Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah. That’s not what worked for you guys. You bitched and moaned till the ignorant independents who sometimes fall for the republican message actually bought into trump university or when we stupidly elected bush twice. If we did. He may have stole Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004.Still haven't learned anything from those arrogant Obama days have you?He was right. Trump has exploded the debt with his unnecessary tax breaks.
Don’t forget obama handed trump the keys and said careful drive slow. Trump didn’t listen. He’s gone bankrupt many times so will we. It’s the downside to supply side economics. Big booms and big busts. And shady as fuck
.You're in the back seat now and if you don't shut the he'll up we'll turn this car around and leave you at home!
Are we to assume, you?Who else hates lesbians?
Will Trump pay for his legal support? The killers boss a lesbian said this creature hated her made her cry Who else hates lesbians?Report: Pittsburgh Shooter Named – is Nazi Robert Bowers – Hates Donald Trump, Says Trump Controlled by Jews
Police are responding to an active shooting situation at the The Tree of Life Synagogue in Squirrel Hill in Pittsburgh.
There are reports of MULTIPLE FATALITIES!
A man reportedly walked into the synagogue and opened fire during a Saturday service.
FOX News reported the shooter went to the third floor of the synagogue. Several worshippers were rescued from the lower floors.
RT reported: The shooter was reportedly wearing a green jacket, a blue shirt, and blue jeans. The radio chatter has cited his date of birth as September 4, 1972.
There are reports the shooter is a Nazi named Robert Bowers.
He hates President Trump and believes Trump is controlled by the Jews
Report: Pittsburgh Shooter Named - is Nazi Robert Bowers - Hates Donald Trump, Says Trump Controlled by Jews
Figure this needs its own thread since it is not being covered anywhere else.
Death you know the answer Man up for onceAre we to assume, you?Who else hates lesbians?
Are we to assume, you?Who else hates lesbians?
Government is ultimately the referee. Think of the nfl. The poor are passing out peanuts in the stands for peanuts. We are players playing with/against the corporations. The corporations now own the teams and the league. And they they tell the politicians or referees how to decide.What about the Grand Canyon? You must want the federal government to sell it off to the highest bidder right? Yes or noI realize it’s not needed but npr is a benefit to society. Corporations can’t control npr. If you don’t see a problem with the rich owning and controlling all the media then that explains why you’re a conservative.You don't see the difference between local municipalities paying taxes to provide water and....NPR? The basic necessities of life and a bunch of windbags talking on the radio???
I mean I don't intend to be overly harsh but....this explains why you're a liberal. It's just mind-numbing to me.
So the feds should sell off the Grand Canyon to a corporation? I mean it’s not “necessary”
You are a liberal. You think the State should own just about everything, I get this. This could go on all day.
You could not see the difference between WATER and NPR. I mean for the love of Pete.
I don't particularly care either way. It could be privately owned; the gov't can keep nat'l parks. But certainly that is not in their Constitutionally outlined powers.
Why do you insist on an answer, so you can be appalled? I already know how you think: gov't should own everything. I get it.
Rigged
We don't know what your hatred of lesbians has to do with this thread topic. Did eddy get lost?Death you know the answer Man up for onceAre we to assume, you?Who else hates lesbians?
think we were speaking of hate and who are the real haters in this country, and who brings it on If the hat fits ,,,wear itAre we to assume, you?Who else hates lesbians?
How did we randomly get to lesbians in this thread?
This is crazy....lol
`You're talking AT me, you didn't ASK me what I knew about NPR.
So much easier to hate half you own nation's population when you put them in nice neat little boxes like you do, isn't it? I'm just showing you what you're like....do you realize this is what you do? You said really vicious things this morning about "Trump Supporters". Do you intend to be this person you are?
Were you born Edwina? Or are you just lashing out as a tard "man"?think we were speaking of hate and who are the real haters in this country, and who brings it on If the hat fits ,,,wear it
No I’m not a socialist. But I did experience what made America great. You won’t like it. It was unions.Government is ultimately the referee. Think of the nfl. The poor are passing out peanuts in the stands for peanuts. We are players playing with/against the corporations. The corporations now own the teams and the league. And they they tell the politicians or referees how to decide.What about the Grand Canyon? You must want the federal government to sell it off to the highest bidder right? Yes or noI realize it’s not needed but npr is a benefit to society. Corporations can’t control npr. If you don’t see a problem with the rich owning and controlling all the media then that explains why you’re a conservative.
So the feds should sell off the Grand Canyon to a corporation? I mean it’s not “necessary”
You are a liberal. You think the State should own just about everything, I get this. This could go on all day.
