Round Rock students suspended for posing with Confederate flag

Great job of exposing your ignorance. It was a battle flag, ass wipe. I bet you don't have a fucking clue about the cause of the war and all the factors involved.
Everyone knows it was started over slavery as far as the losers in the south were concerned. Thats why they pointed it out in their cornerstone speech and articles of succession.
 
Let me get this straight.

The only way they knew the student was posing with the Confederate flag, is because the Asst Principal found the picture while scrolling thru the students phone log?

Has anyone stated they were threatened by it, other than the principal?
 
Let me get this straight.

The only way they knew the student was posing with the Confederate flag, is because the Asst Principal found the picture while scrolling thru the students phone log?

Has anyone stated they were threatened by it, other than the principal?
No one knows. They havent released any details. I'm satisfied that it was because of the loser flag. No doubt the child was inbred.
 
Dumbf***kery isn't bound by geography.

Of course not. There are confederate sympathizing traitors all over the country, not just in Texas.


The traitors are in D.C now. The traitors are the ones that passed the Act of 1871 which did away with the organic constitution and replaced it with a corporate constitution. The traitors are the ones that signed off on the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 and the president at the time (Wilson) that put it into affect. The traitors are the ones that confiscated the people's gold with the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy of 1933 and then made them indentured debt slaves by making them surety on a debt that they did not incur. The traitors are the ones that signed off on all those unfair trade agreements like NAFTA, CAFTA and GATT. The traitors are the politicians that are keeping Trillions of wealth hidden that has been made by skimming tax dollars off the top and investing it.

You don't have a fucking clue on what a real traitor is. You can pledge loyalty to this corporate entity owned by foreign interests all you want but not I.....not ever.
 
Great job of exposing your ignorance. It was a battle flag, ass wipe. I bet you don't have a fucking clue about the cause of the war and all the factors involved.
Everyone knows it was started over slavery as far as the losers in the south were concerned. Thats why they pointed it out in their cornerstone speech and articles of succession.

Really? Only 5 percent of the population had them...you really believe that the other 95 percent fought so the rich 5 percent could own slaves? There were people in the north that still owned slaves when the war started. It goes much deeper than that and it had a lot of outside influences stoking the fires like England, France and the Catholic church (mostly Jesuits). The victors always love to re-write history which is what the international bankers have done. You don't know shit.
 
I'd be interested to know why the VP was looking through the student's phone to begin with. Absent a court order any school official who touches my child's phones will probably receive a broken hand in return.
 
Great job of exposing your ignorance. It was a battle flag, ass wipe. I bet you don't have a fucking clue about the cause of the war and all the factors involved.
Everyone knows it was started over slavery as far as the losers in the south were concerned. Thats why they pointed it out in their cornerstone speech and articles of succession.

Really? Only 5 percent of the population had them...you really believe that the other 95 percent fought so the rich 5 percent could own slaves? There were people in the north that still owned slaves when the war started. It goes much deeper than that and it had a lot of outside influences stoking the fires like England, France and the Catholic church (mostly Jesuits). The victors always love to re-write history which is what the international bankers have done. You don't know shit.
Doesnt really matter how many people had them. The point was that the cause of the war in their minds was slavery. We know because they admitted it. Are you saying they didnt admit they were fighting specifically because of slavery? If you are then i would suggest you read the cornerstone speech. Dont get angry. Get educated.
 
Great job of exposing your ignorance. It was a battle flag, ass wipe. I bet you don't have a fucking clue about the cause of the war and all the factors involved.
Everyone knows it was started over slavery as far as the losers in the south were concerned. Thats why they pointed it out in their cornerstone speech and articles of succession.

Really? Only 5 percent of the population had them...you really believe that the other 95 percent fought so the rich 5 percent could own slaves? There were people in the north that still owned slaves when the war started. It goes much deeper than that and it had a lot of outside influences stoking the fires like England, France and the Catholic church (mostly Jesuits). The victors always love to re-write history which is what the international bankers have done. You don't know shit.
Doesnt really matter how many people had them. The point was that the cause of the war in their minds was slavery. We know because they admitted it. Are you saying they didnt admit they were fighting specifically because of slavery? If you are then i would suggest you read the cornerstone speech.

Executive Mansion,
Washington, August 22, 1862.


Hon. Horace Greeley:
Dear Sir.


I have just read yours of the 19th. addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements, or assumptions of fact, which I may know to be erroneous, I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here, argue against them. If there be perceptable in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.

