Republicans Are Extremely Fearful of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[danielpalos]

only the Rich are Worth it under Capitalism for the Right Wing.

You're not worth a penny you receive in handouts. It's a waste of a cent.

are the Poor really just, Worthless to the Right Wing under Capitalism?

No, just those of you that refuse to do for yourself. You have no value because you've chosen to provide no worth.

Only the Rich have Worth, under Capitalism for the Right Wing?

You have no worth because you expect others to take care of you. You provide nothing of value to society, therefore, you have nothing worth taking care of.

Why complain about the cost of social services or any fraud to obtain them, if a Bible proclaims only one in a thousand is Good, under Capitalism.

 

[Conservative65]

You're not worth a penny you receive in handouts. It's a waste of a cent.

are the Poor really just, Worthless to the Right Wing under Capitalism?

No, just those of you that refuse to do for yourself. You have no value because you've chosen to provide no worth.

Only the Rich have Worth, under Capitalism for the Right Wing?

You have no worth because you expect others to take care of you. You provide nothing of value to society, therefore, you have nothing worth taking care of.

Fifteen thousand "just lost their worth" under Capitalism. We have Government to automatically stabilize Capitalism's boom and bust cycles.

That's not the government's responsibility. I

If you refuse to provide for yourself what you should be providing, you're worthless.

 

[Conservative65]

You're not worth a penny you receive in handouts. It's a waste of a cent.

are the Poor really just, Worthless to the Right Wing under Capitalism?

No, just those of you that refuse to do for yourself. You have no value because you've chosen to provide no worth.

Only the Rich have Worth, under Capitalism for the Right Wing?

You have no worth because you expect others to take care of you. You provide nothing of value to society, therefore, you have nothing worth taking care of.

Why complain about the cost of social services or any fraud to obtain them, if a Bible proclaims only one in a thousand is Good, under Capitalism.

The teachings of the Bible don't advocate government funded social programs. It does advocate those not working not eating.

 

[danielpalos]

are the Poor really just, Worthless to the Right Wing under Capitalism?

No, just those of you that refuse to do for yourself. You have no value because you've chosen to provide no worth.

Only the Rich have Worth, under Capitalism for the Right Wing?

You have no worth because you expect others to take care of you. You provide nothing of value to society, therefore, you have nothing worth taking care of.

Fifteen thousand "just lost their worth" under Capitalism. We have Government to automatically stabilize Capitalism's boom and bust cycles.

That's not the government's responsibility. I

If you refuse to provide for yourself what you should be providing, you're worthless.

Yes, it is a government obligation. our welfare clause is General not Common.

your subjective value of morals is of no concern to me, because we have a First Amendment.

Economic infrastructure is a Government responsibility not a private sector responsibility.

 

[danielpalos]

are the Poor really just, Worthless to the Right Wing under Capitalism?

No, just those of you that refuse to do for yourself. You have no value because you've chosen to provide no worth.

Only the Rich have Worth, under Capitalism for the Right Wing?

You have no worth because you expect others to take care of you. You provide nothing of value to society, therefore, you have nothing worth taking care of.

Why complain about the cost of social services or any fraud to obtain them, if a Bible proclaims only one in a thousand is Good, under Capitalism.

The teachings of the Bible don't advocate government funded social programs. It does advocate those not working not eating.

in the First World, we can provide manna from the public sector more consistently than from God.

True socialism requires social morals for free.

 

[Conservative65]

No, just those of you that refuse to do for yourself. You have no value because you've chosen to provide no worth.

Only the Rich have Worth, under Capitalism for the Right Wing?

You have no worth because you expect others to take care of you. You provide nothing of value to society, therefore, you have nothing worth taking care of.

Why complain about the cost of social services or any fraud to obtain them, if a Bible proclaims only one in a thousand is Good, under Capitalism.

The teachings of the Bible don't advocate government funded social programs. It does advocate those not working not eating.

in the First World, we can provide manna from the public sector more consistently than from God.

True socialism requires social morals for free.

There are no morals under socialism. Begging isn't moral. It's a lack of morals.

 

[danielpalos]

Only the Rich have Worth, under Capitalism for the Right Wing?

You have no worth because you expect others to take care of you. You provide nothing of value to society, therefore, you have nothing worth taking care of.

Why complain about the cost of social services or any fraud to obtain them, if a Bible proclaims only one in a thousand is Good, under Capitalism.

The teachings of the Bible don't advocate government funded social programs. It does advocate those not working not eating.

in the First World, we can provide manna from the public sector more consistently than from God.

True socialism requires social morals for free.

