Republicans can’t have it both ways

[Penelope]

that all i keep hearing ...its the same stupid fucking talking point

who is gonna pay for the poor kids ? they repeat it over and over and over and over

DO lefttards ever form thier own opinion ?

they should abort themselves ....in mass
brainless moronic totalitarian bourgeois consumerist establishment humorless culture-less homogenized democratic socailst zombies

you're idiots
YOU'RE A spoon feed idiot
bet yer mamas real proud

So, uh, who is going to pay for all them poor babies that are going to pop out ff you make abortion illegal? The problem no doubt would be squarely in your court to fix. Don't push it off on liberals to make sense out of your lack of planning for the obvious.

NO one making abortion illegal you fucking morons

thier was an abortion activist who was arrested the other day and she was crying how people could not get abortions in north carolina

a quick google search plenty of places where morons like you can murder your babys ...whats youre problem ya fucking ****** rat

ALABAMA passing a heartbeat laws ?

go to NY where you can murder a 9 month old fresh out of the womb

YOURE SO progressive

youre dumbed down childish hysterical morons
SIT down and shut up the country is sick of you ****** rat mother fuckers
youre laughing stocks

Many poor people cannot afford to travel and miss work for an abortion. So, who is going to take care of all these new kids? When I mean 'take care; I don't mean trash our welfare program after you forced them to give birth either.

They have no problem paying thousands for an abortion over free birth control.

Only because female get pregnant only to have an abortion.

 

[Correll]

Republican policy usually just applies to the wealthy. Any other policy that applies to everyone else is just complete non sense.

Republicans can’t expect to outlaw abortion and continue to not do jack shit for kids born to poor single mothers. Basic social services isn’t some radical leftwing idea. They can whine and shame on the mothers for having kids they can’t afford all they want - it still doesn’t change the fact that the kid, you know, exists. What is supposed to happen to this kid born to a home he or she can’t thrive in? Also, if you are actually dumb enough to think women profit off of welfare by having kids then you should just relinquish your right to vote because you’re too stupid to have it. Do republicans not realize how expensive it is to raise a kid? Any government assistance the mom and kid get is a fraction of the overall cost of raising a kid for 18 years.

What a load of moronic crap.

 

[Norman]

Republican policy usually just applies to the wealthy. Any other policy that applies to everyone else is just complete non sense.

Republicans can’t expect to outlaw abortion and continue to not do jack shit for kids born to poor single mothers. Basic social services isn’t some radical leftwing idea. They can whine and shame on the mothers for having kids they can’t afford all they want - it still doesn’t change the fact that the kid, you know, exists. What is supposed to happen to this kid born to a home he or she can’t thrive in? Also, if you are actually dumb enough to think women profit off of welfare by having kids then you should just relinquish your right to vote because you’re too stupid to have it. Do republicans not realize how expensive it is to raise a kid? Any government assistance the mom and kid get is a fraction of the overall cost of raising a kid for 18 years.

Nice butthurt thread...

The solution is simple - a reduction in single motherhood. We can see how well the growth of this democrat voting block has been working out in the black community. They better look into adoption options if they were too stupid.

Unfortunately for you Billy, my body, my wallet. I don't want to support these idiots or their abortions. Maybe it's time for you to learn some responsibility and not foot the bill with other people's bodies and wallets?

 

[BlueGin]

Republican policy usually just applies to the wealthy. Any other policy that applies to everyone else is just complete non sense.

Republicans can’t expect to outlaw abortion and continue to not do jack shit for kids born to poor single mothers. Basic social services isn’t some radical leftwing idea. They can whine and shame on the mothers for having kids they can’t afford all they want - it still doesn’t change the fact that the kid, you know, exists. What is supposed to happen to this kid born to a home he or she can’t thrive in? Also, if you are actually dumb enough to think women profit off of welfare by having kids then you should just relinquish your right to vote because you’re too stupid to have it. Do republicans not realize how expensive it is to raise a kid? Any government assistance the mom and kid get is a fraction of the overall cost of raising a kid for 18 years.

Nice butthurt thread...

