childish reaction would be “that wouldn't be enough!”

If you posted the exact figure, we could calculate the actual impact.
 
The web is full of wailing from members of the True Capitalism sect: "Give us back proper capitalism! Stop killing us!"
Fools. Your dolce vita was driven by the recovery from 2MW and then the looting of the socialist system in the 90s. End of the movie, please go to the bioreactor. Capitalism stands and has stood on death and plunder.

How was Putin's shitty economy this year?
 
There were major boosts to those programs which in turn majorly boosted consumer spending.

And there was major waste. Now if you want to claim the money spent before June
was enough to end the recession, you should post actual numbers.

It’s safe to assume billions were spent in that 4 month time frame.

Probably a few billion.

We both know that if gave you the exact figure, your knee jerk childish reaction would be “that wouldn't be enough!”

If you posted the exact figure, we could calculate the actual impact.
Again it would be waste of time if I did because regardless of what that number is, you will claim it wouldn’t be enough. We both know that is the truth.

Face it Todd: you got nothing. You’ve done nothing to move the needle in this conversation. Nothing you say is the least bit compelling :dunno:

Get back to me when you can be a grown up and find your own specific information to counter mine, k pumpkin?
 
Again it would be waste of time if I did because regardless of what that number is, you will claim it wouldn’t be enough. We both know that is the truth.

Face it Todd: you got nothing. You’ve done nothing to move the needle in this conversation. Nothing you say is the least bit compelling :dunno:

Get back to me when you can be a grown up and find your own specific information to counter mine, k pumpkin?

Again it would be waste of time if I did because regardless of what that number is, you will claim it wouldn’t be enough.

Truthfully, it wasn't enough to end the recession.

Face it Todd: you got nothing.

You've posted nothing. No facts, just claims.
 
Again it would be waste of time if I did because regardless of what that number is, you will claim it wouldn’t be enough.

Truthfully, it wasn't enough to end the recession.

Face it Todd: you got nothing.

You've posted nothing. No facts, just claims.
Nah we both know those are facts. Hell either way you have not presented any of your own “claims”.
 
You’re just making up your own bullshit rules on the spot. There were major boosts to those programs which in turn majorly boosted consumer spending. Either way, The package cost 787 billion altogether. It’s safe to assume billions were spent in that 4 month time frame. We both know that if gave you the exact figure, your knee jerk childish reaction would be “that wouldnt be enough!” It’s good thing for me you are not an economist.

I very clearly presented facts. I listed the programs that got the boosts which created consumer spending. I also specified when the law was passed. You meanwhile are completely unable to present your own information to counter mine.
Well why haven’t you presented those links? You know, facts
 
Last edited:
Oh gee what convenient logic to adopt. Never mind that it is still better under democrat presidents on average. You can’t cherry pick shit you like and ignore the rest.
/——-/Stop voting democRAT.
 
/——-/Stop voting democRAT.

lol oh the horror!!! A black guy doesn’t want to vote democrat!! I’m so confused!!! My head is going to explode!!!

lol you people are so comical. As if I give a shit some black guy doesn’t like democrats.

Can I tell you what really bothers me about shit like this though? Okay so you make it clear you hate democrats. Trust me I get it. I have total clarity on that. Here’s the issue though: none of you idiots ever explain why you vote Republican instead. Never. You can never defend the GOP on any intellectual level. All you can do is reiterate your hate for democrats. That’s all you’re good for. Explain to me right now WHY I should vote Republican instead and leave democrats out of your answer. Go ahead. I’ll wait.
 

Forum List

Back
Top