You could not see the difference between WATER and NPR. I mean for the love of Pete.
I don't particularly care either way. It could be privately owned; the gov't can keep nat'l parks. But certainly that is not in their Constitutionally outlined powers.
Why do you insist on an answer, so you can be appalled? I already know how you think: gov't should own everything. I get it.
Rigged
Yes. In capitalism some people will make vast sums of money and some will not. It still offers the most freedom to the most people and has lifted vast quantities of the world out of poverty.
Please do not tell me you're an actual Socialist. If you are, and are in MI, you must live in Ann Arbor. Gack
Brooklyn NY the place where Trump had a bridge to sell youWere you born Edwina? Or are you just lashing out as a tard "man"?think we were speaking of hate and who are the real haters in this country, and who brings it on If the hat fits ,,,wear it
`You're talking AT me, you didn't ASK me what I knew about NPR.
So much easier to hate half you own nation's population when you put them in nice neat little boxes like you do, isn't it? I'm just showing you what you're like....do you realize this is what you do? You said really vicious things this morning about "Trump Supporters". Do you intend to be this person you are?
I've tried talking to you...an utter waste of time. While "generalizing" is not an accurate metric to employ when describing groups (and a logical fallacy), this place is far from an academic bastion of facts and logic. Those whom feel most guilty or are inherently prone to feel self-victimized by such hasty generalizations seem to over-react the most to them and use hyperbolic language to describe their hurt. Not my problem. Next time, if you're going to denigrate something like public radio, at least show you have some working knowledge of it.
No I’m not a socialist. But I did experience what made America great. You won’t like it. It was unions.Government is ultimately the referee. Think of the nfl. The poor are passing out peanuts in the stands for peanuts. We are players playing with/against the corporations. The corporations now own the teams and the league. And they they tell the politicians or referees how to decide.What about the Grand Canyon? You must want the federal government to sell it off to the highest bidder right? Yes or noYou are a liberal. You think the State should own just about everything, I get this. This could go on all day.
You could not see the difference between WATER and NPR. I mean for the love of Pete.
I don't particularly care either way. It could be privately owned; the gov't can keep nat'l parks. But certainly that is not in their Constitutionally outlined powers.
Why do you insist on an answer, so you can be appalled? I already know how you think: gov't should own everything. I get it.
Rigged
Yes. In capitalism some people will make vast sums of money and some will not. It still offers the most freedom to the most people and has lifted vast quantities of the world out of poverty.
Please do not tell me you're an actual Socialist. If you are, and are in MI, you must live in Ann Arbor. Gack
But then bush sr created nafta and that was the beginning of the end for unions. Clinton put worker protections in nafta but bush 2 removed them.
Unions and the new deal created the middle class the world had never seen before. Do you think free market capitalism created the middle class? It didn’t. Labor laws, unemployment insurance, social security, none of these things were created by capitalism but they are what created the middle class that existed till about Reagan.
Who got all those great pensions for teachers$$??[/QUOTE]No I’m not a socialist. But I did experience what made America great. You won’t like it. It was unions.Government is ultimately the referee. Think of the nfl. The poor are passing out peanuts in the stands for peanuts. We are players playing with/against the corporations. The corporations now own the teams and the league. And they they tell the politicians or referees how to decide.What about the Grand Canyon? You must want the federal government to sell it off to the highest bidder right? Yes or no
I don't particularly care either way. It could be privately owned; the gov't can keep nat'l parks. But certainly that is not in their Constitutionally outlined powers.
Why do you insist on an answer, so you can be appalled? I already know how you think: gov't should own everything. I get it.
Rigged
Yes. In capitalism some people will make vast sums of money and some will not. It still offers the most freedom to the most people and has lifted vast quantities of the world out of poverty.
Please do not tell me you're an actual Socialist. If you are, and are in MI, you must live in Ann Arbor. Gack
But then bush sr created nafta and that was the beginning of the end for unions. Clinton put worker protections in nafta but bush 2 removed them.
Unions and the new deal created the middle class the world had never seen before. Do you think free market capitalism created the middle class? It didn’t. Labor laws, unemployment insurance, social security, none of these things were created by capitalism but they are what created the middle class that existed till about Reagan.
Oh listen, no doubt--in the Industrial Revolution there was a time that corporations needed reining in. Long work days, horrible pay, terrible conditions. That is precisely WHY gov't oversight is important. However. The pendulum swings, doesn't it? For a while the balance was just right and, yes, the middle class was born and was thriving. And then the unions got too powerful, too demanding and INSANELY too political, in the case of my profession (teaching). At my husband's old workplace, he was not allowed to empty his small trash can. It was detailed as a "union job". Even if it was full to overflowing.