There are no morals under socialism. Begging isn't moral. It's a lack of morals.

it merely requires social morals for free to achieve a Commune of Heaven on Earth.

 

[Conservative65]

You have no worth because you expect others to take care of you. You provide nothing of value to society, therefore, you have nothing worth taking care of.

Why complain about the cost of social services or any fraud to obtain them, if a Bible proclaims only one in a thousand is Good, under Capitalism.

The teachings of the Bible don't advocate government funded social programs. It does advocate those not working not eating.

in the First World, we can provide manna from the public sector more consistently than from God.

True socialism requires social morals for free.

There are no morals under socialism. Begging isn't moral. It's a lack of morals.

it merely requires social morals for free to achieve a Commune of Heaven on Earth.

No morals with socialism.

 

[danielpalos]

Why complain about the cost of social services or any fraud to obtain them, if a Bible proclaims only one in a thousand is Good, under Capitalism.

The teachings of the Bible don't advocate government funded social programs. It does advocate those not working not eating.

in the First World, we can provide manna from the public sector more consistently than from God.

True socialism requires social morals for free.

There are no morals under socialism. Begging isn't moral. It's a lack of morals.

it merely requires social morals for free to achieve a Commune of Heaven on Earth.

No morals with socialism.

unlike market friendly morals with capitalism?

 

[Conservative65]

The teachings of the Bible don't advocate government funded social programs. It does advocate those not working not eating.

in the First World, we can provide manna from the public sector more consistently than from God.

True socialism requires social morals for free.

There are no morals under socialism. Begging isn't moral. It's a lack of morals.

it merely requires social morals for free to achieve a Commune of Heaven on Earth.

No morals with socialism.

unlike market friendly morals with capitalism?

Nothing immoral about capitalism. It rewards those that strive to be better unlike socialism which rewards those that refuse to try.

 

[danielpalos]

in the First World, we can provide manna from the public sector more consistently than from God.

True socialism requires social morals for free.

There are no morals under socialism. Begging isn't moral. It's a lack of morals.

it merely requires social morals for free to achieve a Commune of Heaven on Earth.

No morals with socialism.

unlike market friendly morals with capitalism?

Nothing immoral about capitalism. It rewards those that strive to be better unlike socialism which rewards those that refuse to try.

the right wing fantasy of special pleading?

 

[The Purge]

 

[The Purge]

 

[hadit]

You have no worth because you expect others to take care of you. You provide nothing of value to society, therefore, you have nothing worth taking care of.

Why complain about the cost of social services or any fraud to obtain them, if a Bible proclaims only one in a thousand is Good, under Capitalism.

The teachings of the Bible don't advocate government funded social programs. It does advocate those not working not eating.

in the First World, we can provide manna from the public sector more consistently than from God.

True socialism requires social morals for free.

There are no morals under socialism. Begging isn't moral. It's a lack of morals.

it merely requires social morals for free to achieve a Commune of Heaven on Earth.

And that's why it falls every single time it's tried. The amoral refuse to do their part, instead expecting to be supported as they sit in Mom's basement smoking pot instead of working.

Man is not naturally moral. Capitalism recognizes that and utilizes it so all benefit. Socialism tries to pretend it doesn't exist, and fails.

 

[The Purge]

"As an Arab Communist Muslim Marcher; I am a shoe-in for Community Organizer in AOC's staff!

 

[danielpalos]

...i'll be your peanut butter if you want to be my jelly.

 

[danielpalos]

Why complain about the cost of social services or any fraud to obtain them, if a Bible proclaims only one in a thousand is Good, under Capitalism.

The teachings of the Bible don't advocate government funded social programs. It does advocate those not working not eating.

in the First World, we can provide manna from the public sector more consistently than from God.

True socialism requires social morals for free.

There are no morals under socialism. Begging isn't moral. It's a lack of morals.

it merely requires social morals for free to achieve a Commune of Heaven on Earth.

And that's why it falls every single time it's tried. The amoral refuse to do their part, instead expecting to be supported as they sit in Mom's basement smoking pot instead of working.

Man is not naturally moral. Capitalism recognizes that and utilizes it so all benefit. Socialism tries to pretend it doesn't exist, and fails.

it takes morals. only the Religious seem to be able make it happen.

 

[The Purge]

...i'll be your peanut butter if you want to be my jelly.

Only if YOU eat me!

 

[danielpalos]

...i'll be your peanut butter if you want to be my jelly.

Only if YOU eat me!

thank goodness women don't really believe in equality and equal rights, and try to convince us;

i love breaking in my new, "ClitLickerPro".

 

[The Purge]