As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.

I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do lesswhenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.

I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men every where could be free.

Yours,
A. Lincoln.
 
Great job of exposing your ignorance. It was a battle flag, ass wipe. I bet you don't have a fucking clue about the cause of the war and all the factors involved.
Everyone knows it was started over slavery as far as the losers in the south were concerned. Thats why they pointed it out in their cornerstone speech and articles of succession.

Really? Only 5 percent of the population had them...you really believe that the other 95 percent fought so the rich 5 percent could own slaves? There were people in the north that still owned slaves when the war started. It goes much deeper than that and it had a lot of outside influences stoking the fires like England, France and the Catholic church (mostly Jesuits). The victors always love to re-write history which is what the international bankers have done. You don't know shit.
Doesnt really matter how many people had them. The point was that the cause of the war in their minds was slavery. We know because they admitted it. Are you saying they didnt admit they were fighting specifically because of slavery? If you are then i would suggest you read the cornerstone speech.

Executive Mansion,
Washington, August 22, 1862.


Hon. Horace Greeley:
Dear Sir.


I have just read yours of the 19th. addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements, or assumptions of fact, which I may know to be erroneous, I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here, argue against them. If there be perceptable in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.

As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.

I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do lesswhenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.

I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men every where could be free.

Yours,
A. Lincoln.
You do realize Lincoln wasnt a confederate dont you? What was your point in this letter?
 
Great job of exposing your ignorance. It was a battle flag, ass wipe. I bet you don't have a fucking clue about the cause of the war and all the factors involved.
Everyone knows it was started over slavery as far as the losers in the south were concerned. Thats why they pointed it out in their cornerstone speech and articles of succession.

Really? Only 5 percent of the population had them...you really believe that the other 95 percent fought so the rich 5 percent could own slaves? There were people in the north that still owned slaves when the war started. It goes much deeper than that and it had a lot of outside influences stoking the fires like England, France and the Catholic church (mostly Jesuits). The victors always love to re-write history which is what the international bankers have done. You don't know shit.
Doesnt really matter how many people had them. The point was that the cause of the war in their minds was slavery. We know because they admitted it. Are you saying they didnt admit they were fighting specifically because of slavery? If you are then i would suggest you read the cornerstone speech.

Executive Mansion,
Washington, August 22, 1862.


Hon. Horace Greeley:
Dear Sir.


I have just read yours of the 19th. addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements, or assumptions of fact, which I may know to be erroneous, I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here, argue against them. If there be perceptable in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.

As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.

I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do lesswhenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.

I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men every where could be free.

Yours,
A. Lincoln.
You do realize Lincoln wasnt a confederate dont you? What was your point in this letter?
Did you miss this part???

If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union;
 
Everyone knows it was started over slavery as far as the losers in the south were concerned. Thats why they pointed it out in their cornerstone speech and articles of succession.

Really? Only 5 percent of the population had them...you really believe that the other 95 percent fought so the rich 5 percent could own slaves? There were people in the north that still owned slaves when the war started. It goes much deeper than that and it had a lot of outside influences stoking the fires like England, France and the Catholic church (mostly Jesuits). The victors always love to re-write history which is what the international bankers have done. You don't know shit.
Doesnt really matter how many people had them. The point was that the cause of the war in their minds was slavery. We know because they admitted it. Are you saying they didnt admit they were fighting specifically because of slavery? If you are then i would suggest you read the cornerstone speech.

Executive Mansion,
Washington, August 22, 1862.


Hon. Horace Greeley:
Dear Sir.


I have just read yours of the 19th. addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements, or assumptions of fact, which I may know to be erroneous, I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here, argue against them. If there be perceptable in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.

As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.

I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do lesswhenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.

I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men every where could be free.

Yours,
A. Lincoln.
You do realize Lincoln wasnt a confederate dont you? What was your point in this letter?
Did you miss this part???

If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union;
No I didnt miss that part but what does that have to do with the reasons the loser confederates when to war? Lincoln was the president and CIC of the union army not the confederates.
 
I'd be interested to know why the VP was looking through the student's phone to begin with. Absent a court order any school official who touches my child's phones will probably receive a broken hand in return.
He's looking for kiddie porn to forward to his home pc. Then delete it all from the child's phone with no link to him.
 