That's what happened then--the unions became ridiculous, they just did. Some balance was necessary.
You didn't show one shred of "facts and logic" in that screed. You lumped all conservatives together and told me what I think. Then when I call you on it, you want to hide behind your usual wall of "facts vs opinions".Was it fact or opinion, what you said about Trump supporters this morning? I mean you just posted, "Conservatives and their predisposition toward violence." Fact or opinion?And then there was this: "Trump and his followers represent the very essence of hate". Fact or opinion?I'm a Trump follower, in that I voted for him and generally support his policies. Do I represent the "Very essence of hate"? Present your FACTS to support that. Since you love facts so much.
Who got all those great pensions for teachers$$??[/QUOTE]No I’m not a socialist. But I did experience what made America great. You won’t like it. It was unions.Government is ultimately the referee. Think of the nfl. The poor are passing out peanuts in the stands for peanuts. We are players playing with/against the corporations. The corporations now own the teams and the league. And they they tell the politicians or referees how to decide.What about the Grand Canyon? You must want the federal government to sell it off to the highest bidder right? Yes or no
I don't particularly care either way. It could be privately owned; the gov't can keep nat'l parks. But certainly that is not in their Constitutionally outlined powers.
Why do you insist on an answer, so you can be appalled? I already know how you think: gov't should own everything. I get it.
Rigged
Yes. In capitalism some people will make vast sums of money and some will not. It still offers the most freedom to the most people and has lifted vast quantities of the world out of poverty.
Please do not tell me you're an actual Socialist. If you are, and are in MI, you must live in Ann Arbor. Gack
But then bush sr created nafta and that was the beginning of the end for unions. Clinton put worker protections in nafta but bush 2 removed them.
Unions and the new deal created the middle class the world had never seen before. Do you think free market capitalism created the middle class? It didn’t. Labor laws, unemployment insurance, social security, none of these things were created by capitalism but they are what created the middle class that existed till about Reagan.
Oh listen, no doubt--in the Industrial Revolution there was a time that corporations needed reining in. Long work days, horrible pay, terrible conditions. That is precisely WHY gov't oversight is important. However. The pendulum swings, doesn't it? For a while the balance was just right and, yes, the middle class was born and was thriving. And then the unions got too powerful, too demanding and INSANELY too political, in the case of my profession (teaching). At my husband's old workplace, he was not allowed to empty his small trash can. It was detailed as a "union job". Even if it was full to overflowing.
That's what happened then--the unions became ridiculous, they just did. Some balance was necessary.
Na, not reallyGetting along is way overrated...Cheesy and weak.
Poor short stack…
Civilization and democracy depends on it.
Who got all those great pensions for teachers$$??No I’m not a socialist. But I did experience what made America great. You won’t like it. It was unions.Government is ultimately the referee. Think of the nfl. The poor are passing out peanuts in the stands for peanuts. We are players playing with/against the corporations. The corporations now own the teams and the league. And they they tell the politicians or referees how to decide.I don't particularly care either way. It could be privately owned; the gov't can keep nat'l parks. But certainly that is not in their Constitutionally outlined powers.
Why do you insist on an answer, so you can be appalled? I already know how you think: gov't should own everything. I get it.
Rigged
Yes. In capitalism some people will make vast sums of money and some will not. It still offers the most freedom to the most people and has lifted vast quantities of the world out of poverty.
Please do not tell me you're an actual Socialist. If you are, and are in MI, you must live in Ann Arbor. Gack
But then bush sr created nafta and that was the beginning of the end for unions. Clinton put worker protections in nafta but bush 2 removed them.
Unions and the new deal created the middle class the world had never seen before. Do you think free market capitalism created the middle class? It didn’t. Labor laws, unemployment insurance, social security, none of these things were created by capitalism but they are what created the middle class that existed till about Reagan.
Oh listen, no doubt--in the Industrial Revolution there was a time that corporations needed reining in. Long work days, horrible pay, terrible conditions. That is precisely WHY gov't oversight is important. However. The pendulum swings, doesn't it? For a while the balance was just right and, yes, the middle class was born and was thriving. And then the unions got too powerful, too demanding and INSANELY too political, in the case of my profession (teaching). At my husband's old workplace, he was not allowed to empty his small trash can. It was detailed as a "union job". Even if it was full to overflowing.
That's what happened then--the unions became ridiculous, they just did. Some balance was necessary.
[/QUOTE]
