Role of humans in the Global warming scheme

[Robert W]

Hang on folks, you are not to blame for Global Warming and this proves you are not.

Climate Etc. Read on blog or Reader Role of Humans in the Global Water Cycle and Impacts on Climate Change​ By curryja on August 4, 2024 by Bruce Peachey and Nobuo Maeda Contemporary climate models only include the impact of water vapor as positive feedback on warming; the impact of direct anthropogenic emissions of water vapor has not been seriously considered. ​ Continue reading Role of Humans in the Global Water Cycle and Impacts on Climate Change by Bruce Peachey and Nobuo Maeda Contemporary climate models only include the impact of water vapor as positive feedback on warming; the impact of direct anthropogenic emissions of water vapor has … judithcurry.com

 

[Crick]

Hang on folks, you are not to blame for Global Warming and this proves you are not.

Climate Etc. Read on blog or Reader Role of Humans in the Global Water Cycle and Impacts on Climate Change​ By curryja on August 4, 2024 by Bruce Peachey and Nobuo Maeda Contemporary climate models only include the impact of water vapor as positive feedback on warming; the impact of direct anthropogenic emissions of water vapor has not been seriously considered. ​ Continue reading Role of Humans in the Global Water Cycle and Impacts on Climate Change by Bruce Peachey and Nobuo Maeda Contemporary climate models only include the impact of water vapor as positive feedback on warming; the impact of direct anthropogenic emissions of water vapor has … judithcurry.com

We cannot add water to the Earth's atmopshere Robert. It is already in a state of saturation. Anything we add to it will simply rain out. More water will automatically be added to the atmosphere IF we increase the temperature of the Earth's atmosphere. Increased water vapor is a result, not a cause, of increased temperature.

 

[Crepitus]

Role of humans in the Global warming scheme​

Global warming is not a "scheme" you twit.

 

[Robert W]

We cannot add water to the Earth's atmopshere Robert. It is already in a state of saturation. Anything we add to it will simply rain out. More water will automatically be added to the atmosphere IF we increase the temperature of the Earth's atmosphere. Increased water vapor is a result, not a cause, of increased temperature.

dum dum dum, take this human blamers word of a recognized scientist?

I go with her. She is the esteemed scientist on this issue.

 

[Robert W]

Global warming is not a "scheme" you twit.

Sure it is you twit.

 

[Crick]

Sure it is you twit.

No, it isn't Robert. Thousands and thousands of scientists would have to be knowingly and intentionally lying to the public and that idea simply fails the sanity test.

 

[Crepitus]

Sure it is you twit.

Tell that to Floriduh.

 

[Robert W]

No, it isn't Robert. Thousands and thousands of scientists would have to be knowingly and intentionally lying to the public and that idea simply fails the sanity test.

Every poster knows what you believe. And you eagerly blame humans. I mean really eagerly.

 

[Robert W]

Tell that to Floriduh.

When I was in Florida things were very fine and the weather was really nice.

 

[Robert W]

We cannot add water to the Earth's atmopshere Robert. It is already in a state of saturation. Anything we add to it will simply rain out. More water will automatically be added to the atmosphere IF we increase the temperature of the Earth's atmosphere. Increased water vapor is a result, not a cause, of increased temperature.

How have you been adding water to the atmosphere?

 

[Crepitus]

When I was in Florida things were very fine and the weather was really nice.

They got hit with a hurricane just like 10 days ago, their reefs are dying from too much heat, they keep getting flooded by ridiculously powerful storms....

Don't you ever watch the news?

 

[Robert W]

They got hit with a hurricane just like 10 days ago, their reefs are dying from too much heat, they keep getting flooded by ridiculously powerful storms....

Don't you ever watch the news?

I was not in Florida 10 days ago. Were you there? Are you a reef scientist?

Is it all your fault reefs are dying?

 

[Crepitus]

I was not in Florida 10 days ago. Were you there? Are you a reef scientist?

Is it all your fault reefs are dying?

So no, you don't watch the news.

Now stop trying to pretend you know what's going on.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Global warming is not a "scheme" you twit.

JudithCurry webite vs NASA.

Uhm, what a struggle.

It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s climate. This is based on over a century of scientific evidence forming the structural backbone of today's civilization.

NASA Global Climate Change presents the state of scientific knowledge about climate change while highlighting the role NASA plays in better understanding our home planet. This effort includes citing multiple peer-reviewed studies from research groups across the world,1 illustrating the accuracy and consensus of research results (in this case, the scientific consensus on climate change) consistent with NASA’s scientific research portfolio.

With that said, multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

Scientific Consensus - NASA Science

It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s...

science.nasa.gov

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

dum dum dum, take this human blamers word of a recognized scientist?

I go with her. She is the esteemed scientist on this issue.

vs NASA?

LOL

 

[ding]

vs NASA?

LOL

Versus the geologic record.

 

[ding]

JudithCurry webite vs NASA.

Uhm, what a struggle.

It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s climate. This is based on over a century of scientific evidence forming the structural backbone of today's civilization.

NASA Global Climate Change presents the state of scientific knowledge about climate change while highlighting the role NASA plays in better understanding our home planet. This effort includes citing multiple peer-reviewed studies from research groups across the world,1 illustrating the accuracy and consensus of research results (in this case, the scientific consensus on climate change) consistent with NASA’s scientific research portfolio.

With that said, multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

Scientific Consensus - NASA Science

It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s...

science.nasa.gov

You're like a science groupie, huh?

 

[Crick]

Robert, on Earth, does it ever rain carbon dioxide? Methane? Nitrous oxide? Flurocarbons?

But it does rain water, doesn't it. And not only does it rain, there are 326 quintillion gallons of water just lying around the planet in great, massive puddles we call oceans and lakes and rivers and soaked into the Earth. Do you know what would happen if I got a gallon of liquid CO2, liquid methane, liquid nitrous oxide and liquid fluorocarbon and poured them out on my driveway. They'd boil like mad and be gone in a matter of seconds. Do you understand why they behave differently Robert?

 

[elektra]

No, it isn't Robert. Thousands and thousands of scientists would have to be knowingly and intentionally lying to the public and that idea simply fails the sanity test.

A team of students led by thier professor with a research grant wrote propaganda claiming thousands of scientists agree when not one was asked about global warming.

An intentional lie.

 

[Crick]

A team of students led by thier professor with a research grant wrote propaganda claiming thousands of scientists agree when not one was asked about global warming.

An intentional lie.

Did you just make that up? I'd have thought if that was a true story, you'd have provided a link.