Republicans try but can't change history

[bodecea]

1. They were not "white nationalists", you are a lying asshole.

2. Lefty agitators being responsible is a reasonable suspicion. We've seen one on tape.

3. Most republicans are happy to agree that the 1/6 riot, was a riot and that it was a violent crime.

4. YOu are a lying asshole.

They were Republican white-winger thugs.

 

[Roudy]

A. Of COURSE it was unjustified

B. This was just a stupid slip of the tongue

Iraq war was justified, but a stupid move strategically, since Sadam was a Sunni strongman dictator standing as a counter balance to Iran’s Shiite barbaric mullahs In the region. In other words the genie is out of the bottle now. As we saw, Iran, the worlds greatest promoter of terrorism ended up taking over Iraq, expanded its reach into Lebanon, and a major threat to the Saudis and rest of the Sunni nations. Not to mention the thousands of US soldiers it was directly and indirectly responsible for killing in Iraq.

 

[Faun]

The post you just quoted showed you. Did you not read the post that you quoted?

Since deaths, rape and torture escalated once we invaded, your points are moot.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Not really sure why I am being tagged

We just got one of your fellow Iraq invasion war mongers putting up an announcement that the trillion dollar cost plus lives lost and destruction from the Iraq invasion was worth every penny and every ounce of blood shed.

Even after Trump tells you that Bush lied and it was a waste of resources and lives you are one of those who still lies For your beloved W just had the greatest Freudian slip ever. Putin will probably bring up what was said if we ever get Putin to The Hague for a war crimes trial


your lie:
“Saddam was half hearted and wouldn't fully open up, or produce all the documents.”

 

[struth]

We just got one of your fellow Iraq invasion war mongers putting up an announcement that the trillion dollar cost plus lives lost and destruction from the Iraq invasion was worth every penny and every ounce of blood shed.

Even after Trump tells you that Bush lied and it was a waste of resources and lives you are one of those who still lies For your beloved W just had the greatest Freudian slip ever. Putin will probably bring up what was said if we ever get Putin to The Hague for a war crimes trial


your lie:
“Saddam was half hearted and wouldn't fully open up, or produce all the documents.”

That's not a lie at all...it's totally true.

I could careless what Trump's opinion of the war was. Taking out Saddam was the right thing to do, I agree with Xiden, Clinton, and Bush on that

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Iraq war was justified,

Too bad; Saddam shouldn't have said he had them

No it was bush that should not have said that he had them since it was a lie..

In fact after 911 SH said he didn’t have any. SH actually invited the CIA and M I six to come in with the inspectorsTo search for a legend WMD Wherever they want it.

It was reported on Fox too:

Sunday, December 22, 2002 FOX NEWS WASHINGTON — Saddam Hussein's adviser Amir al-Saadi on Sunday invited the CIA to send its agents to Iraq to point out to U.N. inspectors sites the Bush administration suspects of weapons development.



Al-Saadi also said during a news conference in Baghdad that Iraq was prepared to answer any questions raised by the United States and Britain.

"We are ready to deal with each of those questions if you ask us," he said.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

That's not a lie at all...it's totally true.

This was not half hearted. You are a liar.


Sunday, December 22, 2002 FOX NEWS WASHINGTON — Saddam Hussein's adviser Amir al-Saadi on Sunday invited the CIA to send its agents to Iraq to point out to U.N. inspectors sites the Bush administration suspects of weapons development.

Al-Saadi also said during a news conference in Baghdad that Iraq was prepared to answer any questions raised by the United States and Britain.

"We are ready to deal with each of those questions if you ask us," he said.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Fact check: Some Republicans have tried to rewrite the history of January 6. Here's how | CNN Politics

When the House Select Committee investigating the events of January 6 convenes for the first time, it will be against a backdrop of Republican objections and falsehoods.

www.cnn.com

Because history is what it is. Despite the efforts of Trump and his Cult members in Congress to rewrite it to reflect positively on Trump, theirs is a lost cause.

Trump and his disciples, since January 6 have tried over and over to convince the American people that the insurrection was caused by Antifa, was a peaceful event with lots of love in the air or was just a guided tour of the Capital building.

We know better! It was an aggressive attempt by white nationalists, inspired by Trump, to take over the government of the United States. Anyone who sees it in a different light is not a loyal, patriotic American, but rather is a Trump disciple who places him above the Constitution of the United States and the welfare of the majority of the American people.

Today's congressional hearing will expose the Trump people who tried to storm the Capital for what they really are: enemies of the American people.

Democrats are the ones that try to rewrite history.

 

[struth]

This was not half hearted. You are a liar.


Sunday, December 22, 2002 FOX NEWS WASHINGTON — Saddam Hussein's adviser Amir al-Saadi on Sunday invited the CIA to send its agents to Iraq to point out to U.N. inspectors sites the Bush administration suspects of weapons development.

Al-Saadi also said during a news conference in Baghdad that Iraq was prepared to answer any questions raised by the United States and Britain.

