Republicans continue their assault on Democracy

Status
Not open for further replies.
What???


You need another spanking????



Watch this:
Well....let's review:



Anything here not true, correct, and accurate???????????


1628772748702.png




“BREAKING BIG: Former Senator David Perdue Sues Fulton County for “Absentee Ballots…Scanned Multiple Times” and “16,000 Ballots” Not Counted in 2020 Election” BREAKING BIG: Former Senator David Perdue Sues Fulton County for "Absentee Ballots...Scanned Multiple Times" and "16,000 Ballots" Not Counted in 2020 Election







“Roughly 43,000 absentee ballot counted in DeKalb County in 2020 violated chain of custody rule


More than 70% of the 61,731 absentee ballots put in drop boxes were counted, certified despite violating chain of custody requirements.” Roughly 43,000 absentee ballot counted in DeKalb County in 2020 violated chain of custody rule







“Report: Wisconsin Lost Track of 82,000 Ballots in State Biden Won by 20,000

However, according to the legal foundation’s report, 82,766 mail-in ballots in the state were either undeliverable or suffered an unknown fate.


www.dailysignal.com

Wisconsin Lost Track of 4 Times More Ballots than Biden Won by in 2020

According to the legal foundation’s report, 82,766 mail-in ballots in Wisconsin were either undeliverable or suffered an unknown fate.
www.dailysignal.com
www.dailysignal.com





"Georgia ballots rejected by machines were later altered by election workers to count


... marks for candidates like Trump were sometimes removed so ballots could count for Biden.

A Dominion Voting machine had rejected the ballot on election night because the voter had filled in boxes for both Trump and his Democratic opponent Joe Biden, an error known as an "overvote." The machine determined neither candidate should get a tally, and the ballot was referred for human review.



The image of the ballot, obtained by Just the News, shows the voter messily scribbled a large blob in the box to select Trump as president while also putting a thinner check mark next to Biden's name. "

justthenews.com


Georgia ballots rejected by machines were later altered by election workers to count

Records obtained by Just the News provide unprecedented glimpse into human adjudication of thousands of ballots, where marks for candidates like Trump were sometimes removed so ballots could count for Biden.
justthenews.com

justthenews.com





“Elections Expert Seth Keshel Releases National Fraud Numbers: Finds 8.1 Million Excess Votes in US Election, Affirms Trump Won PA, MI, WI, NV, AZ, GA and MN …examined the final vote counts in all 50 states compared to the estimated numbers based on changing state dynamics and trends to come up with his estimated voter fraud in each state.





www.thegatewaypundit.com


Elections Expert Seth Keshel Releases National Fraud Numbers: Finds 8.1 Million Excess Votes in US Election, Affirms Trump Won PA, MI, WI, NV, AZ, GA and MN

Retired Army intelligence captain, elections data expert, and former baseball analyst Seth Keshel released his final national fraud numbers over the weekend. Seth Keshel examined the final vote counts in all 50 states compared to the estimated numbers based on changing state dynamics and trends...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

www.thegatewaypundit.com






“… an independent election audit team poured through ballot images in Fulton County, Georgia and found numerous examples of fraudulent ballots double-counted in the election. The forensic auditing team found double-counted ballots from the 2020 election and showed them in a video release. “At least 36 batches of mail-in ballots from the November election were double-counted in Fulton County, that is a total of at least 4,000 votes,” he said.”


beckernews.com


'Flat-Out Criminal Fraud': Tucker Reveals *Bombshell* Findings in Fulton County Election Audit

"At least 36 batches of mail-in ballots from the November election were double-counted in Fulton County, that is a total of at least 4,000 votes"...
beckernews.com

beckernews.com






https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNZT1aAG/x/c/4E0vozJeJN8





“Data scientists testified nearly 18,000 electronic votes in Georgia switched from Trump to Biden A team of data scientists testifying before a state Senate panel in Georgia earlier this week said thousands of votes were switched from President Donald Trump to his Democratic challenger Joe Biden during balloting last month.” Data scientists testified nearly 18,000 electronic votes in Georgia switched from Trump to Biden





Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

Extremely suspicious.