Really? Only 5 percent of the population had them...you really believe that the other 95 percent fought so the rich 5 percent could own slaves? There were people in the north that still owned slaves when the war started. It goes much deeper than that and it had a lot of outside influences stoking the fires like England, France and the Catholic church (mostly Jesuits). The victors always love to re-write history which is what the international bankers have done. You don't know shit.
Doesnt really matter how many people had them. The point was that the cause of the war in their minds was slavery. We know because they admitted it. Are you saying they didnt admit they were fighting specifically because of slavery? If you are then i would suggest you read the cornerstone speech.

Executive Mansion,
Washington, August 22, 1862.


Hon. Horace Greeley:
Dear Sir.


I have just read yours of the 19th. addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements, or assumptions of fact, which I may know to be erroneous, I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here, argue against them. If there be perceptable in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.

As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.

I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do lesswhenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.

I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men every where could be free.

Yours,
A. Lincoln.
You do realize Lincoln wasnt a confederate dont you? What was your point in this letter?
Did you miss this part???

If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union;
No I didnt miss that part but what does that have to do with the reasons the loser confederates when to war? Lincoln was the president and CIC of the union army not the confederates.

The Morrill Tax, state sovereignty over Federal authority, England and France promising to help the South when the plan was for France to get the south and England to get back their original colonies. The Jesuits told the southerners that help would be arriving. Only the intervention of the Tsar of Russia kept England's army in Canada and France's arming in Mexico.

“The war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits.” Abe Lincoln


The ironic part is the Civil War ended up not freeing any slaves at all but made us all slaves with the 14th amendment. They just transferred slavery from the private sector to the public sector. The Act of 1871 ended constitutional law and began a corporate constitution which made us subjects of this corporate entity.
 
good story. hopefully the kids kearned their lesson and will think twice about supporting treason in the future
 
Doesnt really matter how many people had them. The point was that the cause of the war in their minds was slavery. We know because they admitted it. Are you saying they didnt admit they were fighting specifically because of slavery? If you are then i would suggest you read the cornerstone speech.

Executive Mansion,
Washington, August 22, 1862.


Hon. Horace Greeley:
Dear Sir.


I have just read yours of the 19th. addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements, or assumptions of fact, which I may know to be erroneous, I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here, argue against them. If there be perceptable in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.

As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.

I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do lesswhenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.

I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men every where could be free.

Yours,
A. Lincoln.
You do realize Lincoln wasnt a confederate dont you? What was your point in this letter?
Did you miss this part???

If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union;
No I didnt miss that part but what does that have to do with the reasons the loser confederates when to war? Lincoln was the president and CIC of the union army not the confederates.

The Morrill Tax, state sovereignty over Federal authority, England and France promising to help the South when the plan was for France to get the south and England to get back their original colonies. The Jesuits told the southerners that help would be arriving. Only the intervention of the Tsar of Russia kept England's army in Canada and France's arming in Mexico.

“The war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits.” Abe Lincoln


The ironic part is the Civil War ended up not freeing any slaves at all but made us all slaves with the 14th amendment. They just transferred slavery from the private sector to the public sector. The Act of 1871 ended constitutional law and began a corporate constitution which made us subjects of this corporate entity.
If you look up the etymology of what the word "emancipation" means you will see that it fits with your view of the 14th amendment. However interesting this is it still doesnt mean the southern losers didnt go to war over slavery.
 
good story. hopefully the kids kearned their lesson and will think twice about supporting treason in the future

If not for treason, you'd be a British subject right now (or possibly German) by now you historical illiterate.

I often wonder how this corporate entity has been able to keep the people fooled for so long...then I see stupidity like Ogi posted and the picture becomes clear.
 
Executive Mansion,
Washington, August 22, 1862.


Hon. Horace Greeley:
Dear Sir.


I have just read yours of the 19th. addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements, or assumptions of fact, which I may know to be erroneous, I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here, argue against them. If there be perceptable in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.

As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.

I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do lesswhenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.

I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men every where could be free.

Yours,
A. Lincoln.
You do realize Lincoln wasnt a confederate dont you? What was your point in this letter?
Did you miss this part???

If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union;
No I didnt miss that part but what does that have to do with the reasons the loser confederates when to war? Lincoln was the president and CIC of the union army not the confederates.

The Morrill Tax, state sovereignty over Federal authority, England and France promising to help the South when the plan was for France to get the south and England to get back their original colonies. The Jesuits told the southerners that help would be arriving. Only the intervention of the Tsar of Russia kept England's army in Canada and France's arming in Mexico.

