Rod Rosenstein Threatened Chairman Nunes and House Intel Members in a Meeting 3 Weeks Ago

What "lies?" The FBI stated there were no factual errors in the memo.
No, just that it was a serious misrepresentation of the facts.
lol Exactly what facts were misrepresented?
Ask them. Oh, sorry--the Intelligence Committee refused to let the FBI come answer that question.
So as far as you know there was no misrepresentation of the facts.
And so far as you know, there WAS. See how that works?
As far as you know, bigfoot exists.
 
The propaganda is ratcheting up to give trump an excuse to fire Rosenstein and Mueller. The memo was just a start, shame that bombed. Shows trump is desperate, he must know Mueller has something on him.

Mewler and Rosenstein should never have been hired. They are operatives for the deep state. They need to be exorcised from the Trump administration.

You really believe there is a DEEP STATE---------that's funny/sad.
 
No, just that it was a serious misrepresentation of the facts.
lol Exactly what facts were misrepresented?
Ask them. Oh, sorry--the Intelligence Committee refused to let the FBI come answer that question.
So as far as you know there was no misrepresentation of the facts.
And so far as you know, there WAS. See how that works?
lol It doesn't work at all. Either your opinions are based on facts or the are not, and your opinions seem not to be based on facts. Now you would take me to task for wanting to base my opinions on facts. By your reasoning, if I said Obama ate babies for a bedtime snack and you continue produce proof he didn't, you'd have to accept that he may have.
Without having the FACTS available, all the facts, the entire FISA warrants and the information on what parts of the dossier were confirmed, and probably many other FACTS as well, no one can say there are not serious omissions of fact, of misrepresentation, of cherry picking--whatever is being said.
You have to have the underlying documents and information, toomuch, and none of us has it. You are trusting Nunes, but it is as much of an "opinion" as mine (which is that I don't know).
 
...
So as far as you know there was no misrepresentation of the facts.

And how can you know that?
I she knew of any misrepresentation of fact, she would not have dodged my question.

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud
lol what omissions? Ooops, no one at the FBI/Justice seems to know.

er... imbecile... you'll have to ask Chris Wrey...

oh wait... you can't....; devin (Donald's proctologist) nunes didn't allow him to testify.

now be quiet, loon. or is Chris Wrey... Donald's boy lying while imbeciles like you are someone not lying?

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud
In other words, you have no reason to believe there are any serious omissions.
 
...
And how can you know that?
I she knew of any misrepresentation of fact, she would not have dodged my question.

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud
lol what omissions? Ooops, no one at the FBI/Justice seems to know.

er... imbecile... you'll have to ask Chris Wrey...

oh wait... you can't....; devin (Donald's proctologist) nunes didn't allow him to testify.

now be quiet, loon. or is Chris Wrey... Donald's boy lying while imbeciles like you are someone not lying?

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud

Just like they voted down the release of the opposition memo.

What people should be REALLY upset about *but they are missing the point on* is that this committee has always been bipartisan - a committee where both sides have worked together and put national security above partisan politics and Nunes has made it a mockery.

What they voted down was releasing the opposition memo without putting it through the vetting process. We all know how those sleazy lying scumbag Dims on the committee are so concerned with revealing methods and identities.

Dims never put anything about their partisan politics - never.
 
I she knew of any misrepresentation of fact, she would not have dodged my question.

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud
lol what omissions? Ooops, no one at the FBI/Justice seems to know.

er... imbecile... you'll have to ask Chris Wrey...

oh wait... you can't....; devin (Donald's proctologist) nunes didn't allow him to testify.

now be quiet, loon. or is Chris Wrey... Donald's boy lying while imbeciles like you are someone not lying?

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud

Just like they voted down the release of the opposition memo.

What people should be REALLY upset about *but they are missing the point on* is that this committee has always been bipartisan - a committee where both sides have worked together and put national security above partisan politics and Nunes has made it a mockery.

What they voted down was releasing the opposition memo without putting it through the vetting process. We all know how those sleazy lying scumbag Dims on the committee are so concerned with revealing methods and identities.

Dims never put anything about their partisan politics - never.

Well that is what they claim...they certainly could have held on the memo until both cleared. SCOTUS does that when it has a majority and minority opinion.

But you guys must be special :dunno:

Or afraid of what might be revealed.
 
...
And how can you know that?
I she knew of any misrepresentation of fact, she would not have dodged my question.

