Ron Paul Wins All of Maines delegates to the RNC in Tampa Romney wins ZERO

[JimBowie1958]

I see the same few butthurt psuedo-conservatives in every Paul thread.

You must realize you look desperate and pathetic to say the same thing in every thread while reality takes place to the contrary of your talking points.

I mean, usually when people get their preverbial ass handed to them, they shut up and move on. But not these guys. Every single thread they say the same thing. Yet, Paul keeps picking up steam and gaining delegates.

Seriously, you might want to get a clue.

Lol, we are playing the long game. Your asshats with tons of stolen money can by elections...for now. Soon they wont be able to throw that kind of cash around any more and then the neocons lose and no, we wont be forgiving them and playing nice.

That or there will be a viable third party that will replace the GOP within 10 years and the Dems will control DC untill we put the GOP away deep enough that we can seriously challenge the Dems again.

Thihs is why you losers ape desperate need to get rid of OBama before he destroys EVERYTHING AND CREATION ITSELF BECOMES UNMOORED!

lol, its all bullshit to keep the peons in the duopoly, but the kink is people are finally realizing the charade and are saying 'NO MORE!'

So enjoy your lying cheating fraud of a loser nominee while it lasts.

You dont have many more of these in the future.

 

[Oddball]

Dont you bring misery and emotional harm to your parents and siblings? Perhaps a wife and children?

This is where Libertarians lose so many people; it is NOT OK for someone to destroy themselves.

But it IS OK for them to destroy themselves with booze, tobacco, food, prescription drugs....

Get a grip.

So your solution to thsoe problems is to make them worse? WTF?

So, you think that drug money supporting gang warfare, international hooliganism, kids who consider their street gangs more family than their own flesh and blood, cities like Memphis, Camden and South Central LA turned into urban war zones makes the problem better?

pfffft!

 

[JimBowie1958]

You clowns are funny. Pathetic, but definitely funny.

No, Pathetic is the crowd of Paul-bots who insist
a) Their candidate is the only "real" conservative.
b) Their candidate is really going to be president. Really!

Lol, you dont recognise clowns when you see them.

 

[The Rabbi]

But it IS OK for them to destroy themselves with booze, tobacco, food, prescription drugs....

Get a grip.

So your solution to thsoe problems is to make them worse? WTF?

So, you think that drug money supporting gang warfare, international hooliganism, kids who consider their street gangs more family than their own flesh and blood, cities like Memphis, Camden and South Central LA turned into urban war zones makes the problem better?

pfffft!

Deflection. Typical of the narco-libtard.
That is a separate problem. One that can be dealt with without surrendering to the narco terrorists.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Point me to the #2 folks.

Paul is definitely the real conservative in the race. Unless you got your "conservative" philosophy in the last 20 years.

he's also an idiot....who hasn't the slightest conception about the real world or the financial markets.

Yeah, the guy who predicted the housing bubble in 2002, that BinLAden was hiding in Pakistan, the corruption of the Federal Reserve, etc is an idiot.

An idiot-savante I guess you mean.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5nGCpzel6o]The amazingly accurate predictions of Ron Paul..listen 'till the end and you'll be shocked! - YouTube[/ame]

Close your eyes and pretend all you want but Paul has been spot on in his predictions of the economy and our international policies.

While the last two chairmen of the Fed, Greenspan and Bernanke, have been getting things wrong from day one.

 

[Oddball]

So your solution to thsoe problems is to make them worse? WTF?

So, you think that drug money supporting gang warfare, international hooliganism, kids who consider their street gangs more family than their own flesh and blood, cities like Memphis, Camden and South Central LA turned into urban war zones makes the problem better?

pfffft!

Deflection. Typical of the narco-libtard.
That is a separate problem. One that can be dealt with without surrendering to the narco terrorists.

It's not a deflection, you fool.

Your favored policy keeps the drug lords and street hoodlums in business, just like alcohol prohibition did...And that's the fact, Jack.

 

[The Rabbi]

So, you think that drug money supporting gang warfare, international hooliganism, kids who consider their street gangs more family than their own flesh and blood, cities like Memphis, Camden and South Central LA turned into urban war zones makes the problem better?

pfffft!

Deflection. Typical of the narco-libtard.
That is a separate problem. One that can be dealt with without surrendering to the narco terrorists.

It's not a deflection, you fool.

Your favored policy keeps the drug lords and street hoodlums in business, just like alcohol prohibition did...And that's the fact, Jack.

No it actually doesnt. That is more narco-libtard myth.
Lack of effective enforcement of draconian laws is what keeps them in business. That and consumer demand.

And it is a deflection. You have deflected from the idea of people being able to destroy their lives at will with no cost to society.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I'm fully aware of the cognitive dissonance that rages from both sides of the aisle. It's quite amusing. Can you imagine the level of back peddle and butthurt that will be ensue should Paul secure the nomination (no matter who thinks it's a far shot or not)?

These leopards can talk all day, but their spots don't wash off.

Well, they will lose their vocal chords in fits of furious screaming when the Paulites who are supposed to represent Romney abstain the first round, lol.

 

[Oddball]

Deflection. Typical of the narco-libtard.
That is a separate problem. One that can be dealt with without surrendering to the narco terrorists.

It's not a deflection, you fool.

Your favored policy keeps the drug lords and street hoodlums in business, just like alcohol prohibition did...And that's the fact, Jack.

No it actually doesnt. That is more narco-libtard myth.
Lack of effective enforcement of draconian laws is what keeps them in business. That and consumer demand.

BWWWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

The only thing that has kept us from winning the fool "war" on (some) drugs is that we haven't thrown enough people into prison!!