The solution is simple - a reduction in single motherhood. We can see how well the growth of this democrat voting block has been working out in the black community. They better look into adoption options if they were too stupid.

Unfortunately for you Billy, my body, my wallet. I don't want to support these idiots or their abortions. Maybe it's time for you to learn some responsibility and not just footing the bill with other people's bodies and wallets?

Liberals don’t really want to help the poor. If they did they wouldn’t pass the buck to everyone else ...they would step up and put their money where their mouth is.

 

[Norman]

Republican policy usually just applies to the wealthy. Any other policy that applies to everyone else is just complete non sense.

Republicans can’t expect to outlaw abortion and continue to not do jack shit for kids born to poor single mothers. Basic social services isn’t some radical leftwing idea. They can whine and shame on the mothers for having kids they can’t afford all they want - it still doesn’t change the fact that the kid, you know, exists. What is supposed to happen to this kid born to a home he or she can’t thrive in? Also, if you are actually dumb enough to think women profit off of welfare by having kids then you should just relinquish your right to vote because you’re too stupid to have it. Do republicans not realize how expensive it is to raise a kid? Any government assistance the mom and kid get is a fraction of the overall cost of raising a kid for 18 years.

Nice butthurt thread...

The solution is simple - a reduction in single motherhood. We can see how well the growth of this democrat voting block has been working out in the black community. They better look into adoption options if they were too stupid.

Unfortunately for you Billy, my body, my wallet. I don't want to support these idiots or their abortions. Maybe it's time for you to learn some responsibility and not just footing the bill with other people's bodies and wallets?

Liberals don’t really want to help the poor. If they did they wouldn’t pass the buck to everyone else ...they would step up and put their money where their mouth is.

Of course not. They want to have a poor horde of dependent voters that they can rally up on demand. Throwing some crumbs at them keeps the lefties in power.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

that all i keep hearing ...its the same stupid fucking talking point

who is gonna pay for the poor kids ? they repeat it over and over and over and over

DO lefttards ever form thier own opinion ?

they should abort themselves ....in mass
brainless moronic totalitarian bourgeois consumerist establishment humorless culture-less homogenized democratic socailst zombies

you're idiots
YOU'RE A spoon feed idiot
bet yer mamas real proud

So, uh, who is going to pay for all them poor babies that are going to pop out ff you make abortion illegal? The problem no doubt would be squarely in your court to fix. Don't push it off on liberals to make sense out of your lack of planning for the obvious.

Why is it the govts problem?

 

[jknowgood]

Republican policy usually just applies to the wealthy. Any other policy that applies to everyone else is just complete non sense.

Republicans can’t expect to outlaw abortion and continue to not do jack shit for kids born to poor single mothers. Basic social services isn’t some radical leftwing idea. They can whine and shame on the mothers for having kids they can’t afford all they want - it still doesn’t change the fact that the kid, you know, exists. What is supposed to happen to this kid born to a home he or she can’t thrive in? Also, if you are actually dumb enough to think women profit off of welfare by having kids then you should just relinquish your right to vote because you’re too stupid to have it. Do republicans not realize how expensive it is to raise a kid? Any government assistance the mom and kid get is a fraction of the overall cost of raising a kid for 18 years.

You do know republicans are not banning abortions. You can still get your jollies off by killing your own child up to eight weeks, dumbass.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Nothing to see here.
Wait..

Republican-led states are charging ahead with a spate of restrictive anti-abortion bills designed to trigger a legal battle that lands at the doorstep of the Supreme Court, lawmakers and experts said.

Alabama, poised to pass the country's toughest limits this week in what would amount to an outright ban on abortion, is just one of two dozen states that have proposed or passed measures to restrict abortion this legislative session, an onslaught abortion rights supporters say is both unprecedented and strategic.

Now attack the messenger. Attack, you brain dead lemmings! Repress! Dissemble! Disparage! Cry! Attack!

 

[Grumblenuts]

Wait!

Missouri passed a bill on Friday to ban abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, making the state the eighth this year to pass abortion restrictions that could challenge the constitutional right established in Roe v. Wade. Earlier this week, Alabama legislators voted to ban abortions in nearly all cases.