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud
lol what omissions? Ooops, no one at the FBI/Justice seems to know.

er... imbecile... you'll have to ask Chris Wrey...

oh wait... you can't....; devin (Donald's proctologist) nunes didn't allow him to testify.

now be quiet, loon. or is Chris Wrey... Donald's boy lying while imbeciles like you are someone not lying?

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud

Just like they voted down the release of the opposition memo.

What people should be REALLY upset about *but they are missing the point on* is that this committee has always been bipartisan - a committee where both sides have worked together and put national security above partisan politics and Nunes has made it a mockery.

yeah, the intel committee was better than most because they seemed to actually give a flying about our national security.

I look forward to nunes' perp walk.
 
Page was not "working with the Russians." That's just one of the abundant lies in your post.

Carter Page was under investigation before he joined the Trump campaign. Your parents are raising a little LIAR.

Where's the evidence he was "working with the Russians?" Oh yeah . . . . . . there is none.


Carter Page has stated all along that the infamous trip he took to Moscow during the campaign season was only to give a speech at a University there. UNDER OATH--his testimony changed dramatically.

carter-page.jpg


"In January 2017, Page's name appeared repeatedly in a leaked contract intelligence dossier containing unsubstantiated allegations of close interactions between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.[27][28][29][30]

On November 2, 2017, Page testified to the U.S. House Intelligence Committee that he had informed Jeff Sessions, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and other Trump campaign officials that he was traveling to Russia to give a speech in July 2016

Page testified that he had met with Russian government officials during this trip and had sent a post-meeting report via email to members of the Trump campaign.[37]He also indicated that campaign co-chairman Sam Clovis had asked him to sign a non-disclosure agreement about his trip.[38] Elements of Page's testimony contradicted prior claims by Trump, Sessions, and others in the Trump administration.[34][37][39][40] Lewandowski, who had previously denied knowing Page or meeting him during the campaign, said after Page's testimony that his memory was refreshed and acknowledged that he had been aware of Page's trip to Russia.
Carter Page - Wikipedia

Carter Page had a FISA warrant issued on him in 2013, and then again in October, 2016.
Repub's voted to release Nune's memo--FISA warrants--Carter Page--what it is really about.

Rachel Maddow busted up this conspiracy 2 days prior to Devin Nunes releasing his memo---:badgrin:



Last night (after the release the REAL bombshell broke) on the Nune's memo.



He "met with government officials?" He shook hands with a few people. That's it.

iu


you are either being paid or you are a liar... or you are intentionally obtuse....

Former Trump Aide Carter Page Was on U.S. Counterintelligence Radar Before Russia Dossier

nutbar

But the FBI/Justice found it necessary to misrepresent the Steele dossier in order to get a surveillance warrant, meaning they had nothing of value on Page before committing that crime to get the warrant.
 
I she knew of any misrepresentation of fact, she would not have dodged my question.

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud
lol what omissions? Ooops, no one at the FBI/Justice seems to know.

er... imbecile... you'll have to ask Chris Wrey...

oh wait... you can't....; devin (Donald's proctologist) nunes didn't allow him to testify.

now be quiet, loon. or is Chris Wrey... Donald's boy lying while imbeciles like you are someone not lying?

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud

Just like they voted down the release of the opposition memo.

What people should be REALLY upset about *but they are missing the point on* is that this committee has always been bipartisan - a committee where both sides have worked together and put national security above partisan politics and Nunes has made it a mockery.

What they voted down was releasing the opposition memo without putting it through the vetting process. We all know how those sleazy lying scumbag Dims on the committee are so concerned with revealing methods and identities.

Dims never put anything about their partisan politics - never.

that's a lie.

keep going though snooks....

you must have at least 1,000 more lies to post today.
 
I she knew of any misrepresentation of fact, she would not have dodged my question.

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud
lol what omissions? Ooops, no one at the FBI/Justice seems to know.

er... imbecile... you'll have to ask Chris Wrey...

oh wait... you can't....; devin (Donald's proctologist) nunes didn't allow him to testify.

now be quiet, loon. or is Chris Wrey... Donald's boy lying while imbeciles like you are someone not lying?

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud

Just like they voted down the release of the opposition memo.

What people should be REALLY upset about *but they are missing the point on* is that this committee has always been bipartisan - a committee where both sides have worked together and put national security above partisan politics and Nunes has made it a mockery.

yeah, the intel committee was better than most because they seemed to actually give a flying about our national security.

