Reshaping the Electorate’: Biden-Harris Admin Granting Citizenship at Fastest Rate in a Decade

The study you linked is from 2012. And even Pew admits the numbers have been closer in other election cycles.
Again, this you, fronting hysterics.

If you put forth better candidates that weren't whack jobs, you might find yourself winning elections again.
So if the Pew study is wrong, don't keep dodging, Slappy, tell us why the Dems/Socialists are in such a hurry to grant citizenship to illegals. Don't try and sidestep the fact that "voters" was an attribute assigned to illegals by the Dems/ Socialists.
 
So if the Pew study is wrong, don't keep dodging, Slappy, tell us why the Dems/Socialists are in such a hurry to grant citizenship to illegals. Don't try and sidestep the fact that "voters" was an attribute assigned to illegals by the Dems/ Socialists.
What hurry? First off, if they are being naturalized, they have completed the citizenship process. What's your problem with immigrants being naturalized legally now? Isn't this how you want it?
 
What hurry? First off, if they are being naturalized, they have completed the citizenship process. What's your problem with immigrants being naturalized legally now? Isn't this how you want it?
The rush to grant citizenship to illegals is happening in a hurry so Dems/ Socialists will have minions to vote along party lines. Let's not forget Biden- Harris are "naturalizing" criminals. Do you understand that crossing the border without authorization is a crime, at least outside of of the alternate realty of the diseased dem / Socialist mind.

That's how you want it, obviously.

Illegals were herded into the country to be made minions that will vote for Dems/ Socialists.
 
Last edited:
The rush to grant citizenship to illegals is happening in a hurry so Dems/ Socialists will have minions to vote along party lines.

That's how you want it, obviously.

Illegals were herded into the country to be made minions that will vote for Dems/ Socialists.
There is no evidence that these newly naturalized citizens will vote Democrat. In fact, quite a few Hispanics are conservatives. Religious ones at that.
All you have is a 10+ year old Pew study that admits....it depended on the election year.

What you are putting forth here is hysteria and speculation. Just recycling alt-right tropes.

Put up better candidates who aren't loons..and you may find yourself winning elections again. :)
 
There is no evidence that these newly naturalized citizens will vote Democrat. In fact, quite a few Hispanics are conservatives. Religious ones at that.
All you have is a 10+ year old Pew study that admits....it depended on the election year.

What you are putting forth here is hysteria and speculation. Just recycling alt-right tropes.

Put up better candidates who aren't loons..and you may find yourself winning elections again. :)
The evidence is in the Pew study and elsewhere that tracked historical trends. It's obvious you have nothing but, " because I say so" as a failed attempt at argument.

You are getting frantic and befuddled because you can't explain the obvious rush by Biden -Harris to create a voter Base of compliant minions.

Why else is there such a rush to create voters just before an election?

You keep sidestepping an obvious question.


This is where you are expected to offer your usual "Nuh uh".
 
Last edited:
The evidence is in the Pew study that tracked historical trends.

You getting frantic and befuddled because you can't explain the obvious rush by Biden -Harris to create a voter Base of compliant minions
Up to 2012.
"In 2012, the Pew Research Center’s National Survey of Latinos found that among Latino immigrants who are not U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents (and therefore likely unauthorized immigrants), some 31% identify as Democrats and just 4% as Republicans. An additional 33% say they are political independents, 16% mention some other political party and 15% say they “don’t know” or refuse to answer the question".

Give me a break. I can't believe you are putting forth this nonsense as fact..or even a trend. Let's forget that the data is over 10 years old. By my hasty math, a full 63% answered independent or "other". Out of that number, I'm sure when the actual time to vote came about that many of them voted Republican.

And that, Hollie, is the data you really need if you are going to make your case that the administration is rushing to naturalized immigrants....who aren't illegal once they are citizens. :)
 
Up to 2012.
"In 2012, the Pew Research Center’s National Survey of Latinos found that among Latino immigrants who are not U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents (and therefore likely unauthorized immigrants), some 31% identify as Democrats and just 4% as Republicans. An additional 33% say they are political independents, 16% mention some other political party and 15% say they “don’t know” or refuse to answer the question".

Give me a break. I can't believe you are putting forth this nonsense as fact..or even a trend. Let's forget that the data is over 10 years old. By my hasty math, a full 63% answered independent or "other". Out of that number, I'm sure when the actual time to vote came about that many of them voted Republican.

And that, Hollie, is the data you really need if you are going to make your case that the administration is rushing to naturalized immigrants....who aren't illegal once they are citizens. :)
As expected, you offered your usual, " because I say so" nonsense. I fully expected you would offer your usual tirade rather than address the issue.


Why the panic on the part of Biden- Harris to grant citizenship just before an election? Put on your dancing shoes and shuffle off as usual.
 
