Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You'd argue with a tree stump. The blacks are going to argue with you and say they weren't equal when the Constitution was ratified. The Chinese, who built the Transcontinental Railroad will argue with you. So will other races that were unable to become citizens.
ALL men are created equal, in the sense that God bestowed upon them unalienable Rights. Those Rights, however, did not extend to the privileges of citizenship. Consequently America was founded on the twin pillars of race and religion.
You are conflating a militarized border with a secure border. They are not the same thing.
1. So it took some time for US to live up to our ideals. That does not change the fact that of the Ideals that we were founded on.
2. Race, religion, Oppression, ect. ect ect ect, was the norm at the time. You might as well say that nation was founded on the planting and eating of food. I reject your narrative of history. It is self serving and self defeating.
3 The tens of millions of illegals living in this country, prove that we do not have a secure border. I would be happy to militarize it, and see if that secures it. If not, I promise to apologize and admit I was wrong. We can then demilitarize it.
You've already been proven wrong. In 1953 Congress began talking about Operation Wetback. By 1954 they were rounding up every undocumented foreigner they could find. In less than five years, the unemployment rate doubled! .....
NOthing in my post made any point about employment. You brought that up to avoid addressing what I actually said.
No sir, YOU'VE been avoiding what I have asked.
I'm presuming we're a nation of laws and that even the illegally ratified laws are in place. You haven't been able to deal in reality. You don't understand the difference between what America was founded on what it evolved into (which, contrary to your opinion, is NOT a good thing.)
Your infantile analogies do not address the many links I've posted. You and I both know you don't know all the different sides to this. The bottom line, whether you like it or not, the Preamble to the Constitution reads:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
I'm sorry that Constitution does not fit your narrative. You will watch your country go down in flames because you cannot make a simple connection. America cannot be a nation that is everything to everybody. Someone WILL be pushed out. This is the last president that is going to see it your way during your lifetime.
You are not making any sense.
You complain about the effects of Third World immigration, while attacking the idea of fighting against Third World immigration.
1. The Proud Boys are not neo nazis.
2. Trump did condemn the white supremacists and neo nazis in charlottesville repeatedly. That you lie about that, shows that you know you need to lie.
1. They are a neo-Nazi group.
2. All you have to look at is then Chief of Staff General Kelly with his face buried in his hands. Trump tried to equate neo-nazis and white supremacists with peaceful protestors who were assaulted with 1 killed.
I am not a Trump supporter, so don't go there when I tell you that you are wrong here.
The people who created the wallist religion (the whole wall worship thing) ARE nazis. That is a fact beyond any dispute. It is also a fact that the wallist religion predominates the effort that was made in Charlottesville.
Not all of the whites who attended the Charlottesville rally were violent white supremacists. That is made self evident that the Charlottesville rally was a one and done event. Contrast that to when the black community has their people shot or beaten in the streets. The outcry and rallies are constant.
We do have a problem with foreigners coming to this country. It is, however, one of our making. But, the people have a RIGHT to protest and seek out change. For anyone to say that all the Charlottesville protesters were white supremacists and so forth would be to claim that all black people are homosexuals just because the gay community marches with blacks when the black people feel their civil rights are being trampled on.
I wholly disagree with the neo nazis that are in charge of the nutty wall idea and I reject the principles of National Socialism. At the same time, I care about my country, my race, my culture and the destiny of this nation. I'm just not willing to step on the back of others to make my lot in life more pleasant. Once you learn that, it will put us closer to sitting down and having a civil conversation that will lead to a solution all sides can live with.
I will tell you that you are wrong. The fact is that the white supremacists and neo-nazis were at the rally. If you rally alongside of them then you support them. The fact is that as long as you associate with neo-nazis and white supremacists, you support them. The Charlottesville protestors were laregely neo-nazis and white supremacists.
Name one other time, in the last 50 years. that a white supremacist rally got hundreds of attendees.
There has been a marked rise in right wing hate groups since Trump's election. These groups have been mainlined. The Republicans are forced to march to Trump's march and that is decidedly racist.
1. They are a neo-Nazi group.
2. All you have to look at is then Chief of Staff General Kelly with his face buried in his hands. Trump tried to equate neo-nazis and white supremacists with peaceful protestors who were assaulted with 1 killed.
I am not a Trump supporter, so don't go there when I tell you that you are wrong here.
The people who created the wallist religion (the whole wall worship thing) ARE nazis. That is a fact beyond any dispute. It is also a fact that the wallist religion predominates the effort that was made in Charlottesville.
Not all of the whites who attended the Charlottesville rally were violent white supremacists. That is made self evident that the Charlottesville rally was a one and done event. Contrast that to when the black community has their people shot or beaten in the streets. The outcry and rallies are constant.
We do have a problem with foreigners coming to this country. It is, however, one of our making. But, the people have a RIGHT to protest and seek out change. For anyone to say that all the Charlottesville protesters were white supremacists and so forth would be to claim that all black people are homosexuals just because the gay community marches with blacks when the black people feel their civil rights are being trampled on.
I wholly disagree with the neo nazis that are in charge of the nutty wall idea and I reject the principles of National Socialism. At the same time, I care about my country, my race, my culture and the destiny of this nation. I'm just not willing to step on the back of others to make my lot in life more pleasant. Once you learn that, it will put us closer to sitting down and having a civil conversation that will lead to a solution all sides can live with.
I will tell you that you are wrong. The fact is that the white supremacists and neo-nazis were at the rally. If you rally alongside of them then you support them. The fact is that as long as you associate with neo-nazis and white supremacists, you support them. The Charlottesville protestors were laregely neo-nazis and white supremacists.
Then when Muslims, gays, transvestites, and atheists march in civil rights marches organized by black people it makes all blacks Muslims, gays, transvestites and atheists. Logic has a funny way of working, don't it?
Granted, most of the people attracted to the nutty wall idea (neo-nazis) - which is what drew most people to that rally; however, there are other groups who are decent people, but have no real leadership. If you're making a left wing argument, then when it comes to traitors, be careful of who YOU keep company with. That guilt by association works both ways.
The fact is that when you don't care whether your party has been taken over by the far right, it is far more than guilt by association. The Republican Party has been taken over by the alt-right and neo-nazis. The people who refuse to stand up to this are guilty by association.
