Republicans Are Extremely Fearful of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[danielpalos]

"Articles of Enforcement" really can start in the House.

 

[Godboy]

They are fearful because, finally, they have to contend with an unabashed liberal progressive that's fighting for the people. Moreover, she's a woman, so they won't be able to just come out her any type of way.

And the best part is, she know exactly how to counter their foolishness.

Yes Republicans, she's coming, and HELL'S coming with her!!!

Any other thoughts on why Republicans are left quaking in their boots over this. one. little. woman?

Just because we mock her utterly stupid comments, doesnt mean we fear her. Youre dumb for thinking anyone is scared.

 

[MarcATL]

Just because we mock her utterly stupid comments, doesnt mean we fear her. Youre dumb for thinking anyone is scared.

Keep saying that. Perhaps you'll convince yourself...someday.

 

[Godboy]

Just because we mock her utterly stupid comments, doesnt mean we fear her. Youre dumb for thinking anyone is scared.

Keep saying that. Perhaps you'll convince yourself...someday.

Youre even dumber for doubling down on the "youre scared" thing. Its childish nonsense. Does that actually work on people in your crappy neighborhood?

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Anyone that know economics knows that you're an idiot that doesn't understand it.

do the rich have to provide labor input to the economy?

do those who truly need social services?

We have a First World economy.

The right wing is still stuck on obsolete economics technologies from last millennium.

If someone unwilling to work or provide for him/herself can't get help from you, let them starve. That's not an obsolete idea. It keep people from becoming freeloaders. The smart ones figure it out and the dumb ones die off.

thank Goodness our Founding Fathers already Ordained and Established "our moral path" for us:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Nothing moral about taking from one that will work and handing it to some fucking piece of shit that refuses to do so.

hearsay and soothsay? I am not the the one with only ad hominems and other forms of fallacies, instead of the good argument of a better solution at lower cost.

Show me where in the Constitution that the Federal Government has a “moral responsibility” to provide for those who don’t provide for themselves. The problem with your argument is that you can not provide evidence where our Founders have quoted, decided and written as the “responsibility” of the Federal Government to provide for all its citizens. In fact, if you bothered to read the United States Constitution it DOES state under the 10th Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Nowhere is it written that it’s the role of the Federal Government. The problem is your responses are out of ignorance not supported by anything written in our Constitution nor quoted by our Founders. Rather it’s the opinion of the left to defer to what other nations are doing, judicial decisions based on globalism and not judicial interpretations that are founded on our own nation’s Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

do the rich have to provide labor input to the economy?

do those who truly need social services?

We have a First World economy.

The right wing is still stuck on obsolete economics technologies from last millennium.

If someone unwilling to work or provide for him/herself can't get help from you, let them starve. That's not an obsolete idea. It keep people from becoming freeloaders. The smart ones figure it out and the dumb ones die off.

thank Goodness our Founding Fathers already Ordained and Established "our moral path" for us:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Nothing moral about taking from one that will work and handing it to some fucking piece of shit that refuses to do so.

hearsay and soothsay? I am not the the one with only ad hominems and other forms of fallacies, instead of the good argument of a better solution at lower cost.

Show me where in the Constitution that the Federal Government has a “moral responsibility” to provide for those who don’t provide for themselves. The problem with your argument is that you can not provide evidence where our Founders have quoted, decided and written as the “responsibility” of the Federal Government to provide for all its citizens. In fact, if you bothered to read the United States Constitution it DOES state under the 10th Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Nowhere is it written that it’s the role of the Federal Government. The problem is your responses are out of ignorance not supported by anything written in our Constitution nor quoted by our Founders. Rather it’s the opinion of the left to defer to what other nations are doing, judicial decisions based on globalism and not judicial interpretations that are founded on our own nation’s Constitution.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

 

[Papageorgio]

If someone unwilling to work or provide for him/herself can't get help from you, let them starve. That's not an obsolete idea. It keep people from becoming freeloaders. The smart ones figure it out and the dumb ones die off.

thank Goodness our Founding Fathers already Ordained and Established "our moral path" for us:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Nothing moral about taking from one that will work and handing it to some fucking piece of shit that refuses to do so.

hearsay and soothsay? I am not the the one with only ad hominems and other forms of fallacies, instead of the good argument of a better solution at lower cost.

