Republicans think "PORN" is more dangerous than "GUNS".

[Seawytch]

Well deanrd
The left believes in regulating "sugary drinks" but not marijuana and other drugs deemed less addictive than sugar! The left argues the choice of reparative therapy should be banned as more dangerous than the choice of abortion. That Christian prayer and expression is imposing on people in schools, but not LGBT policies that are also faith based and a personal choice.

The left passed laws banning and punishing the free choice of how to pay for health care, requiring insurance as the only choice, but refuses govt regulations on the choice of abortion.

As for porn, the cure for the addictions related to porn, to drugs, and for mental and criminal illness is found in spiritual healing.
which can be proven medically to effectively diagnose and cure the causes of both mental and physical ills.

So why isn't the left demanding research into cures for cancer, for criminal addictions, and other mental illness as provided by spiritual healing? This would make medical and mental care affordable and accessible to the public by reducing the cost of diseases and crime that taxpayers are wasting billions on through failed prisons and mental health systems that don't cure anyone.

If the left wants health care for all, the solution is to invest in free programs through medical R&D studies and outreach in spiritual healing.

That solution would also work for problems with guns, porn, sexual and drug abuse/addictions, and causes of all kinds of illness, crime and abusive disorders and conditions.

Sources: www.christianhealingmin.org
www.healingisyours.com
Books and studies on spiritual healing by
Dr. Francis MacNutt, Dr. Phillip Goldfedder, Dr. Scott Peck

Being gay a choice? You could choose that? So did you? If not, do you still dream about it?

Yeah, it is a choice. Nowhere else do we see this abominable abhorrent behavior.

You mean besides everywhere in nature?

Lol. Runs antithetical to continuation of the species doesnt it? Or is it just some freakish type mutation that occurs?

No, not really. If 100% of the species were gay, yes it would but a percentage of the population is not at all antithetical to the continuation of a species.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Well deanrd
The left believes in regulating "sugary drinks" but not marijuana and other drugs deemed less addictive than sugar! The left argues the choice of reparative therapy should be banned as more dangerous than the choice of abortion. That Christian prayer and expression is imposing on people in schools, but not LGBT policies that are also faith based and a personal choice.

The left passed laws banning and punishing the free choice of how to pay for health care, requiring insurance as the only choice, but refuses govt regulations on the choice of abortion.

As for porn, the cure for the addictions related to porn, to drugs, and for mental and criminal illness is found in spiritual healing.
which can be proven medically to effectively diagnose and cure the causes of both mental and physical ills.

So why isn't the left demanding research into cures for cancer, for criminal addictions, and other mental illness as provided by spiritual healing? This would make medical and mental care affordable and accessible to the public by reducing the cost of diseases and crime that taxpayers are wasting billions on through failed prisons and mental health systems that don't cure anyone.

If the left wants health care for all, the solution is to invest in free programs through medical R&D studies and outreach in spiritual healing.

That solution would also work for problems with guns, porn, sexual and drug abuse/addictions, and causes of all kinds of illness, crime and abusive disorders and conditions.

Sources: www.christianhealingmin.org
www.healingisyours.com
Books and studies on spiritual healing by
Dr. Francis MacNutt, Dr. Phillip Goldfedder, Dr. Scott Peck

Being gay a choice? You could choose that? So did you? If not, do you still dream about it?

Yeah, it is a choice. Nowhere else do we see this abominable abhorrent behavior.

No where else but in over 1,000 animal species...


When did you choose? Did you find yourself equally attracted to men and women but flipped a coin?

Nonsense! Animals aren't gay and male fishes don't prefer trouser trout. Stop lying. I don't care what lying report you come up from some lying media pos either.

How about Yale. I mean, the evidence is there. That you refuse to believe it exists is your problem alone.

 

[Montrovant]

You morons do know that one has to be 21 to buy other weapons in Fla, right?

I'm trying to find information about this. Florida requires one to be 21 to get a concealed license. Federal law apparently requires one to be 21 to buy a handgun from a dealer, but only a federally licensed dealer. I haven't seen any such regulation regarding rifles or shotguns in Florida. Nor do I see any 21 years old age limit for gun purchases in Florida.

 

[debbiedowner]

Does frequent ejaculation help ward off prostate cancer? - Harvard Prostate Knowledge

Does frequent ejaculation help ward off prostate cancer?

Marc Garnick, M.D., Editor in Chief of Harvard Medical School’s Annual Report on Prostate Diseases, says:

Two relatively large studies of this question, reported in 2003 and 2004, yielded good news for sexually active men: high ejaculation frequency seemed to protect against prostate cancer.