I look forward to nunes' perp walk.

What I am most upset about is the breaking down of these things. And no one seems to care :(

The Russians are probably happy - they are sowing chaos and distrust in our institutions.
 
Carter Page was under investigation before he joined the Trump campaign. Your parents are raising a little LIAR.

Where's the evidence he was "working with the Russians?" Oh yeah . . . . . . there is none.


Carter Page has stated all along that the infamous trip he took to Moscow during the campaign season was only to give a speech at a University there. UNDER OATH--his testimony changed dramatically.

carter-page.jpg


"In January 2017, Page's name appeared repeatedly in a leaked contract intelligence dossier containing unsubstantiated allegations of close interactions between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.[27][28][29][30]

On November 2, 2017, Page testified to the U.S. House Intelligence Committee that he had informed Jeff Sessions, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and other Trump campaign officials that he was traveling to Russia to give a speech in July 2016

Page testified that he had met with Russian government officials during this trip and had sent a post-meeting report via email to members of the Trump campaign.[37]He also indicated that campaign co-chairman Sam Clovis had asked him to sign a non-disclosure agreement about his trip.[38] Elements of Page's testimony contradicted prior claims by Trump, Sessions, and others in the Trump administration.[34][37][39][40] Lewandowski, who had previously denied knowing Page or meeting him during the campaign, said after Page's testimony that his memory was refreshed and acknowledged that he had been aware of Page's trip to Russia.
Carter Page - Wikipedia

Carter Page had a FISA warrant issued on him in 2013, and then again in October, 2016.
Repub's voted to release Nune's memo--FISA warrants--Carter Page--what it is really about.

Rachel Maddow busted up this conspiracy 2 days prior to Devin Nunes releasing his memo---:badgrin:



Last night (after the release the REAL bombshell broke) on the Nune's memo.



He "met with government officials?" He shook hands with a few people. That's it.

iu


you are either being paid or you are a liar... or you are intentionally obtuse....

Former Trump Aide Carter Page Was on U.S. Counterintelligence Radar Before Russia Dossier

nutbar

But the FBI/Justice found it necessary to misrepresent the Steele dossier in order to get a surveillance warrant, meaning they had nothing of value on Page before committing that crime to get the warrant.


Specifically how was it misrepresented? We don't because a whole lot of stuff was left out.
 
Page was not "working with the Russians." That's just one of the abundant lies in your post.

Carter Page was under investigation before he joined the Trump campaign. Your parents are raising a little LIAR.

Where's the evidence he was "working with the Russians?" Oh yeah . . . . . . there is none.


Carter Page has stated all along that the infamous trip he took to Moscow during the campaign season was only to give a speech at a University there. UNDER OATH--his testimony changed dramatically.

carter-page.jpg


"In January 2017, Page's name appeared repeatedly in a leaked contract intelligence dossier containing unsubstantiated allegations of close interactions between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.[27][28][29][30]

On November 2, 2017, Page testified to the U.S. House Intelligence Committee that he had informed Jeff Sessions, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and other Trump campaign officials that he was traveling to Russia to give a speech in July 2016

Page testified that he had met with Russian government officials during this trip and had sent a post-meeting report via email to members of the Trump campaign.[37]He also indicated that campaign co-chairman Sam Clovis had asked him to sign a non-disclosure agreement about his trip.[38] Elements of Page's testimony contradicted prior claims by Trump, Sessions, and others in the Trump administration.[34][37][39][40] Lewandowski, who had previously denied knowing Page or meeting him during the campaign, said after Page's testimony that his memory was refreshed and acknowledged that he had been aware of Page's trip to Russia.
Carter Page - Wikipedia

Carter Page had a FISA warrant issued on him in 2013, and then again in October, 2016.
Repub's voted to release Nune's memo--FISA warrants--Carter Page--what it is really about.

Rachel Maddow busted up this conspiracy 2 days prior to Devin Nunes releasing his memo---:badgrin:



Last night (after the release the REAL bombshell broke) on the Nune's memo.



He "met with government officials?" He shook hands with a few people. That's it.

iu


you are either being paid or you are a liar... or you are intentionally obtuse....

