Ret. Lt. Col. My Sources Say Obama Was in the Room Watching Benghazi Attack Happened

[ScreamingEagle]

Ret. Lt. Col. My Sources Say Obama Was in the Room Watching Benghazi Attack Happened

Really? Cool! When is he going to provide proof?

Obama watches every other film he can put his mitts on.....i'm sure he got the advanced copy...

 

[NYcarbineer]

Here you go, you NEED these more than any psychiatrist now!

September 11 attacks advance-knowledge conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

lol, nice link.

Here's one of the wacky conspiracy theories you're mocking:

A classified military intelligence program known as "Able Danger" was created in October 1999 specifically targeting al-Qaeda. Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and Congressman Curt Weldon (R-PA) charged before the Senate Judiciary Committee that Able Danger had identified Mohamed Atta, and three of the other hijackers, prior to 9/11.

I re-sized one of the names for you. It's the same Lt. Col. in the OP of this thread,

obviously he's still in the wacky conspiracy theory industry.

You people make it too easy lol

Sorry, that article includes everything brought to the top, whether proven or not! And since that has never been proven to be a LIE, as the current Regimes lies about the video, and now the e-mails about the cover up by the regime, PROVES what has been stated, looks like you subversives have egg on your face!

You Alex Jones types would love to take over this forum but I think you're going to find that you're not up to that mission.

 

[bedowin62]

Ret. Lt. Col. My Sources Say Obama Was in the Room Watching Benghazi Attack Happened

Really? Cool! When is he going to provide proof?

He's in the conspiracy business and that audience doesn't demand proof.

WHAT GOOD IS PROVIDING PROOF TO LEFT-WING LOSERS like you?


you have a memo that says BENGHAZI at the top of the page; and obama's shill is telling reporters it didnt refer to benghazi

you loser lemmings on the Left WANT TO BE LIED TO

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Right's Benghazi hysteria has jumped the shark so many times that more attempts to keep it going just look ludicrous to normal Americans.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Ret. Lt. Col. My Sources Say Obama Was in the Room Watching Benghazi Attack Happened

Really? Cool! When is he going to provide proof?

He's in the conspiracy business and that audience doesn't demand proof.

WHAT GOOD IS PROVIDING PROOF TO LEFT-WING LOSERS like you?


you have a memo that says BENGHAZI at the top of the page; and obama's shill is telling reporters it didnt refer to benghazi

you loser lemmings on the Left WANT TO BE LIED TO

You sound retarded with that sort of ranting. If that is your goal...

...well done.

 

[Spoonman]

Please. we all know the obama administration only uses a show of force against american citizens.

diplomats dying while on foriegn soil is to be expected, but by god, don't let me catch you grazing cattle on public lands.

 

[francoHFW]

OP- Braindead Beckbot hater dupe idiocy. End of story....

 

[Vigilante]

lol, nice link.

Here's one of the wacky conspiracy theories you're mocking:

A classified military intelligence program known as "Able Danger" was created in October 1999 specifically targeting al-Qaeda. Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and Congressman Curt Weldon (R-PA) charged before the Senate Judiciary Committee that Able Danger had identified Mohamed Atta, and three of the other hijackers, prior to 9/11.

I re-sized one of the names for you. It's the same Lt. Col. in the OP of this thread,

obviously he's still in the wacky conspiracy theory industry.

You people make it too easy lol

Sorry, that article includes everything brought to the top, whether proven or not! And since that has never been proven to be a LIE, as the current Regimes lies about the video, and now the e-mails about the cover up by the regime, PROVES what has been stated, looks like you subversives have egg on your face!

You Alex Jones types would love to take over this forum but I think you're going to find that you're not up to that mission.

You left wing subversives will find out just how truth and facts will overcome your socialism, and lies!

 

[Vigilante]

He's in the conspiracy business and that audience doesn't demand proof.

