Robert Reich: Why There’s a Bull Market for Stocks And Bear Market for Workers

TruthOut10

Active Member
Dec 3, 2012
627
100
Today the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose above 14,270 – completely erasing its 54 percent loss between 2007 and 2009.

The stock market is basically back to where it was in 2000, while corporate earnings have doubled since then.

Yet the real median wage is now 8 percent below what it was in 2000, and unemployment remains sky-high.

Why is the stock market doing so well, while most Americans are doing so poorly? Four reasons:

First, productivity gains. Corporations have been investing in technology rather than their workers. They get tax credits and deductions for such investments; they get no such tax benefits for improving the skills of their employees. As a result, corporations can now do more with fewer people on their payrolls. That means higher profits.

Second, high unemployment itself. Joblessness all but eliminates the bargaining power of most workers – allowing corporations to keep wages low. Public policies that might otherwise reduce unemployment – a new WPA or CCC to hire the long-term unemployed, major investments in the nation’s crumbling infrastructure – have been rejected in favor of austerity economics. This also means higher profits, at least in the short run.

Third, globalization. Big American-based corporations have been expanding and hiring around the globe where markets are growing fastest – even while the U.S. market is lackluster. Tax policies and trade policies have encouraged them.

Finally, the Fed’s easy-money policies. They’ve pushed investors into the stock market because bond yields are so low. On Tuesday, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note was just 1.9%.

All of this spells widening inequality in America, because the people who invest the most in the stock market have high incomes. Those who rely most on wages have lower incomes.

Corporate profits are claiming a larger share of national income than at any time in 60 years, while the portion of total income going to employees is near its lowest since 1966.

As my colleague Immanuel Saez recently found, all the economic gains between 2009 and 2011 (the last year for which data were available) went to the richest 1 percent of Americans. The bottom 99 percent has continued to lose ground.

And yet the tax code continues to give preference to capital gains over ordinary income — a huge boon to investors.

The sequestration is likely to make all this worse, since it will slow the U.S. economy and keep unemployment higher than otherwise.

It will also hurt the most vulnerable. Some $1.9 billion in low-income rental subsidies are being eliminated, affecting 125,000 people. Cuts to the Department of Agriculture will eliminate rental assistance for another 10,000 low-income rural people. Meanwhile, 100,000 formerly homeless Americans are likely to be removed from their current emergency shelters.

Robert Reich (Why There's a Bull Market for Stocks And Bear Market for Workers)
 
All of this spells widening inequality in America,

but so what?? imagine if our big corporations hadn't adapted to globalization and so failed in the face of international competition.
If their market is worldwide now of course they will make more. This is something to be encouraged.

Yes workers are suffering becuase they are not beating international competition but that's only because of liberal policies:

1) liberals schools that turn out the dumbest workforce in the world

2) unions that drove 30 million jobs offshore

3) liberal illegals that take 20 million of our jobs

4) huge liberal deficits so China and Japan can buy our deficits rather than our products.

Way way over your head, right????
 
Last edited:
so the little Reich is whining the guberment isn't going to have enough money to throw around
 
so the little Reich is whining the guberment isn't going to have enough money to throw around

When you get recognized as the most effective Secretary of Labor in the history of the department, you get the right to be snarky. Until then, shut up.
 
so the little Reich is whining the guberment isn't going to have enough money to throw around

When you get recognized as the most effective Secretary of Labor in the history of the department, you get the right to be snarky. Until then, shut up.

too stupid and perfectly liberal!!! the guy is a communist. Only Marx or Lennin would say he was most effective in history. He stands for one thing and one thing only: more and more personal bailouts without end, no regard for moral hazard, and no requirement to pay even a penny of the money back!!
 
Last edited:
As my colleague Immanuel Saez recently found, all the economic gains between 2009 and 2011 (the last year for which data were available) went to the richest 1 percent of Americans. The bottom 99 percent has continued to lose ground.

This must stop. We need a rational economic policy, one which rewards those who make America's wealth not those who take it. That never will happen as long as Republicans have any control of government. They are little more than stooges for the rich and the enemies of the middle-class and poor. They always will favor the takers over the makers.
 