Yeah, so "far right" that they want to control the border, and send foreign nationals who are here against the law, home!
What radical terror!!!!
LOL!!!!!!
These weren't state or local officials. They were a well-armed militia.Your bullshit-ery is far greater than mine, if indeed I bullshit at all.The truth is the truth whether you like it or not. You can call it bullshit but you are the bullshit artist around here.
Sanctuary cities do not assist people in breaking the law. They are not required to ask someone if they are citizens or not nor are they required to ask for their papers. Trump's lawsuit against California has been largely thrown out.
The very fact sanctuary cities exist is proof you are just blowing smoke out of your backside whether you know it or not and I'm sure you have hypnotized yourself so as not to question the inherent illegality of a sanctuary refuge.
Sanctuary hiding places serve no other purpose than to give people who are here illegally a place where they won't be ratted out by I put this in nice bright letters so you wouldn't be able to avoid the truth.
The governor of California, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, etc. aren't allowed special dispensation so they can ignore the laws they don't want to follow. This isn't Jim Crow Alabama. They know what they do gives illegal immigrants vital assistance in avoiding the consequences of their illegal actions.
They are willing and eager accomplices to crime. Here...I helped you out again.
That's just extra special stupid. The Constitution doesn't give anyone, especially public officials who all must take oaths of office swearing they will uphold the law, permission to pick and choose the laws they want to enforce and they ones they will ignore like they are ordering off an ala carte menu. Don't insult me with your imbecilic garbage!You are the dumb one as you clearly do not understand the Constitution.
Says the dishonest imbecile, most ironically.You are the dishonest imbecile.
I feel sorry for anyone that enters your brain damaged aura.It is not illegal to not ask about someone's immigration status or their papers. You have no idea what a Jim Crow law is. These laws were declared illegal by the court. The courts have not said that states and local governments have to enforce immigration laws. They are not violating any court order.
You are the one that is uneducated and imbecilic. You are not even close to being right.
I have already pointed out that merely by making yourself a sanctuary for criminals you are already declaring you are enabling and assisting people who are breaking the law. Hey, come and live here, you are saying to illegal immigrants...we won't tell La Migra you are here. You might as well be the gangster's girl friend who gives everybody a place to hide from the cops.
Nobody asks the Seattle City Council to check I.D.s or demand papers from anyone. That's a bullshit red herring.
I would say it's beneath you, but it's really not.
I know exactly what Jim Crow era policy was...ignoring civil rights laws that ended segregation because you didn't want to follow those laws! It is precisely like sanctuary city policy...we will follow the laws we like and ignore the ones we don't like. So bend over and shove that up your bumble bee.
You are the bullshit around here.
1. State and local officials cannot be required to enforce immigration law. Not asking someone's immigration status is not unlawful. The fact is that there is a clear boundary between the jurisdiction of federal and state law enforcement. The Supreme Court affirmed this in the Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012). They set clear limits on states' ability to enforce federal immigration law even if a state wishes to do so. Your opinion has not been affirmed in any court.
2. Your brain does not exist so anyone looking for it would be lost forever. Voters do not support Trump on immigration policy. The states that defied Jim Crow policies were defending policies that had been declared illegal by the courts. Not one court has called sanctuary cities illegal because they understand it does not break any laws. Your opinion has not been endorsed in any court of law as a federal judge tossed most of Trump's lawsuit against California.,
Citizen's arrest.These weren't state or local officials. They were a well-armed militia.Your bullshit-ery is far greater than mine, if indeed I bullshit at all.The truth is the truth whether you like it or not. You can call it bullshit but you are the bullshit artist around here.
Sanctuary cities do not assist people in breaking the law. They are not required to ask someone if they are citizens or not nor are they required to ask for their papers. Trump's lawsuit against California has been largely thrown out.
The very fact sanctuary cities exist is proof you are just blowing smoke out of your backside whether you know it or not and I'm sure you have hypnotized yourself so as not to question the inherent illegality of a sanctuary refuge.
Sanctuary hiding places serve no other purpose than to give people who are here illegally a place where they won't be ratted out by I put this in nice bright letters so you wouldn't be able to avoid the truth.
The governor of California, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, etc. aren't allowed special dispensation so they can ignore the laws they don't want to follow. This isn't Jim Crow Alabama. They know what they do gives illegal immigrants vital assistance in avoiding the consequences of their illegal actions.
They are willing and eager accomplices to crime. Here...I helped you out again.
That's just extra special stupid. The Constitution doesn't give anyone, especially public officials who all must take oaths of office swearing they will uphold the law, permission to pick and choose the laws they want to enforce and they ones they will ignore like they are ordering off an ala carte menu. Don't insult me with your imbecilic garbage!You are the dumb one as you clearly do not understand the Constitution.
Says the dishonest imbecile, most ironically.You are the dishonest imbecile.
I feel sorry for anyone that enters your brain damaged aura.It is not illegal to not ask about someone's immigration status or their papers. You have no idea what a Jim Crow law is. These laws were declared illegal by the court. The courts have not said that states and local governments have to enforce immigration laws. They are not violating any court order.
You are the one that is uneducated and imbecilic. You are not even close to being right.
I have already pointed out that merely by making yourself a sanctuary for criminals you are already declaring you are enabling and assisting people who are breaking the law. Hey, come and live here, you are saying to illegal immigrants...we won't tell La Migra you are here. You might as well be the gangster's girl friend who gives everybody a place to hide from the cops.
Nobody asks the Seattle City Council to check I.D.s or demand papers from anyone. That's a bullshit red herring.
I would say it's beneath you, but it's really not.
I know exactly what Jim Crow era policy was...ignoring civil rights laws that ended segregation because you didn't want to follow those laws! It is precisely like sanctuary city policy...we will follow the laws we like and ignore the ones we don't like. So bend over and shove that up your bumble bee.
You are the bullshit around here.
1. State and local officials cannot be required to enforce immigration law. Not asking someone's immigration status is not unlawful. The fact is that there is a clear boundary between the jurisdiction of federal and state law enforcement. The Supreme Court affirmed this in the Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012). They set clear limits on states' ability to enforce federal immigration law even if a state wishes to do so. Your opinion has not been affirmed in any court.