Former Trump Aide Carter Page Was on U.S. Counterintelligence Radar Before Russia Dossier

nutbar


Which proves exactly nothing. Is there any proof he "colluded" with the Russians? No, not a thing.
 
lol what omissions? Ooops, no one at the FBI/Justice seems to know.

er... imbecile... you'll have to ask Chris Wrey...

oh wait... you can't....; devin (Donald's proctologist) nunes didn't allow him to testify.

now be quiet, loon. or is Chris Wrey... Donald's boy lying while imbeciles like you are someone not lying?

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud

Just like they voted down the release of the opposition memo.

What people should be REALLY upset about *but they are missing the point on* is that this committee has always been bipartisan - a committee where both sides have worked together and put national security above partisan politics and Nunes has made it a mockery.

yeah, the intel committee was better than most because they seemed to actually give a flying about our national security.

I look forward to nunes' perp walk.

What I am most upset about is the breaking down of these things. And no one seems to care :(

The Russians are probably happy - they are sowing chaos and distrust in our institutions.

They are breaking down because of Hillary and Obama's corruption.
 
The propaganda is ratcheting up to give trump an excuse to fire Rosenstein and Mueller. The memo was just a start, shame that bombed. Shows trump is desperate, he must know Mueller has something on him.

Mewler and Rosenstein should never have been hired. They are operatives for the deep state. They need to be exorcised from the Trump administration.

You really believe there is a DEEP STATE---------that's funny/sad.

There obviously is. The memo proves there is a coterie of agents in the FBI who conspired to stage a coup against a lawfully elected president.
 
lol what omissions? Ooops, no one at the FBI/Justice seems to know.

er... imbecile... you'll have to ask Chris Wrey...

oh wait... you can't....; devin (Donald's proctologist) nunes didn't allow him to testify.

now be quiet, loon. or is Chris Wrey... Donald's boy lying while imbeciles like you are someone not lying?

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud

Just like they voted down the release of the opposition memo.

What people should be REALLY upset about *but they are missing the point on* is that this committee has always been bipartisan - a committee where both sides have worked together and put national security above partisan politics and Nunes has made it a mockery.

yeah, the intel committee was better than most because they seemed to actually give a flying about our national security.

I look forward to nunes' perp walk.

What I am most upset about is the breaking down of these things. And no one seems to care :(

The Russians are probably happy - they are sowing chaos and distrust in our institutions.

They are breaking down because of Hillary and Obama's corruption.

You so wish that don't you? Yet the memo said nothing about either of them.
 
The propaganda is ratcheting up to give trump an excuse to fire Rosenstein and Mueller. The memo was just a start, shame that bombed. Shows trump is desperate, he must know Mueller has something on him.

Mewler and Rosenstein should never have been hired. They are operatives for the deep state. They need to be exorcised from the Trump administration.

You really believe there is a DEEP STATE---------that's funny/sad.

There obviously is. The memo proves there is a coterie of agents in the FBI who conspired to stage a coup against a lawfully elected president.

The memo proves no such thing :lmao:
 
lol what omissions? Ooops, no one at the FBI/Justice seems to know.

er... imbecile... you'll have to ask Chris Wrey...

oh wait... you can't....; devin (Donald's proctologist) nunes didn't allow him to testify.

now be quiet, loon. or is Chris Wrey... Donald's boy lying while imbeciles like you are someone not lying?

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud

Just like they voted down the release of the opposition memo.

What people should be REALLY upset about *but they are missing the point on* is that this committee has always been bipartisan - a committee where both sides have worked together and put national security above partisan politics and Nunes has made it a mockery.

What they voted down was releasing the opposition memo without putting it through the vetting process. We all know how those sleazy lying scumbag Dims on the committee are so concerned with revealing methods and identities.

Dims never put anything about their partisan politics - never.

Well that is what they claim...they certainly could have held on the memo until both cleared. SCOTUS does that when it has a majority and minority opinion.

But you guys must be special :dunno:

Or afraid of what might be revealed.


they just know that it was a big nothing and figured only trumptards are stupid enough to care.

but they certainly tried.

Nunes challenger seizes on FBI memo uproar

I read the Nunes memo. There’s not a single damning thing in it.

so where it is... is that it changed no minds. it didn't stop the investigation... it didn't hurt the FBI or Mueller....or Rosenstein....

all that happened is, as Donald himself said... he could kill someone in the middle of fifth avenue and his trumptards wouldn't care.
 
lol what omissions? Ooops, no one at the FBI/Justice seems to know.

er... imbecile... you'll have to ask Chris Wrey...

oh wait... you can't....; devin (Donald's proctologist) nunes didn't allow him to testify.

now be quiet, loon. or is Chris Wrey... Donald's boy lying while imbeciles like you are someone not lying?