As part of Harvard’s Health Professionals Follow-up Study, 29,342 men between the ages of 46 and 81 reported their average number of ejaculations per month in young adulthood (ages 20–29), in mid-life (ages 40–49), and in the most recent year. Ejaculations included sexual intercourse, nocturnal emissions, and masturbation. Study participants also provided comprehensive health and lifestyle data every two years from 1992 to 2000. The scientists found that men who ejaculated 21 or more times a month enjoyed a 33% lower risk of prostate cancer compared with men who reported four to seven ejaculations a month throughout their lifetimes.

An Australian study of 2,338 men came to a similar conclusion. In all, men who averaged 4.6 to seven ejaculations a week were 36% less likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer before the age of 70 than men who ejaculated less than 2.3 times a week on average. The study found no connection between prostate cancer and the number of sex partners. (An earlier study, however, found that men who had sex with 30 or more women were two to three times more likely to develop prostate cancer than men with only one partner.)

Further study is needed to investigate possible protective mechanisms. In theory, emptying the prostate of potentially irritating or harmful substances might be one such mechanism. Regardless of the reason why, take comfort in the fact that ejaculation is not only pleasurable, but also may convey health benefits.

 

[hjmick]

Florida Republicans Believe Porn Is More Dangerous Than Guns

The state's House of Representatives approved the resolution by a voice vote on Tuesday. The resolution states a need for education, research and policy changes to protect Floridians, especially teenagers, from pornography.

Republican Rep. Ross Spano says there is research that finds a connection between pornography use and mental and physical illnesses, forming and maintaining intimate relationships and deviant sexual behavior. Spano is also a candidate for attorney general.

The most twisted part of this is the demands by Florida Republicans to research the public health impact of porn, while the CDC is implicitly banned from doing research on gun violence. The 1996 Dickey Amendment specifically blocks the CDC from using its budget to "advocate or promote gun control," and since objective, peer-reviewed, scientific studies consistently show effective gun control would reduce gun violence, there's no research the CDC can do that won't sacrifice its funding.

-------------------------------------------------------

Yea, that's right. Republicans want to study the damage caused by porn but not the damage caused by guns.

And yet, they follow a guy who not only dates porn stars, they want him to be a role model for their children.

What is with these people?

I guess it just depends on whose hand it's in...

 

[debbiedowner]

By the way, here's a link that shows what the median income is for Parkland FL.

Parkland, Florida Economy

Yea, it's a quite wealthy area.

 

[debbiedowner]

Florida Republicans Believe Porn Is More Dangerous Than Guns

The state's House of Representatives approved the resolution by a voice vote on Tuesday. The resolution states a need for education, research and policy changes to protect Floridians, especially teenagers, from pornography.

Republican Rep. Ross Spano says there is research that finds a connection between pornography use and mental and physical illnesses, forming and maintaining intimate relationships and deviant sexual behavior. Spano is also a candidate for attorney general.

The most twisted part of this is the demands by Florida Republicans to research the public health impact of porn, while the CDC is implicitly banned from doing research on gun violence. The 1996 Dickey Amendment specifically blocks the CDC from using its budget to "advocate or promote gun control," and since objective, peer-reviewed, scientific studies consistently show effective gun control would reduce gun violence, there's no research the CDC can do that won't sacrifice its funding.

-------------------------------------------------------

Yea, that's right. Republicans want to study the damage caused by porn but not the damage caused by guns.

And yet, they follow a guy who not only dates porn stars, they want him to be a role model for their children.

What is with these people?

For many Republicans sex is bad.[/QUOT

Florida Republicans Believe Porn Is More Dangerous Than Guns

The state's House of Representatives approved the resolution by a voice vote on Tuesday. The resolution states a need for education, research and policy changes to protect Floridians, especially teenagers, from pornography.

Republican Rep. Ross Spano says there is research that finds a connection between pornography use and mental and physical illnesses, forming and maintaining intimate relationships and deviant sexual behavior. Spano is also a candidate for attorney general.

The most twisted part of this is the demands by Florida Republicans to research the public health impact of porn, while the CDC is implicitly banned from doing research on gun violence. The 1996 Dickey Amendment specifically blocks the CDC from using its budget to "advocate or promote gun control," and since objective, peer-reviewed, scientific studies consistently show effective gun control would reduce gun violence, there's no research the CDC can do that won't sacrifice its funding.

