Ret. Lt. Col. My Sources Say Obama Was in the Room Watching Benghazi Attack Happened

[depotoo]

Bullsh*t. You are the one remaining clueless. Look through my posts and you will find out it arrived an hour and a half after the attack started.l. Period.

And the main building was secured by 5:20 PM EST. There was no live video feed ever, and the first drone in another part of Libya was not diverted to the consulate until 2 and 1/2 hours after the attack started.

Admit it, the Right has fed you nothing but lies on Benghazi.

So, there WAS live feed as the drone was there DURING the attack that lasted HOURS. The President WAS at the White House, and we have NO RECORD what he was doing after a 5 PM meeting with the VP and the Sec. of Defense, who KNEW that an attack was going on! You're a fucking idiot. And why would we believe that there wasn't live feed to the WJ where the Sec. of Defense was?....Because the Regime says so?.... "You can keep your health care...PERIOD!...AND the NSA ISN'T spying on you!

There was no live feed from any drone, ever. The live feed lie was fabricated by Forbes Mag and thoroughly debunked ages ago.

 

[depotoo]

http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=C4E16543-8F99-430C-BEBA-0045A6433426

Here, I've made it easy for you. Notice the link is the the armed services -not to Forbes.

 

[edthecynic]

http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=C4E16543-8F99-430C-BEBA-0045A6433426

Here, I've made it easy for you. Notice the link is the the armed services -not to Forbes.

From your own damn link:

"In addition, briefers reported that those attempting to respond to or assess the Benghazi
attacks often used cell phones to communicate.68 Obviously, that communication technique in a
location with an underdeveloped telecommunications infrastructure poses difficulties. Further,
the Predator drone could not provide complete and contextualized awareness of events.69 As the
committee was told, the first drone (and one that replaced it later) was able to provide
information to “rear headquarters,” but personnel there believed the data was insufficient to
guide the development of “operational judgments.”70"

 

[tyroneweaver]

Here you go, you NEED these more than any psychiatrist now!

September 11 attacks advance-knowledge conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't recall any conservatives on this forum standing up for bush much

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Liberals have no integrity. Their comments on this board (and this subject in particular) prove it.

The liar Shaffer is no Liberal.

But he IS a liar.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Vigilante]

Liberals have no integrity. Their comments on this board (and this subject in particular) prove it.

The liar Shaffer is no Liberal.

But he IS a liar.

The fucking president is a liar! And in his own words, you dumbass liberal scum!

 

[S.J.]

again I ask, how stupid do you have to be to believe the lying scum on FOX?

Fox News and Benghazi video: For real? - Erik Wemple - The Washington Post

There was never any real-time video of this early portion of the Benghazi hostilities. No one in Washington — State Department, White House, whatever — was watching live feeds of the gate-crashing.
An administration official explains: “The Benghazi compound had a CCTV [closed-circuit television] system. Meaning, a system of cameras on the compound. Those cameras could be monitored from the [Tactical Operations Center, TOC], which is one of the structures on the compound.. . . Those images could not be seen anywhere outside the TOC, let alone outside Benghazi. The footage from those cameras is recorded and stored for a period. The footage from the attack was not in USG [U.S. government] hands until later in September.”
Other officials confirmed this account, and Lamb’s testimony before Congress indicated that she was getting updates ”almost in real time.” By telephone, not video. According to an administration official, a security agent stationed in the operations center was providing Lamb phone updates on the hostilities. “She was on the phone with one of the agents for much of the attack,” notes the administration official via e-mail. “That agent was literally juggling 3 phones, a radio, and his weapon. So she had an ‘open line’ to him and could hear what he said.”
So: No real-time video was available at the time of the initial attack on the compound. Technical capabilities, however, changed later in the night — just after 11:00 p.m. — when a Predator drone took position over the area, minutes before U.S. personnel vacated the compound for a CIA annex about a mile away.
That drone had video-sending capacity, though the footage was of limited use to folks back in Washington. It “didn’t provide resolute clarity on what was happening on the ground — no,” says a Defense Department official. “It later provided us with analysis on the timing of the attacks and the facilities that were impacted, but was not providing real-time information to senior department leaders.”

Do you have something besides an opinion blog? It doesn't exactly qualify as a credible source.