2. Your brain does not exist so anyone looking for it would be lost forever. Voters do not support Trump on immigration policy. The states that defied Jim Crow policies were defending policies that had been declared illegal by the courts. Not one court has called sanctuary cities illegal because they understand it does not break any laws. Your opinion has not been endorsed in any court of law as a federal judge tossed most of Trump's lawsuit against California.,
A well armed militia does not have the authority to unilaterally decide what the law is and then become a separate LEO organization.
The highest ranking Executive Officer of the state is the governor. If that governor says a National Emergency does not exist; it does not exist.The state militia answers to the governor of that state.
These build the wall nutjobs are the very ones who allowed the government to set the legal precedent that undocumented foreigners have "civil rights"... AND that those civil rights trump the property owners private property rights. You've already duly noted that state and local officials cannot be forced to enforce federal immigration law. Furthermore, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that being in the United States without papers is not a crime.
That is the Rule of Law. I was an officer in this country's oldest and most continuous militia. The fact that we've been around longer than any existing civilian militia, having outlasted the rest should tell you that what I'm saying is NOT opinion. It is just the facts and any strategy used has to be employed subject to the parameters of the law.
1. They are a neo-Nazi group.
2. All you have to look at is then Chief of Staff General Kelly with his face buried in his hands. Trump tried to equate neo-nazis and white supremacists with peaceful protestors who were assaulted with 1 killed.
I am not a Trump supporter, so don't go there when I tell you that you are wrong here.
The people who created the wallist religion (the whole wall worship thing) ARE nazis. That is a fact beyond any dispute. It is also a fact that the wallist religion predominates the effort that was made in Charlottesville.
Not all of the whites who attended the Charlottesville rally were violent white supremacists. That is made self evident that the Charlottesville rally was a one and done event. Contrast that to when the black community has their people shot or beaten in the streets. The outcry and rallies are constant.
We do have a problem with foreigners coming to this country. It is, however, one of our making. But, the people have a RIGHT to protest and seek out change. For anyone to say that all the Charlottesville protesters were white supremacists and so forth would be to claim that all black people are homosexuals just because the gay community marches with blacks when the black people feel their civil rights are being trampled on.
I wholly disagree with the neo nazis that are in charge of the nutty wall idea and I reject the principles of National Socialism. At the same time, I care about my country, my race, my culture and the destiny of this nation. I'm just not willing to step on the back of others to make my lot in life more pleasant. Once you learn that, it will put us closer to sitting down and having a civil conversation that will lead to a solution all sides can live with.
I will tell you that you are wrong. The fact is that the white supremacists and neo-nazis were at the rally. If you rally alongside of them then you support them. The fact is that as long as you associate with neo-nazis and white supremacists, you support them. The Charlottesville protestors were laregely neo-nazis and white supremacists.
Then when Muslims, gays, transvestites, and atheists march in civil rights marches organized by black people it makes all blacks Muslims, gays, transvestites and atheists. Logic has a funny way of working, don't it?
Granted, most of the people attracted to the nutty wall idea (neo-nazis) - which is what drew most people to that rally; however, there are other groups who are decent people, but have no real leadership. If you're making a left wing argument, then when it comes to traitors, be careful of who YOU keep company with. That guilt by association works both ways.
The fact is that when you don't care whether your party has been taken over by the far right, it is far more than guilt by association. The Republican Party has been taken over by the alt-right and neo-nazis. The people who refuse to stand up to this are guilty by association.
Yeah, so "far right" that they want to control the border, and send foreign nationals who are here against the law, home!
What radical terror!!!!
LOL!!!!!!
Proud boys assulted anti Americans who are out to assault proud Americans. They protect usAnd they were assulted .. they confronted the racist militant kkk groups now called antifia. They protect free speechYou are factually wrong.. it’s on video1. They are a neo-Nazi group.
2. All you have to look at is then Chief of Staff General Kelly with his face buried in his hands. Trump tried to equate neo-nazis and white supremacists with peaceful protestors who were assaulted with 1 killed.
You are factually incorrect. The Proud Boys assaulted several people. That is why they were arrested.
The Proud Boys did the assault. They used disproportionate force against the protestors. If they had called the police, then the protestors might have been guilty of misdemeanor assault. However they took the law into their own hands and committed felony assault.
These weren't state or local officials. They were a well-armed militia.Your bullshit-ery is far greater than mine, if indeed I bullshit at all.The truth is the truth whether you like it or not. You can call it bullshit but you are the bullshit artist around here.
Sanctuary cities do not assist people in breaking the law. They are not required to ask someone if they are citizens or not nor are they required to ask for their papers. Trump's lawsuit against California has been largely thrown out.
The very fact sanctuary cities exist is proof you are just blowing smoke out of your backside whether you know it or not and I'm sure you have hypnotized yourself so as not to question the inherent illegality of a sanctuary refuge.
Sanctuary hiding places serve no other purpose than to give people who are here illegally a place where they won't be ratted out by I put this in nice bright letters so you wouldn't be able to avoid the truth.
The governor of California, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, etc. aren't allowed special dispensation so they can ignore the laws they don't want to follow. This isn't Jim Crow Alabama. They know what they do gives illegal immigrants vital assistance in avoiding the consequences of their illegal actions.
They are willing and eager accomplices to crime. Here...I helped you out again.
That's just extra special stupid. The Constitution doesn't give anyone, especially public officials who all must take oaths of office swearing they will uphold the law, permission to pick and choose the laws they want to enforce and they ones they will ignore like they are ordering off an ala carte menu. Don't insult me with your imbecilic garbage!You are the dumb one as you clearly do not understand the Constitution.
Says the dishonest imbecile, most ironically.You are the dishonest imbecile.
I feel sorry for anyone that enters your brain damaged aura.It is not illegal to not ask about someone's immigration status or their papers. You have no idea what a Jim Crow law is. These laws were declared illegal by the court. The courts have not said that states and local governments have to enforce immigration laws. They are not violating any court order.
You are the one that is uneducated and imbecilic. You are not even close to being right.
I have already pointed out that merely by making yourself a sanctuary for criminals you are already declaring you are enabling and assisting people who are breaking the law. Hey, come and live here, you are saying to illegal immigrants...we won't tell La Migra you are here. You might as well be the gangster's girl friend who gives everybody a place to hide from the cops.
