Roy Moore says he'll sue WaPo

So you think the Washington Post only talked to this one person. You're not too bright, are you?

It would be almost as much fun to see WaPo trot over 30 corroborating witnesses to the stand as it would be to see Roy mansplain how he "generally" didn't date high school girls when he was in his 30s, but when he did he always asked the Mama. :)

Still creepy
 
Have you even read the bible? Age difference is found throughout the damn thing.

So using religious texts to justify an adult man pursuing teenage high schoolers doesn't excuse Moore, it implicates religion as the cause of his pursuit of teenage high schoolers. Is that the argument you really want to make?


He married the last one he went after, although she was 24 when they got hitched. Still 14 years younger than him.

That doesn't excuse his pursuit of high school girls, and your defense of that pursuit. You don't think there's anything wrong with a man in his thirties pursuing a girl in high school because of the Bible?


The point about Polanski is that lefties bend over backwards to support his dumb ass, but since they already hated Moore is A-ok to just assume he's guilty.

No lefties have ever supported Polanski, but you're trying to passively support him here by saying he was OK to pursue a teenage girl, just not have sex with her (?). That's not a very viable position to have, FYI.
 
I'm using the appropriate word for the situation. Words mean things.

So far the other 3 just said it involved dating or a little making out. Again, considering we have a story about Charlie Sheen cornholing Corey Haim and the proven stuff about Polanski, the lefts concern over this issue is comical.

In hollywood men in their 60's gun for the late teens/early 20's crowd. again, your call for morality is comical.

And in the end Roy Boy married the last one in the series, his current wife.
Charlie Sheen should be prosecuted to find out if the accusations are true........NOT elected to the Senate.

Which just goes to show you how much of a political operation this is. If he does lose the story will die off, having served it's purpose.

Any retraction will be on page 57, right next to the obituaries.

Once again --- what is there to "retract"?

The story, once again, is that a woman reounts how Roy Moore groped her when she was 14.
That's a fact. She did indeed tell that story.

So again --- what's to "retract"?

And journalists of integrity usually have some corroboration before they make the story known. We saw this with the Rolling Stone rape accusation that turned up a reporter that did zero due diligence, and now she and her employer are on the hook.

Her story is corroborated. At least three other people backed it up, and I didn't even research it.

Are you talking about the 3 others he supposedly dates/try to date?

That corroborates he likes younger women, which is also corroborated by the fact his wife is 14 years younger than him.

What it doesn't corroborate is any relation with the 14 year old.
 
just think of all the forthcoming legal discovery :eusa_clap:
"Another Alabama woman will reportedly accuse GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore of sexually assaulting her when she was a minor"
Another Roy Moore Accuser to Come Forward
Here comes the flood!
I wonder if this breaking news is what made McConnell flip all the way today.
I'm gonna need more popcorn
Bailiff Whack his Peepee
'I Believe The Women'
McConnell Says Moore 'Should Step Aside' After Allegations


Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said Monday that Roy Moore should step aside from his campaign for the U.S. Senate following allegations that he pursued relationships with teenagers decades ago.
 
He'll lose if all they did was report what the accusers said..especially if the accusers are willing to testify under oath. Most judges will look at it as the WP as just being the messenger.
 
Have you even read the bible? Age difference is found throughout the damn thing.

So using religious texts to justify an adult man pursuing teenage high schoolers doesn't excuse Moore, it implicates religion as the cause of his pursuit of teenage high schoolers. Is that the argument you really want to make?


He married the last one he went after, although she was 24 when they got hitched. Still 14 years younger than him.

That doesn't excuse his pursuit of high school girls, and your defense of that pursuit. You don't think there's anything wrong with a man in his thirties pursuing a girl in high school because of the Bible?


The point about Polanski is that lefties bend over backwards to support his dumb ass, but since they already hated Moore is A-ok to just assume he's guilty.

No lefties have ever supported Polanski, but you're trying to passively support him here by saying he was OK to pursue a teenage girl, just not have sex with her (?). That's not a very viable position to have, FYI.

Hollywood does the same thing, glorifies it in fact. So though doth protest too much.

When i went to high school in the late 80's early 90's plenty of girls 16-18 were picked up by guys in their late 20's, maybe 30's. I thought it sucked then, as they usually took the best looking ones out of the mix, but there was nothing "wrong" about it.