First of all, it was not a blog or opinion piece, it was the WaPo online, and secondly he was quoting an official. Clinton also testified under oath to the same!

There Was No Monitor, There Was No Real Time Sound Clip and Quote - Hark

Rohrabacher: At any time did you see the initial attack on a monitor with the president?
Clinton: Congressman, there was no monitor, there was no real time. We got the surveillance videos some weeks later.

At the top of the page it says "Erik Wemple - A reported opinion blog on news media". Go look at your link again.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Here you go, you NEED these more than any psychiatrist now!

September 11 attacks advance-knowledge conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't recall any conservatives on this forum standing up for bush much

That was mostly likely due to the fact that you didn't join this forum until 2012...

 

[edthecynic]

Do you have something besides an opinion blog? It doesn't exactly qualify as a credible source.

First of all, it was not a blog or opinion piece, it was the WaPo online, and secondly he was quoting an official. Clinton also testified under oath to the same!

There Was No Monitor, There Was No Real Time Sound Clip and Quote - Hark

Rohrabacher: At any time did you see the initial attack on a monitor with the president?
Clinton: Congressman, there was no monitor, there was no real time. We got the surveillance videos some weeks later.

At the top of the page it says "Erik Wemple - A reported opinion blog on news media". Go look at your link again.

The opinion was about the lying scum at FOX, specifically Lyin Sean HanNITWITty, but the info about the video was NOT opinion, it was a quote from an official which supported the opinion that HanNITWITty is a lying POS.

 

[S.J.]

First of all, it was not a blog or opinion piece, it was the WaPo online, and secondly he was quoting an official. Clinton also testified under oath to the same!

There Was No Monitor, There Was No Real Time Sound Clip and Quote - Hark

Rohrabacher: At any time did you see the initial attack on a monitor with the president?
Clinton: Congressman, there was no monitor, there was no real time. We got the surveillance videos some weeks later.

At the top of the page it says "Erik Wemple - A reported opinion blog on news media". Go look at your link again.

The opinion was about the lying scum at FOX, specifically Lyin Sean HanNITWITty, but the info about the video was NOT opinion, it was a quote from an official which supported the opinion that HanNITWITty is a lying POS.

The "official" being Hillary Clinton?

 

[edthecynic]

At the top of the page it says "Erik Wemple - A reported opinion blog on news media". Go look at your link again.

The opinion was about the lying scum at FOX, specifically Lyin Sean HanNITWITty, but the info about the video was NOT opinion, it was a quote from an official which supported the opinion that HanNITWITty is a lying POS.

The "official" being Hillary Clinton?

No, but Clinton gave confirming testimony under oath to Congress.

And one of your fellow suckers provided this link, and who noted the link is from the Majority Report (read that the GOP) of the Armed Services Committee who confirm that 1) the drone data was useless and 2) the drone data went no farther than the "rear headquarters" meaning there was no live feed to the WH:

http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=C4E16543-8F99-430C-BEBA-0045A6433426

"In addition, briefers reported that those attempting to respond to or assess the Benghazi
attacks often used cell phones to communicate.68 Obviously, that communication technique in a
location with an underdeveloped telecommunications infrastructure poses difficulties. Further,
the Predator drone could not provide complete and contextualized awareness of events.69 As the
committee was told, the first drone (and one that replaced it later) was able to provide
information to “rear headquarters,” but personnel there believed the data was insufficient to
guide the development of “operational judgments.”70"

 

[S.J.]

The opinion was about the lying scum at FOX, specifically Lyin Sean HanNITWITty, but the info about the video was NOT opinion, it was a quote from an official which supported the opinion that HanNITWITty is a lying POS.

The "official" being Hillary Clinton?

No, but Clinton gave confirming testimony under oath to Congress.

And one of your fellow suckers provided this link, and who noted the link is from the Majority Report (read that the GOP) of the Armed Services Committee who confirm that 1) the drone data was useless and 2) the drone data went no farther than the "rear headquarters" meaning there was no live feed to the WH:

http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=C4E16543-8F99-430C-BEBA-0045A6433426

"In addition, briefers reported that those attempting to respond to or assess the Benghazi
attacks often used cell phones to communicate.68 Obviously, that communication technique in a
location with an underdeveloped telecommunications infrastructure poses difficulties. Further,
the Predator drone could not provide complete and contextualized awareness of events.69 As the
committee was told, the first drone (and one that replaced it later) was able to provide
information to “rear headquarters,” but personnel there believed the data was insufficient to
guide the development of “operational judgments.”70"

And we know how honest Hillary is, don't we? And who is the "official" you're referring to, a Democrat by chance?