Nobody asks the Seattle City Council to check I.D.s or demand papers from anyone. That's a bullshit red herring.
I would say it's beneath you, but it's really not.
I know exactly what Jim Crow era policy was...ignoring civil rights laws that ended segregation because you didn't want to follow those laws! It is precisely like sanctuary city policy...we will follow the laws we like and ignore the ones we don't like. So bend over and shove that up your bumble bee.
You are the bullshit around here.
1. State and local officials cannot be required to enforce immigration law. Not asking someone's immigration status is not unlawful. The fact is that there is a clear boundary between the jurisdiction of federal and state law enforcement. The Supreme Court affirmed this in the Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012). They set clear limits on states' ability to enforce federal immigration law even if a state wishes to do so. Your opinion has not been affirmed in any court.
2. Your brain does not exist so anyone looking for it would be lost forever. Voters do not support Trump on immigration policy. The states that defied Jim Crow policies were defending policies that had been declared illegal by the courts. Not one court has called sanctuary cities illegal because they understand it does not break any laws. Your opinion has not been endorsed in any court of law as a federal judge tossed most of Trump's lawsuit against California.,
Can't be held accountable? Sounds like they get off scot free.These weren't state or local officials. They were a well-armed militia.Your bullshit-ery is far greater than mine, if indeed I bullshit at all.The truth is the truth whether you like it or not. You can call it bullshit but you are the bullshit artist around here.
Sanctuary cities do not assist people in breaking the law. They are not required to ask someone if they are citizens or not nor are they required to ask for their papers. Trump's lawsuit against California has been largely thrown out.
The very fact sanctuary cities exist is proof you are just blowing smoke out of your backside whether you know it or not and I'm sure you have hypnotized yourself so as not to question the inherent illegality of a sanctuary refuge.
Sanctuary hiding places serve no other purpose than to give people who are here illegally a place where they won't be ratted out by I put this in nice bright letters so you wouldn't be able to avoid the truth.
The governor of California, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, etc. aren't allowed special dispensation so they can ignore the laws they don't want to follow. This isn't Jim Crow Alabama. They know what they do gives illegal immigrants vital assistance in avoiding the consequences of their illegal actions.
They are willing and eager accomplices to crime. Here...I helped you out again.
That's just extra special stupid. The Constitution doesn't give anyone, especially public officials who all must take oaths of office swearing they will uphold the law, permission to pick and choose the laws they want to enforce and they ones they will ignore like they are ordering off an ala carte menu. Don't insult me with your imbecilic garbage!You are the dumb one as you clearly do not understand the Constitution.
Says the dishonest imbecile, most ironically.You are the dishonest imbecile.
I feel sorry for anyone that enters your brain damaged aura.It is not illegal to not ask about someone's immigration status or their papers. You have no idea what a Jim Crow law is. These laws were declared illegal by the court. The courts have not said that states and local governments have to enforce immigration laws. They are not violating any court order.
You are the one that is uneducated and imbecilic. You are not even close to being right.
I have already pointed out that merely by making yourself a sanctuary for criminals you are already declaring you are enabling and assisting people who are breaking the law. Hey, come and live here, you are saying to illegal immigrants...we won't tell La Migra you are here. You might as well be the gangster's girl friend who gives everybody a place to hide from the cops.
Nobody asks the Seattle City Council to check I.D.s or demand papers from anyone. That's a bullshit red herring.
I would say it's beneath you, but it's really not.
I know exactly what Jim Crow era policy was...ignoring civil rights laws that ended segregation because you didn't want to follow those laws! It is precisely like sanctuary city policy...we will follow the laws we like and ignore the ones we don't like. So bend over and shove that up your bumble bee.
You are the bullshit around here.
1. State and local officials cannot be required to enforce immigration law. Not asking someone's immigration status is not unlawful. The fact is that there is a clear boundary between the jurisdiction of federal and state law enforcement. The Supreme Court affirmed this in the Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012). They set clear limits on states' ability to enforce federal immigration law even if a state wishes to do so. Your opinion has not been affirmed in any court.
2. Your brain does not exist so anyone looking for it would be lost forever. Voters do not support Trump on immigration policy. The states that defied Jim Crow policies were defending policies that had been declared illegal by the courts. Not one court has called sanctuary cities illegal because they understand it does not break any laws. Your opinion has not been endorsed in any court of law as a federal judge tossed most of Trump's lawsuit against California.,
They cannot take the law into their own hands. They are not trained in law enforcement nor can they be held accountable for their actions as law enforcement officers can be.
And they were assulted .. they confronted the racist militant kkk groups now called antifia. They protect free speechYou are factually wrong.. it’s on video1. They are a neo-Nazi group.
2. All you have to look at is then Chief of Staff General Kelly with his face buried in his hands. Trump tried to equate neo-nazis and white supremacists with peaceful protestors who were assaulted with 1 killed.
You are factually incorrect. The Proud Boys assaulted several people. That is why they were arrested.
The Proud Boys did the assault. They used disproportionate force against the protestors. If they had called the police, then the protestors might have been guilty of misdemeanor assault. However they took the law into their own hands and committed felony assault.
Such disproportionate force that not one injury was recorded or treated.
Your support of antifa, makes you the fascist.
Citizen's arrest.These weren't state or local officials. They were a well-armed militia.Your bullshit-ery is far greater than mine, if indeed I bullshit at all.The truth is the truth whether you like it or not. You can call it bullshit but you are the bullshit artist around here.
Sanctuary cities do not assist people in breaking the law. They are not required to ask someone if they are citizens or not nor are they required to ask for their papers. Trump's lawsuit against California has been largely thrown out.
The very fact sanctuary cities exist is proof you are just blowing smoke out of your backside whether you know it or not and I'm sure you have hypnotized yourself so as not to question the inherent illegality of a sanctuary refuge.
Sanctuary hiding places serve no other purpose than to give people who are here illegally a place where they won't be ratted out by I put this in nice bright letters so you wouldn't be able to avoid the truth.
The governor of California, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, etc. aren't allowed special dispensation so they can ignore the laws they don't want to follow. This isn't Jim Crow Alabama. They know what they do gives illegal immigrants vital assistance in avoiding the consequences of their illegal actions.
