Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've asked several times what if any suggestions do the pro gun crowd have to prevent shootings like Oregon...
as that fucking muslime son-of-a-bitch who killed those innocent Christians and report that activity to the proper authorities, recall this: "see something, say something" ??
I've asked several times what if any suggestions do the pro gun crowd have to prevent shootings like Oregon...
you really can not be this stupid, or are you?
i suggest people with a little common sense keep an eye open on F.B., U-Tube and other "social media" sites for people who post such
does that suggestion sound reasonable to you?
Pretty stupid comment, even from you. Lots of Democrats own guns too but more importantly, the guns have always been with us. So obviously to anyone with a half a brain knows the gun isn't the problem.Mass shootings are collateral damage and an acceptable consequence of freedom to own firearms.
If your analytical abilities are limited to what you can feel, then it's all you can come up with I suppose. Nor do you grasp what the freedom to own firearms means, what it means is that government doesn't have the right to take away our ability to defend ourselves, you are bass akwards. I don't have a secret service team following me around, I'll have to take care of the problem myself.
All most all of these mass shooters have one thing in common they all suffer from mental disorders of some type.
that seems a pretty common trait for all demorats, libertards, etc., another thing they have in common is that all the killers are of the libertard persuasion. 
You name call all the time. You just did. LolAhh, so we're going into the everyone call names. Can I predict these guys or what?
Mass shootings are collateral damage and an acceptable consequence of freedom to own firearms.
If they said that, it would be so honest and unwavering that ppl would have to be forced to disagree or agree. But instead of being honest they play this game of peekaboo where any and all suggestions for gun control is translated into Republican speak of "Banning guns". Which does nothing to explain what you're FOR.
I've asked several times what if any suggestions do the pro gun crowd have to prevent shootings like Oregon and after so many times it seems as if they don't have suggestions but are more comfortable bring the peanut gallery that boos anyone's suggestions to do anything different than the status quo
So if you have a suggestion let's here it, if not, go fuck yourself for being the guy I described in the OP
deffinition: "here" in, at, or to this place or position.
There are evil people and there are crazy people.Wait, so you guys believe the whole "everything bad done is the fault of mental illness" rap? I remember when bad people were called bad. Nowadays everyone is "crazy"?
These mass shootings reflect the latter.
Those people were mentally ill and probably should've been locked up but we can't do that anymore cuz liberals fought for the civil rights of the mental.
These shootings are on liberals shoulders. Wear them with disgrace.
Ahh, so we're going into the everyone call names. Can I predict these guys or what?
Except for the fact that your statement is nonsense, mass shootings are the result of the fact that human beings are flawed and capable of acting in violent and immoral ways, the right to bear arms has nothing to do with that. Even if you banned the manufacture, sale and ownership of guns it wouldn't stop these types of crimes since those that commit them would simply go to the black market to obtain their weapons (see: 1920's prohibition and how well that worked out). Passing more gun laws won't stop those willing to commit mass murder (mass murder is ALREADY illegal), all it'll do is add more cost to government and restrict the rights of law abiding citizens.Mass shootings are collateral damage and an acceptable consequence of freedom to own firearms.
Except for the fact that your statement is nonsense, mass shootings are the result of the fact that human beings are flawed and capable of acting in violent and immoral ways, the right to bear arms has nothing to do with that.Mass shootings are collateral damage and an acceptable consequence of freedom to own firearms.
Even if you banned the manufacture, sale and ownership of guns it wouldn't stop these types of crimes since those that commit them would simply go to the black market to obtain their weapons (see: 1920's prohibition and how well that worked out).
Passing more gun laws won't stop those willing to commit mass murder (mass murder is ALREADY illegal), all it'll do is add more cost to government and restrict the rights of law abiding citizens.
...and right on cue, out come the homosexual slurs. The worse insult a liberal can think of. You offered pure unadulterated stupidity, not some reasonable suggestion. Democrats do own guns so it makes no sense to try to say it's a Republican issue. It's a constitutional issue. And people who are targeted aren't collateral damage, you need to look up them big words.Like I said in the OP some people will be honest and simply say that these things will happen and that's the cost of freedom. Others, like you faggot ass plays pretend every suggestion is stupid while I hide my true faggot feelings behind calling someone names.Pretty stupid comment, even from you. Lots of Democrats own guns too but more importantly, the guns have always been with us. So obviously to anyone with a half a brain knows the gun isn't the problem.Mass shootings are collateral damage and an acceptable consequence of freedom to own firearms.
If your analytical abilities are limited to what you can feel, then it's all you can come up with I suppose. Nor do you grasp what the freedom to own firearms means, what it means is that government doesn't have the right to take away our ability to defend ourselves, you are bass akwards. I don't have a secret service team following me around, I'll have to take care of the problem myself.
So if you have a suggestion let's here it, if not, go fuck yourself for being the guy I described in the OP
Guns are just a tool so yes they're mutually exclusive, the problem is, was and always will be behavior and until we as a society are ready to admit and address that it will never get any better.Except for the fact that your statement is nonsense, mass shootings are the result of the fact that human beings are flawed and capable of acting in violent and immoral ways, the right to bear arms has nothing to do with that.Mass shootings are collateral damage and an acceptable consequence of freedom to own firearms.
Yeah that too, also they use guns to do it quickly. Those 2 things aren't mutually exclusive.