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

The attack in Benghazi went on for OVER 7 HOURS, with REPEATED CALLS FOR HELP. and NONE WAS SENT! There was NO sustained attack in Lebanon, it was over in a few minutes!

Ooooh....so no harm, no foul in Beirut then, eh? I guess we should tell the Marines then.

If the war monger McCain had been president, we'd have had another Beirut in Benghazi.

He let that slip with the bomb, bomb, bomb Iran Barbara Ann revelation. If voters had overlooked that and elected McCain on his obvious better qualifications, they could have stayed on his back from day one and easily stopped the madness of the wars overseas. Maybe, McCain let it slip just to release a burden of his and really let democracy work.

 

[Vigilante]

The opinion was about the lying scum at FOX, specifically Lyin Sean HanNITWITty, but the info about the video was NOT opinion, it was a quote from an official which supported the opinion that HanNITWITty is a lying POS.

The "official" being Hillary Clinton?

No, but Clinton gave confirming testimony under oath to Congress.

And one of your fellow suckers provided this link, and who noted the link is from the Majority Report (read that the GOP) of the Armed Services Committee who confirm that 1) the drone data was useless and 2) the drone data went no farther than the "rear headquarters" meaning there was no live feed to the WH:

http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=C4E16543-8F99-430C-BEBA-0045A6433426

"In addition, briefers reported that those attempting to respond to or assess the Benghazi
attacks often used cell phones to communicate.68 Obviously, that communication technique in a
location with an underdeveloped telecommunications infrastructure poses difficulties. Further,
the Predator drone could not provide complete and contextualized awareness of events.69 As the
committee was told, the first drone (and one that replaced it later) was able to provide
information to “rear headquarters,” but personnel there believed the data was insufficient to
guide the development of “operational judgments.”70"

Didn't BJ Clinton give testimony UNDER OATH???...it runs in the family!

 

[edthecynic]

The "official" being Hillary Clinton?

No, but Clinton gave confirming testimony under oath to Congress.

And one of your fellow suckers provided this link, and who noted the link is from the Majority Report (read that the GOP) of the Armed Services Committee who confirm that 1) the drone data was useless and 2) the drone data went no farther than the "rear headquarters" meaning there was no live feed to the WH:

http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=C4E16543-8F99-430C-BEBA-0045A6433426

"In addition, briefers reported that those attempting to respond to or assess the Benghazi
attacks often used cell phones to communicate.68 Obviously, that communication technique in a
location with an underdeveloped telecommunications infrastructure poses difficulties. Further,
the Predator drone could not provide complete and contextualized awareness of events.69 As the
committee was told, the first drone (and one that replaced it later) was able to provide
information to “rear headquarters,” but personnel there believed the data was insufficient to
guide the development of “operational judgments.”70"

And we know how honest Hillary is, don't we? And who is the "official" you're referring to, a Democrat by chance?

The "official" being Hillary Clinton?

No, but Clinton gave confirming testimony under oath to Congress.

And one of your fellow suckers provided this link, and who noted the link is from the Majority Report (read that the GOP) of the Armed Services Committee who confirm that 1) the drone data was useless and 2) the drone data went no farther than the "rear headquarters" meaning there was no live feed to the WH:

http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=C4E16543-8F99-430C-BEBA-0045A6433426

"In addition, briefers reported that those attempting to respond to or assess the Benghazi
attacks often used cell phones to communicate.68 Obviously, that communication technique in a
location with an underdeveloped telecommunications infrastructure poses difficulties. Further,
the Predator drone could not provide complete and contextualized awareness of events.69 As the
committee was told, the first drone (and one that replaced it later) was able to provide
information to “rear headquarters,” but personnel there believed the data was insufficient to
guide the development of “operational judgments.”70"

Didn't BJ Clinton give testimony UNDER OATH???...it runs in the family!

Even the GOP's Armed Services Committee report is dismissed by the Right, proving that once they sink their teeth into a GOP scripted lie, fed to them by the FOX Rumor Mill and hate radio, even the GOP is rejected as too Liberal a source to counter the GOP's own lie.