They are willing and eager accomplices to crime. Here...I helped you out again.
That's just extra special stupid. The Constitution doesn't give anyone, especially public officials who all must take oaths of office swearing they will uphold the law, permission to pick and choose the laws they want to enforce and they ones they will ignore like they are ordering off an ala carte menu. Don't insult me with your imbecilic garbage!You are the dumb one as you clearly do not understand the Constitution.
Says the dishonest imbecile, most ironically.You are the dishonest imbecile.
I feel sorry for anyone that enters your brain damaged aura.It is not illegal to not ask about someone's immigration status or their papers. You have no idea what a Jim Crow law is. These laws were declared illegal by the court. The courts have not said that states and local governments have to enforce immigration laws. They are not violating any court order.
You are the one that is uneducated and imbecilic. You are not even close to being right.
I have already pointed out that merely by making yourself a sanctuary for criminals you are already declaring you are enabling and assisting people who are breaking the law. Hey, come and live here, you are saying to illegal immigrants...we won't tell La Migra you are here. You might as well be the gangster's girl friend who gives everybody a place to hide from the cops.
Nobody asks the Seattle City Council to check I.D.s or demand papers from anyone. That's a bullshit red herring.
I would say it's beneath you, but it's really not.
I know exactly what Jim Crow era policy was...ignoring civil rights laws that ended segregation because you didn't want to follow those laws! It is precisely like sanctuary city policy...we will follow the laws we like and ignore the ones we don't like. So bend over and shove that up your bumble bee.
You are the bullshit around here.
1. State and local officials cannot be required to enforce immigration law. Not asking someone's immigration status is not unlawful. The fact is that there is a clear boundary between the jurisdiction of federal and state law enforcement. The Supreme Court affirmed this in the Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012). They set clear limits on states' ability to enforce federal immigration law even if a state wishes to do so. Your opinion has not been affirmed in any court.
2. Your brain does not exist so anyone looking for it would be lost forever. Voters do not support Trump on immigration policy. The states that defied Jim Crow policies were defending policies that had been declared illegal by the courts. Not one court has called sanctuary cities illegal because they understand it does not break any laws. Your opinion has not been endorsed in any court of law as a federal judge tossed most of Trump's lawsuit against California.,
A well armed militia does not have the authority to unilaterally decide what the law is and then become a separate LEO organization.
The highest ranking Executive Officer of the state is the governor. If that governor says a National Emergency does not exist; it does not exist.The state militia answers to the governor of that state.
These build the wall nutjobs are the very ones who allowed the government to set the legal precedent that undocumented foreigners have "civil rights"... AND that those civil rights trump the property owners private property rights. You've already duly noted that state and local officials cannot be forced to enforce federal immigration law. Furthermore, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that being in the United States without papers is not a crime.
That is the Rule of Law. I was an officer in this country's oldest and most continuous militia. The fact that we've been around longer than any existing civilian militia, having outlasted the rest should tell you that what I'm saying is NOT opinion. It is just the facts and any strategy used has to be employed subject to the parameters of the law.
Who's going to pick their vegetables? It sure as hell isn't going to be a bunch of lazy ass militia.New Mexico militia detains migrants at gunpoint until Border Patrol arrives: report
Let’s get it going! Which one of you coward democrats want to stop us!?
Can't be held accountable? Sounds like they get off scot free.These weren't state or local officials. They were a well-armed militia.Your bullshit-ery is far greater than mine, if indeed I bullshit at all.The truth is the truth whether you like it or not. You can call it bullshit but you are the bullshit artist around here.
Sanctuary cities do not assist people in breaking the law. They are not required to ask someone if they are citizens or not nor are they required to ask for their papers. Trump's lawsuit against California has been largely thrown out.
The very fact sanctuary cities exist is proof you are just blowing smoke out of your backside whether you know it or not and I'm sure you have hypnotized yourself so as not to question the inherent illegality of a sanctuary refuge.
Sanctuary hiding places serve no other purpose than to give people who are here illegally a place where they won't be ratted out by I put this in nice bright letters so you wouldn't be able to avoid the truth.
The governor of California, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, etc. aren't allowed special dispensation so they can ignore the laws they don't want to follow. This isn't Jim Crow Alabama. They know what they do gives illegal immigrants vital assistance in avoiding the consequences of their illegal actions.
They are willing and eager accomplices to crime. Here...I helped you out again.
That's just extra special stupid. The Constitution doesn't give anyone, especially public officials who all must take oaths of office swearing they will uphold the law, permission to pick and choose the laws they want to enforce and they ones they will ignore like they are ordering off an ala carte menu. Don't insult me with your imbecilic garbage!You are the dumb one as you clearly do not understand the Constitution.
Says the dishonest imbecile, most ironically.You are the dishonest imbecile.
I feel sorry for anyone that enters your brain damaged aura.It is not illegal to not ask about someone's immigration status or their papers. You have no idea what a Jim Crow law is. These laws were declared illegal by the court. The courts have not said that states and local governments have to enforce immigration laws. They are not violating any court order.
You are the one that is uneducated and imbecilic. You are not even close to being right.
I have already pointed out that merely by making yourself a sanctuary for criminals you are already declaring you are enabling and assisting people who are breaking the law. Hey, come and live here, you are saying to illegal immigrants...we won't tell La Migra you are here. You might as well be the gangster's girl friend who gives everybody a place to hide from the cops.
Nobody asks the Seattle City Council to check I.D.s or demand papers from anyone. That's a bullshit red herring.
I would say it's beneath you, but it's really not.
I know exactly what Jim Crow era policy was...ignoring civil rights laws that ended segregation because you didn't want to follow those laws! It is precisely like sanctuary city policy...we will follow the laws we like and ignore the ones we don't like. So bend over and shove that up your bumble bee.
You are the bullshit around here.
1. State and local officials cannot be required to enforce immigration law. Not asking someone's immigration status is not unlawful. The fact is that there is a clear boundary between the jurisdiction of federal and state law enforcement. The Supreme Court affirmed this in the Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012). They set clear limits on states' ability to enforce federal immigration law even if a state wishes to do so. Your opinion has not been affirmed in any court.