WHAT GOOD IS PROVIDING PROOF TO LEFT-WING LOSERS like you?


you have a memo that says BENGHAZI at the top of the page; and obama's shill is telling reporters it didnt refer to benghazi

you loser lemmings on the Left WANT TO BE LIED TO

You sound retarded with that sort of ranting. If that is your goal...

...well done.

Well, no, it's YOU and your comrades that look like assholes when you can't see what's plainly put in front of you! BTW, you can keep your healthcare, and your doctor...PERIOD!

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

The Right's Benghazi hysteria has jumped the shark so many times that more attempts to keep it going just look ludicrous to normal Americans.

Keep it going we will until the anti-American scum that sat by and watched US citizens murdered and then lied about it are brought to justice.

 

[Vigilante]

OP- Braindead Beckbot hater dupe idiocy. End of story....

Franco, to keep it honest, you need this as your avatar!

 

[bedowin62]

The Right's Benghazi hysteria has jumped the shark so many times that more attempts to keep it going just look ludicrous to normal Americans.

the only ones looking ludicrous at this point are loser obama-bots laughably trying to agree with an idiotic talking point that says a memo with BENGHAZI at the top of the page didnt refer to benghazi

no matter how many times you try to ridicule others; the facts arent on your side; and you are the one who looks like the lying shill you are

 

[bedowin62]

He's in the conspiracy business and that audience doesn't demand proof.

WHAT GOOD IS PROVIDING PROOF TO LEFT-WING LOSERS like you?


you have a memo that says BENGHAZI at the top of the page; and obama's shill is telling reporters it didnt refer to benghazi

you loser lemmings on the Left WANT TO BE LIED TO

You sound retarded with that sort of ranting. If that is your goal...

...well done.

you're a laughable loser; i've shredded your posts many times.

the only reason you losers keep TRYING to ridicule others on Benghazi is because the other side is getting closer and closer to the truth.
you are the typical fool; foolishly trying to grin and put on a smile when it is all falling apart

 

[BlindBoo]

It is no wonder normal people rolls their eyes when a rabid rightie brings these things up.

By the time the first drone was over head the attack on the Consulate was over and the guys from the CIA Annex and members of the September 17th militia had already rescued the survivors and recovered Smith's body.

There was no "Stand Down Order" given by the White House.

There was no 7 hour battle.

Oh, but the Administration did speculate in their talking points that there may have been a protest like the ones going on all over the ME that week that the extremist may have used as cover for their attack. But of course further investigation cleared up that mistake, not that it matters to the wackos......

 

[candycorn]

Here you go, you NEED these more than any psychiatrist now!

September 11 attacks advance-knowledge conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

lol, nice link.

Here's one of the wacky conspiracy theories you're mocking:

A classified military intelligence program known as "Able Danger" was created in October 1999 specifically targeting al-Qaeda. Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and Congressman Curt Weldon (R-PA) charged before the Senate Judiciary Committee that Able Danger had identified Mohamed Atta, and three of the other hijackers, prior to 9/11.

I re-sized one of the names for you. It's the same Lt. Col. in the OP of this thread,

obviously he's still in the wacky conspiracy theory industry.

You people make it too easy lol

In Conservistan content=credibility....see Putin, Zimmerman, that kook in Nevada etc....

Any enemy of the President is a friend of theirs. Then they try to say they are patriots....what a laugh.

 

[bodecea]

Retired Army Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer said Saturday he has sources saying President Barack Obama was in the room at the White House watching the assault on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya unfold. Two unarmed U.S. drones were dispatched to the consulate and recorded the final hours of the attack, which killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. “This was in the middle of the business day in Washington, so everybody at the White House, CIA, Pentagon, everybody was watching this go down,” Shaffer said on Fox News’ “Justice with Judge Jeanine.” “According to my...

Retired Lt. Col.: My Sources Say Obama Was in the Room Watching Benghazi Attack Happen | Video | TheBlaze.com

What a coincidence. I have a "source" that _____________________ (fill in the blank)

 

[Vigilante]

It is no wonder normal people rolls their eyes when a rabid rightie brings these things up.