Goddamn, you police state goons are a hoot!

 

[JimBowie1958]

Dr. Drock of course knows that Romney is a Federalist who believes the States should handle such matters, exactly as the Founders intended.

You really think the Founding Fathers would h ave approved of the ridiculous level of government spending we now have with all the debts and astronomical tax levels?

Really?

That would explain a whole lot about your perspective on politics.

But Libertarians are necessary totalitarian in their thinking, and don't believe in the will of the people.

And the Wall Street kabals that own Romney and bought primary after primary in deep blue states and little island territories, those guys are the height of democratic zeal I guess.

lol

 

[JimBowie1958]

So people can vote to make prostitution and drug use illegal in your Libertarian world?

Why not?...It's none of your goddamn business.

Sure it is.

And who died and made yo uGod to tell people what is and is not their business?

 

[Oddball]

So people can vote to make prostitution and drug use illegal in your Libertarian world?

Why not?...It's none of your goddamn business.

Sure it is.

And who died and made yo uGod to tell people what is and is not their business?

What makes what nonviolent acts that may happen in my home or amongst other consenting adults your business?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Well yeah actually it is.
That's the fallacy of narco-libertarianism. Like everyone lives in a deserted farm in Montana and has no interaction with other people at all.

And that's the argument of the intellectually bankrupt liberoidal douchebag...Congratulations.

We tried Deadwood once.

Didn't work.

'We' didnt try anything about Deadwood.

It was a good TV series though.

 

[Oddball]

And that's the argument of the intellectually bankrupt liberoidal douchebag...Congratulations.

We tried Deadwood once.

Didn't work.

'We' didnt try anything about Deadwood.

It was a good TV series though.

"Deadwood" and "human nature" are his two go-two strawmen...He somehow fell under the impression that others not knowing what the fuck he's blabbering about makes an iron-clad argument.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Why not?...It's none of your goddamn business.

Sure it is.

And who died and made yo uGod to tell people what is and is not their business?

What makes what nonviolent acts that may happen in my home or amongst other consenting adults your business?

It wasnt qualified that it was in your home. Most prostitution takes place on public property and destroys home values as a crime/vice plague as fe want to live around that kind of shit.

 

[JimBowie1958]

But it IS OK for them to destroy themselves with booze, tobacco, food, prescription drugs....

Get a grip.

No, that is not OK either; why would it be?

I do have a grip; at least I realize that there are people who love me and would be sorely injured if I died before my life's duty was done.

So, are you trying to say that the only thing keeping you from doing recreational drugs is the laws against them?...Really?

The original statement I disagreed with is that it is no bodies business if someone decides to destroy themselves.

That is simply untrue for most people.

 

[JimBowie1958]

That is your opinion.

The collective experiences of civilizations disagree with you, which is why doper civilizations do not exist.

It has all been tried before, you know.

Dude, you know that during the height of our nations economic expansion ALL these drugs were TOTALLY LEGAL, right?

Up until 1875 the US had not one law against opium, pot, beer, moonshine, liquor, cocaine, ANYTHING. Zip/nada/zero/null.

Prohibition of drugs - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So if no stoner society, as you put it, has ever been successful, then why wasnt the US till 1875 showing the decay you seem to expect? Instead we flourished.

The AMA warned us all what would happen if we criminalized drug abuse: we would get far more addicts as they addicts would fear the law too much to get help and we would provide criminal syndicates a sure money maker. Now we have far more drug addicts than we had before these stupid drug laws.

So why are we fighting this war on drugs? To benefit the public or to ensure the closed market for the drug dealers?

Because it wasn't a stoner society.

So you admit that these drugs can be totally legal and not have a stoner society?

Laws began to be enacted once these things became problems. ... But even then prohibition came later.

No, yo uhave it backwards.

The do-gooder niave laws were passed first to rid us of the drug problem, and then the drug problem began getting increasingly worse with each generation.

 

[Oddball]

The original statement I disagreed with is that it is no bodies business if someone decides to destroy themselves.

That is simply untrue for most people.

Who is going to stop them if they're committed to doing so?

Hemingway, Jim Morrison, Steve Howe....Nobody could stop them from destroying their lives.

 

[Oddball]

Sure it is.

And who died and made yo uGod to tell people what is and is not their business?

What makes what nonviolent acts that may happen in my home or amongst other consenting adults your business?

It wasnt qualified that it was in your home. Most prostitution takes place on public property and destroys home values as a crime/vice plague as fe want to live around that kind of shit.

They don't have such problems in Nevada.

 

[The Rabbi]

Dude, you know that during the height of our nations economic expansion ALL these drugs were TOTALLY LEGAL, right?

Up until 1875 the US had not one law against opium, pot, beer, moonshine, liquor, cocaine, ANYTHING. Zip/nada/zero/null.

Prohibition of drugs - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So if no stoner society, as you put it, has ever been successful, then why wasnt the US till 1875 showing the decay you seem to expect? Instead we flourished.

The AMA warned us all what would happen if we criminalized drug abuse: we would get far more addicts as they addicts would fear the law too much to get help and we would provide criminal syndicates a sure money maker. Now we have far more drug addicts than we had before these stupid drug laws.

So why are we fighting this war on drugs? To benefit the public or to ensure the closed market for the drug dealers?

Because it wasn't a stoner society.

So you admit that these drugs can be totally legal and not have a stoner society?

Laws began to be enacted once these things became problems. ... But even then prohibition came later.

No, yo uhave it backwards.

The do-gooder niave laws were passed first to rid us of the drug problem, and then the drug problem began getting increasingly worse with each generation.

So laws were passed because there was no problem?
Um, are YOU on drugs?