Published

7 hours ago

on

Nov 22, 2020

By

Richard Moorhead



Top of Form
A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.

Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.

Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.

Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!



Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.

Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”

bigleaguepolitics.com


Georgia Recount Worker Describes "Pristine" Batch of Ballots - 98% for Joe Biden! - Big League Politics

Extremely suspicious.
bigleaguepolitics.com

bigleaguepolitics.com





=========================================================
Did everyone see this whistle blower who saw the machinations in Democrat Detroit?



Ballots altered, Republican poll watchers kept out....










This lady was an IT employee of Dominion voting machines.

When she saw what was going on, she notified her boss, who didn't want to hear it.





Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence.



"Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center

By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle
on 5th November 2020 @ 7.00pm



© press
The widows were covered in opaque cardboard by election officials
Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of the ballot counting room, blocking poll watchers from witnessing the vote count."



Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged

Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center - Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of... | NEON NETTLE

neonnettle.com
















"New evidence suggests potentially enough fraudulent votes to prove Trump won in Georgia


According to a new report there were potentially enough fraudulent votes cast in Georgia, from people who voted in counties they had already moved out of, to take away the 12,670 vote lead that Biden won by last November:



FEDERALIST – New evidence indicates that more than 10,300 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 2020 general election — a number that will continue to rise over the next several months, potentially exceeding the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.




Under Georgia law, residents must vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election. As Jake Evans, a well-known Atlanta election lawyer, told me, outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, “Their vote in that county would be illegal.”




Soon after the November general election, Mark Davis, the president of Data Productions Inc. and an expert in voter data analytics and residency issues, obtained data from the National Change of Address (NCOA) database that identified Georgia residents who had confirmed moves with the U.S. Postal Service. After excluding moves with effective dates within 30 days of the general election, and by using data available from the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, Davis identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved.




Some of those moves could have been temporary, involving students or members of the military, Davis stressed, adding that under Georgia law temporary relocations do not alter citizens’ residency status or render their votes illegal. But, given the margin separating the two presidential candidates, approximately one-third of the votes at issue could have altered the outcome of the election. Yet the media, the courts, and the Secretary of State’s Office ignored or downplayed the issue.
“It was disconcerting to see the media and the courts largely ignore serious issues like these, especially since the data I was seeing showed very legitimate issues,” Davis said. “In fact, I heard members of the Secretary of State’s team admit some votes were cast with residency issues, but then claimed there weren’t enough of them to cast the outcome of the election in doubt,” Davis added. “That was not at all what I was seeing, and as far as I am aware the Secretary of State’s Office has never put an actual number on the ones they did see.”

Click to expand...


New evidence suggests potentially enough fraudulent votes to prove Trump won in Georgia

According to a new report there were potentially enough fraudulent votes cast in Georgia, from people who voted in counties they had already moved out of, to take away the 12,670 vote lead that Bid…

therightscoop.com






Ready to admit the truth?????
Lol..All debunked. Try again.
 
Given your logic, do you even have a GED? Seriously, your ability to form a coherent argument is strictly grade school.

You post a Supreme Court case from 1892 to buttress your claim of election fraud when in fact the US Supreme Court and other courts have rejected such challenges.

If an election law is overturned, it does not mean the previous election was fraudulent. Stop playing lawyer. You are still making an ass of yourself.



Ivy League grad, here.

Let me know if you'd care to sing along with our fight song.



Learn to read....and then try the Constitution.


. Not only has it been decided in the US Supreme Court that only the state legislature, and not any court, may alter or set the dates, but this played an important role in the 2000 Gore v Bush case.