By the time the first drone was over head the attack on the Consulate was over and the guys from the CIA Annex and members of the September 17th militia had already rescued the survivors and recovered Smith's body.

There was no "Stand Down Order" given by the White House.

There was no 7 hour battle.

Oh, but the Administration did speculate in their talking points that there may have been a protest like the ones going on all over the ME that week that the extremist may have used as cover for their attack. But of course further investigation cleared up that mistake, not that it matters to the wackos......

Just to cover your FIRST LIE...

White House Watched Benghazi Attacked And Didn't Respond

Just one hour after the seven-hour-long terrorist attacks upon the U.S. consulate in Benghazi began, our commander-in-chief, vice president, secretary of defense and their national security team gathered together in the Oval Office listening to phone calls from American defenders desperately under siege and watching real-time video of developments from a drone circling over the site. Yet they sent no military aid that might have intervened in time to save lives.

Why?

The attack began on September 11, at about 10:00 p.m. Libyan time (4:00 p.m. in Washington). Ambassador Chris Stevens and his small staff inside our consulate immediately contacted Washington and our embassy in Tripoli. Thirty minutes later, after the main consulate building was on fire and Ambassador Stevens was missing, Tripoli (400 miles away) dispatched an aircraft carrying 22 men. Much more formidable response resources including Special Operations Forces, transport aircraft and attack fighters were available 480 miles away at the U.S. military base in Sigonella, Sicily, but were never dispatched. An F18 fighter jet blazing in with afterburner thundering to unnerve attackers and take out mortar locations could have reached Benghazi in an hour. Commandos could have arrived there within three hours. This was four hours into the seven- hour assault after President Obama, Vice President Biden and Secretary of Defense Panetta initially met at 5:00 p.m.

In the meantime, the terrorists forced the Americans to abandon the consulate with the ambassador still missing. They fell back to an annex building about a mile away. Looters ransacking the empty consulate discovered Ambassador Stevens lying unconscious from smoke inhalation on the floor and rushed him to a hospital where doctors were unsuccessful in saving his life. Not knowing who he was, they took a cell phone from his pocket and called numbers. By about 2:00 a.m. Libyan time, the American embassy received word he was dead.

At about that same time (four hours into the attack), the 22 men arriving at the Benghazi airport from Tripoli drove into the annex to assist the Americans trapped there. Around 4:00 a.m. enemy mortar rounds killed two defenders on the annex roof. The attack ended at dawn when Libyan militia finally arrived to aid our Americans.

CBS News has reported that a series of email alerts received late Tuesday evening provides additional information that was known by Obama administration officials shortly after the attack commenced. The messages were also independently obtained by ABC News. Although names of individual recipients were redacted, the source who requested anonymity said it appears they were sent to the State Department Operations Center to distribution lists and email accounts of top security officials at the State Department, Pentagon, the FBI, the White House Situation Room and the office of the Director of National Intelligence.

The first alert with a subject line “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack” which arrived from Tripoli just 25 minutes after the attack began describes an assault on the compound by 20 armed people firing shots, with explosions heard as well. It reported that Ambassador Stevens and four COM (Chief of Mission) personnel were sequestered in the compound safe haven with the 17th of February militia providing security support. Another email arriving about one-half hour later reported that shooting had stopped and that the response team was attempting to locate COM personnel.

A third email received two hours after the attack commenced updated officials that Ansar al-Sharia, a terrorist group, claimed responsibility for the Benghazi attack on Facebook and Twitter, and had also threatened to attack the Tripoli embassy. The Facebook claim was subsequently denied by the group at a news conference in the following days, but not entirely convincingly, saying: “We are saluting our people for this zeal in protecting their region, to grant victory to the prophet. The response has to be firm.”
The Obama administration has an immediate obligation to inform the public why security responses were so tragically lacking both before and during the course of this terrible and fatal assault. Why was Ambassador Stevens, after he recognized and communicated the existence of a special 9/11 security threat, repeatedly denied protection he requested? It is clear that on August 2nd the consulate asked for an additional 11 security personnel to be added to the rotation of 24. Though the 11 were to replace temporary security staff, Stevens had made it clear that violence and terrorism were a threat amid a volatile political landscape. He wrote: “Due to the level of threat in regards to crime, political violence and terrorism, post feels this is an appropriate number of LES [locally employed staff] security personnel needed to further embassy diplomatic outreach missions. Violent security incidents continue to take place due to the lack of a coherent national Libyan security force and the strength of local militias and large numbers of armed groups.” He further emphasized that “Host national security support is lacking and cannot be depended on to provide a safe and secure environment.”