Even if you banned the manufacture, sale and ownership of guns it wouldn't stop these types of crimes since those that commit them would simply go to the black market to obtain their weapons (see: 1920's prohibition and how well that worked out).
What do you mean "them"? this is about things that affect all of US, it's about dealing with violence in effective ways AND preserving the rights that we ALL have been blessed with, as far as suggestions go you should ask people that have some expertise in behavioral science and mental health since expecting reasonable answers by querying members of an internet message board is an exercise in the pointless.I KNOW. That's why I always ask the pro gun by any means crowd if they have suggestions. I realized after not getting any suggestions that the Staub quo is the best option for them but, for some reason, they refuse to say that.
Passing more gun laws won't stop those willing to commit mass murder (mass murder is ALREADY illegal), all it'll do is add more cost to government and restrict the rights of law abiding citizens.
I agree, just like traffic lights won't stop accidents but no one suggested that traffic lights will stop all accidents. But it prevent them from happening more often, right?
Thats the point
LOL. Four minutes after repeatedly calling me a fag!Ahh, so we're going into the everyone call names. Can I predict these guys or what?
...and right on cue, out come the homosexual slurs. The worse insult a liberal can think of. You offered pure unadulterated stupidity, not some reasonable suggestion. Democrats do own guns so it makes no sense to try to say it's a Republican issue. It's a constitutional issue. And people who are targeted aren't collateral damage, you need to look up them big words.Like I said in the OP some people will be honest and simply say that these things will happen and that's the cost of freedom. Others, like you faggot ass plays pretend every suggestion is stupid while I hide my true faggot feelings behind calling someone names.Pretty stupid comment, even from you. Lots of Democrats own guns too but more importantly, the guns have always been with us. So obviously to anyone with a half a brain knows the gun isn't the problem.Mass shootings are collateral damage and an acceptable consequence of freedom to own firearms.
If your analytical abilities are limited to what you can feel, then it's all you can come up with I suppose. Nor do you grasp what the freedom to own firearms means, what it means is that government doesn't have the right to take away our ability to defend ourselves, you are bass akwards. I don't have a secret service team following me around, I'll have to take care of the problem myself.
So if you have a suggestion let's here it, if not, go fuck yourself for being the guy I described in the OP
I am not Republican, nor Democrat, Libertarian, Independent, etc. Rumor has it that I am God (I started that rumor). The 2nd amendment has to do with protecting the country, not in a militia form, but in the fact that we are such a large country with quite a few borders. Our military and police cannot possibly protect this country from the evils that lurk beyond the border. Remember when the Constitution was written that we had not really ventured into the west but the framers knew there be injuns lurking. (No offense to any Native Americans--I love you man) We are armed and every bloomin' nation knows it. To attempt an invasion of any kind means going up against the military and police, and about 275 million people with a weapon of some sort. 9/11, thus far, has been the worse anyone has ever been able to do to this country inside our borders. If you want the country to ban guns, start learning a second language now, I suggest Russian. It may not be Russia who invades... oh, who am kidding, anyone who invades the US will backed by Russia if not Russia itself.Mass shootings are collateral damage and an acceptable consequence of freedom to own firearms.
If they said that, it would be so honest and unwavering that ppl would have to be forced to disagree or agree. But instead of being honest they play this game of peekaboo where any and all suggestions for gun control is translated into Republican speak of "Banning guns". Which does nothing to explain what you're FOR.
I've asked several times what if any suggestions do the pro gun crowd have to prevent shootings like Oregon and after so many times it seems as if they don't have suggestions but are more comfortable bring the peanut gallery that boos anyone's suggestions to do anything different than the status quo
I'll give you some homework... and note that I have a ruler so if you refuse, I will slap your hand something fierce, then I'll spank your little bottom. You might like that.
Compare mass shootings pre-1960 to now. I will give you one clue to go by... around 1963ish, hospitals started turning out mentally ill people because Medicaid does not cover it for hospital stays. States started making it harder to have people committed. No one wants to pay taxes for someone else's medical bills. There are about 50 million diagnosed people in the US with a mental disorder--some are self-inflicted so unfortunately no one really realizes someone has snapped except the spouse as she/he is getting killed. Okay? Go for it.
I didn't ask for better "tratment", whatever the fuck that is. You need to learn to read. Puke less, read more....and right on cue, out come the homosexual slurs. The worse insult a liberal can think of. You offered pure unadulterated stupidity, not some reasonable suggestion. Democrats do own guns so it makes no sense to try to say it's a Republican issue. It's a constitutional issue. And people who are targeted aren't collateral damage, you need to look up them big words.Like I said in the OP some people will be honest and simply say that these things will happen and that's the cost of freedom. Others, like you faggot ass plays pretend every suggestion is stupid while I hide my true faggot feelings behind calling someone names.Pretty stupid comment, even from you. Lots of Democrats own guns too but more importantly, the guns have always been with us. So obviously to anyone with a half a brain knows the gun isn't the problem.Mass shootings are collateral damage and an acceptable consequence of freedom to own firearms.
If your analytical abilities are limited to what you can feel, then it's all you can come up with I suppose. Nor do you grasp what the freedom to own firearms means, what it means is that government doesn't have the right to take away our ability to defend ourselves, you are bass akwards. I don't have a secret service team following me around, I'll have to take care of the problem myself.
So if you have a suggestion let's here it, if not, go fuck yourself for being the guy I described in the OP
Boo hoo..you call names and then want better tratment. Fuck off faggot. Now make any other post crying about it.