-------------------------------------------------------

Yea, that's right. Republicans want to study the damage caused by porn but not the damage caused by guns.

And yet, they follow a guy who not only dates porn stars, they want him to be a role model for their children.

What is with these people?

Hey loon, what about gun porn?

I knew it, you do grease up your barrel and sit on it, don't you? I was right all along about you. Damn sick puppy.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Florida Republicans Believe Porn Is More Dangerous Than Guns

The state's House of Representatives approved the resolution by a voice vote on Tuesday. The resolution states a need for education, research and policy changes to protect Floridians, especially teenagers, from pornography.

Republican Rep. Ross Spano says there is research that finds a connection between pornography use and mental and physical illnesses, forming and maintaining intimate relationships and deviant sexual behavior. Spano is also a candidate for attorney general.

The most twisted part of this is the demands by Florida Republicans to research the public health impact of porn, while the CDC is implicitly banned from doing research on gun violence. The 1996 Dickey Amendment specifically blocks the CDC from using its budget to "advocate or promote gun control," and since objective, peer-reviewed, scientific studies consistently show effective gun control would reduce gun violence, there's no research the CDC can do that won't sacrifice its funding.

-------------------------------------------------------

Yea, that's right. Republicans want to study the damage caused by porn but not the damage caused by guns.

And yet, they follow a guy who not only dates porn stars, they want him to be a role model for their children.

What is with these people?

Don't handle both at the same time.

But yeah the gop legislature is a pack of morons. Just for public posturing, they should immediately pass a law raising the age for buying an AR-15. Regardless of how one views the 2nd amendment, not passing that bill is moronic.

Why? We’ve babyed these kids to this level of snowflake why go further?

You ask why an 18 year old should legally be able to buy an AR-15?

Why buy? Join the army, they'll give you one and let you shoot... at people.

Yes, Soggy, you CAN join the Army or the Marines, and they will issue you a weapon. BUT, first they are going to train the shit out of you so that you understand what that weapon is and what it can do.

And, they teach you to hit your target and only your target, not innocent people.

Gun stores don't require the people who buy their guns from them to have training in proper use. The military does.

 

[del]

bullshit

republicans don't think, period.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Florida Republicans Believe Porn Is More Dangerous Than Guns

The state's House of Representatives approved the resolution by a voice vote on Tuesday. The resolution states a need for education, research and policy changes to protect Floridians, especially teenagers, from pornography.

Republican Rep. Ross Spano says there is research that finds a connection between pornography use and mental and physical illnesses, forming and maintaining intimate relationships and deviant sexual behavior. Spano is also a candidate for attorney general.

The most twisted part of this is the demands by Florida Republicans to research the public health impact of porn, while the CDC is implicitly banned from doing research on gun violence. The 1996 Dickey Amendment specifically blocks the CDC from using its budget to "advocate or promote gun control," and since objective, peer-reviewed, scientific studies consistently show effective gun control would reduce gun violence, there's no research the CDC can do that won't sacrifice its funding.

-------------------------------------------------------

Yea, that's right. Republicans want to study the damage caused by porn but not the damage caused by guns.

And yet, they follow a guy who not only dates porn stars, they want him to be a role model for their children.

What is with these people?

Don't handle both at the same time.

But yeah the gop legislature is a pack of morons. Just for public posturing, they should immediately pass a law raising the age for buying an AR-15. Regardless of how one views the 2nd amendment, not passing that bill is moronic.

Why? We’ve babyed these kids to this level of snowflake why go further?

You ask why an 18 year old should legally be able to buy an AR-15?

I’m also asking why an 18 year old that can’t be trusted to buy one can be trusted to tell everyone else they don’t need one either.

Ok, adios.

A question too deep for you? Or an answer you don’t want to contemplate?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

bullshit

republicans don't think, period.

And after your in depth thought and formulating an indisputable reply...

You came up with this. Good job great thinker. Well worth the wait.

 

[del]

bullshit

republicans don't think, period.

And after your in depth thought and formulating an indisputable reply...

You came up with this. Good job great thinker. Well worth the wait.

i imagine it was.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

bullshit

republicans don't think, period.

And after your in depth thought and formulating an indisputable reply...

You came up with this. Good job great thinker. Well worth the wait.

i imagine it was.