Now that's a much more accurate picture of what is really going on with our country (thanks for the post and to Robert Reich's great article). I wanted to add one part of the story our media refuses to talk about related to the end of your post (about what is really going on as well):

"The sequestration is likely to make all this worse, since it will slow the U.S. economy and keep unemployment higher than otherwise.

It will also hurt the most vulnerable. Some $1.9 billion in low-income rental subsidies are being eliminated, affecting 125,000 people. Cuts to the Department of Agriculture will eliminate rental assistance for another 10,000 low-income rural people. Meanwhile, 100,000 formerly homeless Americans are likely to be removed from their current emergency shelters."


The most vulnerable have already been hurt for more than four years, by historic policy mistakes made in the federal Emergency Unemployment Compensation Program (EUC08). I was a victim of these errors that Robert Wagner, the DOL Chief of Special Benefits is responsible for (denied and paid lesser benefits). He advised the Employment & Training Administration improperly about the existing Federal-State Extended Benefit Law, and the result was a serious error that violates three federal regulations, that still was published and issued to all states nationwide, starting in UIPL 23-08 Change 1, the Q&A about "Multiple EUC Claims" (August 15,2008). I refuted those errors in a California Court of law in 2011 (see details below).

As your post shows, the long term unemployment is not changing much if at all. The real truth is that this is a "revolving door", because the non-U6 BLS UI rate reports don't count the vnerable people who run out of benefits and stop looking for work, or even those who work one hour a week! Many of our fellow citizens are simply vanishing into thin air (as far as "reporting" goes"). I intend to help them when everyone else is trying to ignore their existence...

Ever since my appeal victory against faulty and illegal US Policy Mistakes in the EUC08 program, I have been investigating and sharing the data I have uncovered via FOIA/PA requests and state public records acts over the past year, publicly and with our lame-stream teleprompter mentality US "for profit media". Despite beating the policy mistakes in a California court of law, uncovering threats, violations of civil rights, abuses of authority, public corruption and economic stimulus fraud, nobody in the Obama Administration has any plans to try to refute my evidence nor address it in any way, any time soon...ditto for the media cowards.

You can find my detailed posts here on USMB, about this important and much ignored story that may yet break out someday soon, or follow the links below to vet my facts, evidence and scans of FOIA/PA request documents for yourselves:

http://www.facebook.com/UnemploymentBenefitsRestorationProject

https://www.change.org/petitions/de...re-robbing-the-unemployed-out-of-recovery-aid

The Obama Administration is currently doing everything it can to avoid my FOIA request, complaints and petition to redress these historic grievances that affect more than 29 million claims that have spent more than $90 billion dollars on EUC08 since 2008 (I am presently actively engaged with the DOJ/RATB/DOL/White House and 50+ state audit agencies working to expose this). So much for his lofty "Open Government Directives" eh?

(regarding the vulnerable folk who did not make it through court like I a was able to) If I had not prevailed in that appeal case on 10/20/11 (CUIAB A0-265448), then I would be owed more than $20,000 in back benefits as of today (pre and post appeal victory EUC08 clams over three years). Now imagine if 1% of all those claims since 2008 have similar "issues" and these ARRA funded benefits have been denied (from claimants and our weak economy for four years+). I have been trying to help a handful of the other victims (there are many I am sad to report), bring cases to court and the heels of my own victory, but this is not easy for people struggling to survive (to wait out a superior court case while unemployed and without benefits or much lesser ones).

This has made it very very easy for the US Government t just sweep the story under the rug. Its too big for the current media to handle, and few have the budgets or time to dig through all the information (and crimes sadly). The Obama White House knew about my appeal victory and evidence before the last election btw, and here the FOIA document(s) to prove it (from 10/21/11+) :

White House Notified About CUIAB Case A0-265448 Photos by corazonroto512 | Photobucket

Yet still no interest from our excellent and thorough fourth estate (our weak us press)?
 
"The sequestration is likely to make all this worse, since it will slow the U.S. economy and keep unemployment higher than otherwise.


if fact the sequestration stimulus will stimulate the economy. The government will spend less but then the private sector will have more to spend.

This of course helps the economy since the private sector has more money with which to invent the kind of new products that got is from the stone age to here.
 
Most of your posting are truly sad indeed, didn't read the article to begin with and if you did had no fooking clue what the point he was trying to make.

He's telling you how disconnected the "market" is from "main street" how even though the "market" is booming it has NOTHING really do with the "main street" bouncing back.