Up to 2012.
"In 2012, the Pew Research Center’s National Survey of Latinos found that among Latino immigrants who are not U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents (and therefore likely unauthorized immigrants), some 31% identify as Democrats and just 4% as Republicans. An additional 33% say they are political independents, 16% mention some other political party and 15% say they “don’t know” or refuse to answer the question".

Give me a break. I can't believe you are putting forth this nonsense as fact..or even a trend. Let's forget that the data is over 10 years old. By my hasty math, a full 63% answered independent or "other". Out of that number, I'm sure when the actual time to vote came about that many of them voted Republican.

And that, Hollie, is the data you really need if you are going to make your case that the administration is rushing to naturalized immigrants....who aren't illegal once they are citizens. :)


"Out of that number, I'm sure when the actual time to vote came about that many of them voted Republican"

You forgot to append your usual, "because I say so". How nice to be 100% sure with 0% facts.

Super! You have nothing to offer. Just a lot of hurt feelings you can't resolve.
 
As expected, you offered your usual, " because I say so" nonsense. I fully expected you would offer your usual tirade rather than address the issue.


Why the panic on the part of Biden- Harris to grant citizenship just before an election? Put on your dancing shoes and shuffle off as usual.
OK, now you have an article that's more relevant to the discussion. However, it doesn't appear to make that much of a difference in the end. So what the administration is doing, is simply clearing the backlog created by the last administration.
Their definition of immigrants includes both naturalized and undocumented.

"Immigrants overall are twice as likely to say that the Democratic Party (32%) represents their political views better than the Republican Party (16%). The gap is similar among naturalized citizens (37% say the Democratic Party, 21% say the Republican party). Immigrants, including naturalized citizens, also much more likely to say to immigrants as a group have fared better under President Biden than under President Trump.
Still, large shares don’t lean towards either party on these questions. One quarter say neither party represents their personal political views and a similar share (27%) say they’re not sure, and about half (47%) say that when it comes to lives of immigrants, it makes no difference who the president is"

The real issue here is you believe immigrants are being naturalized faster to create voters for Democrats in the upcoming election.
Outside of mass naturalization (which won't happen), that's not possible. :)
But the fact remains that Republican candidates..suck! They are for the most part...loons.
If you put better candidates up, you'd find these immigrants voting for them...and you'd be winning elections again.
 
OK, now you have an article that's more relevant to the discussion. However, it doesn't appear to make that much of a difference in the end. So what the administration is doing, is simply clearing the backlog created by the last administration.
Their definition of immigrants includes both naturalized and undocumented.

"Immigrants overall are twice as likely to say that the Democratic Party (32%) represents their political views better than the Republican Party (16%). The gap is similar among naturalized citizens (37% say the Democratic Party, 21% say the Republican party). Immigrants, including naturalized citizens, also much more likely to say to immigrants as a group have fared better under President Biden than under President Trump.
Still, large shares don’t lean towards either party on these questions. One quarter say neither party represents their personal political views and a similar share (27%) say they’re not sure, and about half (47%) say that when it comes to lives of immigrants, it makes no difference who the president is"

The real issue here is you believe immigrants are being naturalized faster to create voters for Democrats in the upcoming election.
Outside of mass naturalization (which won't happen), that's not possible. :)
But the fact remains that Republican candidates..suck! They are for the most part...loons.
If you put better candidates up, you'd find these immigrants voting for them...and you'd be winning elections again.
As expected, you offer mothing relevant. only specious opinion absent any facts. If you put better arguments in place you wouldn't be such a buffoon. As expected you are still sidesteing the reason why Biden -Harris are in such a panic to invent new voters.

It's hilarious that you whine about candidates when your DIE candidate received not a single primary vote and is a candidate because her boss was kicked out by a few in your politburo.
 
Last edited:
As expected, you offer only specious opinion absent any facts. If you put better arguments in place you wouldn't be such a buffoon. As expected you are still sidesteing the reason why Biden -Harris are in such a panic to invent new voters.
There's no "opinion" here. I am quoting what these articles state.

What you are doing is called 'flooding the zone". Repeating the same nonsense over and over, hoping that you'll wear people down over time.
You haven't come CLOSE to defending your OP.

There..is..no..panic. :auiqs.jpg:
This is what's called a made up problem. To explain away the fact that Republicans have gone down the rat hole and aren't coming out anytime soon. :)
 
There's no "opinion" here. I am quoting what these articles state.

What you are doing is called 'flooding the zone". Repeating the same nonsense over and over, hoping that you'll wear people down over time.
You haven't come CLOSE to defending your OP.

There..is..no..panic. :auiqs.jpg:
This is what's called a made up problem. To explain away the fact that Republicans have gone down the rat hole and aren't coming out anytime soon. :)
That was quite the dance. As expected. You offered nothing but, ," because I say so", nothing factual.

