Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Regardless of the current minimum wage, if automation can replace your job....it will
Republican platform: Keep wages low or else Robots will replace you
I see the usual leftist fanatics are trying to fool people once again into believing their lies about Republicans.
You people really need some new material. Don't you get tired of reciting the same old tripe without end?
The question here is simple.
What's more important to you? A religious adherence to and obedience of the 'free market', or,
the good of the nation?
meanwhile President is shutting down coal mining and working on shutting down fracking....jobs that actually pay a
" living wage"
The question here is simple.
What's more important to you? A religious adherence to and obedience of the 'free market', or,
the good of the nation?
Bottom line
WTF does health have to do with anything?Republican platform: Keep wages low or else Robots will replace you
Straw man much?
Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
----------------------------------
I wouldnt neccesarily call Health a strawman
That tells me that the minimum wage needs to rise.
And that tells me a portion of the above will be fired and replaced by robots or other low skilled processes as the economics of the situation for the majority of small businesses, mom and pop restaurants for example WON"T be able to keep these low skilled workers.
Deflect much?This is their argument made by Health and others. As if Robots and Automation will only be used IF wages go up.
Their stance is literally dont want or request more money because more money will hurt you. Then, like RandallFlagg, they defend Walmart and McD's paying low wages AND oppose welfare. The low wages paid sends people to welfare via their Employee hotline!
But thats ok...They dont support higher wages which will get more people off of welfare but want the right to complain about the results of paying shit wages
The conservacons are always trying to convince that they are the same as the republicans that fought slavery. Yeah right. If that were true, why do they defend wage slavery and jeer at occupied wall streeters.
The question here is simple.
What's more important to you? A religious adherence to and obedience of the 'free market', or,
the good of the nation?
The question here is simple.
What's more important to you? A religious adherence to and obedience of the 'free market', or,
the good of the nation?
Bottom line
The question here is simple.
What's more important to you? A religious adherence to and obedience of the 'free market', or,
the good of the nation?
Bottom line
How is that nation better off by companies adopting uncompetitive business practices, eventually going out of business? If we took that to the logical conclusion we would be building cars with hammers and anvils.
The question here is simple.
What's more important to you? A religious adherence to and obedience of the 'free market', or,
the good of the nation?
Bottom line
What is the primary function of a business?
Their stance is literally dont want or request more money because more money will hurt you. Then, like RandallFlagg, they defend Walmart and McD's paying low wages AND oppose welfare. The low wages paid sends people to welfare via their Employee hotline!
But thats ok...They dont support higher wages which will get more people off of welfare but want the right to complain about the results of paying shit wages
Regardless of the current minimum wage, if automation can replace your job....it will
That bell cannot be unrung.Bottom line
How is that nation better off by companies adopting uncompetitive business practices, eventually going out of business? If we took that to the logical conclusion we would be building cars with hammers and anvils.
No, all you have to do is apply our standards of labor compensation, working conditions, etc., to any foreign country that wants to import to the US,
and if their goods aren't being produced at acceptable levels comparable to ours, you slap a tariff on their goods that makes up the difference.
I will not respond to a deflection.Bottom line
What is the primary function of a business?
What is the primary function of a government established to protect the general welfare of the People?
What if business, in performing its 'primary function' is doing detriment to the general welfare?
I will not respond to a deflection.What is the primary function of a business?
What is the primary function of a government established to protect the general welfare of the People?
What if business, in performing its 'primary function' is doing detriment to the general welfare?
Answer my very simple question. That is the only acceptable response.
Once more. What is the primary function of a business?
That bell cannot be unrung.How is that nation better off by companies adopting uncompetitive business practices, eventually going out of business? If we took that to the logical conclusion we would be building cars with hammers and anvils.
No, all you have to do is apply our standards of labor compensation, working conditions, etc., to any foreign country that wants to import to the US,
and if their goods aren't being produced at acceptable levels comparable to ours, you slap a tariff on their goods that makes up the difference.
Would you be in support of a closed market?
That for example all autos imported be saddled with tariffs?
And would you be happy with paying $70,000 for a new car?
Genius, trade wars are pointless. Nobody wins.
Protectionism is impossible for this country. Consumers would never stand for it.
The question here is simple.
What's more important to you? A religious adherence to and obedience of the 'free market', or,
the good of the nation?
Bottom line
What is the primary function of a business?
What is the primary function of a government established to protect the general welfare of the People?
What if business, in performing its 'primary function' is doing detriment to the general welfare?