The "Market" is self-inflating itself and as usual it will reach a point of critical mass and burst again.

But go ahead and discount what he's saying because of this and that, bottom line there is really not much happening for the market to by rising to levels as high of this.
 
As my colleague Immanuel Saez recently found, all the economic gains between 2009 and 2011 (the last year for which data were available) went to the richest 1 percent of Americans. The bottom 99 percent has continued to lose ground.

This must stop. We need a rational economic policy, one which rewards those who make America's wealth not those who take it. That never will happen as long as Republicans have any control of government. They are little more than stooges for the rich and the enemies of the middle-class and poor. They always will favor the takers over the makers.
Socialists have control of gubmint and the only reason that the Dow is over 14,000 is because Baghdad Ben Bernanke is pumping $40 BIL a month into securities.

Talk about stooges for the rich.
 
Today the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose above 14,270 – completely erasing its 54 percent loss between 2007 and 2009.

The stock market is basically back to where it was in 2000, while corporate earnings have doubled since then.

Yet the real median wage is now 8 percent below what it was in 2000, and unemployment remains sky-high.

Why is the stock market doing so well, while most Americans are doing so poorly? Four reasons:

First, productivity gains. Corporations have been investing in technology rather than their workers. They get tax credits and deductions for such investments; they get no such tax benefits for improving the skills of their employees. As a result, corporations can now do more with fewer people on their payrolls. That means higher profits.

Second, high unemployment itself. Joblessness all but eliminates the bargaining power of most workers – allowing corporations to keep wages low. Public policies that might otherwise reduce unemployment – a new WPA or CCC to hire the long-term unemployed, major investments in the nation’s crumbling infrastructure – have been rejected in favor of austerity economics. This also means higher profits, at least in the short run.

Third, globalization. Big American-based corporations have been expanding and hiring around the globe where markets are growing fastest – even while the U.S. market is lackluster. Tax policies and trade policies have encouraged them.

Finally, the Fed’s easy-money policies. They’ve pushed investors into the stock market because bond yields are so low. On Tuesday, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note was just 1.9%.

All of this spells widening inequality in America, because the people who invest the most in the stock market have high incomes. Those who rely most on wages have lower incomes.

Corporate profits are claiming a larger share of national income than at any time in 60 years, while the portion of total income going to employees is near its lowest since 1966.

As my colleague Immanuel Saez recently found, all the economic gains between 2009 and 2011 (the last year for which data were available) went to the richest 1 percent of Americans. The bottom 99 percent has continued to lose ground.

And yet the tax code continues to give preference to capital gains over ordinary income — a huge boon to investors.

The sequestration is likely to make all this worse, since it will slow the U.S. economy and keep unemployment higher than otherwise.

It will also hurt the most vulnerable. Some $1.9 billion in low-income rental subsidies are being eliminated, affecting 125,000 people. Cuts to the Department of Agriculture will eliminate rental assistance for another 10,000 low-income rural people. Meanwhile, 100,000 formerly homeless Americans are likely to be removed from their current emergency shelters.

Robert Reich (Why There's a Bull Market for Stocks And Bear Market for Workers)

This is still another example of an ASSET BUBBLE.

Investment money MUST be invested and thanks to the above reasons, mostly now, bonds' low yields, RE values down) it's going into the stock market equities.

But what happens when those corporations profits level off as the economy once again cools?

POOF!
 
Investment money MUST be invested and thanks to the above reasons, mostly now, bonds' low yields, RE values down) it's going into the stock market equities.

Actually bonds and RE have been down for years!! Stocks are up only now because earnings are up now and world economies seem more stable than ever. A tiny part of it may be an asset bubble but only a tiny part of it. Sorry
 
all of this spells widening inequality in america,

but so what?? Imagine if our big corporations hadn't adapted to globalization and so failed in the face of international competition.
If their market is worldwide now of course they will make more. This is something to be encouraged.

Yes workers are suffering becuase they are not beating international competition but that's only because of liberal policies:

1) liberals schools that turn out the dumbest workforce in the world

2) unions that drove 30 million jobs offshore

3) liberal illegals that take 20 million of our jobs

4) huge liberal deficits so china and japan can buy our deficits rather than our products.

Way way over your head, right????

^ qft!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top