As you claim you are quoting the article, Quote the part of the article that states "I'm sure when the actual time to vote came about that many of them voted Republican".

What you are dong is called "spamming the thread". You offer nothing but specious opinion and whining. BIDEN-HARRIS are in a panic to create a voter Base which was a stated goal of the dems/ Socialists long ago. Obviuosly, you continue to sidestep and dance because you can't address that issue.
 
That was quite the dance. As expected. You offered nothing but, ," because I say so", nothing factual.

As you claim you are quoting the article, Quote the part of the article that states "I'm sure when the actual time to vote came about that many of them voted Republican".

What you are dong is called "spamming the thread". You offer nothing but specious opinion and whining. BIDEN-HARRIS are in a panic to create a voter Base which was a stated goal of the dems/ Socialists long ago. Obviuosly, you continue to sidestep and dance because you can't address that issue.
These articles don't support your OP assertion. Period. You use immigration as a constant crutch and excuse because your candidates are terrible and can't win elections. So you make excuses why you lose.
No introspection. No evaluation. Just put forth the same crap over and over and hope enough people buy it. Jeez...:rolleyes:
 
These articles don't support your OP assertion. Period. You use immigration as a constant crutch and excuse because your candidates are terrible and can't win elections. So you make excuses why you lose.
No introspection. No evaluation. Just put forth the same crap over and over and hope enough people buy it. Jeez...:rolleyes:
Wow. Another " becausevI say so" tirade.thevarticles clearly show that immigrants, more often than not, vote democrat. That is the obvious reason why Biden-Harris are on a panic to exploit their illegals as a voting base.

If you sidestep and deflect long enough, it's just an indication of cowardice.

Why the panic to create "newcomer," citizens ny the Dems/ Socialists just prior to the election?

Feel fee to skedaddle, as usual.
 
Wow. Another " becausevI say so" tirade.thevarticles clearly show that immigrants, more often than not, vote democrat. That is the obvious reason why Biden-Harris are on a panic to exploit their illegals as a voting base.

If you sidestep and deflect long enough, it's just an indication of cowardice.

Why the panic to create "newcomer," citizens ny the Dems/ Socialists just prior to the election?

Feel fee to skedaddle, as usual.
Again, there is no panic. Nowhere in your linked articles does it say anything about panic. That is Breitbart speculation and opinion.
And once again, undocumented immigrants are not allowed to vote in a national or state election...anywhere.

You are the one who is panicked. And you should be. Your candidates aren't that good.
The Republican party hasn't really offered up any substantive policy for the average voter since the 1980's.
^Shrug^.
 

Like trained, clapping seals, importing "newcomer," voters is their way to win an election.

The Dems/ Socialists made it clear why their open border would and will continue.

View attachment 995084
The federal government is approving U.S. citizenship requests at the quickest rate in a decade, dispensing with a backlog attributed to the coronavirus pandemic and a tighter approval regime that reached its zenith under former President Donald Trump, a report Tuesday sets out.

analyst Xiao Wang, chief executive of Boundless, a company that reportedly uses government data to analyze immigration trends while offering services to immigrants who seek professional help in navigating the application process, told the outlet the rush comes with commensurate outcomes:


The NY Times report goes on to set out at under five months, application processing speed is now on a par with 2013 and 2014. About 3.3 million immigrants have become citizens during President Joe Biden’s time in office, with less than two months to go before the close of the 2024 fiscal year.

The change in speed can also be traced back to the last change in occupant for the White House.
Finally. Biden is fixing the backlog Trump created.

Good post.
 
Again, there is no panic. Nowhere in your linked articles does it say anything about panic. That is Breitbart speculation and opinion.
And once again, undocumented immigrants are not allowed to vote in a national or state election...anywhere.

You are the one who is panicked. And you should be. Your candidates aren't that good.
The Republican party hasn't really offered up any substantive policy for the average voter since the 1980's.
^Shrug^.
Again. There is an obvious panic by the Dems/ Socialists to increase their voter base. Why the need for Biden- Harris "Granting Citizenship at Fastest Rate in a Decade", just before the election?

is it just a coincidence?

Put up better Candidates and maybe you won't have to rely on illegals as an imported voter base.
 
Absent the NY "Slimes" far leftist garbage,

"In 2012, the Pew Research Center’s National Survey of Latinos found that among Latino immigrants who are not U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents (and therefore likely unauthorized immigrants), some 31% identify as Democrats and just 4% as Republicans. An additional 33% say they are political independents, 16% mention some other political party and 15% say they “don’t know” or refuse to answer the question."


In order to argue the premise, you should have done your homework.




Why don't you tell us why the dems/ Socialists are in such a frantic rush to grant citizenship to their " newcomers".

Unauthorized immigrants are not being given citizenship.
 

Forum List

Back
Top