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud

Just like they voted down the release of the opposition memo.

What people should be REALLY upset about *but they are missing the point on* is that this committee has always been bipartisan - a committee where both sides have worked together and put national security above partisan politics and Nunes has made it a mockery.

yeah, the intel committee was better than most because they seemed to actually give a flying about our national security.

I look forward to nunes' perp walk.

What I am most upset about is the breaking down of these things. And no one seems to care :(

The Russians are probably happy - they are sowing chaos and distrust in our institutions.

They are breaking down because of Hillary and Obama's corruption.

more lies....

is there something wrong with you?
 
Where's the evidence he was "working with the Russians?" Oh yeah . . . . . . there is none.


Carter Page has stated all along that the infamous trip he took to Moscow during the campaign season was only to give a speech at a University there. UNDER OATH--his testimony changed dramatically.

carter-page.jpg


"In January 2017, Page's name appeared repeatedly in a leaked contract intelligence dossier containing unsubstantiated allegations of close interactions between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.[27][28][29][30]

On November 2, 2017, Page testified to the U.S. House Intelligence Committee that he had informed Jeff Sessions, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and other Trump campaign officials that he was traveling to Russia to give a speech in July 2016

Page testified that he had met with Russian government officials during this trip and had sent a post-meeting report via email to members of the Trump campaign.[37]He also indicated that campaign co-chairman Sam Clovis had asked him to sign a non-disclosure agreement about his trip.[38] Elements of Page's testimony contradicted prior claims by Trump, Sessions, and others in the Trump administration.[34][37][39][40] Lewandowski, who had previously denied knowing Page or meeting him during the campaign, said after Page's testimony that his memory was refreshed and acknowledged that he had been aware of Page's trip to Russia.
Carter Page - Wikipedia

Carter Page had a FISA warrant issued on him in 2013, and then again in October, 2016.
Repub's voted to release Nune's memo--FISA warrants--Carter Page--what it is really about.

Rachel Maddow busted up this conspiracy 2 days prior to Devin Nunes releasing his memo---:badgrin:



Last night (after the release the REAL bombshell broke) on the Nune's memo.



He "met with government officials?" He shook hands with a few people. That's it.

iu


you are either being paid or you are a liar... or you are intentionally obtuse....

Former Trump Aide Carter Page Was on U.S. Counterintelligence Radar Before Russia Dossier

nutbar

But the FBI/Justice found it necessary to misrepresent the Steele dossier in order to get a surveillance warrant, meaning they had nothing of value on Page before committing that crime to get the warrant.


Specifically how was it misrepresented? We don't because a whole lot of stuff was left out.

Internal Justice documents showed the Department was skeptical about the Steele dossier but that was not presented to the Court. The application for a warrant is presented to the Court under oath, so withholding relevant information from the Court amounts to perjury. That's why we need a special commission to investigate the FBI/Justice to see just how high up this corruption goes.
 
lol what omissions? Ooops, no one at the FBI/Justice seems to know.

er... imbecile... you'll have to ask Chris Wrey...

oh wait... you can't....; devin (Donald's proctologist) nunes didn't allow him to testify.

now be quiet, loon. or is Chris Wrey... Donald's boy lying while imbeciles like you are someone not lying?

FBI condemns Nunes memo for 'omissions,' escalating feud

Just like they voted down the release of the opposition memo.

What people should be REALLY upset about *but they are missing the point on* is that this committee has always been bipartisan - a committee where both sides have worked together and put national security above partisan politics and Nunes has made it a mockery.

What they voted down was releasing the opposition memo without putting it through the vetting process. We all know how those sleazy lying scumbag Dims on the committee are so concerned with revealing methods and identities.

Dims never put anything about their partisan politics - never.

Well that is what they claim...they certainly could have held on the memo until both cleared. SCOTUS does that when it has a majority and minority opinion.

But you guys must be special :dunno:

Or afraid of what might be revealed.
Yes, they could have done that, but why should they? Schiff could have got his ass in gear and prepared his own memo at the same time. I see no reason for Republicans to make concessions to Dims on the committee who are doing everything possible to prevent the facts from getting out.

It's not the Supreme Court.
 

Forum List

Back
Top