Republicans won’t be satisfied with overturning Roe

OP...you can still kill your unborn. Just press your state to legalize it for you. I'm sure a lot of them will. This was a bad decision, NOT in the federal purview and it should be overturned. Lefties have successfully infiltrated state gov't. you can handle this. I'm sure of it.
Too bad his parents didn't avail themselves to the right bestowed by RvW
 

"We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Samuel Alito writes in the document,

I say that we hold that the Supreme Court is no longer legitimate. The Democrats need to RISE UP and start civil war to protect women and their right to privacy. This is unbelievable to see 5 people try and change 50 years of precedent. This will destroy the COUNTRY.
All that time you people have spent on right wing people promoting insurrection, yet here you are saying FAR worse things than Trump ever did. Dont you ever mention 1/6 again. If you do, i will wreck you by posting your own words in this thread.
 
I do not see that as being correct. A state court cannot overrule the supreme court, as the federal appeals and supreme court are where state supreme court cases are appealed, if appealed. So states cannot get away with holding a supreme court case decision as moot.
This whole thing is really about our worthless legislative bodies of the US House and US Senate, being total p#ussy Wimps, refusing to do their job and passing the buck to the Supremes. Our method of filibuster, make is a simple matter to get out of having to go on the record to approve, disapprove, amend of write and pass controversial legislation and political cowardice rules the day, when all you have to do is say you intend to filibuster. For much and for many, it is just a mouthpiece job, getting them a paycheck and in some cases inside information or power to feather their nest. This is the Supremes trying to get everybody off the hook at the Federal level, forcing state legislatures to take the heat to act in smaller more controllable bodies.

Where did you want a state court to overrule the Supreme Court, if they could?
 
Where did you want a state court to overrule the Supreme Court, if they could?
You were the one that said it could be moot in the state courts. Did I misunderstand you. I thought you were saying the possible Supreme Court decision could be moot in the state courts.
 
‘Abortion has long been a political bonanza for conservative politics and they are not going to want to give it up. If Roe is overturned there will immediately be a push to ban abortion nationally through some sort of "fetal personhood" doctrine and there will be attempts to cripple scientific advances by banning stem cell research, eliminating access to abortion medications and certain forms of birth control. Any states that might have exceptions for rape and incest will be challenged, restrictions on travel and laws against crossing state lines to obtain an abortion will be enacted. And at some point, they will have to consider punishment for women who obtain illegal abortions because that's where this inevitably leads. (Even Donald Trump instinctively understood that before they instructed him how to lie about it for general consumption.) The right has been organized around this issue for 40 years. If Roe is overturned, they will have to keep upping the ante to keep those grassroots activists engaged.’


Exactly.
DeadPeople.jpg
 
Or even moot.

Exactly!

Anyway. Toddster, I know that we historically disagree about monetary policy and all of that but I'm gonna need a lead on pussy hats, if you could. I think they're gonna be a good investment, looking forward to the Fall months. Pussy hats as far as the eye can see, I'll bet. Oh yes indeed! Probably make a small fortune...
 
“Republican senators are giving us a glimpse of the culture war clashes to come. There are already warning signs — including the Texas directive that prohibits parents from legally providing gender-affirming treatment and therapies to their children, as well as various state officials’ questioning whether the Constitution sanctions contraceptive use. Indeed, some Republican senators have gestured toward these future conflicts. In his questions to Jackson, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) repeatedly sought her views of Obergefell v. Hodges, the court’s 2015 decision legalizing same-sex marriage, pressing her as to whether the decision was properly decided. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) took her turn at the microphone to criticize Griswold v. Connecticut, the 1965 case that legalized contraception use. It’s not a stretch to imagine this revisionism extending to Loving v. Virginia, the ruling that legalized interracial marriage. A Republican senator recently said he was open to overturning that ruling. He later walked back his comments.

All this underscores that abortion was never the conservatives’ endgame. It is merely a way station on the path to rolling back a wide range of rights — the rights that scaffold the most intimate aspects of our lives and protect the liberty and equality of marginalized groups.”


Republicans’ assault on citizens’ rights and protected liberties has just begun.
Why don't you let Republicans speak for themselves?
 
“Republican senators are giving us a glimpse of the culture war clashes to come. There are already warning signs — including the Texas directive that prohibits parents from legally providing gender-affirming treatment and therapies to their children, as well as various state officials’ questioning whether the Constitution sanctions contraceptive use. Indeed, some Republican senators have gestured toward these future conflicts. In his questions to Jackson, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) repeatedly sought her views of Obergefell v. Hodges, the court’s 2015 decision legalizing same-sex marriage, pressing her as to whether the decision was properly decided. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) took her turn at the microphone to criticize Griswold v. Connecticut, the 1965 case that legalized contraception use. It’s not a stretch to imagine this revisionism extending to Loving v. Virginia, the ruling that legalized interracial marriage. A Republican senator recently said he was open to overturning that ruling. He later walked back his comments.

All this underscores that abortion was never the conservatives’ endgame. It is merely a way station on the path to rolling back a wide range of rights — the rights that scaffold the most intimate aspects of our lives and protect the liberty and equality of marginalized groups.”


Republicans’ assault on citizens’ rights and protected liberties has just begun.
Wow, you woke up from your nap to share this wacko diatribe? You are one sick puppy.
 
‘Abortion has long been a political bonanza for conservative politics and they are not going to want to give it up. If Roe is overturned there will immediately be a push to ban abortion nationally through some sort of "fetal personhood" doctrine and there will be attempts to cripple scientific advances by banning stem cell research, eliminating access to abortion medications and certain forms of birth control. Any states that might have exceptions for rape and incest will be challenged, restrictions on travel and laws against crossing state lines to obtain an abortion will be enacted. And at some point, they will have to consider punishment for women who obtain illegal abortions because that's where this inevitably leads. (Even Donald Trump instinctively understood that before they instructed him how to lie about it for general consumption.) The right has been organized around this issue for 40 years. If Roe is overturned, they will have to keep upping the ante to keep those grassroots activists engaged.’


Exactly.
Oh. Well if Salon wrote it, it must be true.
:laughing0301:
 
“Republican senators are giving us a glimpse of the culture war clashes to come. There are already warning signs — including the Texas directive that prohibits parents from legally providing gender-affirming treatment and therapies to their children, as well as various state officials’ questioning whether the Constitution sanctions contraceptive use. Indeed, some Republican senators have gestured toward these future conflicts. In his questions to Jackson, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) repeatedly sought her views of Obergefell v. Hodges, the court’s 2015 decision legalizing same-sex marriage, pressing her as to whether the decision was properly decided. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) took her turn at the microphone to criticize Griswold v. Connecticut, the 1965 case that legalized contraception use. It’s not a stretch to imagine this revisionism extending to Loving v. Virginia, the ruling that legalized interracial marriage. A Republican senator recently said he was open to overturning that ruling. He later walked back his comments.

All this underscores that abortion was never the conservatives’ endgame. It is merely a way station on the path to rolling back a wide range of rights — the rights that scaffold the most intimate aspects of our lives and protect the liberty and equality of marginalized groups.”


Republicans’ assault on citizens’ rights and protected liberties has just begun.

MAGA Baby, MAGA!!! :dance:
 

"We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Samuel Alito writes in the document,

I say that we hold that the Supreme Court is no longer legitimate. The Democrats need to RISE UP and start civil war to protect women and their right to privacy. This is unbelievable to see 5 people try and change 50 years of precedent. This will destroy the COUNTRY.
The Dems have been the problem for years. Good job SCOTUS.
 

Forum List

Back
Top