2. Your brain does not exist so anyone looking for it would be lost forever. Voters do not support Trump on immigration policy. The states that defied Jim Crow policies were defending policies that had been declared illegal by the courts. Not one court has called sanctuary cities illegal because they understand it does not break any laws. Your opinion has not been endorsed in any court of law as a federal judge tossed most of Trump's lawsuit against California.,
They cannot take the law into their own hands. They are not trained in law enforcement nor can they be held accountable for their actions as law enforcement officers can be.
Hey you're the one who claims they can't be held accountable. Make up your dizzy mind.Citizen's arrest.These weren't state or local officials. They were a well-armed militia.Your bullshit-ery is far greater than mine, if indeed I bullshit at all.
The very fact sanctuary cities exist is proof you are just blowing smoke out of your backside whether you know it or not and I'm sure you have hypnotized yourself so as not to question the inherent illegality of a sanctuary refuge.
Sanctuary hiding places serve no other purpose than to give people who are here illegally a place where they won't be ratted out by I put this in nice bright letters so you wouldn't be able to avoid the truth.
The governor of California, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, etc. aren't allowed special dispensation so they can ignore the laws they don't want to follow. This isn't Jim Crow Alabama. They know what they do gives illegal immigrants vital assistance in avoiding the consequences of their illegal actions.
They are willing and eager accomplices to crime. Here...I helped you out again.
That's just extra special stupid. The Constitution doesn't give anyone, especially public officials who all must take oaths of office swearing they will uphold the law, permission to pick and choose the laws they want to enforce and they ones they will ignore like they are ordering off an ala carte menu. Don't insult me with your imbecilic garbage!
Says the dishonest imbecile, most ironically.
I feel sorry for anyone that enters your brain damaged aura.
I have already pointed out that merely by making yourself a sanctuary for criminals you are already declaring you are enabling and assisting people who are breaking the law. Hey, come and live here, you are saying to illegal immigrants...we won't tell La Migra you are here. You might as well be the gangster's girl friend who gives everybody a place to hide from the cops.
Nobody asks the Seattle City Council to check I.D.s or demand papers from anyone. That's a bullshit red herring.
I would say it's beneath you, but it's really not.
I know exactly what Jim Crow era policy was...ignoring civil rights laws that ended segregation because you didn't want to follow those laws! It is precisely like sanctuary city policy...we will follow the laws we like and ignore the ones we don't like. So bend over and shove that up your bumble bee.
You are the bullshit around here.
1. State and local officials cannot be required to enforce immigration law. Not asking someone's immigration status is not unlawful. The fact is that there is a clear boundary between the jurisdiction of federal and state law enforcement. The Supreme Court affirmed this in the Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012). They set clear limits on states' ability to enforce federal immigration law even if a state wishes to do so. Your opinion has not been affirmed in any court.
2. Your brain does not exist so anyone looking for it would be lost forever. Voters do not support Trump on immigration policy. The states that defied Jim Crow policies were defending policies that had been declared illegal by the courts. Not one court has called sanctuary cities illegal because they understand it does not break any laws. Your opinion has not been endorsed in any court of law as a federal judge tossed most of Trump's lawsuit against California.,
A well armed militia does not have the authority to unilaterally decide what the law is and then become a separate LEO organization.
The highest ranking Executive Officer of the state is the governor. If that governor says a National Emergency does not exist; it does not exist.The state militia answers to the governor of that state.
These build the wall nutjobs are the very ones who allowed the government to set the legal precedent that undocumented foreigners have "civil rights"... AND that those civil rights trump the property owners private property rights. You've already duly noted that state and local officials cannot be forced to enforce federal immigration law. Furthermore, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that being in the United States without papers is not a crime.
That is the Rule of Law. I was an officer in this country's oldest and most continuous militia. The fact that we've been around longer than any existing civilian militia, having outlasted the rest should tell you that what I'm saying is NOT opinion. It is just the facts and any strategy used has to be employed subject to the parameters of the law.
What part of it is not a crime to be present without papers do you have a problem understand?
In order to do a citizen's arrest, you have to have a crime. While it is against the law to cross the border, if the officials don't witness the act, then NO CRIME EXISTS. It is a civil issue of which you cannot act.
But, go ahead. I've been advising militia groups not to try that stupid crap for well over three decades. I know a LOT of former militia folks doing time in federal prison. Feel free to ignore sound counsel. Maybe Trump will pardon you.
Can't be held accountable? Sounds like they get off scot free.These weren't state or local officials. They were a well-armed militia.Your bullshit-ery is far greater than mine, if indeed I bullshit at all.The truth is the truth whether you like it or not. You can call it bullshit but you are the bullshit artist around here.
Sanctuary cities do not assist people in breaking the law. They are not required to ask someone if they are citizens or not nor are they required to ask for their papers. Trump's lawsuit against California has been largely thrown out.
The very fact sanctuary cities exist is proof you are just blowing smoke out of your backside whether you know it or not and I'm sure you have hypnotized yourself so as not to question the inherent illegality of a sanctuary refuge.
Sanctuary hiding places serve no other purpose than to give people who are here illegally a place where they won't be ratted out by I put this in nice bright letters so you wouldn't be able to avoid the truth.
The governor of California, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, etc. aren't allowed special dispensation so they can ignore the laws they don't want to follow. This isn't Jim Crow Alabama. They know what they do gives illegal immigrants vital assistance in avoiding the consequences of their illegal actions.
They are willing and eager accomplices to crime. Here...I helped you out again.
That's just extra special stupid. The Constitution doesn't give anyone, especially public officials who all must take oaths of office swearing they will uphold the law, permission to pick and choose the laws they want to enforce and they ones they will ignore like they are ordering off an ala carte menu. Don't insult me with your imbecilic garbage!You are the dumb one as you clearly do not understand the Constitution.
Says the dishonest imbecile, most ironically.You are the dishonest imbecile.
I feel sorry for anyone that enters your brain damaged aura.It is not illegal to not ask about someone's immigration status or their papers. You have no idea what a Jim Crow law is. These laws were declared illegal by the court. The courts have not said that states and local governments have to enforce immigration laws. They are not violating any court order.
You are the one that is uneducated and imbecilic. You are not even close to being right.