Andrew Wood, former head of a U.S. military team in Libya, has reported: “…the security in Benghazi was a struggle and remained a struggle throughout my time there”. He added that the head of U.S. security in the region had pushed for more people “…but was never able to attain the numbers he felt comfortable with.” Eric Nordstrom, the former security chief for U.S. diplomats in Libya, has observed that he had been fighting a losing battle over numbers in which “ …we couldn’t even keep what we had.” He finally concluded after his contact with state department bosses that “…we were not going to get resources until the aftermath of an incident”.


And why, in the heat of battle with real-time communications regarding what was going on, didn’t our top leaders send responsive help that was so urgently needed? Past presidents have taken rapid actions to protect our people. For example, in 1984, President Reagan ordered U.S. pilots to force an airliner carrying terrorists to land at Sigonella within a 90 minute window while they were still airborne. The Obama national security team had several hours to move forces from that same air base to Benghazi. We deserve an explanation.

White House Watched Benghazi Attacked And Didn't Respond - Forbes

 

[bodecea]

Retired Army Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer said Saturday he has sources saying President Barack Obama was in the room at the White House watching the assault on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya unfold. Two unarmed U.S. drones were dispatched to the consulate and recorded the final hours of the attack, which killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. “This was in the middle of the business day in Washington, so everybody at the White House, CIA, Pentagon, everybody was watching this go down,” Shaffer said on Fox News’ “Justice with Judge Jeanine.” “According to my...

Retired Lt. Col.: My Sources Say Obama Was in the Room Watching Benghazi Attack Happen | Video | TheBlaze.com

WOW! Dredging a 2 1/2 year old GOP scripted lie. You assholes must be desperate!!!

....We wouldn't expect you subversives to do anything else when you can't refute it!

 

[auditor0007]

Man you're one lost CTer

Actually there is quite a bit of merit to that. Where was Republicans outrage in 83 when 241 American Marines were killed in Beirut, Lebanon? Oh that's right, Reagan was president so that wasn't a big deal. Remember the guards were not even permitted to have guns?

The attack in Benghazi went on for OVER 7 HOURS, with REPEATED CALLS FOR HELP. and NONE WAS SENT! There was NO sustained attack in Lebanon, it was over in a few minutes!

Yes it was over very quickly because our Marines were not even permitted to have guns in a potential combat situation. Talk about a lapse in judgement that ended up having devastating consequences. And everyone knew that was a dangerous situation. And under Bush, a number of Americans died in our embassies around the world. The difference is that nobody was calling for heads to roll until now, and the reason for that is that the far right will take anything and try to use it for political gain. It's truly pathetic. Another reason I am glad I left the Republican Party. You guys keep this up and you will continue to see people move away from the party. It's inevitable.

 

[Vigilante]

WOW! Dredging a 2 1/2 year old GOP scripted lie. You assholes must be desperate!!!

....We wouldn't expect you subversives to do anything else when you can't refute it!

WH Tries Jedi Mind Trick to Explain Smoking Gun Benghazi Email

“It [the smoking gun email] was explicitly not about Benghazi. It was about the overall situation in the region, the Muslim world, where you saw protests across embassy facilities across the region.”

It was the political version of "These are not the droids you are looking for."

ABC News' Jonathan Karl went after White House Press Secretary Jay Carney Wednesday about the Benghazi emails indicating a political basis for the Administration's response that were released by Judicial Watch the day before.