Alabama’s bill is the first outright ban on abortion

Okay, deny it some more. Go!

 

[Dale Smith]

that all i keep hearing ...its the same stupid fucking talking point

who is gonna pay for the poor kids ? they repeat it over and over and over and over

DO lefttards ever form thier own opinion ?

they should abort themselves ....in mass
brainless moronic totalitarian bourgeois consumerist establishment humorless culture-less homogenized democratic socailst zombies

you're idiots
YOU'RE A spoon feed idiot
bet yer mamas real proud

So, uh, who is going to pay for all them poor babies that are going to pop out ff you make abortion illegal? The problem no doubt would be squarely in your court to fix. Don't push it off on liberals to make sense out of your lack of planning for the obvious.

NO one making abortion illegal you fucking morons

thier was an abortion activist who was arrested the other day and she was crying how people could not get abortions in north carolina

a quick google search plenty of places where morons like you can murder your babys ...whats youre problem ya fucking ****** rat

ALABAMA passing a heartbeat laws ?

go to NY where you can murder a 9 month old fresh out of the womb

YOURE SO progressive

youre dumbed down childish hysterical morons
SIT down and shut up the country is sick of you ****** rat mother fuckers
youre laughing stocks

Many poor people cannot afford to travel and miss work for an abortion. So, who is going to take care of all these new kids? When I mean 'take care; I don't mean trash our welfare program after you forced them to give birth either.

They always seem to pony up with the means to pay for anchor babies and stipends for them....hmmmmm?

 

[Crepitus]

Republicans can’t have it both ways

Wrong. I can have it EVERY way!

Just make sure you use protection.

 

[fncceo]

Republicans can’t have it both ways

Wrong. I can have it EVERY way!

Just make sure you use protection.

I never carry guns in the bedroom ... unless they are props.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Republican policy usually just applies to the wealthy. Any other policy that applies to everyone else is just complete non sense.

Republicans can’t expect to outlaw abortion and continue to not do jack shit for kids born to poor single mothers. Basic social services isn’t some radical leftwing idea. They can whine and shame on the mothers for having kids they can’t afford all they want - it still doesn’t change the fact that the kid, you know, exists. What is supposed to happen to this kid born to a home he or she can’t thrive in? Also, if you are actually dumb enough to think women profit off of welfare by having kids then you should just relinquish your right to vote because you’re too stupid to have it. Do republicans not realize how expensive it is to raise a kid? Any government assistance the mom and kid get is a fraction of the overall cost of raising a kid for 18 years.

Yes yes. Kill all children that don’t meet your requirements. The handicapped, the poor, the wrong skin color, the wrong religion.

The only thing separating you from the Nazis is the Nazis had cool uniforms.

 

[Polishprince]

Republican policy usually just applies to the wealthy. Any other policy that applies to everyone else is just complete non sense.

Republicans can’t expect to outlaw abortion and continue to not do jack shit for kids born to poor single mothers. Basic social services isn’t some radical leftwing idea. .

Actually, the Republicans do PLENTY for children born of single mums. President Trump pays copious amounts of food stamps and school lunches to these little bastards, at least those who are born in poverty. The Baby's Daddies are brought to court to pony up.

That's all that a man can do, and IMHO, its a lot kinder that authorizing the whacking of these illegitimate kids in the womb. It isn't their fault they don't know who their dad is.

 

[Polishprince]

The only thing separating you from the Nazis is the Nazis had cool uniforms.

Indeed they did. Mr. Hitler hired Hugo Boss as the officer designer of the 3rd Reich.

Yet, hypocritically, the libs have not boycotted him.

 

[night_son]

Republican policy usually just applies to the wealthy. Any other policy that applies to everyone else is just complete non sense.

Republicans can’t expect to outlaw abortion and continue to not do jack shit for kids born to poor single mothers. Basic social services isn’t some radical leftwing idea. They can whine and shame on the mothers for having kids they can’t afford all they want - it still doesn’t change the fact that the kid, you know, exists. What is supposed to happen to this kid born to a home he or she can’t thrive in? Also, if you are actually dumb enough to think women profit off of welfare by having kids then you should just relinquish your right to vote because you’re too stupid to have it. Do republicans not realize how expensive it is to raise a kid? Any government assistance the mom and kid get is a fraction of the overall cost of raising a kid for 18 years.