I have already pointed out that merely by making yourself a sanctuary for criminals you are already declaring you are enabling and assisting people who are breaking the law. Hey, come and live here, you are saying to illegal immigrants...we won't tell La Migra you are here. You might as well be the gangster's girl friend who gives everybody a place to hide from the cops.
Nobody asks the Seattle City Council to check I.D.s or demand papers from anyone. That's a bullshit red herring.
I would say it's beneath you, but it's really not.
I know exactly what Jim Crow era policy was...ignoring civil rights laws that ended segregation because you didn't want to follow those laws! It is precisely like sanctuary city policy...we will follow the laws we like and ignore the ones we don't like. So bend over and shove that up your bumble bee.
You are the bullshit around here.
1. State and local officials cannot be required to enforce immigration law. Not asking someone's immigration status is not unlawful. The fact is that there is a clear boundary between the jurisdiction of federal and state law enforcement. The Supreme Court affirmed this in the Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012). They set clear limits on states' ability to enforce federal immigration law even if a state wishes to do so. Your opinion has not been affirmed in any court.
2. Your brain does not exist so anyone looking for it would be lost forever. Voters do not support Trump on immigration policy. The states that defied Jim Crow policies were defending policies that had been declared illegal by the courts. Not one court has called sanctuary cities illegal because they understand it does not break any laws. Your opinion has not been endorsed in any court of law as a federal judge tossed most of Trump's lawsuit against California.,
They cannot take the law into their own hands. They are not trained in law enforcement nor can they be held accountable for their actions as law enforcement officers can be.
Those who are said to be unaccountable. Derp.Can't be held accountable? Sounds like they get off scot free.These weren't state or local officials. They were a well-armed militia.Your bullshit-ery is far greater than mine, if indeed I bullshit at all.
The very fact sanctuary cities exist is proof you are just blowing smoke out of your backside whether you know it or not and I'm sure you have hypnotized yourself so as not to question the inherent illegality of a sanctuary refuge.
Sanctuary hiding places serve no other purpose than to give people who are here illegally a place where they won't be ratted out by I put this in nice bright letters so you wouldn't be able to avoid the truth.
The governor of California, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, etc. aren't allowed special dispensation so they can ignore the laws they don't want to follow. This isn't Jim Crow Alabama. They know what they do gives illegal immigrants vital assistance in avoiding the consequences of their illegal actions.
They are willing and eager accomplices to crime. Here...I helped you out again.
That's just extra special stupid. The Constitution doesn't give anyone, especially public officials who all must take oaths of office swearing they will uphold the law, permission to pick and choose the laws they want to enforce and they ones they will ignore like they are ordering off an ala carte menu. Don't insult me with your imbecilic garbage!
Says the dishonest imbecile, most ironically.
I feel sorry for anyone that enters your brain damaged aura.
I have already pointed out that merely by making yourself a sanctuary for criminals you are already declaring you are enabling and assisting people who are breaking the law. Hey, come and live here, you are saying to illegal immigrants...we won't tell La Migra you are here. You might as well be the gangster's girl friend who gives everybody a place to hide from the cops.
Nobody asks the Seattle City Council to check I.D.s or demand papers from anyone. That's a bullshit red herring.
I would say it's beneath you, but it's really not.
I know exactly what Jim Crow era policy was...ignoring civil rights laws that ended segregation because you didn't want to follow those laws! It is precisely like sanctuary city policy...we will follow the laws we like and ignore the ones we don't like. So bend over and shove that up your bumble bee.
You are the bullshit around here.
1. State and local officials cannot be required to enforce immigration law. Not asking someone's immigration status is not unlawful. The fact is that there is a clear boundary between the jurisdiction of federal and state law enforcement. The Supreme Court affirmed this in the Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012). They set clear limits on states' ability to enforce federal immigration law even if a state wishes to do so. Your opinion has not been affirmed in any court.
2. Your brain does not exist so anyone looking for it would be lost forever. Voters do not support Trump on immigration policy. The states that defied Jim Crow policies were defending policies that had been declared illegal by the courts. Not one court has called sanctuary cities illegal because they understand it does not break any laws. Your opinion has not been endorsed in any court of law as a federal judge tossed most of Trump's lawsuit against California.,
They cannot take the law into their own hands. They are not trained in law enforcement nor can they be held accountable for their actions as law enforcement officers can be.
Would you mind explaining something to me? Put some thought into this. The Declaration of Independence says:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Now, here is court precedent on Rights:
“The absolute rights of individuals may be resolved into the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right to acquire and enjoy property. These rights are declared to be natural, inherent, and unalienable.” Atchison & N. R. Co. v. Baty, 6 Neb. 37, 40, 29 Am. Rep. 356 (1877)
A few more synonyms for those bolded words would be irrevocable, God given, untouchable. I could cite you a LOT of precedent.
If a man is born with an unalienable Right, and if Liberty is a Right bestowed upon us by a Creator, bearing in mind that the presupposition BEFORE such a thing as a citizen of the U.S. existed, who in the Hell is getting off scot free (sic) of anything?
1. They are a neo-Nazi group.
2. All you have to look at is then Chief of Staff General Kelly with his face buried in his hands. Trump tried to equate neo-nazis and white supremacists with peaceful protestors who were assaulted with 1 killed.
I am not a Trump supporter, so don't go there when I tell you that you are wrong here.
The people who created the wallist religion (the whole wall worship thing) ARE nazis. That is a fact beyond any dispute. It is also a fact that the wallist religion predominates the effort that was made in Charlottesville.
Not all of the whites who attended the Charlottesville rally were violent white supremacists. That is made self evident that the Charlottesville rally was a one and done event. Contrast that to when the black community has their people shot or beaten in the streets. The outcry and rallies are constant.
We do have a problem with foreigners coming to this country. It is, however, one of our making. But, the people have a RIGHT to protest and seek out change. For anyone to say that all the Charlottesville protesters were white supremacists and so forth would be to claim that all black people are homosexuals just because the gay community marches with blacks when the black people feel their civil rights are being trampled on.
I wholly disagree with the neo nazis that are in charge of the nutty wall idea and I reject the principles of National Socialism. At the same time, I care about my country, my race, my culture and the destiny of this nation. I'm just not willing to step on the back of others to make my lot in life more pleasant. Once you learn that, it will put us closer to sitting down and having a civil conversation that will lead to a solution all sides can live with.