“U.S. Supreme Court

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)



McPherson v. Blacker



Argued Oct. 11, 1892
Decided Oct. 17, 1892



“The validity of a state law
providing for the appointment of electors of President and Vice President having been drawn in question before the highest tribunal of a state as repugnant to the laws and Constitution of the United States, and that court having decided in favor of its validity, this Court has jurisdiction to review the judgment under Rev.Stat. § 709. Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.



Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”
 
What???


You need another spanking????



Watch this:
Well....let's review:



Anything here not true, correct, and accurate???????????


1628772748702.png




“BREAKING BIG: Former Senator David Perdue Sues Fulton County for “Absentee Ballots…Scanned Multiple Times” and “16,000 Ballots” Not Counted in 2020 Election” BREAKING BIG: Former Senator David Perdue Sues Fulton County for "Absentee Ballots...Scanned Multiple Times" and "16,000 Ballots" Not Counted in 2020 Election







“Roughly 43,000 absentee ballot counted in DeKalb County in 2020 violated chain of custody rule


More than 70% of the 61,731 absentee ballots put in drop boxes were counted, certified despite violating chain of custody requirements.” Roughly 43,000 absentee ballot counted in DeKalb County in 2020 violated chain of custody rule







“Report: Wisconsin Lost Track of 82,000 Ballots in State Biden Won by 20,000

However, according to the legal foundation’s report, 82,766 mail-in ballots in the state were either undeliverable or suffered an unknown fate.


www.dailysignal.com

Wisconsin Lost Track of 4 Times More Ballots than Biden Won by in 2020

According to the legal foundation’s report, 82,766 mail-in ballots in Wisconsin were either undeliverable or suffered an unknown fate.
www.dailysignal.com
www.dailysignal.com





"Georgia ballots rejected by machines were later altered by election workers to count


... marks for candidates like Trump were sometimes removed so ballots could count for Biden.

A Dominion Voting machine had rejected the ballot on election night because the voter had filled in boxes for both Trump and his Democratic opponent Joe Biden, an error known as an "overvote." The machine determined neither candidate should get a tally, and the ballot was referred for human review.



The image of the ballot, obtained by Just the News, shows the voter messily scribbled a large blob in the box to select Trump as president while also putting a thinner check mark next to Biden's name. "

justthenews.com


Georgia ballots rejected by machines were later altered by election workers to count

Records obtained by Just the News provide unprecedented glimpse into human adjudication of thousands of ballots, where marks for candidates like Trump were sometimes removed so ballots could count for Biden.
justthenews.com

justthenews.com





“Elections Expert Seth Keshel Releases National Fraud Numbers: Finds 8.1 Million Excess Votes in US Election, Affirms Trump Won PA, MI, WI, NV, AZ, GA and MN …examined the final vote counts in all 50 states compared to the estimated numbers based on changing state dynamics and trends to come up with his estimated voter fraud in each state.





www.thegatewaypundit.com


Elections Expert Seth Keshel Releases National Fraud Numbers: Finds 8.1 Million Excess Votes in US Election, Affirms Trump Won PA, MI, WI, NV, AZ, GA and MN

Retired Army intelligence captain, elections data expert, and former baseball analyst Seth Keshel released his final national fraud numbers over the weekend. Seth Keshel examined the final vote counts in all 50 states compared to the estimated numbers based on changing state dynamics and trends...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

www.thegatewaypundit.com






“… an independent election audit team poured through ballot images in Fulton County, Georgia and found numerous examples of fraudulent ballots double-counted in the election. The forensic auditing team found double-counted ballots from the 2020 election and showed them in a video release. “At least 36 batches of mail-in ballots from the November election were double-counted in Fulton County, that is a total of at least 4,000 votes,” he said.”


beckernews.com


'Flat-Out Criminal Fraud': Tucker Reveals *Bombshell* Findings in Fulton County Election Audit

"At least 36 batches of mail-in ballots from the November election were double-counted in Fulton County, that is a total of at least 4,000 votes"...
beckernews.com

beckernews.com






https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNZT1aAG/x/c/4E0vozJeJN8





“Data scientists testified nearly 18,000 electronic votes in Georgia switched from Trump to Biden A team of data scientists testifying before a state Senate panel in Georgia earlier this week said thousands of votes were switched from President Donald Trump to his Democratic challenger Joe Biden during balloting last month.” Data scientists testified nearly 18,000 electronic votes in Georgia switched from Trump to Biden





Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

Extremely suspicious.