 

[Vigilante]

No, but Clinton gave confirming testimony under oath to Congress.

And one of your fellow suckers provided this link, and who noted the link is from the Majority Report (read that the GOP) of the Armed Services Committee who confirm that 1) the drone data was useless and 2) the drone data went no farther than the "rear headquarters" meaning there was no live feed to the WH:

http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=C4E16543-8F99-430C-BEBA-0045A6433426

"In addition, briefers reported that those attempting to respond to or assess the Benghazi
attacks often used cell phones to communicate.68 Obviously, that communication technique in a
location with an underdeveloped telecommunications infrastructure poses difficulties. Further,
the Predator drone could not provide complete and contextualized awareness of events.69 As the
committee was told, the first drone (and one that replaced it later) was able to provide
information to “rear headquarters,” but personnel there believed the data was insufficient to
guide the development of “operational judgments.”70"

And we know how honest Hillary is, don't we? And who is the "official" you're referring to, a Democrat by chance?

No, but Clinton gave confirming testimony under oath to Congress.

And one of your fellow suckers provided this link, and who noted the link is from the Majority Report (read that the GOP) of the Armed Services Committee who confirm that 1) the drone data was useless and 2) the drone data went no farther than the "rear headquarters" meaning there was no live feed to the WH:

http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=C4E16543-8F99-430C-BEBA-0045A6433426

"In addition, briefers reported that those attempting to respond to or assess the Benghazi
attacks often used cell phones to communicate.68 Obviously, that communication technique in a
location with an underdeveloped telecommunications infrastructure poses difficulties. Further,
the Predator drone could not provide complete and contextualized awareness of events.69 As the
committee was told, the first drone (and one that replaced it later) was able to provide
information to “rear headquarters,” but personnel there believed the data was insufficient to
guide the development of “operational judgments.”70"

Didn't BJ Clinton give testimony UNDER OATH???...it runs in the family!

Even the GOP's Armed Services Committee report is dismissed by the Right, proving that once they sink their teeth into a GOP scripted lie, fed to them by the FOX Rumor Mill and hate radio, even the GOP is rejected as too Liberal a source to counter the GOP's own lie.

I see you refuse to answer my question that did BLOW JOB CLINTON LIE under OATH!... Let's get this done, instead of diversion!

 

[edthecynic]

And we know how honest Hillary is, don't we? And who is the "official" you're referring to, a Democrat by chance?

Didn't BJ Clinton give testimony UNDER OATH???...it runs in the family!

Even the GOP's Armed Services Committee report is dismissed by the Right, proving that once they sink their teeth into a GOP scripted lie, fed to them by the FOX Rumor Mill and hate radio, even the GOP is rejected as too Liberal a source to counter the GOP's own lie.

I see you refuse to answer my question that did BLOW JOB CLINTON LIE under OATH!... Let's get this done, instead of diversion!

I love it, you attempt to divert from the fact that the GOP led Armed Services Committee found that the drone data was useless and went no farther than the "rear headquarters" meaning it never went to the WH, destroying your lie that the WH watched a live feed from the drone, and then accuse me of diversion.

See my sig

 

[g5000]

It is fascinating to observe the psychosis which bewails the "lies" told by the Obama Administration about the Benghazi tragedy and yet continues to gobble up the unadulterated bullshit lie that "Obama watched as they died".

Dissociative personality disorder certainly is an interesting disease.

 

[Vigilante]

Even the GOP's Armed Services Committee report is dismissed by the Right, proving that once they sink their teeth into a GOP scripted lie, fed to them by the FOX Rumor Mill and hate radio, even the GOP is rejected as too Liberal a source to counter the GOP's own lie.

I see you refuse to answer my question that did BLOW JOB CLINTON LIE under OATH!... Let's get this done, instead of diversion!

I love it, you attempt to divert from the fact that the GOP led Armed Services Committee found that the drone data was useless and went no farther than the "rear headquarters" meaning it never went to the WH, destroying your lie that the WH watched a live feed from the drone, and then accuse me of diversion.

See my sig

So besides you NOT answering the question did CLINTON LIE under oath, you're now stating that the WH was unable to see any pictures from a drone? Correct?