Show me where in the Constitution that the Federal Government has a “moral responsibility” to provide for those who don’t provide for themselves. The problem with your argument is that you can not provide evidence where our Founders have quoted, decided and written as the “responsibility” of the Federal Government to provide for all its citizens. In fact, if you bothered to read the United States Constitution it DOES state under the 10th Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Nowhere is it written that it’s the role of the Federal Government. The problem is your responses are out of ignorance not supported by anything written in our Constitution nor quoted by our Founders. Rather it’s the opinion of the left to defer to what other nations are doing, judicial decisions based on globalism and not judicial interpretations that are founded on our own nation’s Constitution.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Still waiting for you to tell us.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

If someone unwilling to work or provide for him/herself can't get help from you, let them starve. That's not an obsolete idea. It keep people from becoming freeloaders. The smart ones figure it out and the dumb ones die off.

thank Goodness our Founding Fathers already Ordained and Established "our moral path" for us:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Nothing moral about taking from one that will work and handing it to some fucking piece of shit that refuses to do so.

hearsay and soothsay? I am not the the one with only ad hominems and other forms of fallacies, instead of the good argument of a better solution at lower cost.

Show me where in the Constitution that the Federal Government has a “moral responsibility” to provide for those who don’t provide for themselves. The problem with your argument is that you can not provide evidence where our Founders have quoted, decided and written as the “responsibility” of the Federal Government to provide for all its citizens. In fact, if you bothered to read the United States Constitution it DOES state under the 10th Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Nowhere is it written that it’s the role of the Federal Government. The problem is your responses are out of ignorance not supported by anything written in our Constitution nor quoted by our Founders. Rather it’s the opinion of the left to defer to what other nations are doing, judicial decisions based on globalism and not judicial interpretations that are founded on our own nation’s Constitution.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

You need a definition of the word “promote” now? Clearly, I am willing to bet, that definition is very different from the word PROVIDE.

This is precisely why I stated your ignorance on the subject.

 

[Cellblock2429]

They are fearful because, finally, they have to contend with an unabashed liberal progressive that's fighting for the people. Moreover, she's a woman, so they won't be able to just come out her any type of way.

And the best part is, she know exactly how to counter their foolishness.

Yes Republicans, she's coming, and HELL'S coming with her!!!

Any other thoughts one why Republicans are left quaking in their boots over this. one. little. woman?

yup


just like Democrats were afraid of Palin in 2008

Palin lost

Ocasio Cortez won

/—-/ Palin lost when she ran for governor?

 

[danielpalos]

thank Goodness our Founding Fathers already Ordained and Established "our moral path" for us:

Nothing moral about taking from one that will work and handing it to some fucking piece of shit that refuses to do so.

hearsay and soothsay? I am not the the one with only ad hominems and other forms of fallacies, instead of the good argument of a better solution at lower cost.

Show me where in the Constitution that the Federal Government has a “moral responsibility” to provide for those who don’t provide for themselves. The problem with your argument is that you can not provide evidence where our Founders have quoted, decided and written as the “responsibility” of the Federal Government to provide for all its citizens. In fact, if you bothered to read the United States Constitution it DOES state under the 10th Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Nowhere is it written that it’s the role of the Federal Government. The problem is your responses are out of ignorance not supported by anything written in our Constitution nor quoted by our Founders. Rather it’s the opinion of the left to defer to what other nations are doing, judicial decisions based on globalism and not judicial interpretations that are founded on our own nation’s Constitution.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Still waiting for you to tell us.

promote the general Welfare. it does not say, promote the general warfare.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Nothing moral about taking from one that will work and handing it to some fucking piece of shit that refuses to do so.

hearsay and soothsay? I am not the the one with only ad hominems and other forms of fallacies, instead of the good argument of a better solution at lower cost.

Show me where in the Constitution that the Federal Government has a “moral responsibility” to provide for those who don’t provide for themselves. The problem with your argument is that you can not provide evidence where our Founders have quoted, decided and written as the “responsibility” of the Federal Government to provide for all its citizens. In fact, if you bothered to read the United States Constitution it DOES state under the 10th Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Nowhere is it written that it’s the role of the Federal Government. The problem is your responses are out of ignorance not supported by anything written in our Constitution nor quoted by our Founders. Rather it’s the opinion of the left to defer to what other nations are doing, judicial decisions based on globalism and not judicial interpretations that are founded on our own nation’s Constitution.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Still waiting for you to tell us.

promote the general Welfare. it does not say, promote the general warfare.

Once again you still can’t back up your point. Promote the general welfare does not mean provide for.

So let’s move on, admit you don’t have a clue, if you have nothing else. What else do you got that I can so easily shoot down?

 

[danielpalos]

hearsay and soothsay? I am not the the one with only ad hominems and other forms of fallacies, instead of the good argument of a better solution at lower cost.