Published

7 hours ago

on

Nov 22, 2020

By

Richard Moorhead



Top of Form
A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.

Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.

Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.

Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!



Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.

Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”

bigleaguepolitics.com


Georgia Recount Worker Describes "Pristine" Batch of Ballots - 98% for Joe Biden! - Big League Politics

Extremely suspicious.
bigleaguepolitics.com

bigleaguepolitics.com





=========================================================
Did everyone see this whistle blower who saw the machinations in Democrat Detroit?



Ballots altered, Republican poll watchers kept out....










This lady was an IT employee of Dominion voting machines.

When she saw what was going on, she notified her boss, who didn't want to hear it.





Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence.



"Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center

By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle
on 5th November 2020 @ 7.00pm



© press
The widows were covered in opaque cardboard by election officials
Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of the ballot counting room, blocking poll watchers from witnessing the vote count."



Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged

Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center - Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of... | NEON NETTLE

neonnettle.com
















"New evidence suggests potentially enough fraudulent votes to prove Trump won in Georgia


According to a new report there were potentially enough fraudulent votes cast in Georgia, from people who voted in counties they had already moved out of, to take away the 12,670 vote lead that Biden won by last November:



FEDERALIST – New evidence indicates that more than 10,300 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 2020 general election — a number that will continue to rise over the next several months, potentially exceeding the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.




Under Georgia law, residents must vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election. As Jake Evans, a well-known Atlanta election lawyer, told me, outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, “Their vote in that county would be illegal.”




Soon after the November general election, Mark Davis, the president of Data Productions Inc. and an expert in voter data analytics and residency issues, obtained data from the National Change of Address (NCOA) database that identified Georgia residents who had confirmed moves with the U.S. Postal Service. After excluding moves with effective dates within 30 days of the general election, and by using data available from the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, Davis identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved.




Some of those moves could have been temporary, involving students or members of the military, Davis stressed, adding that under Georgia law temporary relocations do not alter citizens’ residency status or render their votes illegal. But, given the margin separating the two presidential candidates, approximately one-third of the votes at issue could have altered the outcome of the election. Yet the media, the courts, and the Secretary of State’s Office ignored or downplayed the issue.
“It was disconcerting to see the media and the courts largely ignore serious issues like these, especially since the data I was seeing showed very legitimate issues,” Davis said. “In fact, I heard members of the Secretary of State’s team admit some votes were cast with residency issues, but then claimed there weren’t enough of them to cast the outcome of the election in doubt,” Davis added. “That was not at all what I was seeing, and as far as I am aware the Secretary of State’s Office has never put an actual number on the ones they did see.”

Click to expand...


New evidence suggests potentially enough fraudulent votes to prove Trump won in Georgia

According to a new report there were potentially enough fraudulent votes cast in Georgia, from people who voted in counties they had already moved out of, to take away the 12,670 vote lead that Bid…

therightscoop.com






Ready to admit the truth?????
Cut and Paste gone wild!

Shows what a Columbia degree will learn ya
 
Ivy League grad, here.

Let me know if you'd care to sing along with our fight song.



Learn to read....and then try the Constitution.


. Not only has it been decided in the US Supreme Court that only the state legislature, and not any court, may alter or set the dates, but this played an important role in the 2000 Gore v Bush case.



“U.S. Supreme Court

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)



McPherson v. Blacker



Argued Oct. 11, 1892
Decided Oct. 17, 1892



“The validity of a state law
providing for the appointment of electors of President and Vice President having been drawn in question before the highest tribunal of a state as repugnant to the laws and Constitution of the United States, and that court having decided in favor of its validity, this Court has jurisdiction to review the judgment under Rev.Stat. § 709. Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.



Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

See the 14th amendment that became the new rule. If the states continued to have the legislature appoint EC electors, they would lose representation in the house of representatives.
 
No Ray, what it says is the legislature may reject the results without cause…….that is overturning the results of the election

It says nothing about suspicious activity, proving suspicious activity or the court deciding whether suspicious activity justifies a new election

The legislature has already rejected the election results. The court just decides whether to order a new election.
Do they have a choice?

It says that it may reject the ballots which then they file for a court hearing. It doesn't say they can throw the ballots out.
 
Ivy League grad, here.

Let me know if you'd care to sing along with our fight song.



Learn to read....and then try the Constitution.


. Not only has it been decided in the US Supreme Court that only the state legislature, and not any court, may alter or set the dates, but this played an important role in the 2000 Gore v Bush case.



“U.S. Supreme Court

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)



McPherson v. Blacker



Argued Oct. 11, 1892
Decided Oct. 17, 1892



“The validity of a state law
providing for the appointment of electors of President and Vice President having been drawn in question before the highest tribunal of a state as repugnant to the laws and Constitution of the United States, and that court having decided in favor of its validity, this Court has jurisdiction to review the judgment under Rev.Stat. § 709. Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.



Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”
According to most of the low end whites you attempt to pander to on here, that would make you one of those educated communists.
 
A new bill in Arizona allows the partisan legislature to overturn the results of the election, eliminates most mail in voting, requires one day of voting and forbids election centers


Arizona is turning Blue
Republicans are set on stopping that from happening

Voters may elect a Democrat, but the Republican Legislature will just overturn the results.
Just goes to show Republicans are scared of a real election and willing to do do anything possible to retain power and disenfranchise voters and if that fails, to simply overturn an election.

Arizona has had no excuse mail in voting for 20 years. Approximately 80% of Arizona‘s residents use it. Other than urban centers, Arizona has a population sparsely spread over huge unpopulated areas, this particularly true of reservations where distances and poverty make voting in person very difficult.

First I’ve said this…but today’s Republicans, as represented and other areas are just evil.
 
A new bill in Arizona allows the partisan legislature to overturn the results of the election, eliminates most mail in voting, requires one day of voting and forbids election centers


Arizona is turning Blue
Republicans are set on stopping that from happening

Voters may elect a Democrat, but the Republican Legislature will just overturn the results.
The fact that you progressives are so upset that mail in voting us being rejected throughout the nation shows me they are over the target of your cheating ability....
 
Just goes to show Republicans are scared of a real election and willing to do do anything possible to retain power and disenfranchise voters and if that fails, to simply overturn an election.

Arizona has had no excuse mail in voting for 20 years. Approximately 80% of Arizona‘s residents use it. Other than urban centers, Arizona has a population sparsely spread over huge unpopulated areas, this particularly true of reservations where distances and poverty make voting in person very difficult.

First I’ve said this…but today’s Republicans, as represented and other areas are just evil.
Oh yes...Soooooo evil....because we want fair elections...That's evil alright....
 
If you really have an Ivy League Education, you should request a full refund. Cutting and pasting is taught in most kindergarten classes.

You come across as someone who was home schooled, with limited exposure to anything that didn't reinforce your teachers' racist, conservative view points. You don't check your sources for veracity or ethics, which any first year student in an Ivy League school is taught to do, because your work is only as good as your sources.

Your sources are liars, Russian propaganda sites, or conspiracy theory sites. Hardly anything that anyone with a real Ivy League education would use.


"If you really have an Ivy League Education, you should request a full refund. Cutting and pasting is taught in most kindergarten classes."


Fear not......I'm here to educate you.




I have noted, of late, that some opponents have chosen a tortuous route to arguing against my post: rather than substance, they (you) have chosen style as the tactic.