Despite the text of the email, Carney tried to get away with saying the letter was not about Benghazi, saying,“It was explicitly not about Benghazi. It was about the overall situation in the region, the Muslim world, where you saw protests across embassy facilities across the region.”
Karl aggressively questioned Carney about the week leading up to Susan Rice's post Benghazi appearance on the Sunday news shows where she blamed the attack on an anti-Muslim You Tube video. Carney tried to respond with snark:

Karl: You just had an attack on a — (inaudible) — consulate in Benghazi. You had Americans killed. You knew full well that what Susan Rice was primarily going to be asked about was about that attack — a terrorist attack on a U.S. consulate in Benghazi.
Carney: Can I read the promo from your show, ABC “This Week”?
Karl: You do acknowledge that these — (inaudible) — was going to be about the Benghazi attack?
Carney: Absolutely, about — Jon, absolutely. And she — and that’s why, as members of Congress did, Ambassador Rice relied on points about the Benghazi attack that were produced by the CIA.
Karl: So –
Carney: When — hold on. As American embassies throughout the region remain under fire — that’s ABC “This Week” promo. Again, we prepare Q-and-As for administration officials based on what we think they’re going to be asked. When I come out here –
​

The back and forth continued until Karl segued into the possible White House lies.

Karl: Ambassador Rice went on those shows, and she said that the attack in Benghazi was rooted in protests over an Internet video. We now know that that was not true, that, in fact, the CIA Director, Morell, just — former Director Morell just testified last month that quote, “when she talked about the video, my reaction was, that’s not something the analysts have attributed this attack to. It did not come from the CIA. You stood there at the podium time after time and said that she was referring to talking points created by the CIA. Now we see a document that comes from the White House, not from the CIA, attributing the protests to the video, and we have the former director of the CIA saying that that was not something that his analysts had attributed it to.
Carney: Jon, I would point you to what Mike Morell has said repeatedly in testimony about the creation of the talking points.
Karl: Well, now we have new talking points, and you didn’t release them — (inaudible) –
Carney: Let me finish, please. Jon, I answered that question. The fact of the matter is, there were protests in the region. The talking points cited protests at that facility. The connection between protests and video — and the video turned out not to be the case, but it was based on the best information that we had, and the fact that there were protests –
Karl: It was not based on what the CIA was saying, Jay.
Carney: Jon, I would point you to — I understand the –
Karl: This is what Morell said just last month, that when he heard that, he said that is not something our analysts have said. So that, now we see, came from the White House, right?
Carney: Jon — no, you’re wrong. If you look at that document, that document that we’re talking about today was about the overall environment in the Muslim world — the protests outside of Khartoum — the embassy in Khartoum, outside of the embassy in Tunis, the protests outside of the embassy in Cairo. These were big stories.
​

The memo Karl and Carney were discussing set the goals for Susan Rice's appearance on the Sunday programs. These goals seem to disagree with what Carney says about the memo.

Carney: I know that you and I are both in a different time zone right now, but we’re still in April of 2014, and this is a discussion about what she said and what turned out to be the case that we have had dozens of time in this room. And the fact of the matter is she went out there with the best information that we had at the time. The CIA deputy director has testified to that. The fact that there were protests around the region threatening our embassies at the very same time is something that is often forgotten but obviously affected the whole environment about how we perceived what was happening at the time. And again, the implication is that we were somehow holding back information, when in fact we were simply saying what we thought was right. And when elements of that turned out not to be true, we were the first people to say so. It was based on what we knew at the time.
Karl: Why were you holding back this information? Why was this email not turned over to the Congress? Why was it not released when you released all the other emails? This is directly relevant. Why did you hold this back? Why did it take a court case for you to release this — (inaudible) –
Carney: Jon, I can say it again and again, and I know you can keep asking again and again. This document was not about Benghazi.

WH Tries Jedi Mind Trick to Explain Smoking Gun Benghazi Email | Truth Revolt
​