Show me where in the Constitution that the Federal Government has a “moral responsibility” to provide for those who don’t provide for themselves. The problem with your argument is that you can not provide evidence where our Founders have quoted, decided and written as the “responsibility” of the Federal Government to provide for all its citizens. In fact, if you bothered to read the United States Constitution it DOES state under the 10th Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Nowhere is it written that it’s the role of the Federal Government. The problem is your responses are out of ignorance not supported by anything written in our Constitution nor quoted by our Founders. Rather it’s the opinion of the left to defer to what other nations are doing, judicial decisions based on globalism and not judicial interpretations that are founded on our own nation’s Constitution.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Still waiting for you to tell us.

promote the general Welfare. it does not say, promote the general warfare.

Once again you still can’t back up your point. Promote the general welfare does not mean provide for.

So let’s move on, admit you don’t have a clue, if you have nothing else. What else do you got that I can so easily shoot down?

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

There is no authority to promote the general warfare or the common defense.

 

[Papageorgio]

Nothing moral about taking from one that will work and handing it to some fucking piece of shit that refuses to do so.

hearsay and soothsay? I am not the the one with only ad hominems and other forms of fallacies, instead of the good argument of a better solution at lower cost.

Show me where in the Constitution that the Federal Government has a “moral responsibility” to provide for those who don’t provide for themselves. The problem with your argument is that you can not provide evidence where our Founders have quoted, decided and written as the “responsibility” of the Federal Government to provide for all its citizens. In fact, if you bothered to read the United States Constitution it DOES state under the 10th Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Nowhere is it written that it’s the role of the Federal Government. The problem is your responses are out of ignorance not supported by anything written in our Constitution nor quoted by our Founders. Rather it’s the opinion of the left to defer to what other nations are doing, judicial decisions based on globalism and not judicial interpretations that are founded on our own nation’s Constitution.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Still waiting for you to tell us.

promote the general Welfare. it does not say, promote the general warfare.

I understand what it said, I am waiting for to show us where in the Constitution, not the preamble where it specifically states that people that are lazy should be supported by hard working taxpayers. Also, if this was the intent of the forefathers was to pay the lazy for not working, why didn’t they create a law during the first meeting of Congress?

 

[Papageorgio]

Show me where in the Constitution that the Federal Government has a “moral responsibility” to provide for those who don’t provide for themselves. The problem with your argument is that you can not provide evidence where our Founders have quoted, decided and written as the “responsibility” of the Federal Government to provide for all its citizens. In fact, if you bothered to read the United States Constitution it DOES state under the 10th Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Nowhere is it written that it’s the role of the Federal Government. The problem is your responses are out of ignorance not supported by anything written in our Constitution nor quoted by our Founders. Rather it’s the opinion of the left to defer to what other nations are doing, judicial decisions based on globalism and not judicial interpretations that are founded on our own nation’s Constitution.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Still waiting for you to tell us.

promote the general Welfare. it does not say, promote the general warfare.

Once again you still can’t back up your point. Promote the general welfare does not mean provide for.

So let’s move on, admit you don’t have a clue, if you have nothing else. What else do you got that I can so easily shoot down?

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

There is no authority to promote the general warfare or the common defense.

No we don’t take you seriously because you are lazy, uninformed, uneducated, unreasoning scam artist.

 

[danielpalos]

hearsay and soothsay? I am not the the one with only ad hominems and other forms of fallacies, instead of the good argument of a better solution at lower cost.

Show me where in the Constitution that the Federal Government has a “moral responsibility” to provide for those who don’t provide for themselves. The problem with your argument is that you can not provide evidence where our Founders have quoted, decided and written as the “responsibility” of the Federal Government to provide for all its citizens. In fact, if you bothered to read the United States Constitution it DOES state under the 10th Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Nowhere is it written that it’s the role of the Federal Government. The problem is your responses are out of ignorance not supported by anything written in our Constitution nor quoted by our Founders. Rather it’s the opinion of the left to defer to what other nations are doing, judicial decisions based on globalism and not judicial interpretations that are founded on our own nation’s Constitution.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Still waiting for you to tell us.

promote the general Welfare. it does not say, promote the general warfare.

I understand what it said, I am waiting for to show us where in the Constitution, not the preamble where it specifically states that people that are lazy should be supported by hard working taxpayers. Also, if this was the intent of the forefathers was to pay the lazy for not working, why didn’t they create a law during the first meeting of Congress?

Promoting the general welfare means coming up with solutions to simple poverty and not excuses.