I’m sure there’s a lot of unexplainable things in your imagination.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Neither guns nor porn are dangerous

 

[mikegriffith1]

More anti-science posturing from Democrats. I take it you're unaware of the mountain of scientific evidence that porn is more addictive than cocaine, that porn can cause mental illness, and that porn can make some men unable to perform with a flesh-and-blood woman, not to mention the fact that porn can lead to rape and pedophilia.

 

[Moonglow]

More anti-science posturing from Democrats. I take it you're unaware of the mountain of scientific evidence that porn is more addictive than cocaine, that porn can cause mental illness, and that porn can make some men unable to perform with a flesh-and-blood woman, not to mention the fact that porn can lead to rape and pedophilia.

Ha nothing compared to marriage and kids....

 

[hazlnut]

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Well deanrd
The left believes in regulating "sugary drinks" but not marijuana and other drugs deemed less addictive than sugar! The left argues the choice of reparative therapy should be banned as more dangerous than the choice of abortion. That Christian prayer and expression is imposing on people in schools, but not LGBT policies that are also faith based and a personal choice.

The left passed laws banning and punishing the free choice of how to pay for health care, requiring insurance as the only choice, but refuses govt regulations on the choice of abortion.

As for porn, the cure for the addictions related to porn, to drugs, and for mental and criminal illness is found in spiritual healing.
which can be proven medically to effectively diagnose and cure the causes of both mental and physical ills.

So why isn't the left demanding research into cures for cancer, for criminal addictions, and other mental illness as provided by spiritual healing? This would make medical and mental care affordable and accessible to the public by reducing the cost of diseases and crime that taxpayers are wasting billions on through failed prisons and mental health systems that don't cure anyone.

If the left wants health care for all, the solution is to invest in free programs through medical R&D studies and outreach in spiritual healing.

That solution would also work for problems with guns, porn, sexual and drug abuse/addictions, and causes of all kinds of illness, crime and abusive disorders and conditions.

Sources: www.christianhealingmin.org
www.healingisyours.com
Books and studies on spiritual healing by
Dr. Francis MacNutt, Dr. Phillip Goldfedder, Dr. Scott Peck

Being gay a choice? You could choose that? So did you? If not, do you still dream about it?

Yeah, it is a choice. Nowhere else do we see this abominable abhorrent behavior.

You mean besides everywhere in nature?

Lol. Runs antithetical to continuation of the species doesnt it? Or is it just some freakish type mutation that occurs?

No, not really. If 100% of the species were gay, yes it would but a percentage of the population is not at all antithetical to the continuation of a species.

Why would a species select to not continue?

 

[deanrd]

deanrd lies and makes shit up again, starts a thread, gets mocked.

Yer kind are so funni.

Yer kind screams liar.

So I say, what lie?

Yer kind screams about everything.

So I say, give me an example.

Yer kind screams liar.

So I say if you make the claim, you need to give an example.

Yer kind screams liar.

So I say well, if you can't name a single lie, then it's you that's the liar. Then I walk away knowing I can't give an ignorant crazy any more valuable time.

Then yer kind screams chicken, you can't take it when you are called on your lying.

Then I either ask what lie and repeat the entire thing over again or I laugh and go get a latte.

You are lying right now. No matter what lie is pointed out you told, your sorry lying ass will simply lie and say you aren't lying. It's noted and observed behavior by you lying scum.

Too bad no one ever takes the time to point out the lie.

But I know the reason why. I also post lots of links from reputable sources.

And while Fox and Breitbart are not reputable, I even use them once in a while.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Florida Republicans Believe Porn Is More Dangerous Than Guns

The state's House of Representatives approved the resolution by a voice vote on Tuesday. The resolution states a need for education, research and policy changes to protect Floridians, especially teenagers, from pornography.

Republican Rep. Ross Spano says there is research that finds a connection between pornography use and mental and physical illnesses, forming and maintaining intimate relationships and deviant sexual behavior. Spano is also a candidate for attorney general.

The most twisted part of this is the demands by Florida Republicans to research the public health impact of porn, while the CDC is implicitly banned from doing research on gun violence. The 1996 Dickey Amendment specifically blocks the CDC from using its budget to "advocate or promote gun control," and since objective, peer-reviewed, scientific studies consistently show effective gun control would reduce gun violence, there's no research the CDC can do that won't sacrifice its funding.

-------------------------------------------------------

Yea, that's right. Republicans want to study the damage caused by porn but not the damage caused by guns.

And yet, they follow a guy who not only dates porn stars, they want him to be a role model for their children.

What is with these people?

For many Republicans sex is bad.

Why is sex bad? We're supposed to be fruitful and multiply are we not?