Right From the Prosecution's Opening Arguments, the Judge Permits Trump's Rights to be Trashed

The vast majority of Americans polled believe the Trump trials are political show trials and wouldn't be happening if he wasn't running for president.

Trump did nothing wrong!!!
 
When the guy from the Biden administration, Matthew Colangelo who was #3 at the DoJ, and left to take up this matter of persecuting Trump, anyone with eyes could see the involvement of the White House in this persecution.

But the guy then told the jury in opening arguments that Trump was on trial in part for election interference. But there is no such charge in the indictment.

The Supreme Court has ruled that no mention of a crime not charged can be mentioned. Trump's attorneys objected to this.

And judge Marchan laughed it off and permitted this clear violation of Trump rights.

This is of course so Marchan can get as quick a conviction as possible so Democrats can tout Trump as a felon.

This opening act is itself solid grounds for overturning any guilty verdict. But that takes time, and Dems will get what they want if Trump is convicted.


“The defendant, Donald Trump, orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 presidential election,” Colangelo said, according to multiple reports.


thats a shame.
 
Matthew Colangelo—a Manhattan prosecutor and former Justice Department attorney—
He left the DOJ and was hired in 2022 by the Manhattan prosecutor office.

Job change is not a crime and his a prosecutor for Manhattan

Trump is charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records
 
When the guy from the Biden administration, Matthew Colangelo who was #3 at the DoJ, and left to take up this matter of persecuting Trump, anyone with eyes could see the involvement of the White House in this persecution.

But the guy then told the jury in opening arguments that Trump was on trial in part for election interference. But there is no such charge in the indictment.

The Supreme Court has ruled that no mention of a crime not charged can be mentioned. Trump's attorneys objected to this.

And judge Marchan laughed it off and permitted this clear violation of Trump rights.

This is of course so Marchan can get as quick a conviction as possible so Democrats can tout Trump as a felon.

This opening act is itself solid grounds for overturning any guilty verdict. But that takes time, and Dems will get what they want if Trump is convicted.


“The defendant, Donald Trump, orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 presidential election,” Colangelo said, according to multiple reports.


Matthew Colangelo—a Manhattan prosecutor and former Justice Department attorney—
He left the DOJ and was hired in 2022 by the Manhattan prosecutor office.

Job change is not a crime and he is a prosecutor for Manhattan

Trump is charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records

election interference is nothing more than a motive and shows criminal intent for falsifying business records

He is not being charged with election interference

That is Smiths case Donald Trump VS US

The Supreme Court has ruled that no mention of a crime not charged can be mentioned. Trump's attorneys objected to this.

I do not know what the above means
 

Forum List

Back
Top