The reason may be

  1. harboring the desire to attack, they have neither the ability nor the ammunition to deal with the point.
  2. they are lacking in the educational training of developing an argumentative essay.


Some pointers.

1. Citing an authority with an established reputation is better, of course, than citing someone whose credentials are not so lofty. (http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml)


2. What has been pejoratively referred to as ‘simply cut and paste,’ is, in fact, carefully chosen to substantiate a point. Is the information covered fact, opinion, or propaganda? Facts can usually be verified; opinions, though they may be based on factual information, evolve from the interpretation of facts.(http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/skill26.htm#LinkReason)

3. A valid objection to this selection of sources may be the type of audience being addressed. Is the ‘pasted selection’ aimed at a specialized or a general audience? Do you find the level ‘over your head’ or is this source too elementary? Ibid.

4. Are you objecting to the author's credentials--institutional affiliation (where he or she works), educational background, past writings, or experience? Or simply looking for a weapon to attack the post? This, of course, would be puerile.

5. Providing summaries or outlines of a source is valid as long as a link to the original is provided, and the author’s meaning is conveyed.

6. Nor is it necessary to insert one’s own language if the original article is simply abbreviated, with link provided.

7. What has been called ‘cut and paste’ is frequently the message board version of footnotes and endnotes of an academic essay. “…footnotes were declared outmoded just before the era of the word-processors which make using footnotes so much easier. Still, because of its relative ease in both writing and reading, parenthetical documentation is greatly preferred by most instructors.” http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml

websites.wnc.edu/~kille/Fred/researchpaper.rtf




I hope you took notes so you look a tad less foolish in the future.
 
It says that it may reject the ballots which then they file for a court hearing. It doesn't say they can throw the ballots out.
That's what the plain text says, just read it.

1. THE LEGISLATURE SHALL CALL ITSELF INTO SESSION TO REVIEW THE BALLOT TABULATING PROCESS FOR THE REGULAR PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS AND ON REVIEW SHALL ACCEPT OR REJECT THE ELECTION RESULTS. IF THE LEGISLATURE ACCEPTS THE ELECTION RESULTS, THE ELECTION CANVASS AND RELATED CERTIFICATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS MAY PROCEED AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY LAW, AND THE LEGISLATURE MAY ADJOURN ITS SESSION. IF THE LEGISLATURE REJECTS THE ELECTION RESULTS, ANY QUALIFIED ELECTOR MAY FILE AN ACTION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TO REQUEST THAT A NEW ELECTION BE HELD.

Simply put, if the legislature accepts, the ballots get counted, electors chosen etc.

If the legislature rejects, people can petition the courts for a new election. Meaning that no ballots are counted, or electors chosen. The election in it's entirety is declared VOID and NULL. As if no election had ever taken place.
 
That's what the plain text says, just read it.

1. THE LEGISLATURE SHALL CALL ITSELF INTO SESSION TO REVIEW THE BALLOT TABULATING PROCESS FOR THE REGULAR PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS AND ON REVIEW SHALL ACCEPT OR REJECT THE ELECTION RESULTS. IF THE LEGISLATURE ACCEPTS THE ELECTION RESULTS, THE ELECTION CANVASS AND RELATED CERTIFICATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS MAY PROCEED AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY LAW, AND THE LEGISLATURE MAY ADJOURN ITS SESSION. IF THE LEGISLATURE REJECTS THE ELECTION RESULTS, ANY QUALIFIED ELECTOR MAY FILE AN ACTION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TO REQUEST THAT A NEW ELECTION BE HELD.

Simply put, if the legislature accepts, the ballots get counted, electors chosen etc.

If the legislature rejects, people can petition the courts for a new election. Meaning that no ballots are counted, or electors chosen. The election in it's entirety is declared VOID and NULL. As if no election had ever taken place.

That's what I've said. That's a far cry from legislatures overturning the election.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top