I will tell you that you are wrong. The fact is that the white supremacists and neo-nazis were at the rally. If you rally alongside of them then you support them. The fact is that as long as you associate with neo-nazis and white supremacists, you support them. The Charlottesville protestors were laregely neo-nazis and white supremacists.
Name one other time, in the last 50 years. that a white supremacist rally got hundreds of attendees.
There has been a marked rise in right wing hate groups since Trump's election. These groups have been mainlined. The Republicans are forced to march to Trump's march and that is decidedly racist.
Said the man that could not cite another time that a whit supremacist rally got hundreds of attendees.
Because whtie supremacists are an insignificant fringe and you know it.
Your vile lies about Trump being racist, is just you being an asshole.
Hey you're the one who claims they can't be held accountable. Make up your dizzy mind.Citizen's arrest.These weren't state or local officials. They were a well-armed militia.You are the bullshit around here.
1. State and local officials cannot be required to enforce immigration law. Not asking someone's immigration status is not unlawful. The fact is that there is a clear boundary between the jurisdiction of federal and state law enforcement. The Supreme Court affirmed this in the Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012). They set clear limits on states' ability to enforce federal immigration law even if a state wishes to do so. Your opinion has not been affirmed in any court.
2. Your brain does not exist so anyone looking for it would be lost forever. Voters do not support Trump on immigration policy. The states that defied Jim Crow policies were defending policies that had been declared illegal by the courts. Not one court has called sanctuary cities illegal because they understand it does not break any laws. Your opinion has not been endorsed in any court of law as a federal judge tossed most of Trump's lawsuit against California.,
A well armed militia does not have the authority to unilaterally decide what the law is and then become a separate LEO organization.
The highest ranking Executive Officer of the state is the governor. If that governor says a National Emergency does not exist; it does not exist.The state militia answers to the governor of that state.
These build the wall nutjobs are the very ones who allowed the government to set the legal precedent that undocumented foreigners have "civil rights"... AND that those civil rights trump the property owners private property rights. You've already duly noted that state and local officials cannot be forced to enforce federal immigration law. Furthermore, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that being in the United States without papers is not a crime.
That is the Rule of Law. I was an officer in this country's oldest and most continuous militia. The fact that we've been around longer than any existing civilian militia, having outlasted the rest should tell you that what I'm saying is NOT opinion. It is just the facts and any strategy used has to be employed subject to the parameters of the law.
What part of it is not a crime to be present without papers do you have a problem understand?
In order to do a citizen's arrest, you have to have a crime. While it is against the law to cross the border, if the officials don't witness the act, then NO CRIME EXISTS. It is a civil issue of which you cannot act.
But, go ahead. I've been advising militia groups not to try that stupid crap for well over three decades. I know a LOT of former militia folks doing time in federal prison. Feel free to ignore sound counsel. Maybe Trump will pardon you.
I didn't say it. Your argument is with that busy bee poster.Hey you're the one who claims they can't be held accountable. Make up your dizzy mind.Citizen's arrest.These weren't state or local officials. They were a well-armed militia.
A well armed militia does not have the authority to unilaterally decide what the law is and then become a separate LEO organization.
The highest ranking Executive Officer of the state is the governor. If that governor says a National Emergency does not exist; it does not exist.The state militia answers to the governor of that state.
These build the wall nutjobs are the very ones who allowed the government to set the legal precedent that undocumented foreigners have "civil rights"... AND that those civil rights trump the property owners private property rights. You've already duly noted that state and local officials cannot be forced to enforce federal immigration law. Furthermore, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that being in the United States without papers is not a crime.
That is the Rule of Law. I was an officer in this country's oldest and most continuous militia. The fact that we've been around longer than any existing civilian militia, having outlasted the rest should tell you that what I'm saying is NOT opinion. It is just the facts and any strategy used has to be employed subject to the parameters of the law.
What part of it is not a crime to be present without papers do you have a problem understand?
In order to do a citizen's arrest, you have to have a crime. While it is against the law to cross the border, if the officials don't witness the act, then NO CRIME EXISTS. It is a civil issue of which you cannot act.
But, go ahead. I've been advising militia groups not to try that stupid crap for well over three decades. I know a LOT of former militia folks doing time in federal prison. Feel free to ignore sound counsel. Maybe Trump will pardon you.
What do you want people to be held accountable for? Coming here and taking a job willingly offered? Renting a house that a landlord willingly rented to them? You think it should be a crime to take a job and feed your kids?
Those who are said to be unaccountable. Derp.Can't be held accountable? Sounds like they get off scot free.These weren't state or local officials. They were a well-armed militia.You are the bullshit around here.
1. State and local officials cannot be required to enforce immigration law. Not asking someone's immigration status is not unlawful. The fact is that there is a clear boundary between the jurisdiction of federal and state law enforcement. The Supreme Court affirmed this in the Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012). They set clear limits on states' ability to enforce federal immigration law even if a state wishes to do so. Your opinion has not been affirmed in any court.
2. Your brain does not exist so anyone looking for it would be lost forever. Voters do not support Trump on immigration policy. The states that defied Jim Crow policies were defending policies that had been declared illegal by the courts. Not one court has called sanctuary cities illegal because they understand it does not break any laws. Your opinion has not been endorsed in any court of law as a federal judge tossed most of Trump's lawsuit against California.,
They cannot take the law into their own hands. They are not trained in law enforcement nor can they be held accountable for their actions as law enforcement officers can be.
Would you mind explaining something to me? Put some thought into this. The Declaration of Independence says:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Now, here is court precedent on Rights:
“The absolute rights of individuals may be resolved into the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right to acquire and enjoy property. These rights are declared to be natural, inherent, and unalienable.” Atchison & N. R. Co. v. Baty, 6 Neb. 37, 40, 29 Am. Rep. 356 (1877)
A few more synonyms for those bolded words would be irrevocable, God given, untouchable. I could cite you a LOT of precedent.
If a man is born with an unalienable Right, and if Liberty is a Right bestowed upon us by a Creator, bearing in mind that the presupposition BEFORE such a thing as a citizen of the U.S. existed, who in the Hell is getting off scot free (sic) of anything?