 

[HenryBHough]

Turns out that those concerns are not all that uncommon.
There's even a scientific name for it:

coulrophobia​

 

[Papageorgio]

Show me where in the Constitution that the Federal Government has a “moral responsibility” to provide for those who don’t provide for themselves. The problem with your argument is that you can not provide evidence where our Founders have quoted, decided and written as the “responsibility” of the Federal Government to provide for all its citizens. In fact, if you bothered to read the United States Constitution it DOES state under the 10th Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Nowhere is it written that it’s the role of the Federal Government. The problem is your responses are out of ignorance not supported by anything written in our Constitution nor quoted by our Founders. Rather it’s the opinion of the left to defer to what other nations are doing, judicial decisions based on globalism and not judicial interpretations that are founded on our own nation’s Constitution.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Still waiting for you to tell us.

promote the general Welfare. it does not say, promote the general warfare.

I understand what it said, I am waiting for to show us where in the Constitution, not the preamble where it specifically states that people that are lazy should be supported by hard working taxpayers. Also, if this was the intent of the forefathers was to pay the lazy for not working, why didn’t they create a law during the first meeting of Congress?

Promoting the general welfare means coming up with solutions to simple poverty and not excuses.

If people need help from time to time, fine. If you choose to be lazy, it’s on you, it is a choice. Hard working taxpaying Americans should not have to pay for a choice of an individual that chooses to be lazy.

 

[jasonnfree]

do the rich have to provide labor input to the economy?

do those who truly need social services?

We have a First World economy.

The right wing is still stuck on obsolete economics technologies from last millennium.

If someone unwilling to work or provide for him/herself can't get help from you, let them starve. That's not an obsolete idea. It keep people from becoming freeloaders. The smart ones figure it out and the dumb ones die off.

thank Goodness our Founding Fathers already Ordained and Established "our moral path" for us:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Nothing moral about taking from one that will work and handing it to some fucking piece of shit that refuses to do so.

hearsay and soothsay? I am not the the one with only ad hominems and other forms of fallacies, instead of the good argument of a better solution at lower cost.

Show me where in the Constitution that the Federal Government has a “moral responsibility” to provide for those who don’t provide for themselves. The problem with your argument is that you can not provide evidence where our Founders have quoted, decided and written as the “responsibility” of the Federal Government to provide for all its citizens. In fact, if you bothered to read the United States Constitution it DOES state under the 10th Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Nowhere is it written that it’s the role of the Federal Government. The problem is your responses are out of ignorance not supported by anything written in our Constitution nor quoted by our Founders. Rather it’s the opinion of the left to defer to what other nations are doing, judicial decisions based on globalism and not judicial interpretations that are founded on our own nation’s Constitution.

It (the constitution) does mention 'we the people' but not a word about corporations, and the corporations do get plenty of free stuff you know. Bailouts, subsidies, military protection in their overseas ventures for profit.

 

[Papageorgio]

If someone unwilling to work or provide for him/herself can't get help from you, let them starve. That's not an obsolete idea. It keep people from becoming freeloaders. The smart ones figure it out and the dumb ones die off.

thank Goodness our Founding Fathers already Ordained and Established "our moral path" for us:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Nothing moral about taking from one that will work and handing it to some fucking piece of shit that refuses to do so.

hearsay and soothsay? I am not the the one with only ad hominems and other forms of fallacies, instead of the good argument of a better solution at lower cost.

Show me where in the Constitution that the Federal Government has a “moral responsibility” to provide for those who don’t provide for themselves. The problem with your argument is that you can not provide evidence where our Founders have quoted, decided and written as the “responsibility” of the Federal Government to provide for all its citizens. In fact, if you bothered to read the United States Constitution it DOES state under the 10th Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Nowhere is it written that it’s the role of the Federal Government. The problem is your responses are out of ignorance not supported by anything written in our Constitution nor quoted by our Founders. Rather it’s the opinion of the left to defer to what other nations are doing, judicial decisions based on globalism and not judicial interpretations that are founded on our own nation’s Constitution.

It (the constitution) does mention 'we the people' but not a word about corporations, and the corporations do get plenty of free stuff you know. Bailouts, subsidies, military protection in their overseas ventures for profit.

Nice diversion, can’t answer his question, just let it go.

 

[danielpalos]

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Still waiting for you to tell us.

promote the general Welfare. it does not say, promote the general warfare.

I understand what it said, I am waiting for to show us where in the Constitution, not the preamble where it specifically states that people that are lazy should be supported by hard working taxpayers. Also, if this was the intent of the forefathers was to pay the lazy for not working, why didn’t they create a law during the first meeting of Congress?

Promoting the general welfare means coming up with solutions to simple poverty and not excuses.

If people need help from time to time, fine. If you choose to be lazy, it’s on you, it is a choice. Hard working taxpaying Americans should not have to pay for a choice of an individual that chooses to be lazy.

there is no authority to promote walls or the general warfare or the common offense.