Regardless of the inane and trite ideological talking points your ilk regurgitate and wear like some sacramental aegis, the protest for legal abortion remains an outcry for justification, for an "out" from personal responsibility. Nowhere is this more clear than in the argument you put forward in this thread. The answer to your question, an answer known by most adult men since the beginning of time, is quite elegant for its biological simplicity and derivative only of common sense. The answer is: responsibility for paying for the life of a new child rests solely on the shoulders of his or her parents. In ancient times that burden could indeed be steep, as new parents might have to actually perform intensive physical labor in order to provide for their newborn's needs or perhaps even relocate their new family to kinder geography. Now, however, in this modern world of ours, a job that comes with this benefit known as health insurance will normally do the trick for the vast majority of men and women who choose not to sit around on their asses and wait for our government to pay for their lives.

Your argument here depends on millions of Americans to be in poverty, without employment and without associated health benefits. In other words, your argument attempts to persuade or convince those who read it that some silent legion of potential American Parents likely choose not to work and by working receive medical insurance, but instead suffer because the government will not supplement their mass ennui, apathy and all around chronic refusal to get a job. Big surprise, what this argument boils down to is potential American Parents being yet another group of perpetual victims of the state. See, in order for your ideological arguments to hold a drop of water, the people involved in whatever said argument must first be proven yet another group of victims.

Funny, isn't it? How fulfillment of common adult personal responsibility, how taking responsibility for one's actions (working a job, providing for family) render this abortion justification talking point completely null and fucking void. There is no majority of America where working age men and women sit around, refuse to get a job and expect manna to fall from the heaven to save and provide for their lives. Unless of course, we're talking cultures. Cultures where that is exactly what the Democrats expect certain inner city peoples to do. Your ilk, your ideology? In order to function at all requires victims who never escape victimhood. Without victimizing segments of our population and then making votes and money off their story of suffering, the American Left could not exist. But you fucked up, friend. Your side suddenly decided to make murdering unborn children your new call to martyrdom, your new messiah. Once across that particular line you just can't go back.

 

[Defiant1]

People who support their children get a job.
If you can screw, you can work...

 

[night_son]

People who support their children get a job.
If you can screw, you can work...

Thank you. This is the greatest fear of the American Left . . . the fear that people will refuse to be victims and will take full responsibility for their own actions. Without a majority class of victims to exploit for political gain like fleeced sheep, every last ideological platform of the modern Democratic Party crumbles away into dust.

 

[Crepitus]

Republicans can’t have it both ways

Wrong. I can have it EVERY way!

Just make sure you use protection.

I never carry guns in the bedroom ... unless they are props.

How is.....?

Ya know what?

Never mind. I just realized I don't want to know

 

[Grumblenuts]

The fetus in the sixth week of pregnancy, which is roughly four weeks after fertilization, is the size of a pomegranate seed. Many, many women have doubtlessly miscarried around this mark without ever knowing it—they would assume they were just having an unusually heavy period. Nonetheless, Georgia’s law recognizes the fetus, from that point onward, as a “class of living, distinct person,” to be afforded “full legal recognition.” The legislation is written in such a way that people who seek abortions after six weeks could be prosecuted; people who miscarry, even at this incredibly early point, could be investigated for attempting to commit second-degree murder. This feels dystopic, but it is what the doctrine of fetal personhood demands. If the fetus is a person, it is a person who possesses, as Sally Rooney put it in the London Review of Books, “a vastly expanded set of legal rights, rights available to no other class of citizen”—the right to “make free, non-consensual use of another living person’s uterus and blood supply, and cause permanent, unwanted changes to another person’s body.” In the relationship between woman and fetus, she wrote, the woman is “granted fewer rights than a corpse.”

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all fetuses are created unequal, that they are endowed by their Creator with a vastly expanded set of legal Rights, that among these are the right to “make free, non-consensual use of another living person’s uterus and blood supply, and cause permanent, unwanted changes to another person’s body.”