Leonardo Dicaprio keeps aging, and yet the girls he dates remains in the same range, 19-24 I'd say.

Roman Polanski Honored At European Film Awards

FACT CHECK: Did Meryl Streep Applaud Roman Polanski at the Academy Awards?
 
Derpy went to the bible, and I refuted his point about it.

You didn't refute anything...in fact, you implicated religion in this too...that Moore is justified pursuing high school girls because, the Bible.

There is more time in human history where older men marrying younger women was the norm than time when it wasn't.

Again, 3 of the 4 were legal, and none of the stories about them involve any sex.
 
Are you talking about the 3 others he supposedly dates/try to date?

It's not "suppsoedly"...he did do that. You seem to be trying to obfuscate the issue here, so let's get back to the main thought; that you think it's OK for a man in his thirties to pursue high school girls.

Why do you think that's OK?


That corroborates he likes younger women, which is also corroborated by the fact his wife is 14 years younger than him.

"Younger women" implies women in their twenties or in college, not high school girls. Ick.


What it doesn't corroborate is any relation with the 14 year old.

So you're saying he never had pursued a girl when she was 14, even though she says he did.
 
Atty. Gloria Allred to hold news conference with new Roy Moore accuser

Atty. Gloria Allred to hold news conference with new Roy Moore accuser

Moore is screwed totally

2:30 eastern - Timer set!

DizzyMintyIvorybackedwoodswallow-max-1mb.gif
 
Charlie Sheen should be prosecuted to find out if the accusations are true........NOT elected to the Senate.

Which just goes to show you how much of a political operation this is. If he does lose the story will die off, having served it's purpose.

Any retraction will be on page 57, right next to the obituaries.

Once again --- what is there to "retract"?

The story, once again, is that a woman reounts how Roy Moore groped her when she was 14.
That's a fact. She did indeed tell that story.

So again --- what's to "retract"?

And journalists of integrity usually have some corroboration before they make the story known. We saw this with the Rolling Stone rape accusation that turned up a reporter that did zero due diligence, and now she and her employer are on the hook.

Her story is corroborated. At least three other people backed it up, and I didn't even research it.

Are you talking about the 3 others he supposedly dates/try to date?

That corroborates he likes younger women, which is also corroborated by the fact his wife is 14 years younger than him.

What it doesn't corroborate is any relation with the 14 year old.

No. I'm referring to three other friends of hers who confirmed that she related the same story in the past.
All referring to the same incident with the same person.
 
"He also is the founder and president of the Foundation for Moral Law." :laugh2:





Roy Stewart Moore (born February 11, 1947) is an American politician and former Alabama state judge known for being twice elected to and twice removed from the Alabama Supreme Court. He also is the founder and president of the Foundation for Moral Law. Moore is the Republican nominee in the 2017 special election to fill the United States Senate seat vacated by Jeff Sessions.


Moore is a conspiracy theorist and an advocate of far-right politics. He earned significant national attention and controversy over his strongly anti-homosexual, anti-Muslim, and far-right[1][2] views, his belief that Christianity should order public policy,[3][4] as well as his past ties to neo-Confederates and white nationalist groups.[5][6][7][8][9] According to Vox, if Moore is elected, he is likely to be the most far-right senator, "far afield from even the most conservative Republican currently in the Senate."[10] Moore was also a leading voice in the anti-Obama birther movement, which promoted the debunked conspiracy theory that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States.[11][12] Among other beliefs, his view that Christianity should supersede public laws has been cause for criticism.[4][13]
 
Derpy went to the bible, and I refuted his point about it.

You didn't refute anything...in fact, you implicated religion in this too...that Moore is justified pursuing high school girls because, the Bible.

There is more time in human history where older men marrying younger women was the norm than time when it wasn't.

Funny we never hear this point when the subject is Mohammed huh?

So are you saying Roy Moore is two thousand years old?
 
OMFG a political PLOY to block creepy frauds from serving in the senate. :laugh2:
 
Your Liberal scheme against Roy Moore just fell apart Libruls ...Putin declared that Roy Moore was totally innocent ...so you are done ...
 

Forum List

Back
Top