freedombecki
Let's go swimmin'!
Sooo, Ricky wants to invade Iraq for the THIRD time? How nice...
Rick Perry Would Put U.S. Troops Back In Iraq (VIDEO)
No, Perry wants to prevent people like Barack Obama from the proxy murders of American allies who collaborated with American troops to bring peace to warmongering Iraq. Saddam's old group will make short work of the new government America paid trillions so their youngsters can grow up in a peaceful world.
Obama pretends his ideas are so high and mighty AlQaeda and their collaborators from Saddam's reign will play nice on our departure. I hold him responsible for the bloodletting that is to come in the Middle East over his cowardice in the face of facts.
Let me explain this as nicely and as slowly as possible.
One. "Saddam's Old Group" (which by the way is called the Ba'ath Party of Iraq... there's another one that runs Syria) is now non-existent.
Two. Iraq is now engaged in sectarian violence between the Shiite majority, the Sunni Minority, and the Kurds as well as various cells of Al Qaeda operatives that are taking advantage of the chaos there, like they have been in Somalia for the past two decades.
Three. This sectarian violence has gone on for NOT years, NOT decades, BUT CENTURIES.
Four. There is absolutely NOTHING we can do about this sectarian violence.
Five. Al Qaeda did and does not have a safe haven in Iraq because we left. Our presence there actually means nothing in the long run.
HOW SO YOU ASK????
Well I'll enlighten you.
Al Qaeda thrives on sectarian wars, random violence, political instability, and famine. These things are all too common in the Middle East. This is especially so after the "Arab spring" which has left countries like Egypt... Libya... Ethiopia... Nigeria... Syria... Yemen... and others in complete or partial chaos.
Al Qaeda made it's way into Libya last year helping the rebels overthrow their drugged up dictator.
Libya will soon become a safe haven for Al Qaeda.
Egypt is falling into chaos since they ousted their President.
Egypt will soon become a safe haven for Al Qaeda.
Syria may be next.
Most people use Iraq becoming a safe haven for Al Qaeda as a reason for staying there (I feel as though that's us being sitting ducks... but I'll play along and follow the logic).
My question is so... if we have to be in Iraq to keep Iraq from being a safe haven for Islamic Militants what about...
Libya, Syria, or Egypt?
How about the examples of other nations that already are safe havens for Al Qaeda?
Yemen? Somalia? Northern Nigeria? Niger? Chad? Sudan?
Should we occupy these nations as well? Or is there a more practical, cost effective, less dangerous, and more efficient way of combating Al Qaeda in all of these various nations where Al Qaeda reigns even more freely then in Iraq and Afghanistan? And IF we can combat Al Qaeda in Somalia or Libya, without invading, occupying, and rebuilding these nations from the ground up at the expense of tax payers, WHY CAN'T WE DO THE SAME FREAKING THING IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN? It's an honest and simple question I think this party needs to consider if we want to defeat radical Islam... SERIOUSLY.
I'm not some let's all get along liberal that blames the wars on America beating down on the brown people. I believe in the fundamental purpose of the war on terror, to protect our own interests worldwide and defeat organized radical Islamism. I JUST DON'T BELIEVE WE'RE TAKING THE MOST INTELLIGENT APPROACH. Quite the opposite... I think our approach is idiotic, way to costly, and may lead to our downfall as a nation if we don't change immediately. That is all.
Your new national bird?