“The war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits.” Abe Lincoln


The ironic part is the Civil War ended up not freeing any slaves at all but made us all slaves with the 14th amendment. They just transferred slavery from the private sector to the public sector. The Act of 1871 ended constitutional law and began a corporate constitution which made us subjects of this corporate entity.
If you look up what the word "emancipation" means you will see that it fits with your view of the 14th amendment. However interesting this is it still doesnt mean the southern losers didnt go to war over slavery.
Then why did Lincoln wait a year and a half into it to free them? Slavery was a secondary issue at best. Not everyone that fought in the war had slaves and they had their reasons for fighting on the side that they did. It was the insidious influence from outside sources that created the resentment and hostility. America at the time owed a huge debt of gratitude to Russia for keeping England and France at bay.....how did America "thank" Russia? By financing Lenin and Trotsky in order to overthrow the Tsar and make it a communist nation and they made money on construction and factory building. Motto of the story, never let friendship stand in the way if there's a buck to be made.
 
You do realize Lincoln wasnt a confederate dont you? What was your point in this letter?
Did you miss this part???

If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union;
No I didnt miss that part but what does that have to do with the reasons the loser confederates when to war? Lincoln was the president and CIC of the union army not the confederates.

The Morrill Tax, state sovereignty over Federal authority, England and France promising to help the South when the plan was for France to get the south and England to get back their original colonies. The Jesuits told the southerners that help would be arriving. Only the intervention of the Tsar of Russia kept England's army in Canada and France's arming in Mexico.

“The war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits.” Abe Lincoln


The ironic part is the Civil War ended up not freeing any slaves at all but made us all slaves with the 14th amendment. They just transferred slavery from the private sector to the public sector. The Act of 1871 ended constitutional law and began a corporate constitution which made us subjects of this corporate entity.
If you look up what the word "emancipation" means you will see that it fits with your view of the 14th amendment. However interesting this is it still doesnt mean the southern losers didnt go to war over slavery.
Then why did Lincoln wait a year and a half into it to free them? Slavery was a secondary issue at best. Not everyone that fought in the war had slaves and they had their reasons for fighting on the side that they did. It was the insidious influence from outside sources that created the resentment and hostility. America at the time owed a huge debt of gratitude to Russia for keeping England and France at bay.....how did America "thank" Russia? By financing Lenin and Trotsky in order to overthrow the Tsar and make it a communist nation and they made money on construction and factory building. Motto of the story, never let friendship stand in the way if there's a buck to be made.
Obviously you didnt read my post. i think you just want to write this all down just to say you did something. Lincoln was not a confederate. Your claim was that no one knew why the losers in the south went to war. i corrected your false assessment by telling you the losers put into their documents and speeches why they were going to war.
 
Did you miss this part???

If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union;
No I didnt miss that part but what does that have to do with the reasons the loser confederates when to war? Lincoln was the president and CIC of the union army not the confederates.

The Morrill Tax, state sovereignty over Federal authority, England and France promising to help the South when the plan was for France to get the south and England to get back their original colonies. The Jesuits told the southerners that help would be arriving. Only the intervention of the Tsar of Russia kept England's army in Canada and France's arming in Mexico.

“The war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits.” Abe Lincoln


The ironic part is the Civil War ended up not freeing any slaves at all but made us all slaves with the 14th amendment. They just transferred slavery from the private sector to the public sector. The Act of 1871 ended constitutional law and began a corporate constitution which made us subjects of this corporate entity.
If you look up what the word "emancipation" means you will see that it fits with your view of the 14th amendment. However interesting this is it still doesnt mean the southern losers didnt go to war over slavery.
Then why did Lincoln wait a year and a half into it to free them? Slavery was a secondary issue at best. Not everyone that fought in the war had slaves and they had their reasons for fighting on the side that they did. It was the insidious influence from outside sources that created the resentment and hostility. America at the time owed a huge debt of gratitude to Russia for keeping England and France at bay.....how did America "thank" Russia? By financing Lenin and Trotsky in order to overthrow the Tsar and make it a communist nation and they made money on construction and factory building. Motto of the story, never let friendship stand in the way if there's a buck to be made.
Obviously you didnt read my post. i think you just want to write this all down just to say you did something. Lincoln was not a confederate. Your claim was that no one knew why the losers in the south went to war. i corrected your false assessment by telling you the losers put into their documents and speeches why they were going to war.


Obviously you don't comprehend the part of that letter I highlighted. You corrected nothing because your level of understanding concerning the war is simplistic when it was more complicated than just that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top