"We are ready to deal with each of those questions if you ask us," he said.

Yeah it was, that was day late and a dollar short, and after the UN found chemical weapons.

Regardless, taking out Saddam was more then just about his WMD program. He was a brutal tyrant, and killer....

"
Iraq admitted, among other things, an offensive biological warfare capability, notably, 5,000 gallons of botulinum, which causes botulism; 2,000 gallons of anthrax; 25 biological-filled Scud warheads; and 157 aerial bombs. And I might say UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq has actually greatly understated its production. ...

Over the past few months, as [the weapons inspectors] have come closer and closer to rooting out Iraq's remaining nuclear capacity, Saddam has undertaken yet another gambit to thwart their ambitions by imposing debilitating conditions on the inspectors and declaring key sites which have still not been inspected off limits. ...

It is obvious that there is an attempt here, based on the whole history of this operation since 1991, to protect whatever remains of his capacity to produce weapons of mass destruction, the missiles to deliver them, and the feed stocks necessary to produce them. The UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq still has stockpiles of chemical and biological munitions, a small force of Scud-type missiles, and the capacity to restart quickly its production program and build many, many more weapons. ...

Now, let's imagine the future. What if he fails to comply and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route, which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made? Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you he'll use the arsenal. ...

— President Clinton ~ 1998

 

[DudleySmith]

No it was bush that should not have said that he had them since it was a lie..

In fact after 911 SH said he didn’t have any. SH actually invited the CIA and M I six to come in with the inspectorsTo search for a legend WMD Wherever they want it.

It was reported on Fox too:

Sunday, December 22, 2002 FOX NEWS WASHINGTON — Saddam Hussein's adviser Amir al-Saadi on Sunday invited the CIA to send its agents to Iraq to point out to U.N. inspectors sites the Bush administration suspects of weapons development.



Al-Saadi also said during a news conference in Baghdad that Iraq was prepared to answer any questions raised by the United States and Britain.

"We are ready to deal with each of those questions if you ask us," he said.

Sorry, we aren't as gullible as you would like; you're just too simple minded and have to parrot old nonsense. You should stay over at DU where your mentally ill peers hang out.

Not only did your Hero Saddam claim he was going to use his weapons, he attacked several countries we had defense agreements with, so WMDs is not even a real issue anyway, just a fake 'talking point' for disgruntled morons who don't have squat..

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Yeah it was, that was day late and a dollar short, and after the UN found chemical weapons.

BUSH didn’t invade Iraq in 1998. The UN FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF chemical weapons in 2003,

This was bold face lie:
“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.” DUBYA the DECIDER March 17 2003.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Sorry, we aren't as gullible a

YOU are A LIAR.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Not only did your Hero Saddam claim he was going to use his weapons

Not after September 11 2001? You are a liar because you cannot provide a quote:

 

[struth]

BUSH didn’t invade Iraq in 1998. The UN FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF chemical weapons in 2003,

This was bold face lie:
“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.” DUBYA the DECIDER March 17 2003.

I didn’t say he invaded in 1998.

Saddam continued violations of the UN Resolutions, and attempts to continue to develop WMDs, is merely one of the numerous reasons to take out saddam

 

[struth]

Not after September 11 2001? You are a liar because you cannot provide a quote:

yes, you might be right..saddam might of stopped threatening to use them after he became aware that the US was going to actually do something about his regime of terror and death

 

[Godboy]

Since deaths, rape and torture escalated once we invaded, your points are moot.

Uhuh, whatever you say.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

he attacked several countries we had defense agreements with

Not after September 11 2001? You are a liar because you cannot provide a link showing SH attacking any countries we had defense agreements with

 

[NotfooledbyW]

yes, you might be right..saddam might of stopped threatening to use them after he became aware that the US was going to actually do something about his regime of terror and death

YOU are still a liar because SH said HE DIDNT HAVE WMD and was cooperating with inspectors proactively according to Blix’s last report.

THE UN found nothing being hidden because there were none to be found in IRAQ.

nobody had to die to find no WMD. The UN wanted a few more months to wrap things up.

Biden and Clinton wanted Bush to wait three months and let the inspectors finish the peaceful work / no one had to die except for Dubya’s lie.


So this was the BIG lie for 2003
“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.” DUBYA the DECIDER March 17 2003

 

[Lesh]

Regardless, taking out Saddam was more then just about his WMD program. He was a brutal tyrant, and killer....

So we're invading the Philippines and Russia next?

There were no WMDs and the invasion was a foolish disaster

 

[struth]

YOU are still a liar because SH said HE DIDNT HAVE WMD and was cooperating with inspectors proactively according to Blix’s last report.

THE UN found nothing being hidden because there were none to be found in IRAQ.

nobody had to die to find no WMD. The UN wanted a few more months to wrap things up.

Biden and Clinton wanted Bush to wait three months and let the inspectors finish the peaceful work / no one had to die except for Dubya’s lie.


So this was the BIG lie for 2003
“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.” DUBYA the DECIDER March 17 2003

well Saddam said! hahah